Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 9, 2009 8:55 AM. The previous post in this blog was Product review. The next post in this blog is Dialogue, 2009. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, November 9, 2009

No tengo a nadie

Joining the Republicans to vote no on health care reform: Brian Baird, the Democrat from the Lars Larson Show.

Comments (11)

Thank you Brian Baird! You have my support!

Strike 1, Strike 2....

I'll withold judgment until I know what "health care reform" means.

It may mean everyone goes under Medicare, but passing this at midnight on a Saturday augurs not well.

Right now, it looks like "health care reform" means "Senate filibuster."

What's disappointing, is that Senators don't even have to diaper up and read the phone book cover-to-cover anymore to perform a filibuster like back in the day. They just have to announce a filibuster, and then they all go back to their offices and do whatever they do until enough back room moves or adjustments to the bill (read: added pork) are made to get an affirmative cloture vote.

At least obstructionists had to work at it back in the day.

I agree with Brian. Casting aspersions isn't gonna work.

Right on, Brian - !! Much appreciated; you have my support.

Somehow, I doubt that his reasons for a no vote are the same as Kucinich's

Any port in a storm.

And this storm is a doozy!

Pelosi had her 218 or whatever it was on Friday night and released the moderates and Blue Dogs to do as they wished. How else to explain the near simultanious announcements of several "moderates" that they'd be voting no? Best to give him this one vote to placate the crazies in WA-3 than run the risk of turning a relatively safe seat into a toss-up. Pelosi was very shrewd on this. She *might* be smarter than I thought.

This is why the whole thing ought to go down anyway. Unless the bill that comes out of conference is radically better than either the House or Senate bills, we'd be better off with nothing but a chance to turn 2010 into a referendum on Medicare for All:

Marcia Angell, M.D.
Physician, Author, Senior Lecturer, Harvard Medical School
Posted: November 8, 2009 08:02 PM
BIO Become a Fan

Is the House Health Care Bill Better than Nothing?


The House health reform bill -- known to Republicans as the Government
Takeover -- finally passed after one of Congress's longer, less
enlightening debates. Two stalwarts of the single-payer movement split
their votes; John Conyers voted for it; Dennis Kucinich against.
Kucinich was right.

Conservative rhetoric notwithstanding, the House bill is not a
"government takeover." I wish it were. Instead, it enshrines and
subsidizes the "takeover" by the investor-owned insurance industry that
occurred after the failure of the Clinton reform effort in 1994. To be
sure, the bill has a few good provisions (expansion of Medicaid, for
example), but they are marginal. It also provides for some regulation
of the industry (no denial of coverage because of pre-existing
conditions, for example), but since it doesn't regulate premiums, the
industry can respond to any regulation that threatens its profits by
simply raising its rates. The bill also does very little to curb the
perverse incentives that lead doctors to over-treat the well-insured.
And quite apart from its content, the bill is so complicated and
convoluted that it would take a staggering apparatus to administer it
and try to enforce its regulations.

What does the insurance industry get out of it? Tens of millions of
new customers, courtesy of the mandate and taxpayer subsidies. And not
just any kind of customer, but the youngest, healthiest customers --
those least likely to use their insurance. The bill permits insurers to
charge twice as much for older people as for younger ones. So older
under-65's will be more likely to go without insurance, even if they
have to pay fines. That's OK with the industry, since these would be
among their sickest customers. (Shouldn't age be considered a
pre-existing condition?)

Insurers also won't have to cover those younger people most likely
to get sick, because they will tend to use the public option (which is
not an "option" at all, but a program projected to cover only 6 million
uninsured Americans). So instead of the public option providing
competition for the insurance industry, as originally envisioned, it's
been turned into a dumping ground for a small number of people whom
private insurers would rather not have to cover anyway.

If a similar bill emerges from the Senate and the reconciliation process,
and is ultimately passed, what will happen?

First, health costs will continue to skyrocket, even faster than
they are now, as taxpayer dollars are pumped into the private sector.
The response of payers -- government and employers -- will be to shrink
benefits and increase deductibles and co-payments. Yes, more people
will have insurance, but it will cover less and less, and be more
expensive to use.

