Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 26, 2010 8:09 PM. The previous post in this blog was Trouble in the Beav'. The next post in this blog is Grant High saved; not so for Marshall, Benson. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, April 26, 2010

It's official: American government reduced to corporate goons

I hope this story is a joke, but I doubt it.

Police agencies now have "steering committees" with corporate weasels on it? Un-farookin'-believable.

Comments (19)

so scary that we are all too terrified to respond

See here:

"Microsoft and Adobe are members of REACT’s steering committee, a group of 25 companies that includes Apple Inc., Symantec Corp., KLA-Tencor Inc., Applied Materials Inc. and Cisco Systems Inc., and acts as a liaison between industry and law enforcement."

(Sshhhh. Don't tell Sam or Dan! It might give 'em more bad ideas!)

Their motto is "To Suspect and Serve (a warrant)."

If you think stories like this are a joke, you're living in a dream world. And if you think REACT is scary, which it is, you ought to take a look at Oregon Intragard:

Who are these people and how come none of us know anything about this highly sophisticated surveillance program to turn in neighbors and make us all paranoid?

Who's behind all this?

What are these warrants you mention here? Some quaint document like the Geneva Conventions?
Remember back when President Bush initiated a surveillance sweeping operation of the American People? The reason was that 9/11 changed everything which made it awkward later when we found out he started it well before 9/11.
Of course, the right wing cheerleaders raced to the cameras to proclaim their undying allegiance to Bush and Cheney saying, "If Osama bin Ladin is calling someone from a cave, we want to know about it."
Later it turned out the Bush administration was also screening communications between Pentagon workers and reporters.
Reporters homes were tapped and their emails read.
Without a warrant. Without their knowledge.
So reading a story with a warrant in it at all is kind of a nostalgic experience.
The authorities here should just say the new Iphone could be used by terrorists to set off IEDs so therefore this is a national security issue.
Not only wouldn't you need a warrant, but the homeowner doesn't even need to know who just ransacked his house.
It's all part of keeping us safe.

Supposing there was a rash of burglaries in a particular location which the police could not break. The people get together build a kitty and offer a reward for the arrest and conviction of the perps. Someone comes forward with info, a warrant is sworn out, the cops raid a house, find the goodies and make an arrest.

Now substitute intellectual property rights for the above mentioned goodies and you have REACT.

I don't see them any more as goons than the people robbed of their possessions.

Heavy handed approach to implementing the law does not make the victims themselves goons, even corporations.

This is a little different.

For one thing, intellectual property claims are at least 50% bullsh*t. Civil laws are adequate to protect IP rights, particularly in a case like this one.

Moreover, try to get the cops in Mountain View to go after home burglary suspects with this kind of fervor -- they'd laugh you out of the precinct.

There used to be a name for police "steering committees" -- I believe the term was "vigilantes."

Corporate goons.

This is in regards to InfraGard mentioned above. I don't remember the exact time. I think it was 1998 when there was a hacking war between hackers in U.S. and China. My company's internet service was one of the first that was attacked by hackers based in China. We were able to ID the attack and made appropriate defense to prevent similar attacks. I reported the attack to the FBI and was invited to attend a local meeting to share our experience with other professionals in the area that managed internet servers and services. It was just before the group was formalized and called InfraGard.

I had kept in touch with it now and then. It is more of a meeting of nerds than anything sinister. The discussions can get pretty technical and would bore most people. But it can be quite useful in getting informed on internet security. I believe anyone who manages an internet service for a company or organization can freely participate.

I don't know if it makes a difference, but supposedly the genesis of this story is that someone left an next gen Apple iPhone proto in a bar. It was found and then sold to this guy's WEBsite, Gizmodo, for $5,000.

Supposedly Apple is doing all this to get their phone back. I guess they have a point, but who knows whether its a publicity stunt, true or if Apple should have just let it go.

I can't see how it is too out of character for Apple to be heavy-handed with the way they insist everything for their eppt must go thru iTunes/AppleStore, ubt who knows.

As far as IP in the high-tech biz, it does make a diff when you can have a few month jump on the competition, so I wouldn't say all IP claims are BS. Unfortunately, most IP theft seems to be coming from off-shore wher stuff gets reverse-engineering in a heartbeat (eg, Intel chipsets have their Chinese equivs almost the next day after Intel releases.)

I'm glad Lawrence brought up "intellectual property rights." When I saw this original Bojack piece, it occurred immediately that this story is related to the storm trooping going on in the heartland under the direction of Monsanto and their servants in state and federal legislatures and judiciary. Bad, bad, bad.


Btw, U.S. Patent laws were one of the primary shielded fonts of the funding for the rise and rampage of industrialized fascism in Germany in the early 20th c. -- and Wall Street played a big role (like G.W. Bush's Geronimo's-grave-desecrating grandpa, Prescott Bush @ Harriman Bros.) in that despite laws against that. Don't believe it? It's a fact.

See, e.g., "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin. And, And,

Aside from the handful of culprits and scapegoats from the I.G. Farben conglomerate (BASF, Bayer, Hoechst, Agfa, et al.) tried at Nuremburg, many of the actual corporate perpetrators and their in-the-know financiers, inside & outside Germany, skated away with all their money intact.

Different players, though the song remains the same....But, "Everything that's small has to grow. And it has to grow!" So here's to Jason Chen, Gizmo, and Jason's lawyers -- HUZZAH!

You all might want to read up on Gawker Media and Gizmodo's history and intentions before assuming this is some sort of corporate cabal wielding secret power.

One recent example:

A quote from the company's founder in that article:
""We don't seek to do good," says Denton, wearing a purplish shirt, jeans and a beard that resembles a three-day growth. "We may inadvertently do good. We may inadvertently commit journalism. That is not the institutional intention." "

And here's a quote that's interesting from

"Journalist shield laws are about journalists being able to protect sources who may have committed crimes. They’re not a license for journalists to commit crimes themselves. Gawker is making an argument that is beside the point. They’re arguing, “Hey, bloggers are journalists.” The state of California is arguing “Hey, you committed a felony.”"

Gawker Media (and Gizmodo) have a history of offering cash for things like this iPhone. Publicly. They also have a history of claiming that things like this are fair game, and that they can do what they like with them if somebody brings it to them.

Now imagine, if you will, that instead of an iPhone, this was about your credit card information.

If it was my credit card information, the police in the Bay Area would not be busting down anybody's doors over it. They'd tell me to call the bank and change my number.

They ought to be telling Steve Jobs to get over it. But no. When the victim is an arrogant corporation with a lot of money, suddenly the cops get out the battering ram and start breaking and entering over a stupid cell phone. If that doesn't bother you, it should.

Guess poor little Stevie's kidz didn't have *mobileme* on their precious proto-hype

*Fahrenheit 113* (the inoperative temperature of an iPhone) -- the heat is on!

If the cell phone was "stupid", or intellectual property is BS, why did Gawker pay $5,000 (or more) to get their hands on it?

And, why did the person finding it not just leave it there or throw it away?


Okay, yes, the police screwed up here. They seem to have tried to treat this as some sort of computer crime and forgotten about federal journalist-shield laws, which is a pretty big deal. But keep in mind, what was really going on was straight-up sale of stolen property.

The story as we know it goes like this. An apple employee had a device to field test. Said hapless fellow went out for some beer and left his sample behind, leading to the best t-shirt ever:

(Steve Wozniak, Apple co-founder)

Anyway, some guy picked it up and played with it enough to get the facebook name of the device's last user, Gray Powell. Apple remote-killed it pretty promptly, and the finder seems to have held on to it a while, showing his friends, before hitting on the bright idea of selling access to it to a tech media outlet. He seems to have shopped it around a bit; Wired claims to have gotten an offer, Endgadget showed the teaser pictures, but Gizmodo laid down five big ones to get their hands on the device. They then disassembled it and published the results, including a rather poorly-planned photo of their staffer Jason Chen holding the hot potato. The crowd went wild, and Apple sent a fairly terse but polite letter asking for their property back; Gizmodo complied.

All this would be just a simple misadventure, except for a few key facts. One of them is that California has a pretty clear duty-to-return law that specifically prohibits using found property for personal gain. Another is that *any* GSM phone is identified six ways to Sunday via its SIM card, and only AT&T uses this particular physical SIM - a fact well-known among Apple fans such as Gizmodo.

People involved are apparently claiming that they made an effort to contact Apple to return it, but somehow it never occurred to anyone to ask the carrier, who (unlike a manufacturer) knows for damn sure who pays the bill for the cellphone service. Getting a cellphone back to its owner is easy through this approach; I have done it myself.

So the upshot of all this is that it's dead clear from just the article Gizmodo published that someone broke the law in a couple ways. First, by not making a serious effort at returning the phone. (No one sent a facebook message to Mr. Powell, no one went to their local AT&T store to have them contact the owner, and no one put it in a box and FedExed it to 1 Infinite Loop. Apparently someone fooled around with calling Apple HQ on the phone but were not believed. In absence of other options one might suppose that was adequate, but other unexplored options were abundant.) And second, by apparently exchanging $5,000 for obviously stolen property.

The notion that Apple somehow unleashed the police on these guys is remotely plausible, but the simpler explanation by far is that some cop or DA up for election reads Gizmodo and decided to join the media circus by bagging an easy high-profile target.

Were I Gizmodo's corporate counsel, I'd be thanking my lucky stars that the REACT team bungled the search so badly that they may have tainted all evidence beyond use. It seems to me no lesser screwup would have saved Gizmodo from a serious hammering over this - one that I happen to think they richly deserve.

someone broke the law in a couple ways

Yeah, but it's not a police matter. If this was your stolen property or mine, nobody would be knocking down anyone's door. Nowadays they could steal your $30,000 car, and you'd be told to mail in a postcard while the cops ate some more donuts.

The reason the police are so hot in this case is because that's the way Apple® wants it. Which is the entire point of this post. Which some people just apparently can't grasp.

This is a civil matter, plain and simple. And a lousy case for Apple, at that. I doubt Gizmodo will wind up paying much of anything.

Oh, I agree the police would not normally be doing this if it weren't such a high-profile case. I just see no evidence as yet that Apple is behind the search warrant. On the other hand, it appears both San Mateo and Santa Clara counties each have elections for both Sheriff and District Attorney in about six weeks. :-)

"I just see no evidence as yet that Apple is behind the search warrant."

Let's see, Apple's lawyer tell Gizmodo he wants the phone back and a couple of days later the police bust this guys door down. Are you sure you don't see a connection?

It seems selective enforcement to me - Then again, it may be all hype on Apple's part (not like Jobs ever engages in drama with their products.)

PS - I'm not an Apple fan, if it makes a diff.


Correct. Apple asked Gizmodo for it, and Gizmodo at that point gave it back. Then a couple days later the cops bust down the door.

There's an implication, sure, but nothing more definitive than that. I mean, it'd be shocking if Apple didn't ask the theft be prosecuted, wouldn't it? I doubt they needed a steering committee post to make that happen, though.

(And yes, absolutely selective enforcement. This is news? At least they took a break from busting random potheads.)


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics