This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 18, 2009 2:27 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Frohnmayer's folly.
The next post in this blog is Shunned by BlueOregon.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
The "leaders" of the City of Portland are such bullies sometimes. And when they're wrong, they won't own up to it. They'll throw up one desperate lie after another, rather than face the truth. It's a cause for real civic shame, for every one of us who lives here.
I'm really surprised that Fish and Fritz are sitting by and watching this happen. What they think they're achieving by letting it go on is truly mystifying. It doesn't take long to be brought over to the dark side, I guess. Nick, Amanda, you're losing your souls. Is it really worth it?
Comments (22)
I'm really surprised that Fish and Fritz are sitting by and watching this happen
Why? They've proven themselves only slightly more interested in meaningful issues than the rest of City Council.
And Fish of course is a freshman, and positioning himself for a future mayoral run. So--he's been very careful to pick safe issues.
Fritz has tried very hard to get on City Council, but is largely ineffective.
When the soccer scarves were broken out by both Fritz and Fish at recent discussions of soccer teams, I knew that that they were more about being shrewd and strategizing their future than being a courageous public servant.
Isn't there some way that the city or its insurer or whoever will wind up paying the judgment can limit its exposure here? Say, tell the defense mouthpiece "Alright, here's what we're good for, $______. If you try that excitable delirium s--t, any judgment greater than that comes out of the PPB retirement fund."
I had to read this with care. I assumed that "excited delirium" described the state of the arresting officers. For that matter, doesn't it pretty much characterize our city government?
This reminds me of the Portland Archdiocese strategy. Not only is it morally wrong, it will lead to a much higher award against the city, because the desperate argument itself supports plaintiff's coverup story. I hope my taxes go to compensate the Chasse family. It would be the best thing my taxes have been spent on in a decade. Better this than the scam du jour. What a pathetic pile of poop we have for leadership.
From the beginning the Chasse family has been pressing for the truth about how Jim died at the hands of the Portland Police and the subsequent white washing of the whole incident. I highly doubt the family would take any settlement at this point that did not include a complete airing of the whole dirty business. Most likely we will see a trial that is both embarrassing to the Portland Police, its leadership and the City Council and a huge judgement for the Chasse family.
All along the Police brass has been hiding behind the rhubarb that the officers were acting within department policy (interesting policy that condones kicking the s**t out of someone who might have been urinating in public). Now they have a new ruse with the "excited delirium" defense. Like the other posters, I thought it applied to the officers who might have been caught up in the "heat of the moment" and couldn't stop from beating and tasering Mr. Chasse because he was still moving.
Every time I read a new development in this incident it turns my stomach. It is my hope, and I know that it is a longshot, that after the civil trial the District Attorney will look at charging the offending officers with murder.
What's astounded me about the discussions of the Chasse case is that it appears that police officers have absolutely no conception of what blunt force trauma does to the human body. Even if they did have some sort of rationale for using an immense amount of force to subdue a subject -- and there are certainly times when that's needed -- you have to be an idiot to think that that force didn't have some effect on the subject. If you shoot someone it makes a hole. If you hit someone in the ribs -- particularly if you do it over and over -- you're likely to break something. Even if the force is necessary, they can't be ignorant of the effect.
Jack, it's a very good question, and one every advocate should face squarely prior to making a commitment to dash their integrity on the rocks of an institution.
Can it be done? Yes. But one must put principles before personalities, and that's harder to do than type.
Added pressure: as the advocate's constituency grows, so does dissent, regardless of position.
Added pressure: social media the nattering nabobs of negativity, and cumulatively the clatter drowns out reasoned discussion.
Added pressure: friendships, families, even social banality transform to become work-focused.
You have to ask - who in their right mind would do such a thing?
The city commissioners may be thinking that it's their job to limit the city's liability. But it isn't. We elected them to lead. To do the right thing on behalf of all of us. Allowing this blatant lie to be perpetrated isn't anywhere near that.
Saltzman and Adams are incapable of leadership, we know that. And Fireman Richard Daley is off the deep end. But Fish and Fritz ought to step up here.
I don't think Randy & Co. would pay for the use of HST's famous phrase. Rather, they would threaten to condemn it or to send a hit squad of inspectors and PPB cops to the licensing office to play a little video of the Chasse beatdown for them, just as an "encouragement" for negotiation.
I hope Amnesty International and the ACLU jump on board this train and pound that ludicrous, craven, shameless "excited delirium" BS permanently into the stinking muck it slithered out of.
Even if the guy died from "excited delirium" (which we all know is not true), wouldn't it have been brought on solely by the Taser? That's going to be a great excuse in front a jury. You Tasered a puny little mentally ill guy over a suspicion of offensive littering?
It's desperate. It's disgusting. It is pure evil. If there is a God, there will be hell to pay, and not just by the murderers in uniform.
