Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 24, 2009 11:15 PM. The previous post in this blog was Sleep tight. The next post in this blog is Sorry, not a winner. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, August 24, 2009

Change that didn't happen

That Obama fella sure knows how to take orders, doesn't he?

Comments (34)

So who is pulling his chain? Everyone thought Cheney was the puppet master for Bush. Who could it be for Obama?

And as long as we are asking questions..why rush thousand-page bills through Congress with nobody reading them? Who wrote them? Whats the hurry?

Just like how everyone 'read' and Patriot Act

So who is pulling his chain?

In the financial sector, it looks like it's Larry Summers, or some combination of Goldman people.

Let's see, the head of a government institution with barely any oversight, no auditing, and complete responsibility for the flow (or non-flow) of money in the world's largest economy is nearing the end of a term, and he gets nominated again.

Shocking, that. I think Obama just nominated his own boss.

"Change you can deceive with."


Bernanke? The head of a government institution? No, we're talking about the Federal Reserve. It's a private institution owned by bankers here and abroad.
It just controls our government by controlling the money supply.

Thomas Jefferson: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered...I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

We've gone from a Jeffersonian Democracy to a Jeffersonian Nightmare.

In fact, the Federal Reserve has been in court vigorously defending its right not to tell us where our money went. Manhattan Chief U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled against them yesterday so we're heading for a showdown.

It could explain why Bernanke's move happened now so that it's done and he's still in power if the ugly truth emerges. As we all know, there is never any accountability if you're in power in Washington. And, of course, afterwards it's time to look to the future rather than prosecute the wrongdoers.

Just like how everyone 'read' and Patriot Act

I wouldnt disagree with that. However, I think the some of the current bills being run through Congress will be just as bad for us as a country as the PATRIOT ACT was/is. Particularly since, apparently nobody knows what is in those bills, (even those voting for them), except the secret people/organizations who wrote them.
I mean seriously, how can you consciously give your vote to something without knowing what exactly it will do?

Its people like John Conyers who scares me...he said about the health care bill-
"What good is reading the bill if its 1000 pages, and you dont have 2 days and 2 lawyers to understand what it means?"

Then why the hell are you in Congress?

Whats the hurry?

The administration wanted to get health care reform through congress before the inevitable lying/propaganda machine used by the right wing was unleashed. No such luck.

As for the Bernanke reappointment--that hopeful feeling I had on the evening of Nov. 4th 2008, and the following months is going, going...

Did anyone have an alternative candidate for the position?

"The administration wanted to get health care reform through congress before the inevitable lying/propaganda machine used by the right wing was unleashed."

So now its "lying" and "propoganda" to merely put out there what is potentially in the bill? "Death Panels" may be a crudely worded term, but there is no mistake that they are in at least one of the proposed bills. And I'm not saying that is a bad thing. 'End of Life' issues are and should be discussed. But it is disingenuous to pretend nothing like that is in the bill and it is all just a 'right wing smear'.

Unfortunately an official has to either have a couple of affairs, kill kittens in public or troll in bathrooms in order to be turfed out. Much of what Bernanke does is too mysterious for most of the American public to fathom and while much of what he has done is destructive and highly questionable, many would (and do) call him "competent."

We're in deep shite.

Everyone should have an advance directive and health care power of attorney. If we did, there would be no need for "death panels".
What a ridiculous canard. Knowledge trumps fear, unfortunately ignorance seems to reign supreme. By the way, the State has a great form directive and power of attorney. While you're at it pick up a Stevens Ness general power as well. It's kinda like a "life panel". Sorry to rain on your koolaid fest.

The Patriot Act should serve as a lesson to those who think a government promise of "trust us" is as ephemeral as the words traversing a teleprompter.

When the Patriot Act was passed the administration promised that it would be used only to prosecute terrorists.

In a matter of months, go-getter prosecutor were using the Patriot Act for a wide variety of "crimes" that had nothing to do with terrorism. In a curious twist, Eliot Spitzer used the Patriot Act to bust prostitutes.

A ladder climbing bureautician implementing legislation will trump the most earnest promises of the politician writing the legislation.

But it is disingenuous to pretend nothing like that is in the bill and it is all just a 'right wing smear'.

No doubt...I know many people who are genuinely concerned about whats going to happen with their health care...whether or not they pass reform. Mainly because nobody knows what is in the bill--not even those voting on it. Its not all just "scripted astroturf" or whatever they are calling it now. Sure, there are right wing organizations frothing about it. But there were left wing groups doing the same thing to anything the last administration did.

