

We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get! If you'd like to advertise without going through the Blogads system, that's do-able, too. Just e-mail us here for more information.
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 54
At this date last year: 50
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (38)
I'd presume this to be Turner Construction, the contractor for the 2000 renovations.
Posted by Roger | July 1, 2009 11:19 AM
Why is Nick the Fish keeping a low profile? Maybe he is salivating over incoming contributions?
Posted by KISS | July 1, 2009 11:19 AM
I'm sure Fireman Pele has been making life miserable for Nick because he didn't help stimulate Little Lord Paulson by selling out Lents Park.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 1, 2009 11:21 AM
Roger,
Any word yet if the renovations and public improvements include turning the J-shape of the basic structure into a U? In other words, are we renovating and improving something that is now currently not in existence like a huge new chunk of stadium?
Posted by Bill McDonald | July 1, 2009 11:34 AM
Why would a "sustainable"(privatized) government take the legal course of action and allow open bidding ? That might not be sustainable. The 24 hour money laundromat might go out of business. The Portland "partnerships" are always so disgusting. Luckily, down here in Eugene the leaders and planners all swoon "lets do what Portland is doing".
Posted by conspiracyzach | July 1, 2009 12:02 PM
I dinna like no-bids either, I think you are right to question this. However isn't Paulson on the hook for overruns? That at least should keep the "liars budget" from ballooning too far I would think.
Oh, and on a related note, tonight's US Open Cup match vs. the newly minted MLS Sounders just sold out. That's 17-19K tickets sold depending on how many tarps are removed from the upper sections.
One footy match = $500K+ in tix sales + concession and merch, local biz boost pre/post game in the 100s of thousands, Tri-met usage boost, parking revenue boost, etc.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 12:08 PM
When the UO arena(no-bid contract) opens in Eugene I hope you will consider posting a attend-ometer for that for the first season. The Ducks will still be on the historic losing spree and the new arena is far bigger than Mac Court and with far more expensive seats.
Posted by conspiracyzach | July 1, 2009 12:08 PM
Bill: No authoritative word, but that would seem the most practical way to do this.
Posted by Roger | July 1, 2009 12:15 PM
My money's on Hoffman Construction.
Posted by dg | July 1, 2009 12:55 PM
Here's my guess: We'll get close to a deal on this and the overrun threshold number for Paulson will jump up just before the deal's done because of unforeseen expenses like the high cost of reality, or there will be a thicket of new deals where we pump new money to him. You know the drill and you know who will get drilled.
At some point we'll be choosing between going to court or caving into more money.
The council will act like they got played, but in reality they just want this started and it doesn't bother them if they get played. In their hearts they probably know much of these numbers are little more than dreams. But they'll go along, because when the wealthy want something, that is what they are there to provide.
Projects are always by definition successful. War is Peace.
By the way, I want to salute the thousands and thousands of brave soccer fans who venture to the game tonight even though PGE Park is currently inadequate for a soccer match. That takes real courage venturing into unacceptable conditions like these.
Posted by Bill McDonald | July 1, 2009 1:04 PM
Turner Construction is building it.
I'm happy to see the less incestuous and more experienced (with stadiums) Turner get to build it over Hoffman, although either way, the taxpayers lose.
Posted by HED | July 1, 2009 1:11 PM
Bill M writes ^ unforeseen expenses like the high cost of reality
I presume you mean't "realty" but like your original as well :)
Posted by haha | July 1, 2009 1:40 PM
> By the way, I want to salute the thousands and thousands
> of brave soccer fans who venture to the game tonight even though
> PGE Park is currently inadequate for a soccer match.
Those used to large events at PGE Park (Women's WC, etc) are telling me to eat and pee before the game b/c it will be impossible to do during the match.
They have had to turn away 1000s of paying customers due to not having enough seating.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 1:41 PM
They have had to turn away 1000s of paying customers
Another bogus assertion from clowns in scarves. That number comes from where, exactly?
And don't equate a once-in-a-while match against archrival Seattle with what they'll draw routinely in a regular season. If the league survives, that is.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 1, 2009 1:46 PM
I've given up on posting assurtions on this blog, I stick to the facts.
My estimate is based on only 400 "standing-room" tickets available for walk-ups (normally 1000s sold). Evidence from Ticketbastard sales velocity also supports more demand than supply.
Your projection of dismal attendance figures for MLS2011 however, is 100% an unchallenged, uncritizied assertion. So be careful where you throws those rocks, that wall over there looks awfully see-thru.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 1:53 PM
My estimate is based on only 400 "standing-room" tickets available for walk-ups (normally 1000s sold).
That's not "turning away thousands of paying customers," Gene.
Your projection of dismal attendance figures for MLS2011
Did I do that? No. As usual, Gene, you are living in your little fantasy world. Keep going, though. You make my case well.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 1, 2009 2:01 PM
"Your projection of dismal attendance figures for MLS2011 however, is 100% an unchallenged, uncritizied assertion."
Oh, I don't know outside of Seattle and Toronto, the whole MLS is on a downhill slope attendance-wise.
With this no-bid at least we know how Paulson can fund his part of it thru kickbacks now.
Posted by Steve | July 1, 2009 2:10 PM
Let me try to break this down.
1) Let's say normally 2,500 tickets sold via walk-ups.
2) Only 400 available
3) That's 2,100 more tickets that could have been sold!
That combined with the fact that Ticketmaster only had single seats available 1-2 days before kick off, and rapidly sold even those off the last day, means that there was lots of folks trying to buy tickets that could not. A conservative estimate would be about 2000, but a seasoned ticket flipper put it at closer to 4k.
Refute my point if you can, but "fantasy world" doesn't cut it. Especially when you have suddenly forgot your assertions that MLS will be going under in a few years, low attendance will kill the bond payback, etc etc.
I don't mind going back and forth with a little snark but if you seriously want to discuss this issue then do it, quit throwing bombs and convince someone that already hasn't made up their mind. I'm not certain this blog has done that yet.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 2:13 PM
Gene - How would you compare to the other exhibition match against Club America a oouple of weeks back that drew a raging 5000 people.
I mean so what, you get all worked up about playing Seattle when Seattle really doesn't give a whit about Portland.
Avg attendance for the Timbers is less than 10K.
"a seasoned ticket flipper"
You must be kidding me.
Posted by Steve | July 1, 2009 2:20 PM
Gene, there is no bond payback by Paulson. That is one of the main problems with the Paulson deal. If Paulson is selling so many tickets, then he should pay for his facility, not the taxpayers.
Posted by JerryB | July 1, 2009 2:29 PM
> Oh, I don't know outside of Seattle
> and Toronto, the whole MLS is on a
> downhill slope attendance-wise.
From the analysis that I've seen, professional sports attendance is down nationwide. Despite that national trend, Seattle is selling out and Portland has MLS-size crowds at their USL games.
In my opinion it's a waste of time for the other side to even focus on attendance questions. Initial funding, long-term performance of the league, political issues, all of these are valid concerns (even for me, believe it or not!) but noise like "Mayor Creepy" and "Lord Paulson" and construction companies paying off the Timbers Army drowns out most of this site's signal.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 2:30 PM
"it's a waste of time for the other side to even focus on attendance questions."
Um, how did you expect Mr Paulson to pay back all the money CoP is lending him?
"long-term performance of the league"
Well, this is round 3 (NASL - FAIL, USL - FAIL, MLS - ?)
Posted by Steve | July 1, 2009 2:34 PM
How would you compare to the other exhibition match against Club America a oouple of weeks back that drew a raging 5000 people.
Since you asked: I would compare it by saying it was an exhibition against a club no one cares about, advertised poorly, and still managed to do pretty well for an exhibition.
This Seattle game is much closer to what we could expect for the high end of regular season MLS attendance. Play off games and top-level exhibitions will be even higher.
> I mean so what, you get all worked up
> about playing Seattle when Seattle
> really doesn't give a whit about
> Portland.
I know this is rhetorical statement but I just can't help highlighting how obvious it is that this is a deeply personal thing for most of you. But in case you are actually interested in reality you can google "ECS" or Emerald City Supporters and see how very, very serious they are taking us.
> Avg attendance for the Timbers is less
> than 10K.
This is kinda comical in that you are trying to disparage a very good ave attendance for USL.
>> "a seasoned ticket flipper"
> You must be kidding me.
You know all those people trying to buy/sell tickets at events? Believe it or not they actually do it to make money, not for charity. (I know!) Some of them are very good at estimating event demand.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 2:38 PM
>> "it's a waste of time for the other
>> side to even focus on attendance
>> questions."
> Um, how did you expect Mr Paulson to pay
> back all the money CoP is lending him?
I mean that it's a valid point, but a losing argument. If attendance was the only question re: MLS in Portland we would already have a team.
>>"long-term performance of the league"
> Well, this is round 3 (NASL - FAIL, USL
> - FAIL, MLS - ?)
Your ignorance is showing again. The tiniest bit of research will show you how NASL died (think Enron and the Rolling Stone concert).
USL is alive and kicking, tho a weird league that depends soley on franchise fees from what I can tell.
MLS? Who knows. So far it's still peaking though. Time will tell if the fan growth will match the team expansion in 2011.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 2:43 PM
Good government? This is GREAT government.
Great for Paulson...
Great for construction companies...
Great for union tradesmen...
Great for Sam/Randy's re-election...
Great for lobbyists...
Great for soccer fans...
