Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 16, 2009 6:25 AM. The previous post in this blog was If your iPhone update times out. The next post in this blog is Beaverton looking at $40 million or more for Paulson. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Amnesty, but a real wallop if you don't come clean

I love the readers of this blog. When I don't know something that I'd like to know, I just ask, and a wealth of information usually comes my way in response.

Take for example yesterday's post on Oregon's upcoming tax amnesty program. I wondered aloud in the comments section whether this was the Legislature's idea, or instead was purely an initiative of the Department of Revenue. By the end of the day, an alert reader answered that question, and then some. The reader writes:

The legislature implemented this program in Senate Bill 880, which was signed into law by the governor on July 14. It becomes effective on September 28. The full text of the enrolled bill is here.

The Department of Revenue was active in the design and support of this bill. However, officials from Sallie Mae also testified before the Oregon legislature on the design and implementation of the program, as apparently Sallie Mae is very active in implementing these programs in other states that have recently run tax amnesty programs. Oregon is actually in the minority, as most states have had tax amnesty programs at one point or another.

I think, perhaps, what is most important to know about Oregon's tax amnesty program is that it is a carrot-and-stick approach -- not just a carrot. Essentially, the program is designed to bring people into the system who are not currently filing or know that they have unreported tax liabilities. However, the legislation imposes a 25% post-amnesty penalty on those who could have used the program and did not. This penalty is on top of the other penalties such as substantial understatement and interest due. (See Section 4 of the bill.) Given the very short window of amnesty, it is very important to understand the penalties involved with not participating. The legislature made clear this penalty would not apply to those who made good faith errors on their tax returns, but discretion to assess the penalty remains with the DOR. If a taxpayer is assessed with an understatement by the IRS, the post-amnesty penalty does not attach unless the taxpayer has been assessed penalties by the IRS under sections 6662, 6662A, 6663 or 7201 of the [federal] Internal Revenue Code.

Fascinating. First of all, what the heck is Sallie Mae, the firm spawned of the federal student loan administration (and now a private company officially called SLM Corporation), doing messing around running state tax amnesty programs? Is that mission creep, or what? And there they were lobbying in Salem to get one implemented in Oregon. Did they get a juicy contract to run the program? That would be an interesting followup fact to know.

Hmmmm.... private corporation lobbying.... ties to Kulongoski.... bill carried by Ginny Burdick.... you know, I do believe I smell the Goldschmidt people in here. Just a crazy hunch. Meanwhile, old Sallie is fading fast...

But I digress. Even bigger news from our reader are the dire consequences for those who don't play along. Wow -- accept our mercy or else! Penalties go way, way up if you could come clean in the amnesty but don't! They're not mentioning that in the television ads. Maybe they'll run a followup spot or two featuring Samuel L. Jackson and John Travolta just before the November 19 deadline.

Another helpful reader sends along a number of related documents, including this one, which shows that the program is expected to net $16.2 million for the state after payment of expenses, which are required by the law to be capped at $1 million. Do Oregonian tax deadbeats really have $17 million lying around to send in at this point in the state's history? Time will tell, I guess.

The same reader makes a pitch for the amnesty program from the point of view of the harried business owner doing business in multiple states:

I have taken advantage of amnesty in my corporate life in the past. I always felt like what we owed was due to a blindside change of the rules. I felt that a little compassion was due, since I always tried hard to file according to law, but when you're dealing with large corporations it is almost impossible to get everything right. Then again, I took some of our audits to court and won a few over the years.... There are a bunch more out-of-state. I really miss the "thrill of the hunt" now that I'm retired.
Food for thought there as well. There's compassion in the Oregon program, all right, but it seems that there's more than a little bit of vegeance in it as well.

Comments (12)

Tax amnesties are effective tools for raising revenue both in the short and long term. The long-term revenue impact comes from bringing previously-noncompliant taxpayers into the system on a prospective basis - it's a lot harder to stop paying taxes once you're in the system.

If a taxpayer does not take advantage of the amnesty program but later determines that he or she could have done so, the taxpayer can seek to file with Oregon under its voluntary disclosure program. The voluntary disclosure program, which is of long standing in this state, allows taxpayers to file back taxes without being subject to penalties - presumably this would apply to the 25% amnesty penalty as well. The voluntary disclosure program does not allow for the waiver of any interest due, but it does limit the "lookback period" to three years, unlike the amnesty program which extends to all open years. (Many taxpayers should use the voluntary disclosure program rather than the amnesty program for this very reason - the state is leaving it to the taxpayer to choose.) The key is that the taxpayer has to come forward and cannot be "caught" by the state.

The Sallie Mae involvement is a good question!

Sallie Mae has a subsidiary known as Asset Performance Group(APG) which is a debt collection firm.

I would assume that would be the link

The long-term revenue impact comes from bringing previously-noncompliant taxpayers into the system on a prospective basis

That's a nice story, but is there any empirical data to back it up? Also, what are the revenue effects of the loss of morale among previously compliant taxpayers?

I think I may be one of these people... but I'm not sure. We payed very little federal income tax last year, but then when I did the state tax form, it said we owed an additional $1000 to the state. I figured I must be doing it wrong because I don't see how we could possibly owe that much (not to mention there's no way we could come up with that much more money). I don't know what to do: if I do owe, but don't contact the state, maybe they'll overlook me; but if they don't, then I guess they garnish my husband's already meager wages. If I do contact them, there'll be no penalties, but I still won't be able to pay them. If I'm afraid of the state, and can't afford a tax accountant, who the heck helps people comply with state taxes?

Jack,

It is a nice story - that's why virtually every state has had a voluntary disclosure or amnesty program at one time or another. These programs work.

I cannot speak for the entire state, but I have personally negotiated several voluntary disclosure agreements with Oregon as well as other jurisdictions on behalf of previously non-compliant taxpayers. Off the top of my head, I can think of a baker's dozen of companies that are now filing income tax returns in Oregon that were not doing so previously. (Granted, in this economy a few of them are paying minimum taxes thanks to some losses, but that's not the point.) I will not say how much these companies are paying in taxes, but the collective tax payments vastly exceed the penalties waived. And those taxes keep getting paid every year.

In each case, the company in question came forward voluntarily and obtained penalty relief. They were not contacted by the state, so I suppose we'll never know if they would have been found by Oregon and dinged with penalties in addition to their outstanding tax and interest liability.

Does it hurt your morale as a taxpayer to have these taxpayers in Oregon's system, paying taxes and filing returns, even though they all avoided a one-time penalty? Or would you rather have them hanging back, refusing to file returns and waiting for the day that Oregon's Department of Revenue tracked them down - a day that may have never come?

Offering taxpayers a break to come forward on their own is pure common sense. What incentive is there for taxpayers to come forward if they will be treated exactly the same as if they are caught by the state? Why not just wait for the state to catch you?

I fail to see how a common sense program like voluntary disclosure or a short-term amnesty program could possibly hurt the morale of a reasonable person. The basic rule stands: if the state catches you, you get hit with penalties in addition to back taxes and interest. But if you come forward on your own, some relief should be available - but you're still going to pay your back taxes and interest on those taxes.

Do you have any evidence that these programs damage taxpayer morale to the extent of hurting revenue? That would be interesting data.

Annie -

You might want to contact the good folks at the Portland Promise Center. According to their website, the PPC works with the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance program, which provides tax compliance assistance at no charge. Check it out at portlandpromise.org. I hope it helps.

Scott: Thanks for the anecdotes. I asked for data. You have none. And yes, my morale is diminished by the fact that your deadbeat clients got away with the penalties that they so richly deserve.

Jack:

My clients are not deadbeats. A deadbeat would not come forward and admit to a previously undetected tax liability and pay all associated back taxes along with interest. A deadbeat would wait until caught and then try to skate on whatever they owed. That isn't the same thing.

Knowing that my clients are now paying Oregon taxes hurts your morale. That's your right, I suppose. Is that going to change how you file your taxes? Are you going to take deductions to which you aren't otherwise entitled? Are you going to underreport your income? My guess is no, you're going to be just as law-abiding as you have always been. It's hard for me to see how a voluntary disclosure/amnesty program would harm revenue as you speculate.

You already have data from the state showing how much revenue it expects to generate from the amnesty program. Do you have any data supporting your speculation that "hurt morale" will adversely affect revenue? I have personal experience with these programs raising revenue and improving compliance. Do you have anything besides a question?

You did not answer the other question - would you rather have these taxpayers refuse to come forward because they don't want to pay penalties? If there's no benefit to taxpayers who come forward voluntarily to settle previously owed liabilities, then you're putting all the responsibility on the Department to catch them. And the Department can't catch everyone.

I am all for hitting taxpayers who are caught by the Department with all the penalties in the arsenal. Benefits offered through voluntary disclosures and occasional amnesties are just common sense.

Guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

People who don't pay their taxes on time and don't even file a tax return are deadbeats. Even if they pay late.

If penalties deter people from paying, they ought to be repealed. For everyone. But they're there for a reason. Popping up and waiving them, out of the blue, diminishes their effectiveness considerably.

data from the state showing how much revenue it expects to generate

That's pretty funny. Predictions are now data?

"Popping up and waiving [penalties], out of the blue, diminishes their effectiveness considerably."

Data, please? Sounds like someone hasn't talked with a tax director or CFO in a while.

If multistate taxation were simple, I might possibly agree with your "deadbeat" assessment. But it isn't - many tax practitioners just don't know enough about it to properly advise their clients. Internal tax departments have not been immune to layoffs, further depriving businesses of resources. Given that the threshold issue in multistate tax is whether the state has the constitutional authority to tax a given taxpayer, bad advice often leads to taxpayers you would, incorrectly, call "deadbeats."

Here's an example. One of my clients was represented by a well-established Portland firm with a respected tax pratice. You know the firm. The head of the tax practice advised this company - based back east but expanding their sales to Oregon - that they could avoid nexus with Oregon by using a team of independent contractors as a sales force rather than their own employees. This attorney - whom you know - was unaware of the U.S. Supreme Court decision squarely on point that holds to the contrary. This attorney is a good tax attorney, but is a federal practitioner and not as familiar with state issues as one would wish.

The company relied on this attorney's advice and for three years made sales into Oregon without filing returns on the grounds that Oregon lacked the constitutional authority to tax. I met the client's tax director (a strong fed guy with no state experience) and we talked about Oregon taxes. He was horrified to find out that he had taken a foolish filing position in Oregon.

Within six weeks we had negotiated a voluntary disclosure agreement with Oregon and paid back taxes and interest for all three years. They did not pay penalties. The company continues to file Oregon tax returns.

This business relied on the advice of a well-respected local attorney who happened to give them bad advice. As soon as they were aware of the problem, they remedied it. By no definition - no matter how simplistic, knee-jerk, or uninformed - is this client a deadbeat.

There are deadbeats out there, and I say throw the book at them. I just prefer to know the facts before I start throwing.


The company relied on this attorney's advice and for three years made sales into Oregon without filing returns on the grounds that Oregon lacked the constitutional authority to tax. I met the client's tax director (a strong fed guy with no state experience) and we talked about Oregon taxes. He was horrified to find out that he had taken a foolish filing position in Oregon.

The taxpayer should not have been subject to penalties. If it were, then the penalty provisions need to be changed, not waived. To the extent that the lawyer gave bad advice, that should be the lawyer's malpractice insurance carrier's problem, not the taxpayers'.

Anyone who pays late should pay interest. They had the time value of the money. If your client paid the tax and the interest, that's the right result. Under amnesty, which is the subject of this post, the client would not pay full interest -- not the right result.

The Department of Revenue resisted amnesty for many years, and with good reason. Amnesty is a gimmick that sacrifices long-term goals for short-term revenue, plus a cut for a private collection agency company.

There are deadbeats out there, and I say throw the book at them.

No, that's not what you say. Amnesty lets deadbeats off the hook along with the saintly people that you represent. And you say amnesty is good.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009

The Occasional Book

Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 115
At this date last year: 21
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics