This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 23, 2009 9:51 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Rip (Off) City.
The next post in this blog is Major development.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
A number of streetcar alignments have been looked at in the past, but the ones that will be included in the study are the Willamette shore line, and two hybrids which mix use of the shore line with Southwest Macadam Avenue in Portland. Hybrid 1 would share the outside lanes of Macadam with cars, while Hybrid 2 would use the outside lanes for a southbound route and construct a separate lane for the northbound streetcar and cars making right turns.
You'll never get home.
Comments (20)
Streetcars on narrow, hilly 43 / Macadam? That sounds like an obviuosly bad idea. Seems like you'd hardly need to do a study to determine the Bus only option is the way to go. Of course, that means the steering committee will probably recommend streetcars. Whatever the recommendation, do you think the folks in Dunthorpe will get things to go the way they want?
I used to commute down 43 morning and afternoon through LO. I don't recall seeing anyone waiting for the bus except maids, gardeners, and the occasional aux pair. It would be interesting to get an actual head count on LO residents who would use a street car much less bus for anything other than a weekend trip to the Pearl. I for one, would prefer to be wafted into town in my S500.
Feels like Groundhog Day in Green City USA. Which are the ten or twenty bridges most likely to fail in Oregon ? If they were more well known these streetcars and the claimed effect on the global temperature might get a little harder to sell.
Anecdotally, as a Lake Oswego resident who lives on the west end of town and thus would not use the streetcar or Line 35 bus, I know of several "affluent" Lake Oswego and West Linn residents who use Route 35 to commute to downtown. The maids, gardeners and occasional aux pairs are presumably those in Dunthorpe itself.
Since Highway 43 and Macadam are already pretty full with cars, I don't think either a streetcar or an express bus is the way to go. Using the old railway line seems to be the only change from the status quo that has long-term promise.
But it would be very expensive to retrofit that old line, and I have my doubts that it is worth the cost.
They need to build this anomalous part of the streetcar line to convince the feds that the purpose of the Portland streetcar system really is to transport people (not to develop real estate). If the feds ever change what they look at to make this determination, look for this project to get dropped immediately.
Most of the proposed streetcar line will run along the existing rail right of way where the trolley runs in the summer. Other than the portion at the north end, it will be completely separate from Macadam. Come on Bojack, site an original source:
Aaron, you're wrong about the proposed trolley line location at the critical lengths along the line. Most of Macadam's congestion occurs north of Sellwood Bridge all the way to it's merging with Front Ave. The portion through Johns Landing has the trolley right in the middle of Macadam where there is now major backups. That would be a mistake.
Also, the trolley location isn't a fixed plan, several alignments are being discussed. In fact, the trolley should be put to a vote since there is a disagreement that it's ridership would meet the standards for any federal subsidies, or even a good investment for the ridership it may have. In fact, the trolley is not a forgone conclusion, but it is in the eyes of the Planners.
Furthermore, its astounding that little, real public input has been generated for this issue. Sure, there's a committee of a few and a few public meetings with maybe 20 people showing up. But that is not public input when there is over 5000 residents and 8000 working in the north end; 2500 between there and Lake Oswego, and all the citizens of Lake Oswego and beyond.
And is it wise to expend the money now on the trolley which generally has little density potential; is along the Willamette where only one side of line can feed people to the line?
And what happens to the zoning of Johns Landing that was fought for over a decade by the neighborhood association that limited FAR and heights so that views to the river could be maintained, that density would not be too great to flood the very narrow strip of streets (three to five blocks width from the river to the steep, unbuildable hills right up to I-5? So much for zoning, so much for a neighborhood, just more height now limited to 35 ft along Macadam to maybe 100 ft.
MAX to Lake O? I'm all for it. Look what MAX did for the crime rates in Beaverton and Hillsboro. Maybe someone will actually listen when the Lake-O set cries that MAX is just a vehicle to transport,distribute and give the criminal element a larger playing field with easier pickings in the suburbs. After it's built Lake Oswegans will wake up and realize they are suddenly in the gritty, real world. EEk Gads.
Jack, you're right about Macadam being only north of Sellwood Bridge, and called as such. It's State Hwy 43 to the south.