Taxpayers got screwed good. Then they get to realize the true cost of these subsidies when Paulson's LLC fails to meet their obligations.
Posted by Mister Tee | July 1, 2009 2:57 PM
Let the sun shine, let the sun shine, let the sun shine it.... (sing along now).... and this is why sunshine laws and such are good... PDX is getting more crooked than a lazy river in CT
Posted by LucsAdvo | July 1, 2009 3:01 PM
"USL is alive and kicking, tho a weird league that depends soley on franchise fees from what I can tell."
Hey, what do you think Garber's plan is to keep MLS alive? He charges Paulson $35M, makes Randy/Sam jump thru hoops to keep him happy and then hopes/prays the next Ponzi victim will pay $50M to fund the 11 out of 14 money-losers.
Posted by Steve | July 1, 2009 3:07 PM
Portland has MLS-size crowds at their USL games.
Really? Then we really are doomed:
Thursday, April 30, 2009 - 8,549
Saturday, May 02, 2009 - 6,742
Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 7,566
Saturday, May 30, 2009 - 9,081
Sunday, May 31, 2009 - 5,017
Thursday, June 04, 2009 - 6,427
Friday, June 19, 2009 - 8,111
Sunday, June 28, 2009 - 7,783
Posted by Jack Bog | July 1, 2009 5:00 PM
When the UO arena(no-bid contract) opens in Eugene I hope you will consider posting a attend-ometer for that for the first season.
I love how people deflect legitimate criticism of unscrupulous practices by pointing out that you didn't scream bloody murder when someone else (in another city) did it previously.
No bid contracts on huge public projects are an indicia of graft. No one should qualify for one of them if there is any indication that they may have used money/bribes/contributions etc., to influence the award.
Until we put something in place to clean things up, we'll be living in the world of political pay-to-play.
Posted by PanchoPDX | July 1, 2009 5:46 PM
The lies continue.
Posted by none | July 1, 2009 6:07 PM
Genie,
If the Timbers are currently drawing "MLS size crowds," then how does Paulson think he will make a go of it in two years, when the Timbers are actual members of the MLS? And if he can't, what chance do the other teams have once the league stops subsidizing itself with "expansion team fees?"
Is something going to change between now and then to boost attendance? Are the Raiders and Yankees are going to switch to soccer? If not, you're just relying on soccer itself as the selling point. Not likely to happen.
Posted by Mike (the other one) | July 1, 2009 7:14 PM
To add insult to injury-- they are all out of towners-- the architect, the contractor, the program manager. Not a lick of business for Portland's "creative class" nor relief for the highest unemployment in the nation, a lot of which is in this sector. Anybody have a clothespin I can borrow for my nose-- I'm getting tired of holding it every time I read about this project.
Posted by Eastport | July 1, 2009 9:15 PM
I think we're talking past each other. If the USL Timbers get MLS crowds *or better* then that's a good sign right? So better-than-MLS is even better? Anyway...
Thought I would post to say that no, the bathroom and concessions situation wasn't out-of-control. PGE handled 17K just fine.
Just to be fair.
Posted by Gene | July 1, 2009 10:21 PM
So big of you.
And what about the field surface? It is soooooo terrible! You can't play soccer on it! Another lie.
There is no need to remodel PGE Park for soccer. It is a fool's errand to satisfy a handful of rich guys' appetites for money and power. The Timbers fans are the pawns.
Nice new portable stands, share the stadium with the baseball team. If that's not good enough for the Timbers, then there should be no deal. But then Fireman Randy wouldn't be such the darling of the construction boys, now, would he?
Posted by Jack Bog | July 2, 2009 3:12 AM
If MLS is on the brink of collapse, then why is it expanding so rapidly? Seattle this year, Philadelphia next year, and Vancouver and Portland (or Montreal?) the year after that. Am I giving these new owners too much credit by assuming they have kicked the tires before they hand over that franchise fee?
Posted by Ben | July 2, 2009 5:34 AM
Ben,
Look how long it took investors to figure out Bernie Madoff's scheme. Owners who are in the first few rounds will easily recover their entry fees during the next round of expansion.
Posted by Mike (the other one) | July 2, 2009 6:37 AM
Pancho PDX, I think you missed my point. My point was that the crowds will not fill the new arena in Eugene-it is going to fail. Too big and bad timing. I was also criticizing that it was also a no-bid contract deal. All these sport stadium partnership deals are turkeys. Politicians get bribed so they will approve them. So, I think you were off in thinking I was deflecting anything. The UO arena is going to fail and the Ducks will continue their historic series of losses.
Posted by conspiracyzach | July 2, 2009 7:18 AM
If you would like to read the official rationale the Oregon University System gave for making the UO project a no-bid contract use Google with these keywords: ellerbe beckett ous sole source.
Posted by conspiracyzach | July 2, 2009 7:25 AM