But, you say, the Congressional Budget Office has said the House
bill will be a little better than budget-neutral over ten years. That
may be, although the assumptions are arguable. Note, though, that the
CBO is not concerned with total health costs, only with costs to the
government. And it is particularly concerned with Medicare, the biggest
contributor to federal deficits. The House bill would take money out of
Medicare, and divert it to the private sector and, to some extent, to
Medicaid. The remaining costs of the legislation would be paid for by
taxes on the wealthy. But although the bill might pay for itself, it
does nothing to solve the problem of runaway inflation in the system as
a whole. It's a shell game in which money is moved from one part of our
fragmented system to another.

Here is my program for real reform:

Recommendation #1: Drop the Medicare eligibility age from 65
to 55. This should be an expansion of traditional Medicare, not a new
program. Gradually, over several years, drop the age decade by decade,
until everyone is covered by Medicare. Costs: Obviously, this
would increase Medicare costs, but it would help decrease costs to the
health system as a whole, because Medicare is so much more efficient
(overhead of about 3% vs. 20% for private insurance). And it's a better
program, because it ensures that everyone has access to a uniform
package of benefits.

Recommendation #2: Increase Medicare fees for primary care
doctors and reduce them for procedure-oriented specialists.

Specialists such as cardiologists and gastroenterologists are now excessively
rewarded for doing tests and procedures, many of which, in the opinion
of experts, are not medically indicated. Not surprisingly, we have too
many specialists, and they perform too many tests and procedures.
Costs: This would greatly reduce costs to Medicare, and the reform would
almost certainly be adopted throughout the wider health system.

Recommendation #3: Medicare should monitor doctors' practice
patterns for evidence of excess, and gradually reduce fees of doctors
who habitually order significantly more tests and procedures than the
average for the specialty. Costs: Again, this would greatly reduce costs,
and probably be widely adopted.

Recommendation #4: Provide generous subsidies to medical
students entering primary care, with higher subsidies for those who
practice in underserved areas of the country for at least two years.
Costs: This initial, rather modest investment in ending our shortage of
primary care doctors would have long-term benefits, in terms of both
costs and quality of care.

Recommendation #5: Repeal the provision of the Medicare drug
benefit that prohibits Medicare from negotiating with drug companies
for lower prices. (The House bill calls for this.) That prohibition has
been a bonanza for the pharmaceutical industry. For negotiations to be
meaningful, there must be a list (formulary) of drugs deemed
cost-effective. This is how the Veterans Affairs System obtains some of
the lowest drug prices of any insurer in the country. Costs: If
Medicare paid the same prices as the Veterans Affairs System, its
expenditures on brand-name drugs would be a small fraction of what they
are now.

Is the House bill better than nothing? I don't think so. It simply
throws more money into a dysfunctional and unsustainable system, with
only a few improvements at the edges, and it augments the central role
of the investor-owned insurance industry. The danger is that as costs
continue to rise and coverage becomes less comprehensive, people will
conclude that we've tried health reform and it didn't work. But the
real problem will be that we didn't really try it. I would rather see
us do nothing now, and have a better chance of trying again later and
then doing it right.

I like Dr. Angell's suggestions, but I disagree with her (and Kucinich's) rejection of the current legislation. If we "do nothing now" as she suggests, we will move into an election year having accomplished nothing on this issue after keeping it on the front burner all year -- and the voters will punish Democrats for it by staying home on election day enabling major Republican gains. This is what happened in 1994 when progressives joined conservatives in rejecting the Clinton plan.

Let's learn from this tactical mistake and take what we can get now, inadequate as it surely is. This way we at least keep some momentum for change on our side and will have a shot at improving the bill later when its faults manifest themselves clearly.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lugana, San Benedetto 2013
Canoe Ridge, Cabernet, Horse Heaven Hills 2011
Arcangelo, Negroamaro Rosato
Vale do Bomfim, Douro 2012
Portuga, Branco 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Late Bottled Vintage Porto 2009
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Kristina's Reserve 2010
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 28, 2012
Coppola, Sofia, Rose 2014
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Napa Meritage 2011
Kramer, Chardonnay Estate 2012
Forlorn Hope, Que Saudade 2013
Ramos, Premium Tinto, Alentejano 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Rutherford Cabernet 2012
Bottego Vinaia, Pinot Grigio Trentino 2013
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2011
Pete's Mountain, Elijah's Reserve Cabernet, 2007
Beaulieu, George Latour Cabernet 1998
Januik, Merlot 2011
Torricino, Campania Falanghina 2013
Edmunds St. John, Heart of Gold 2012
Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2010
Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011

The Occasional Book

Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 249
At this date last year: 345
Total run in 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics