The discussion about Gitmo in the media is insanely juvenile and naive. I keep hearing senators say they don't want these prisoners in their back yards. Do these terrorist suspects pack some sort of superhuman strength or radioactive quality that provides a means to break out of a high-security prison? And if keeping them imprisoned stateside isn't an option, don't we have other military bases around the globe?
And what the hell do we need Guantanamo for anyway? It's not our island, and we sanction its existence... It's Cuba's, for gods sake, give it back. We can "protect" the Caribbean from the cozy confines of mainland Florida... what, a couple hundred miles away?
We all have made it a hobby to gripe about government spending, but the most bloated pig at the collective teat, our military industrial complex, is somehow a sacred cow. Anyone who dares ask to scale it back is accused of not keeping the country safe. At some point (now, perhaps?) we'll need to put our money where our mouth is.
I was surprised recently to see Gates defend the move of terrorists to super-max facilities in the US. He said there had never been an escape from one of those facilities and described those opposing such a move as fear mongers.
Earth to Gates...it's not that they will escape, it is the concern about influencing other inmates currently in the system. Note the four accused conspirators just arrested in NY, a few of whom were recent graduates of the state prison system.
OK, even if that is not a good enough reason to keep these creeps at Gitmo, Wapato is the last place the feds will ever use. The restrictions and regulations signed over to the neighborhood by Mult Co would likely prevent housing a mischievous pet there.
"...it is the concern about influencing other inmates currently in the system."
That's another talking point bandied about by pols. But really, isn't this problem easily solved by keeping them separate? It would be cheaper than keeping a military base open...
"Note the four accused conspirators just arrested in NY, a few of whom were recent graduates of the state prisonon system."
Isn't one out of every 20 males between 18-25 years old a graduate of a state or federal penitentiary?
Besides I don't see why some goat herder who was in the wrong place at the wrong time needs to exposed to our prison system. Realistically its probably safer for them in Gitmo.
If you want to see a real *turrurist* look in the mirror, Gibby.
Multnomah County is the second to last place they would try to relocate GITMO prisoners (next door to Senator Feinstein's home in California is the last). Wapato's neighborhood agreements could be renegotiated, but the NIMBY opposition to Supermax would be insurmountable and the correctional officer's union would be bouncing off the walls unless they were guaranteed first crack at the new jobs.
Supermax facilities are designed to preclude all contact with other prisoners. They have limited contact with prison staff, and (from what I've read) are only permitted one hour/day outside their cell (if at all).
Wapato was designed as a drug treatment facility/medium security prison with lots of common areas. It would be cheaper to build a new Supermax facility than try and convert Wapato.
That said, there are plenty of drug addicts committing assaults, robberies, i.d. thefts, and drug crimes that would be most comfortable in Wapato. If Ted Wheeler ever finds a way to fund it.
If he can't, he should sell/lease it to a private prison operator who can fill it up with contract prisoners. A rustbelt state eager for construction spending and federal wages/pensions would be the more likely recipient if a new facility is needed. I would guess Michigan, Ohio, or Pennsylvania.
"Supermax facilities are designed to preclude all contact with other prisoners. They have limited contact with prison staff, and (from what I've read) are only permitted one hour/day outside their cell (if at all)."
And this is more humane treatment than they are receiving at GITMO how?!
Good question, Butch! There's a strong argument that solitary confinement in a Supermax prison is torture. There just isn't a satisfactory solution to the problem that was created with these detentions.
Hey, they're suicide bombers right. So just pack em full of c4 & send em back to their comrades. Sheesh - problem solved.
Oh, yeah, I forgot, you know those drone pilots workin the airways from their beach cabanas in Diego? They just hit Craigs List with employment ads for "Chief Remote Detonators", must have wii experience.
Unrelated - Mello scores 36- over/under. Go Nuggets.
The Unabomber (Theodore John Kaczynski), the Oklahoma City bomber (Terry Nichols), and the 20th Hijacker (Zacarias Moussaoui) are all Supermax Prisoners.
The former bosses of the Mexican and Columbian drug cartels, the Aryan Brotherhood, Nuestra Familia, a few mafiosos, plus assorted serial killers, terrorists, hijackers, ans Sr. Javier Vásquez Velasco (who tortured/murdered DEA Agent Kiki Camarena).
It would be a crying shame if these inmates couldn't get a decent burger, play some volleyball, and hug their families during visiting hours. Many of them even maintain their innocence. No reason to think they're not telling the truth: certainly they shouldn't be tortured by living in isolation.
I dunno, I dont think the NIMBY people are worried about these guys escaping. I think they are more worried about their buddies coming to rescue them. And I am not all that confident that a bunch of prison guards will be able to keep that from happening. And lets face, we all know that they can get into the country undetected.
Arent there a few "private" prisons? Maybe send them there. And dont some of the conspiracy folks rant about these "FEMA" prisons hidden somewhere in the midwest? If those exist, maybe send them there.
Leave GITMO open....then send about 1/2 of those jokers in Washington DC there for some time to reflect on what they have done to this country. Let them out in a year and then send the other half of them there.
It would be a crying shame if these inmates couldn't get a decent burger, play some volleyball, and hug their families during visiting hours.
I agree. let's not be better than them--let's be *worse* than them.
because after all, society only becomes better by living and acting as its worst members. so, whatever mass murderers and terrorists do, we should do. only then will crime be deterred.
right?
I mean, look at how waterboarding has made us safer in the world. case in point.
or invading Afghanistan--just look at how much crime, terrorism, and murder have gone down in the past seven years. it's wonderful.
At least it is phoenetically correct: loo-sez. It is also one of the most common misspellings in English.
SDB,
I believe you may judge a society on how it treats the most vulnerable members of that society.
But the SuperMax Prisoners are not the most vulnerable, they are the most dangerous. If you are going to oppose the death penalty, then you need a way to supervise these most dangerous inmates without putting their jailor's lives in jeopardy and while minimizing the opportunity for escape. SuperMax (while arguably inhumane) achieves both objectives.
I heartily endorse waterboarding for the three guys who endured it: too bad they survived.
Its about allowing activist judges have a crack at them.
I know, right? like that new conservative chief justice, basically saying he wanted to overturn Roe v Wade. talk about activist judge! And here I thought he was supposed to be impartial. stupid activist judge.
As soon as they are on US soil the Fed Gov looses control.
I know, right? I mean, who the heck wants to have to endure the US justice system! And its conservative activist judges!
"Actually two of those three guys was released because it turns out they really were a carpet salesman and personal fitness coach respectively."
Which sounds like something Jeanne Garofolo told Larry King. But hearing Jeanne Garofolo say it doesn't make it so.
I reiterate: if Yuan believes that an innocent carpet salesman and a personal fitness coach were waterboarded by the CIA, then he needs to provide a citation or reference to substantiate his claim.
Otherwise, the reader may assume he's making it up.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (24)
I like it. As long as the Feds pay the rack rate and we don't let anybody from Community Corrections serve them methadone with their tea.
That $1.1 million worth of public art has gone unnoticed for too long.
Bonus: they speak Klingon!
Posted by Mister Tee | May 23, 2009 11:55 AM
Sure, why not? This state needs the money.
The discussion about Gitmo in the media is insanely juvenile and naive. I keep hearing senators say they don't want these prisoners in their back yards. Do these terrorist suspects pack some sort of superhuman strength or radioactive quality that provides a means to break out of a high-security prison? And if keeping them imprisoned stateside isn't an option, don't we have other military bases around the globe?
And what the hell do we need Guantanamo for anyway? It's not our island, and we sanction its existence... It's Cuba's, for gods sake, give it back. We can "protect" the Caribbean from the cozy confines of mainland Florida... what, a couple hundred miles away?
We all have made it a hobby to gripe about government spending, but the most bloated pig at the collective teat, our military industrial complex, is somehow a sacred cow. Anyone who dares ask to scale it back is accused of not keeping the country safe. At some point (now, perhaps?) we'll need to put our money where our mouth is.
Posted by TKrueg | May 23, 2009 12:14 PM
I was surprised recently to see Gates defend the move of terrorists to super-max facilities in the US. He said there had never been an escape from one of those facilities and described those opposing such a move as fear mongers.
Earth to Gates...it's not that they will escape, it is the concern about influencing other inmates currently in the system. Note the four accused conspirators just arrested in NY, a few of whom were recent graduates of the state prison system.
OK, even if that is not a good enough reason to keep these creeps at Gitmo, Wapato is the last place the feds will ever use. The restrictions and regulations signed over to the neighborhood by Mult Co would likely prevent housing a mischievous pet there.
Posted by Gibby | May 23, 2009 12:22 PM
"...it is the concern about influencing other inmates currently in the system."
That's another talking point bandied about by pols. But really, isn't this problem easily solved by keeping them separate? It would be cheaper than keeping a military base open...
Posted by TKrueg | May 23, 2009 1:40 PM
"Note the four accused conspirators just arrested in NY, a few of whom were recent graduates of the state prisonon system."
Isn't one out of every 20 males between 18-25 years old a graduate of a state or federal penitentiary?
Besides I don't see why some goat herder who was in the wrong place at the wrong time needs to exposed to our prison system. Realistically its probably safer for them in Gitmo.
If you want to see a real *turrurist* look in the mirror, Gibby.
Posted by Yuan | May 23, 2009 1:41 PM
Don't we already have 50 +/- of them in the supermax in CO?
Posted by mp97303 | May 23, 2009 1:48 PM
Gibby,
Multnomah County is the second to last place they would try to relocate GITMO prisoners (next door to Senator Feinstein's home in California is the last). Wapato's neighborhood agreements could be renegotiated, but the NIMBY opposition to Supermax would be insurmountable and the correctional officer's union would be bouncing off the walls unless they were guaranteed first crack at the new jobs.
Supermax facilities are designed to preclude all contact with other prisoners. They have limited contact with prison staff, and (from what I've read) are only permitted one hour/day outside their cell (if at all).
Wapato was designed as a drug treatment facility/medium security prison with lots of common areas. It would be cheaper to build a new Supermax facility than try and convert Wapato.
That said, there are plenty of drug addicts committing assaults, robberies, i.d. thefts, and drug crimes that would be most comfortable in Wapato. If Ted Wheeler ever finds a way to fund it.
If he can't, he should sell/lease it to a private prison operator who can fill it up with contract prisoners. A rustbelt state eager for construction spending and federal wages/pensions would be the more likely recipient if a new facility is needed. I would guess Michigan, Ohio, or Pennsylvania.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 23, 2009 1:57 PM
"Supermax facilities are designed to preclude all contact with other prisoners. They have limited contact with prison staff, and (from what I've read) are only permitted one hour/day outside their cell (if at all)."
And this is more humane treatment than they are receiving at GITMO how?!
Posted by butch | May 23, 2009 3:21 PM
Good question, Butch! There's a strong argument that solitary confinement in a Supermax prison is torture. There just isn't a satisfactory solution to the problem that was created with these detentions.
Posted by Allan L. | May 23, 2009 4:15 PM
Hey, they're suicide bombers right. So just pack em full of c4 & send em back to their comrades. Sheesh - problem solved.
Oh, yeah, I forgot, you know those drone pilots workin the airways from their beach cabanas in Diego? They just hit Craigs List with employment ads for "Chief Remote Detonators", must have wii experience.
Unrelated - Mello scores 36- over/under. Go Nuggets.
Posted by genop | May 23, 2009 5:16 PM
Allan has a point,
The Unabomber (Theodore John Kaczynski), the Oklahoma City bomber (Terry Nichols), and the 20th Hijacker (Zacarias Moussaoui) are all Supermax Prisoners.
The former bosses of the Mexican and Columbian drug cartels, the Aryan Brotherhood, Nuestra Familia, a few mafiosos, plus assorted serial killers, terrorists, hijackers, ans Sr. Javier Vásquez Velasco (who tortured/murdered DEA Agent Kiki Camarena).
It would be a crying shame if these inmates couldn't get a decent burger, play some volleyball, and hug their families during visiting hours. Many of them even maintain their innocence. No reason to think they're not telling the truth: certainly they shouldn't be tortured by living in isolation.
Right?
Posted by Mister Tee | May 23, 2009 5:38 PM
I dunno, I dont think the NIMBY people are worried about these guys escaping. I think they are more worried about their buddies coming to rescue them. And I am not all that confident that a bunch of prison guards will be able to keep that from happening. And lets face, we all know that they can get into the country undetected.
Arent there a few "private" prisons? Maybe send them there. And dont some of the conspiracy folks rant about these "FEMA" prisons hidden somewhere in the midwest? If those exist, maybe send them there.
Posted by Jon | May 23, 2009 5:52 PM
Leave GITMO open....then send about 1/2 of those jokers in Washington DC there for some time to reflect on what they have done to this country. Let them out in a year and then send the other half of them there.
Posted by conspiracyzach | May 23, 2009 6:26 PM
It would be a crying shame if these inmates couldn't get a decent burger, play some volleyball, and hug their families during visiting hours.
I agree. let's not be better than them--let's be *worse* than them.
because after all, society only becomes better by living and acting as its worst members. so, whatever mass murderers and terrorists do, we should do. only then will crime be deterred.
right?
I mean, look at how waterboarding has made us safer in the world. case in point.
or invading Afghanistan--just look at how much crime, terrorism, and murder have gone down in the past seven years. it's wonderful.
Posted by Sucking down Belgians | May 23, 2009 7:11 PM
It isn't about NIMBY or security.
Its about allowing activist judges have a crack at them.
As soon as they are on US soil the Fed Gov looses control.
Posted by dman | May 23, 2009 7:28 PM
Loses. Loses control.
The activist judges know how to spell. Work on it.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2009 9:11 PM
At least it is phoenetically correct: loo-sez. It is also one of the most common misspellings in English.
SDB,
I believe you may judge a society on how it treats the most vulnerable members of that society.
But the SuperMax Prisoners are not the most vulnerable, they are the most dangerous. If you are going to oppose the death penalty, then you need a way to supervise these most dangerous inmates without putting their jailor's lives in jeopardy and while minimizing the opportunity for escape. SuperMax (while arguably inhumane) achieves both objectives.
I heartily endorse waterboarding for the three guys who endured it: too bad they survived.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 24, 2009 4:03 AM
"I heartily endorse waterboarding for the three guys who endured it: too bad they survived."
Actually two of those three guys was released because it turns out they really were a carpet salesman and personal fitness coach respectively.
Posted by Yuan | May 24, 2009 9:09 AM
was = were
Posted by Yuan | May 24, 2009 9:10 AM
"Actually two of those three guys were released because it turns out..."
Citation please.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 24, 2009 9:49 AM
Its about allowing activist judges have a crack at them.
I know, right? like that new conservative chief justice, basically saying he wanted to overturn Roe v Wade. talk about activist judge! And here I thought he was supposed to be impartial. stupid activist judge.
As soon as they are on US soil the Fed Gov looses control.
I know, right? I mean, who the heck wants to have to endure the US justice system! And its conservative activist judges!
Posted by Sucking down Belgians | May 24, 2009 8:35 PM
You have blood on your hands, Mr. Tee.
"Out, damn'd spot! out, I say! One, two, why, then
'tis time to do't. Hell is murky."
Posted by Yuan | May 25, 2009 11:16 AM
Yuan wrote,
"Actually two of those three guys was released because it turns out they really were a carpet salesman and personal fitness coach respectively."
Which sounds like something Jeanne Garofolo told Larry King. But hearing Jeanne Garofolo say it doesn't make it so.
I reiterate: if Yuan believes that an innocent carpet salesman and a personal fitness coach were waterboarded by the CIA, then he needs to provide a citation or reference to substantiate his claim.
Otherwise, the reader may assume he's making it up.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 26, 2009 6:49 AM
Step aside Montana
Posted by AmberZ | May 26, 2009 10:35 AM