I hope the Chasse family will air all this ugliness in a public trial. I am hoping for a verdict that will send the city into bankruptcy. The right wingers do not have a monopoly on government incompetence or dishonesty. The behavior of the city and its police force demonstrate that too clearly. (And I'm not real proud of my own fair city almost getting played for a sucker on the baseball stadium horses**t.)
I've seen this act before from the Portland Police, and they are good at it. In the late '80s, I got hit my PDX cop while on my bike. Clearly his fault, but in the "he said, he said" the cop's version of "the cyclist fell down, I rendered assistance" prevailed. I missed a month of work, racked up lots of medical bills and gained a permanently messed up elbow that has required 2 surgeries since.
Chasse was run down by the same machine that got me. Sadly in his case, it was a bigger, badder, more focused and lethal machine.
Don't expect these folks to ever step up to the plate: they just don't have it in them. Too much of an "we gotta protect our own" attitude.
It's been a while since the heyday of gonzo journalism, so the quote, "when things get weird, the weird get pro", seems vaguely unfamiliar.
Wasn't it more like, when things get weird, guzzle some more whiskey and LSD?
The combination would do nothing for Sam and Randy, and the window of opportunity is likely past for it to help Amanda or Nick, either. Dan Saltzman remains a mystery, but he seems pretty much paralysed by fear. Might could use some mind-expanding, or whatever Timothy Leary called it.
The rage this situation provokes has the curious effect of raising the question, is it possible that Randy Leonard is the only mirage of leadership we have on the council, since he at least says something negative about the police, while Dan wants to give the guys involved two weeks vacation?
Probably just proof of utter opportunism on Randy's part, unfortunately. It is a mild comfort to fantasize about a mirage of leadership, however.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (22)
I'm really surprised that Fish and Fritz are sitting by and watching this happen
Why? They've proven themselves only slightly more interested in meaningful issues than the rest of City Council.
And Fish of course is a freshman, and positioning himself for a future mayoral run. So--he's been very careful to pick safe issues.
Fritz has tried very hard to get on City Council, but is largely ineffective.
When the soccer scarves were broken out by both Fritz and Fish at recent discussions of soccer teams, I knew that that they were more about being shrewd and strategizing their future than being a courageous public servant.
Posted by ecohuman | November 18, 2009 2:36 PM
"Excited Delirium":2009 = "Twinkie Defense":1979
Posted by Dave J. | November 18, 2009 2:40 PM
Isn't there some way that the city or its insurer or whoever will wind up paying the judgment can limit its exposure here? Say, tell the defense mouthpiece "Alright, here's what we're good for, $______. If you try that excitable delirium s--t, any judgment greater than that comes out of the PPB retirement fund."
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 18, 2009 2:44 PM
I had to read this with care. I assumed that "excited delirium" described the state of the arresting officers. For that matter, doesn't it pretty much characterize our city government?
Posted by Allan L. | November 18, 2009 3:43 PM
the PPB retirement fund
You wish. That "fund" is us.
Posted by Allan L. | November 18, 2009 3:44 PM
This reminds me of the Portland Archdiocese strategy. Not only is it morally wrong, it will lead to a much higher award against the city, because the desperate argument itself supports plaintiff's coverup story. I hope my taxes go to compensate the Chasse family. It would be the best thing my taxes have been spent on in a decade. Better this than the scam du jour. What a pathetic pile of poop we have for leadership.
Posted by Jim | November 18, 2009 3:46 PM
From the beginning the Chasse family has been pressing for the truth about how Jim died at the hands of the Portland Police and the subsequent white washing of the whole incident. I highly doubt the family would take any settlement at this point that did not include a complete airing of the whole dirty business. Most likely we will see a trial that is both embarrassing to the Portland Police, its leadership and the City Council and a huge judgement for the Chasse family.
All along the Police brass has been hiding behind the rhubarb that the officers were acting within department policy (interesting policy that condones kicking the s**t out of someone who might have been urinating in public). Now they have a new ruse with the "excited delirium" defense. Like the other posters, I thought it applied to the officers who might have been caught up in the "heat of the moment" and couldn't stop from beating and tasering Mr. Chasse because he was still moving.
Every time I read a new development in this incident it turns my stomach. It is my hope, and I know that it is a longshot, that after the civil trial the District Attorney will look at charging the offending officers with murder.
Posted by cbb | November 18, 2009 4:18 PM
Is there an emoticon that combines anger, disbelief and disgust? If so, please insert here:
Posted by Carol Wells | November 18, 2009 4:23 PM
What's astounded me about the discussions of the Chasse case is that it appears that police officers have absolutely no conception of what blunt force trauma does to the human body. Even if they did have some sort of rationale for using an immense amount of force to subdue a subject -- and there are certainly times when that's needed -- you have to be an idiot to think that that force didn't have some effect on the subject. If you shoot someone it makes a hole. If you hit someone in the ribs -- particularly if you do it over and over -- you're likely to break something. Even if the force is necessary, they can't be ignorant of the effect.
Posted by darrelplant | November 18, 2009 4:31 PM
If I were playing the game Balderdash, I would have said that death through Excited Delirium is when someone dies during sex.
Posted by Travis | November 18, 2009 7:15 PM
Jack, it's a very good question, and one every advocate should face squarely prior to making a commitment to dash their integrity on the rocks of an institution.
Can it be done? Yes. But one must put principles before personalities, and that's harder to do than type.
Added pressure: as the advocate's constituency grows, so does dissent, regardless of position.
Added pressure: social media the nattering nabobs of negativity, and cumulatively the clatter drowns out reasoned discussion.
Added pressure: friendships, families, even social banality transform to become work-focused.
You have to ask - who in their right mind would do such a thing?
Posted by J Renaud | November 18, 2009 8:36 PM
The city commissioners may be thinking that it's their job to limit the city's liability. But it isn't. We elected them to lead. To do the right thing on behalf of all of us. Allowing this blatant lie to be perpetrated isn't anywhere near that.
Saltzman and Adams are incapable of leadership, we know that. And Fireman Richard Daley is off the deep end. But Fish and Fritz ought to step up here.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 18, 2009 8:41 PM
That latest scheme is really twisted and vile. The City of Portland should adopt a new, truer motto and license it from Hunter S. Thompson's estate:
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Posted by Mojo | November 18, 2009 10:53 PM
I don't think Randy & Co. would pay for the use of HST's famous phrase. Rather, they would threaten to condemn it or to send a hit squad of inspectors and PPB cops to the licensing office to play a little video of the Chasse beatdown for them, just as an "encouragement" for negotiation.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 19, 2009 12:07 AM
I hope Amnesty International and the ACLU jump on board this train and pound that ludicrous, craven, shameless "excited delirium" BS permanently into the stinking muck it slithered out of.
Posted by dyspeptic | November 19, 2009 1:32 AM
Even if the guy died from "excited delirium" (which we all know is not true), wouldn't it have been brought on solely by the Taser? That's going to be a great excuse in front a jury. You Tasered a puny little mentally ill guy over a suspicion of offensive littering?
It's desperate. It's disgusting. It is pure evil. If there is a God, there will be hell to pay, and not just by the murderers in uniform.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 19, 2009 2:03 AM
I hope the Chasse family will air all this ugliness in a public trial. I am hoping for a verdict that will send the city into bankruptcy. The right wingers do not have a monopoly on government incompetence or dishonesty. The behavior of the city and its police force demonstrate that too clearly. (And I'm not real proud of my own fair city almost getting played for a sucker on the baseball stadium horses**t.)
Posted by lives in beaverton, works in portland | November 19, 2009 8:57 AM
I've seen this act before from the Portland Police, and they are good at it. In the late '80s, I got hit my PDX cop while on my bike. Clearly his fault, but in the "he said, he said" the cop's version of "the cyclist fell down, I rendered assistance" prevailed. I missed a month of work, racked up lots of medical bills and gained a permanently messed up elbow that has required 2 surgeries since.
Chasse was run down by the same machine that got me. Sadly in his case, it was a bigger, badder, more focused and lethal machine.
Don't expect these folks to ever step up to the plate: they just don't have it in them. Too much of an "we gotta protect our own" attitude.
Posted by NoPoDoesn't | November 19, 2009 9:10 AM
Perhaps someone ought to drop a line to the folks at 20/20 or 48Hours ?
Posted by RANZ | November 19, 2009 11:33 AM
It's been a while since the heyday of gonzo journalism, so the quote, "when things get weird, the weird get pro", seems vaguely unfamiliar.
Wasn't it more like, when things get weird, guzzle some more whiskey and LSD?
The combination would do nothing for Sam and Randy, and the window of opportunity is likely past for it to help Amanda or Nick, either. Dan Saltzman remains a mystery, but he seems pretty much paralysed by fear. Might could use some mind-expanding, or whatever Timothy Leary called it.
The rage this situation provokes has the curious effect of raising the question, is it possible that Randy Leonard is the only mirage of leadership we have on the council, since he at least says something negative about the police, while Dan wants to give the guys involved two weeks vacation?
Probably just proof of utter opportunism on Randy's part, unfortunately. It is a mild comfort to fantasize about a mirage of leadership, however.
Posted by gaye harris | November 19, 2009 11:46 AM
Alien Boy should be out soon. We can hope that the story gets picked up by the national media from that.
Posted by dyspeptic | November 19, 2009 4:10 PM
Officer Humphreys is in trouble again.
Breaking news:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2009/11/live_blog_portland_police_shoo.html
Posted by none | November 19, 2009 4:21 PM