Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 3, 2009 5:25 PM. The previous post in this blog was Don't dunk drunk. The next post in this blog is Pasadena via Duck. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Vancouver's Lieberman

The House voted today to extend the federal estate tax. But of course, Brian Baird, the supposedly Democratic congressman from the 'Couv, joined all 174 Republicans in voting against it. His good buddy Lars Larson will no doubt be proud.

No estate tax, no stock transactions tax, no health care reform -- the list of goofball positions by Baird goes on and on. If the folks up that way want people in Portland to take them seriously, they could start by finding a real Democrat to represent them.

Comments (24)

What's the point of even having government anymore? Seriously, we're in such a bad state these days. Republicans refuse to endorse any Democratic stance/idea/proposal and it seems to be the same for the reverse. It's pathetic and completely disheartening. I don't think I've heard one positive reaction to O's Afghanistan policy. Everyone of them immediately jumped on it yet offered no solution themselves to the problem that they created. I've completely given up on government. They're worthless.

Comparing any other Congresscritter to Lieberman. MAN, that's cold. (I have Jewish friends who use "Lieberman" the way Latino friends use "Tio Taco".)

It is impossible to call any tax fair, because "fair" is a subjective measure.

However, surely the estate tax comes closest of all taxes to the fair concept.

The deceased, whose death triggers the tax has not lost any assets because, well, the deceased is dead. The heirs have not lost anything because they never had the assets. The tax affects only a very small number of estate, and those estate are very large. Good estate planning can mitigate much if not all of the tax even for large estates. The tax has an impact, albeit small, or the trends towards highly skewed income distribution towards the very wealthy.

While some argue that the estate causes the "fire sale" of farms and small businesses, no one has ever been able to document that assertion.

If you support reduction or abolition of the estate tax, kindly tell us what programs you would cut, or what taxes you would raise or how much you would borrow to offset the loss of revenue.

If "good estate planning can mitigate much if not all of the tax even for large estates", then what's the point of the tax?

The point of the tax is that even with good estate planning which mitigates the tax for even large estates, (1) one way to mitigate the tax is to make large contributions to charity which serve a public good similar to government spending, see Gates and Buffett (2) estate planning frequently only postpones the tax, and (3) even with good estate planning, there are estates in this country that are so large that no amount of planning can defeat the tax, and these estates are the ones which make up the huge majority of the estate tax. The argument that the estate tax causes families to have to sell the family farm, or close down the family business is an urban myth, much like crocodiles in the sewer and aligators on golf shirts.

The concentration of wealth in the upper .1% of the population is huge, and this fact alone would create a lot of support for the tax if the majority of folks realized how large it is. A recent tax case in New York City involving a potential tax liabilty of $27 million for NYCity taxes for a hedge fund manager is illustrative, because in order to owe that much NYCity tax the individual would have had to have taxable income of over $700 million in one year. Does any one single individual, particularly a hedge fund manager, ever contribute enough to society to justify that amount for one year's worth of work?

Finally, on a personal note, the estate tax gives rise to lucrative employment for tax consultants like me, thus shifting income from the very wealthy to the not-so-wealthy but very deserving, but I doubt if this argument will win the day with many other folks and so I will not mention it.

Dear Mr. Finkel,

Back in the early eighties when estate taxes were more brutal than they are now, my mother died at 56. She was was predeceased by my father whose unexpected illness killed him at 59 two years earlier. My sisters and I (from teens to early twenties then) were forced to pay $65,000.00 in inheritance taxes on property that my parents had struggled to purchase, and own outright, free and clear. Like our home, for example. We had minimal liquid assets. My parents had not planned their estate, granted, but check again their ages at the time of their deaths.

The lucrative employment of a tax consultant like you gave us very little comfort at the time. Fortunately, a dear family friend and professional was willing to assist us for a lowered rate. How you feel you would have been in a position to deserve anything from us in beyond me.

Well, PDXLifer obviously I cannot comment on the situation you faced in the 1980's and I can see it is a very serious subject for you and continues to cause you pain even today. I am sorry for that. With respect to your situation I can say this.

1. My position and comments are directed at today's Estate Tax environment, not what was in the past, which is not relevant for policy considerations.

2. In order to have an Estate Tax liability of $65,000 (or say about $250,000 with inflation) under the house bill passed today and opposed by the gentleman cited in Jack's blog and by all of the Republicans, a married couple would have to have a taxable estate of slightly over $7 million. Do you really think it is wrong for an estate of that size to pay $65,000 of Estate Tax? Does that really create a hardship on the heirs?

3. Your question of what would someone like me deserves from you is simple. For a fee far less than the amount of the Estate Tax we could have provided advice that is legal, ethical and morally sound that would have eliminated the tax entirely, or reduced it in an amount substantially greater than the fee.

I am sure the family friend you mentioned was indeed a dear family friend, and it sounds like he or she prepared the Estate Tax Return at a reduced rate, which is very nice. However, where was this dear family friend when you needed that person to do the Estate Tax planning to avoid the tax altogether? You need to understand that Estate Tax Planning is done prior to death, not when the Estate Tax Return is prepared and filed.

4. Finally, I again raise my question. If the Estate Tax is eliminated, what government programs would you reduce, or whose taxes would you increase to offset the revenue loss, or would you just add the lost revenue to the deficit and national debt that is already huge and growing?


You were not "forced" to pay the tax. You could have sold the home and paid the tax out of the proceeds. Or you could have taken out a mortgage on the property and paid the mortgage payments by converting the house into a rental.

It would obviously have been better to plan for the unexpected, but the fact that someone struggles to purchase a house and owns it free and clear really doesn't change the social justice consideration about the estate tax.

...the estate tax gives rise to lucrative employment for tax consultants like me, thus shifting income from the very wealthy to the not-so-wealthy but very deserving, but I doubt if this argument will win the day with many other folks and so I will not mention it.
But you just did. And it basically sounds like you're saying that the law should stay on the books because you deserve that money more than the people who own it, simply because they have more of it than you.

If the folks up that way want people in Portland to take them seriously, they could start by finding a real Democrat to represent them.

Jack, why do you think the people "up that way" care at all what the people in Portland think about them? Maybe they keep electing Baird because he's not Randy Leonard or Sam Adams or Diane Linn or Neil Goldschmidt or Erik Sten or...

Sidney, hitting 7 million in assets is not that hard for a farmer these days. Land and equipment is very expensive and these guys just don't have the liquid cash laying around to pay extra taxes with. I wouldn't be suprised small businesses can hit the cap without to much problem too and also not have the liquid cash sitting in the sock drawer to pay with.

The primary reason to have the estate tax is the fact that the income tax on the growth of one's assets is not triggered at death, and yet one's heirs get a "fresh start" in the basis of those assets for purposes of income tax transactions in the future.

Picture a hypothetical taxpayer, Bill Gates. He founded Microsoft with an initial investment of $5,000. Now his MS stock is worth $1 gazillion. When he dies, there's no income tax, and forever thereafter there will be no income tax on the growth of that stock from $5,000 to $1 gazillion. If his kids sell it for $1 gazillion, there's no income tax on that appreciation at all. If they sell it for $1 gazillion + $1, the income tax is imposed only on $1.

The estate tax is the tradeoff for that gigantic income tax benefit.

I wouldn't be suprised small businesses can hit the cap without to much problem too and also not have the liquid cash sitting in the sock drawer to pay with.

Estates that are comprised largely of interests in closely held businesses are allowed to pay their estate taxes over a period of many years, with interest charged at only a highly favorable interest rate.

why do you think the people "up that way" care at all what the people in Portland think about them? Maybe they keep electing Baird because he's not Randy Leonard or Sam Adams or Diane Linn or Neil Goldschmidt or Erik Sten or...

You're right. He's freakin' Joe Lieberman.

Enjoy your tolls.

Ken, and others

The final paragraph of my original post was written with tongue firmly in cheek (and while I was watching a pretty good football game). Tax Policy is a serious issue, but that does not mean we cannot comment some times in a somewhat light and less serious manner. Obviously some of you took my statements in that paragraph in a more serious manner than I intended. Hey folks, lighten up. If that paragraph had been in say, the New Yorker I would have been praised for my sardonic wit.