And have you noticed on any of the radio stations that give updated traffic reports how often SW Macadam is mentioned? Backups, time to travel to the Sellwood Bridge, wrecks.....it's one of the most mentioned traffic problem streets of Portland.
So the answer is to put 5 mph trolleys on it with a stop every four blocks to totally cause chaos.Then every one will take mass transit to Lake Oswego and West Linn.
Lee, you've been at the meetings where they spout nutty estimates that tens of thousands of riders will use the streetcar each day to and from Lake O. For some unknown reason, they talk about this line like it's completely different than the rest of the streetcar lines. This streetcar will travel 45 mph, and will be packed with passengers morning, noon, and night. It's the line that will magically transform the rest of the system from a development project into a transportation project worthy of hundreds of millions in federal subsidies.
Yes, anon, I've been to a few of those meetings. It like when PDOT's Matt Brown said there will be 40% transit ridership in SoWhat. What???? Then, when you politely question this unheard of high number, he answers, "Well, we have an independent study that shows that it is achievable". Of course the study was paid for by PDOT seeking that outcome, even though the metro area only has 5% mass transit usage.
With this mindset that is how the trolley planners come up ridiculous ridership numbers. It would be great to have the feds analysis how Portland hasn't produced the real numbers Portland has projected to extract money from the feds.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (20)
Streetcars on narrow, hilly 43 / Macadam? That sounds like an obviuosly bad idea. Seems like you'd hardly need to do a study to determine the Bus only option is the way to go. Of course, that means the steering committee will probably recommend streetcars. Whatever the recommendation, do you think the folks in Dunthorpe will get things to go the way they want?
Posted by dg | July 23, 2009 11:56 AM
Didnt this come up a while back when they wanted to use the old freight line along the river?
Posted by Jon | July 23, 2009 12:21 PM
I used to commute down 43 morning and afternoon through LO. I don't recall seeing anyone waiting for the bus except maids, gardeners, and the occasional aux pair. It would be interesting to get an actual head count on LO residents who would use a street car much less bus for anything other than a weekend trip to the Pearl. I for one, would prefer to be wafted into town in my S500.
Posted by Dean | July 23, 2009 12:41 PM
Feels like Groundhog Day in Green City USA. Which are the ten or twenty bridges most likely to fail in Oregon ? If they were more well known these streetcars and the claimed effect on the global temperature might get a little harder to sell.
Posted by conspiracyzach | July 23, 2009 12:48 PM
Anecdotally, as a Lake Oswego resident who lives on the west end of town and thus would not use the streetcar or Line 35 bus, I know of several "affluent" Lake Oswego and West Linn residents who use Route 35 to commute to downtown. The maids, gardeners and occasional aux pairs are presumably those in Dunthorpe itself.
Since Highway 43 and Macadam are already pretty full with cars, I don't think either a streetcar or an express bus is the way to go. Using the old railway line seems to be the only change from the status quo that has long-term promise.
But it would be very expensive to retrofit that old line, and I have my doubts that it is worth the cost.
Posted by Gordon | July 23, 2009 1:03 PM
Boy am I ever happy that I finally moved away from Portland (and the metro area). The 'uber' stupidity continues to astound me.
Posted by Thank God | July 23, 2009 1:15 PM
They need to build this anomalous part of the streetcar line to convince the feds that the purpose of the Portland streetcar system really is to transport people (not to develop real estate). If the feds ever change what they look at to make this determination, look for this project to get dropped immediately.
Posted by anonymous | July 23, 2009 2:19 PM
Most of the proposed streetcar line will run along the existing rail right of way where the trolley runs in the summer. Other than the portion at the north end, it will be completely separate from Macadam. Come on Bojack, site an original source:
http://www.metro-region.org/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=227
Posted by Aaron | July 23, 2009 3:24 PM
So will this get me to Lake Oswego faster than if I walked there?
Posted by Ryan | July 23, 2009 3:25 PM
site an original source
it's "cite."
Thanks for the link. For fiction, I prefer Kindle.
Any streetcar on Macadam, anywhere north of the Sellwood Bridge, is pure stupidity.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 23, 2009 3:47 PM
Any streetcar on Macadam, anywhere north of the Sellwood Bridge, is pure stupidity.
If you'd said "south", I'd have agreed with you.
Posted by Max | July 23, 2009 5:24 PM
If it's insane it's likely to come about.
Posted by Ben | July 23, 2009 6:46 PM
Aaron, you're wrong about the proposed trolley line location at the critical lengths along the line. Most of Macadam's congestion occurs north of Sellwood Bridge all the way to it's merging with Front Ave. The portion through Johns Landing has the trolley right in the middle of Macadam where there is now major backups. That would be a mistake.
Also, the trolley location isn't a fixed plan, several alignments are being discussed. In fact, the trolley should be put to a vote since there is a disagreement that it's ridership would meet the standards for any federal subsidies, or even a good investment for the ridership it may have. In fact, the trolley is not a forgone conclusion, but it is in the eyes of the Planners.
Furthermore, its astounding that little, real public input has been generated for this issue. Sure, there's a committee of a few and a few public meetings with maybe 20 people showing up. But that is not public input when there is over 5000 residents and 8000 working in the north end; 2500 between there and Lake Oswego, and all the citizens of Lake Oswego and beyond.
And is it wise to expend the money now on the trolley which generally has little density potential; is along the Willamette where only one side of line can feed people to the line?
And what happens to the zoning of Johns Landing that was fought for over a decade by the neighborhood association that limited FAR and heights so that views to the river could be maintained, that density would not be too great to flood the very narrow strip of streets (three to five blocks width from the river to the steep, unbuildable hills right up to I-5? So much for zoning, so much for a neighborhood, just more height now limited to 35 ft along Macadam to maybe 100 ft.
Damn neighborhoods, trolleys are the future.
Posted by Lee | July 23, 2009 9:37 PM
If you'd said "south", I'd have agreed with you.
Is it even called Macadam south of the bridge?
Posted by Jack Bog | July 23, 2009 10:29 PM
Why not a water taxi service on the river from Ore City to downtown? No congestion and kinda fun.
Posted by tom | July 23, 2009 10:41 PM
And what happens to the zoning of Johns Landing that was fought for over a decade by the neighborhood association...
I believe the aerial tram gives a resounding answer to that question.
Posted by john rettig | July 23, 2009 11:26 PM
MAX to Lake O? I'm all for it. Look what MAX did for the crime rates in Beaverton and Hillsboro. Maybe someone will actually listen when the Lake-O set cries that MAX is just a vehicle to transport,distribute and give the criminal element a larger playing field with easier pickings in the suburbs. After it's built Lake Oswegans will wake up and realize they are suddenly in the gritty, real world. EEk Gads.
Posted by RANZ | July 24, 2009 10:51 AM
Jack, you're right about Macadam being only north of Sellwood Bridge, and called as such. It's State Hwy 43 to the south.
And have you noticed on any of the radio stations that give updated traffic reports how often SW Macadam is mentioned? Backups, time to travel to the Sellwood Bridge, wrecks.....it's one of the most mentioned traffic problem streets of Portland.
So the answer is to put 5 mph trolleys on it with a stop every four blocks to totally cause chaos.Then every one will take mass transit to Lake Oswego and West Linn.
Posted by Lee | July 24, 2009 10:53 AM
Lee, you've been at the meetings where they spout nutty estimates that tens of thousands of riders will use the streetcar each day to and from Lake O. For some unknown reason, they talk about this line like it's completely different than the rest of the streetcar lines. This streetcar will travel 45 mph, and will be packed with passengers morning, noon, and night. It's the line that will magically transform the rest of the system from a development project into a transportation project worthy of hundreds of millions in federal subsidies.
Posted by anonymous | July 24, 2009 1:36 PM
Yes, anon, I've been to a few of those meetings. It like when PDOT's Matt Brown said there will be 40% transit ridership in SoWhat. What???? Then, when you politely question this unheard of high number, he answers, "Well, we have an independent study that shows that it is achievable". Of course the study was paid for by PDOT seeking that outcome, even though the metro area only has 5% mass transit usage.
With this mindset that is how the trolley planners come up ridiculous ridership numbers. It would be great to have the feds analysis how Portland hasn't produced the real numbers Portland has projected to extract money from the feds.
Posted by Lee | July 24, 2009 10:43 PM