What happened to all those bumper stickers that said "dissent is Patriotic"?

What happened to all those bumper stickers that said "dissent is Patriotic"?

well, well, well--the winger comments tell us that they don't even understand this blog posting was a sharp jab at Obama. Imagine that?

Huh. I thought we all agreed with Krugman.

Krugman Says Bernanke Should Be Reappointed to Fed
Aug. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Ben S. Bernanke deserves another term as Federal Reserve Chairman based on his success in battling the financial crisis, said Princeton University Economist Paul Krugman, a winner of the Nobel Prize.
“He’s earned the right to a second term,” Krugman, 56, said yesterday in an interview in Kuala Lumpur. “He turned the Fed into the financial intermediary of last resort. When the banking system failed to deliver capital where it was needed, he put the Fed into the markets.”
Debate over the fate of Bernanke, 55, is intensifying as he nears the end of his four-year term as chairman on Jan. 31. While Krugman and economist Nouriel Roubini have voiced support for the former Princeton economist, others including Anna Schwartz have said a lack of transparency exacerbated the financial crisis.
“I think Bernanke has done a really good job,” Krugman said. “He failed to see this coming and he was behind the curve in early phases. But he’s been really very good in the sense that it’s really very hard to see how anyone could have done more to stem this crisis.”

Although Jack and I disagree on much, I really respect how he holds everyone responsible for perceived injustices, no matter which side of the isle they're on. I do the same on the conservative side, and I wish more people would do it more often on both.

Why should we expect change when both political parties are bankrolled by the same individuals and organizations? We used to call this bribery.

well, well, well--the winger comments tell us that they don't even understand this blog posting was a sharp jab at Obama. Imagine that?

Well, duh. I do get that. My dissent comment was made at the current state of debate in this country in general right now, not this particular blog.

The real question is whether or not there should be a Federal Reserve? The Constitution doesn't turn the job of issuing money to the private sector - so for starters it's unconstitutional.
It's also a bad idea. Yes, you could argue that it's prevented a depression, but it looks to me more like it's bought a little time before the big one hits - a bigger one owing to these last frenzied trillions going out the door.
It's also allowed these weasels in charge of the financial system to ransack the country with the extra time - or so it appears.
The Fed loves these little appearances of being under government control - with the President choosing the head, etc...but I read the President has to pick from a list of potential candidates selected by the Fed, so what does that tell you?
Not to mention that Congress is only considering a bill next month that would allow us oversight into the Fed's operations. It's crazy.
Finally, where were these outraged conservatives during the Bush years? Why weren't they screaming about freedom and tyranny back then? Simple, because they had the football so they didn't care.
Meanwhile, anybody who criticized President Bush was attacked for being blinded by Bush hatred.
Well, now that we're taking this President to task for things - I still wish there was more protest on Afghanistan - there's a few compliments but basically conservatives just go on running their mouths about how superior their point of view is. Meanwhile when they had the football, they fumbled the football so badly, that we may never get it back.

Finally, Dick Cheney is screaming about Obama's inability to keep us safe. Mark my words: If there is another strike anytime soon, the first thought from the American People should be, "False flag operation."
Anything's possible with that psychopath.

Bill, I think I may have found something I agree with you on! I also believe there should be no Federal Reserve.

Um, err, concerning the Jefferson remarks; the conquerors stole the land from the indigenous peoples and appropriated it to themselves. Is it any wonder it is still going on?

"Brenny, you're doing a great job."

I guess the quote should have been "a heck of a job". I can't even get punch lines right.

where were these outraged conservatives during the Bush years? Why weren't they screaming about freedom and tyranny back then? Simple, because they had the football so they didn't care.

Well, for the record, I was...particularly during Bush's second term. I even went Independent.

But this is exactly what is happening now with the current administration. Say, on Iraq...we're still there, our soliders are still dying..where are the protests every other weekend? Outrage in the streets?

Must be "all cool now."

As far as I am concerned, the Fed has two major policy functions -- one is to intercede to support the banking system when crisis strikes -- that is to say prevent the not so proverbial (as we saw a year ago) runs on the banks. That's legit and necessary. And when the Fed is conducting this function, there is need for secrecy and massive intervention. Bernanke was masterful on this.

The other major policy function of managing the economy (inflation vs. employment) is much more controversial. History tells us that Fed intervention in this dimension distorts markets and hurts the economy as least as much as it helps. Too cheap credit for too long was part of what gassed up the credit bubble.

I go back to Milton Friedman's recommendation of targeting, under normal circumstances, steady growth in the money supply so as to accomodate, but not drive economic growth. Granted, with all the various instruments, securities and accounts of various stripes out there these days defining the money supply isn't as easy as it once was, but there are enough indicators that this can be done to an approximation.

Bernanke had once talked about target inflation rates as a way of getting at the steady state growth issue. Let's see if he goes back there. I have my doubts as to whether he will, but don't doubt that he will be more likely to head off the big inflation than Summers or any of the other candidate Dems would have been.

Recall that Obama was pretty darn sarcastic about Volcker having firm opinions, yet Paul Volcker is the one person that we know for sure understands how to run the Fed to control inflation with an iron fist.

And why announce Bernanke today? So criminal investigation of CIA employees hits page 3 of the WSJ and page 5 of the WP. I don't subscribe to the NYT, but I would bet the CIA story is buried inside there as well.

The CIA story takes up most of the top half of the front page of today's NYT. So if Obama was trying to distract attention from Bush/Cheney's ugly legacy by announcing the Bernanke appointment today, it didn't work.

Hey Richard, whose ugly legacy are those 184 benches I passed by this morning next to the Pentagon? And stupid me, I thought it was governement employees interrogating, not Bush, not Cheney. Those guys really got around.

Bush and Cheney were responsible for the torture, as they hatched the plan for it, sought formal legal sanction for it, signed off on it and, in the case of Cheney at least, continue to promote it.

I don't know exactly what you mean by invoking the September 11 killings. Are you trying to defend torture? Are you trying to say that torture is a justified or patriotic response to 9/11?

If that's the case, your views are shameful, to say the least. It continues to shock and sicken me to see how many people share them.

What I am suggesting Richard is that if you have differences on how to best fend off terrorism (no matter how you do it, it is ugly business, just as it was ugly business to put bullets in the back of the heads of those teenagers off the coast of Somalia a few months back) that those are political differences. Handle it through the political process. I am suggesting that you should not be criminally persecuting or prosecuting government employees who except for the fact that they have jobs of greater consequence and difficulty than most are more like you and I than you might imagine.

Handle it through the political process. I am suggesting that you should not be criminally persecuting or prosecuting government employees

Grady, shouldn't government employees be prosecuted if they break the law? I don't think anyone is suggesting prosecution simply because a new president has come in with some new rules that are different than the old rules. The fact is, there were rules and laws in place while Bush was president as well, and if those were broken -- and it seems pretty clear they were -- someone needs to be held accountable. Otherwise, what happens to "rule of law" anyway?

Miles, just think if you were criminally prosecuted whenever you exceeded or violated some norm, rule, law or regulation in your day-to-day life?

The folks who do our dirty work under extremely difficult circusmstances are subjected to greater pressure and expectations than most of us can imagine. The nature of their jobs is that when they screw up or push too hard, their foibles are going to look a lot worse than yours. If you don't like how these folks are performing there are dozens of ways of dealing with them short of criminal prosecution.

The instant these employees realize they are being criminally investigated, rightly or wrongly, they have to go out and hand over a retainer to some high-priced Conneticutt Ave criminal lawyer. Bye-bye tuition fund. Bye-bye retirement savings. Forget about your family's financial future.

And though I suspect you disagree with what most of these folks do, they were trying to help their country.

I'm less interested in prosecuting the government official who screws up unintentionally than I am prosecuting those who purposefully went outside the legal boundaries. And you're right, I'm assuming that happened in these cases, either at the CIA operative level or higher up in the Administration. The inquiry is a good thing, because it should establish some of the context for the law breaking.

I think the "trying to help the country" excuse can be taken too far. The soldier who goes on a murderous rampage, killing innocent women and children, will tell you that he was under stress and trying to help the country. But obviously he should be prosecuted, don't you agree? Once we give carte blanche to soldiers and operatives with difficult jobs, civilians will lose control of the military and intelligence branches, which is what our founding fathers feared.

I also think the detailed nature of the guidelines indicates that a lot of thought went into the torture techniques, and I have to assume that the operatives knew those guidelines inside and out. So a violation either came from a rogue operative, or from a direct command up the chain. I think we HAVE to hold the person accountable in order to preserve who we are as a country.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics