
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,800 unique visits a day, and more than 44,000 page views a week (as of October 26). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Dom Martinho, Tinto 2005
Chateau St. Jean, Cabernet, California 2007
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2007
Revelry, The Reveler, 2007
Joseph Drouhin, Chablis 2006
Altos Las Hormigas, Mendoza Malbec 2008
Alodio, Ribeira Sacra Mencia 2007
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2008
Kiona, Lemberger 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Paranga, Kir-Yianni 2005
L. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Rose 2007
Gloria Ferrer, Sonoma Brut
Kirkland, Napa Valley Meritage 2006
Abacela, Tempranillo 2006
Woodward Canyon, Columbia Valley Red
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2007
Mas Donis Barrica, Celler de Capcanes Red, 2005
Three Rivers, Merlot 2006
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Lezaun, Rosado, Navarra
Lezaun, Red, Navarra
Hedges, Three Vineyards, Red Mountain 2005
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Vega Sindoa, Cabernet-Tempranillo 2006
Inama, Soave Classico 2007
Alois Lageder, Lagrein Rosato 2008
Broglia, Gavi 2007
Marqués de Cáceres, Rioja Rose 2008
Spaltagna, Riserva Pinot Noir 2008
Portuga, Rose 2008
Warre's Warrior Port
Lange, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Guiraud, Le G, 2007
Falset, Garnacha Rose, Montsant 2006
Castello di Bossi, Chianti Classico 2004
Domaine Chandon, Pinot Noir, La Riviere Sonoma 2006
Brazin, Old Vine Zinfandel, Lodi 2006
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2006
Casillero del Diablo, Cabernet 2007
Gentil Hugel, Alsace 2006
Mesoneros de Castilla, Ribero del Duero, Rosado 2008
Cor, Momentum 2007
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2006
Rubico, Lacrima di Morro d'Alba 2007
Gilstrap Brothers, Reserve Merlot 2003
Conundrum 2007
Chandler Reach, 36 Red
Santa Rita, Reserve Cabernet 2005
Marietta, Old Vine Red Lot 47
L'Ecole No. 41, Recess Red 2006
Dom Martinho, Red 2004
Beaulieu, Georges Latour 1994
Caymus, Cabernet 1995
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2005
Bergevin Lane, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2005
Savigny-les-Beaune, Les Lavieres 2003
David Hill, Reserve Merlot, Rogue Valley 2006
Educated Guess, Cabernet 2006
Maquis Lien, Red 2005
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2007
David Hill, Farmhouse White
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Marques de Casa Concha, Cabernet 2005
Santi, Sortesele Pinot Grigio 2006
Al Muvedre, Tinto Joven 2006
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2006
Gritti, Ca' Andrea, Umbria red 2005
Altos de Luzon, Jumilla 2004
Thomas Leithner, Zweigelt 2004
Cain Cuvee NV 3
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot 2003
Meridian, Sauvignon Blanc 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Paringa, Shiraz 2005
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 64
At this date last year: 28
Total run in 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (24)
This is the kind of news we need, and the kind that will be lost in the shuffle when our local papers finally go under.
Posted by Allan L. | November 2, 2009 8:28 AM
Hey, this is govt, come up with an idea, jigger the numbers around to make it look like it just might work (even though they know it won't) to get it passed and then pray.
PGE Park, tram, OHSU expansion, etc. and, unfortunately, national health care.
Posted by Steve | November 2, 2009 8:39 AM
Do you suppose the Guv ignored the problem because it stood in the way of his legacy building. I mean, this dude wants to be the Guv who started the Green Revolution in Oregon, isn't he?
Posted by mp97303 | November 2, 2009 9:09 AM
First, will Kulongoski at last step out from behind his flacks and lawyers and answer tough questions from reporters in a public forum?
Second, did the companies that benefited from the tax credits contribute to Kulongoski's 2006 campaign fund, and/or the slush fund he established right after the election?
Third, what will Kroger do?
Posted by Fred Leonhardt | November 2, 2009 9:33 AM
Pick a number, any number - oh wait, we don't like that number, screw with it, make it smaller. There ya go, that number will fly.
Yes, it has no connection with reality, but so, we do this all the time. Yes, that's the number we like, we'll go with that one.
Posted by native oregonian | November 2, 2009 9:35 AM
The state is also not telling the truth about how much revenue will come from the higher personal and corporate taxes. They assume people will not change their actions when faced with higher rates. They called that being "conservative" when it is actually unrealistic.
Posted by B.A. | November 2, 2009 10:01 AM
Give the Oregonian credit on this one. We wouldn't be having this conversation if it weren't for some good reporting from Portland's daily.
Posted by Pete | November 2, 2009 10:21 AM
Don't forget the most scandalous thing of all: BETC deductions can (and are) sold in an aftermarket, at a very steep discount.
So, say some ethanol or biodiesel scammer gets a big pile of BETC --- what good does it do them, they're losing money hand over fist. So they SELL the credits (at a big discount) to a more profitable business, which has made no improvements at all. Biofuels scammer pockets the cash (typically 1/3 of the credits nominal value) and big buyer deducts the whole value of the credits, thus sinking the state budget even further into the red.
Thus, we have the spectacle of energy tax credits given to industries that are WORSE for the environment than petroleum in the first place, with those credits then being essentially turned into securitized investments to help companies avoid taxes.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 2, 2009 10:48 AM
For the soundtrack:
Dirty Back Road
(Ricky Wilson & Robert Waldrop)
Wreckless drivin', like a sportscar
God I want you, like a fuel engine!
Energized line, like a road
You-oo-oo-oo--oo ride me-ee-ee-ee-ee
Like a road
You-oo-oo-oo--oo ride me-ee-ee-ee-ee
Foot on the peddle
Feet in the air
Sand in my hair
Oh, don't look back
Don't look behind you
Wreckless drivin' on
Dirty Back Road
(repeat)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmdyfEQ4-D4
OR
"Party Out of Bounds"?
Posted by Mojo | November 2, 2009 10:55 AM
Seldes, your post solidifies why I am against the national Cap&Trade legislation now before congress. Oregon's BETC deal is the same as the national.
What also perplexes me, is the Oregonians inability to connect Sunday's article to earlier articles on solar credits that were recently given to 30 homeowners in one neighborhood here in Portland.
The O lauded the "sustainability", "green" of it all. They wrote that each homeowner was paying only $3000 to $4000 for their electrical generating solar panels. They didn't play up the fact that over 80% of the real cost ($35,000 to $40,000) was being subsidized by Fed, State, City and EcoTrust grants and tax subsidies.
Plus there's the BETC element to this neighborhood giveaway. All the rest of us are essentially paying for this neighborhood's "greenness".
Why can't the Oregonian really tell the whole story and connect the dots in all of their sustainable articles? Same goes for the Tribune and Willamette Week and Channel 2 and 8 that ran the same story and many other sustainable features.
Posted by Lee | November 2, 2009 1:23 PM
aka Cap & Charade.
Posted by Mojo | November 2, 2009 1:48 PM
Lee, while I'm also opposed to the cap and trade concept, I don't think it's correct to say that it's the same as the BETC, which is theoretically unlimited (whereas the number of carbon credits that could theoretically be created is set by the total of emissions).
The straightforward alternative to the cap and trade foolishness is a green tax shift, reducing taxes on the things we want our economy to produce (jobs, investments, wages, earnings) and increasing taxes on the things we don't want (pollution, toxic wastes). Then there's no need for cap and trade jacking around and you don't have to create a market for funny business with selling phony offsets and all the other crap that makes the banksters salivate.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 2, 2009 2:47 PM
Matt Taibi in Rolling Stone called cap and trade the next great money making boondoggle for Goldman Sachs.
Posted by mp97303 | November 2, 2009 3:51 PM
Maybe - just maybe - this article will wake some of the voters in Portland up when it comes to more BS from City Hall about any projects they deem to be "Green", "Sustainable", or "Eco-Friendly". All code for getting your pockets picked by a few well connected "friends" of the politicians. Isn't about time someone called out Randy Leonard on his bio-diesel and ethanol boondogles?
Posted by Dave A.. | November 2, 2009 4:05 PM
Goldman Sachs is a little late the party - Al Gore has been working with carbon emissions traders for several years now. Guess who benefits from the "global warming" I mean "climate change" debate there?
As for Kroger - this guy didn't have the political will to take on Samadumbs, but you really expect he will go after Klug during his lame duck year? And yes, he has been lame far more than just a year.
Posted by Mike (the other one) | November 2, 2009 4:45 PM
Nice to see the Governor at the Sanyo ceremony today, busting open that sake keg. Don't worry, your ceremonial robes will protect you from the splash.
Let's see, $40M of tax credits over five years, for an estimated 200 jobs. That's $200,000 per job, or more if they don't reach that goal.
Do you suppose that the state will see more than a small fraction of that come back before the venture fails, or they move on to the next sucker state?
What's more, photovoltaics aren't green to produce -- it takes a lot of energy, water, and harsh toxic substances to make those. That's why you need a factory to begin with. And there's waste.
Not so green after all.
Posted by eat them up yum | November 2, 2009 6:31 PM
That's what slays me about this whole green tech thing - making photovoltaics is a very un-green industrial process. Can you say "gallium-arsenide"?? Fits right in with Oregon's long-standing tradition of raping the environment for fun and profit.
Posted by Frank | November 2, 2009 6:59 PM
Let's not get too technical and research too deep. Sam, Dan and Randy's staff, the Sustainable Planning Bureau staff, EcoTrust, and all the other generally young staff who may have graduated in Polysc, English Lit. or sociology and never held a job outside of government (or even a job) won't be able to follow your thinking on "sustainability".
It's a religion, just have Faith. Don't critique it.
Posted by lw | November 2, 2009 9:45 PM
I hate to defend these guys on anything, but this
is losing the forest for the trees. Good current PV designs are averaging 15% efficiency, with payback on the invested energy within two years -- it's a serious chunk of energy embedded in them yes, but if installed and maintained properly, PV panels will be producing power for 30 years, with 100% of the pollution generated and contained in an industrial facility where it can be addressed.
This is in a state where the plurality of our electricity comes from coal, the dirtiest form of power there is. Annually Boardman alone produces 5 million tons of CO2, on top of about a half ton of mercury, tons of NOx, SOx, a surprising amount of radionuclides (I lost the exact number), and particulates (haze) -- all pumped directly into the atmosphere.
The only problem with PV in Oregon is that the bozos in DOT are insisting on creating the "Solar Highway" on the rainy side of the state where the insolation is far less than on the east side.
Complaining about wastes from making PV in a state where coal is the biggest fuel source for electricity is like complaining that the fire department left mud all over your driveway when they put out your housefire.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 2, 2009 11:06 PM
There's an old New Yorker cartoon which shows a bunch of choppers and old paunchy white guys in leathers with fancy colors on the back that say, "Hell's Accountants". One of them says, "Let's run downtown and gang audit someone!" I'd like to nominate The Energy Trust of Oregon for this week's zero-notice gang audit.
Of course nothing will come of any of it. The good old boys will make sure nobody looks under those rocks. Just like all the creative uses of TIF, in Oregon, it's not a racket if the politicians meant it to fund things that don't bear scrutiny.
Posted by dyspeptic | November 2, 2009 11:07 PM
Auditors, frauditors:
Madoff's longtime auditor pleads guilty to fraud
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MADOFF_SCANDAL_ACCOUNTANT
Posted by Mojo | November 3, 2009 10:44 AM
Someone mentioned the ODOE thing over in the Vicki Walker thread, and I responded there, but it probably belongs here:
We have definitely set things up to fail in terms of expecting any legislative oversight. Nobody wants to think about the downside of the very part-time Legislature that we have, but this debacle should definitely count towards that tally.
When the Leg meets it's absolute bedlam, with hearings stacked upon hearings stacked upon hearings, with lobbyists being the only ones who've had any time to prepare. The schedule is so compressed that there's little or no attempt by the Leg to do any form of oversight, of to simply have any time to learn about how the last set of laws are working out.
Basically we run a very large, round-the-clock diversified business with a very part-time absentee board of directors made up of amateurs, none of whom got the seat on the board because of any particular competence in program evaluation.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 3, 2009 12:18 PM
George Seldes, you state that "the plurality of our electricity comes from coal". From this and your later paragraph I'm thinking that you are using "plurality" to mean the "majority". An obscure interpretation of the word.
If my take on your use of the word is correct, then coal doesn't provide over 50% of Oregon's electrical energy.
Posted by lw | November 3, 2009 1:25 PM
Coal provides 41% of Oregon's electricity (more than hydro) and 50% of the _region's_.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 6, 2009 9:03 AM