Darrin, Your point is well taken, but Jack's point is that there are provisions to take your point into account. Also, those who would continue the tax have also proposed provisions for special consideration for family farms. Again, I would ask someone to document for me that there are a large amount of family farmers and small businesses devasted by the estate tax. It may sound logical, but it just doesn't happen.

Finally, again, no one has answered my question about how to replace the revenue, or which expenditures to reduce or whether we should just borrow more money if the estate tax is eliminated. There is no free lunch. If the estate tax is repealed we know who will benefit, my question is who will pay for those benefits?

Why would people in Vancouver care if Portland takes them seriously?

The ones who work in Portland care a lot about how they're treated by the Oregon tax system; that's one of many examples.

I guess my point is that most people I know who live in Vancouver don't spend a lot of time worrying about what Portland thinks of them. They definitely aren't going to take that into consideration when electing their representative. I've lived in Portland all my life. One thing I've increasingly noticed is that people in Portland seem to have a feeling that other cities in the region are somehow inferior to ours. I think that attitude has hurt us. And I think your comment was an example of that. No big deal, but I thought it was worth a comment.

My thought on the estate tax has always been that we shouldn't impose the tax as long as the assets are left, unrestricted, to the next generation. In most of those situations the assets would be spent within a decade or two and would end up in the hands of more productive individuals. Under the current system many large estates use trusts or other devices to lock up assets so that the next generation (or second or third generation) is protected from losing what previous generations accumulated. I think this should be allowed, but at the cost of paying the estate tax.

So the folks of Southwest Washington should elect people who Oregonians consider "serious," or they can't expect to be treated fairly by the Oregon tax system? That -- along with Mayor Slimy's threat to kill the CRC unless it has light rail -- sound a lot like quid pro quo. Or extortion. Pick your label.

"Finally, again, no one has answered my question about how to replace the revenue, or which expenditures to reduce or whether we should just borrow more money if the estate tax is eliminated. There is no free lunch. If the estate tax is repealed we know who will benefit, my question is who will pay for those benefits?"

I'm convinced that being opposed to taxes of all kinds is simply a stance many people have adopted--almost all Republicans these days, for instance--without any regard for the intellectual, moral or civic merits of the position. You're wasting your time, Sid, if you think anti-taxers are going to engage seriously in a discussion of government funding and personal responsibility for providing that funding. Some people just see a tax, any kind of tax, and they're against it--social responsibility be damned.

Thank you, Ronald Reagan, for making pure, stupid selfishness seem like a legitimate political position.

Replace the name Vancouver with Gresham and you will have a good idea of the demographics, values, etc.
Move Mary Starett and get her to run for Baird's seat. This gets her to DC and visibility. [She is able to speak although what she says is idiotic.]
Voila! --- 2012 Republican or Tea Bagger candidate for President and good bye Sarah!

no one has answered my question about how to replace the revenue, or which expenditures to reduce or whether we should just borrow more money if the estate tax is eliminated. There is no free lunch

If the estate tax were eliminated the charade of stepping up cost bases would stop as well. Then when John the spendthrift heir or Jane the wastrel heiress gets around to blowing the dough they would pay whatever the appropriate income tax is on the net proceeds from the sale of the appreciated asset.

Grandpa and grandma when no longer encouraged to give bucks to some quirky foundation in order to avoid the tax man will be more likely to pass assets on to heirs, adding to the pool of taxable gains.

When it is all said or done tax revenues might not be much different. A slice of the tax planning sector could find more productive pursuits. And if revenues are shaved, we're only talking about one or two percent of Federal receipts to begin with. You could make a heck of a down payment (or cover the difference entirely perhaps) on whatever revenue is lost by requiring GM and Chrysler to sell bonds to fund a buy out of the government's ownership interest.

And by the way, since you all seem anxious to get into Bill Gates and Warren Buffet's pockets, what assurance do we have that they will pay one red cent of Federal Estate Tax (assuming current law) when it is all said and done?

Jack-- Why would anyone take Portland serious now that the inmates are running the asylum?


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics