The next Portland "urban renewal" disaster: the Rose Quarter
It couldn't be plainer. The mayor of Kansas City is warning Portland not to take on a Cordish "entertainment district" in the Rose Quarter unless it is willing to, as O reporter Ted Sickinger puts it, "hemorrhage public money." Between the dubious and predatory business model and Cordish's "reputation for hardball negotiating and tin-eared community relations," the city should be laughing the Blazers brass right out of City Hall with this one. If I owned a restaurant or a bar within two miles of the Rose Quarter, I'd be screaming bloody murder about it. But of course, the stupider it sounds, the more the city commissioners like it, and so we can look forward to heapin' helpin's of tax excrement financing and all sorts of other gyrations trying to make it happen.
And you can bet it will be "green" and "sustainable" development -- LEED super-platinum! That will get the sheep into the pen for the shearing a whole lot quicker.
Comments (26)
I'm a numbers guy and the article had several that stood out. Revenues 84% less than expected. (where have we seen that before) Reserve gone in 1st year and General Fund had to pony up 4+ million. Projected General Fund contribution this year is 7 - 10 million. Sounds like another Tram or SAP to me.
What would make me want to go to the Rose Quarter, where parking is a hassle, in order to sit in a chain restaurant and eat mediocre food; when I can stay in my neighborhood (Hawthorne / Division) or go to one of the others (Albina / N. Mississippi comes to mind) where I can obtain better service, better product, at a cheaper price AND not have my tax dollars utterly wasted?
Answer this question satisfactorily and I'm on board.
I'm puzzled. Is Portland facing a void in its late night entertainment options that can only be filled by a subsidized "entertainment district?"
This is something in which I can't even see the supposed benefit. Even if it was built, wouldn't it just take business from other parts of the city?
Excellent points. Imagine what N. Mississippi (my old neighborhood) would be like now if the city had anchored the street with a Hard Rock Cafe and a Senor Frogs. Shudder!
Obviously what Kansas City needs is a headquarters hotel for its convention center which would ensure plenty of business for the entertainment district. Someone should tell them.
why has it become the norm for government to subsidize business??? When did our leaders start becoming such suckers and falling for horrible, money-wasting, but flashy plans? I really don't get it. My lord, the mayor in the city where there people last preyed is telling us not to do it. How stupid do we have to be to not listen? Oy, my blood pressure is rising.
C'mon people, you just know Randy and Sam can do this waaaaay better than any other politician. Your appalling lack of faith in their skills is upsetting.
How about we just let entertainment districts form organically like NW 23rd, SE Hawthorne, N Mississippi and NE Alberta - all of which, surprisingly enough, required absolutely no planning or interference from the city.
Unless, of course, you want another bang-up job like Sammy's doing to downtown businesses.
I guess since the Burnside Bridge head is still an empty lot, "the powers that still be" feel compelled to build something, anything, anywhere, just to waste our money. I am guessing that there is very little if any neighborhood association activity in that area of Portland so the potential for citizen opposition is minimal.
Warning to small business owners; be careful if you oppose this. The big boys can play nasty and rough.
I love putting two quotes from the article side by side. Here's the Mayor of Kansas City talking about the project: "It's never going to make money. I can't imagine how it could make money."
Here's one of our people: "Interesting, it appears to be successful here," said Tom Miller, chief of staff for Mayor Sam Adams. "But if you want to cookie-cutter it and drop it into Portland, it will fail."
So our people look, but do not see. Then they have the audacity to warn that a similar project here in Portland could fail unless they put their own special stamp on it.
Then it hits me all over again: Success is not the goal. That's a real world pursuit. This is about a success in their minds. This is about things that appear successful long enough to point to and say, "See, there's our vision."
Who cares if the masses flock to it? Who cares if the city has to raid the general fund? How are mere citizens supposed to understand the greatness that goes on in these people's heads?
Backers are promising a "uniquely Portland" development. Will it include:
Brew pubs? Sure, but out of state chains to compete with the local, independent ones; pubs to sell inferior brews to people who don't know the difference but want to have the brew pub experience.
Food cart corral? No way.
Whimsical bike racks? Probably not.
Dress code? Most likely. In Kansas City the dress code banned caps worn backwards, chains or necklaces worn by men, untucked shirts, white T-shirts, work boots and long, baggy clothing. The city council responded last month by passing a dress code ordinance for businesses given city tax abatements or incentives. The ban is now limited to no work boots or flip flops, no undershirts and no sports attire in certain businesses. What will it be in Portland? No bike shoes? No facial piercings? No facial tats? No pink, purple, green or other unnaturally-hued hair?
Those junkie politicians and local mega-CofC types are confusing vision with hallucination. The public has to quit supplying them with the monies and offices that they use to support that habit.
They're so infatuated (or is it saturated) with the rush that swirls around the art of seduction, that whatever rationality they may have once possessed is tragically impaired, if not permanently damaged.
What a bunch of narcissistic knuckleheads and smarmy thieves.
Your city's been stolen from you. Take it back. Quit playing monty with them. Change the game. The Recall should be just for starters.
The multiple failures of Urban Renewal schemes in the Portland region is in fact the failure of our planning which insists we much continue subsidizing the mixed use/ high density Centers and Corridors approach that continually fails.
,they're trying to trumpet the beauty of our land use planning as if it's all coming together.
It's pure insanity and Metro et al are beyond help.
South Waterfront, the ultimate fiscal mess and boondoggle that Metro land use planning spawns, should have been a final lesson and a genesis for turning in a new direction.
Not hardly.
In stark contrast to reality, Metro has released an executive summary of a report yet to be written, that calls for much more of the same "successes" their "Centers and Corridors" have been.
The inability for the public at large to grasp what is happening dooms us to be repeating the SoWa, Beaverton Round, Cascade Station, Convention Center schemes for another decade or two.
Dress code? Most likely. In Kansas City the dress code banned caps worn backwards, chains or necklaces worn by men, untucked shirts, white T-shirts, work boots and long, baggy clothing. The city council responded last month by passing a dress code ordinance for businesses given city tax abatements or incentives. The ban is now limited to no work boots or flip flops, no undershirts and no sports attire in certain businesses. What will it be in Portland? No bike shoes? No facial piercings? No facial tats? No pink, purple, green or other unnaturally-hued hair?
Are you kidding? This is Portland...with a dress code like that how would they get any staff to run the place?
Great book on the many techniques used to peddle nonsense like this. Think of it as an inoculation against the real Swine Flu -- grifters making you sick by robbing you blind.
If there is a live entertainment district and it does have a dress code, some group will probably organize a "uniquely Portland" naked bike ride around the edge of the district in protest, during peak business hours of course.
hey can we put this cordish thingee in SOWA , it's empty too. It's got a streecar to nowhere already.... maybe some hookers can fill homer's condo
see-thru towers.
When I saw the Kansas City pictures it reminded me of Back to the Future II when Biff Tannen took over the town. Or maybe Potterville, in It's a Wonderful Life.
If I wanted to live in Atlantic City, I'd move there.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (26)
I'm a numbers guy and the article had several that stood out. Revenues 84% less than expected. (where have we seen that before) Reserve gone in 1st year and General Fund had to pony up 4+ million. Projected General Fund contribution this year is 7 - 10 million. Sounds like another Tram or SAP to me.
Posted by pdxmick | May 12, 2009 6:45 AM
Politicians are good at finding votes and selling snake oil, but have never been good at finding a profit in things commercial.
Posted by David E Gilmore | May 12, 2009 7:28 AM
My question about this "entertainment district":
What would make me want to go to the Rose Quarter, where parking is a hassle, in order to sit in a chain restaurant and eat mediocre food; when I can stay in my neighborhood (Hawthorne / Division) or go to one of the others (Albina / N. Mississippi comes to mind) where I can obtain better service, better product, at a cheaper price AND not have my tax dollars utterly wasted?
Answer this question satisfactorily and I'm on board.
Posted by MachineShedFred | May 12, 2009 7:31 AM
I'm puzzled. Is Portland facing a void in its late night entertainment options that can only be filled by a subsidized "entertainment district?"
This is something in which I can't even see the supposed benefit. Even if it was built, wouldn't it just take business from other parts of the city?
Posted by Al in SE Portland | May 12, 2009 7:56 AM
MachineShedFred -
Excellent points. Imagine what N. Mississippi (my old neighborhood) would be like now if the city had anchored the street with a Hard Rock Cafe and a Senor Frogs. Shudder!
Posted by Scott | May 12, 2009 8:13 AM
Obviously what Kansas City needs is a headquarters hotel for its convention center which would ensure plenty of business for the entertainment district. Someone should tell them.
Posted by Walter Freeman | May 12, 2009 8:15 AM
why has it become the norm for government to subsidize business??? When did our leaders start becoming such suckers and falling for horrible, money-wasting, but flashy plans? I really don't get it. My lord, the mayor in the city where there people last preyed is telling us not to do it. How stupid do we have to be to not listen? Oy, my blood pressure is rising.
Posted by M | May 12, 2009 8:21 AM
C'mon people, you just know Randy and Sam can do this waaaaay better than any other politician. Your appalling lack of faith in their skills is upsetting.
How about we just let entertainment districts form organically like NW 23rd, SE Hawthorne, N Mississippi and NE Alberta - all of which, surprisingly enough, required absolutely no planning or interference from the city.
Unless, of course, you want another bang-up job like Sammy's doing to downtown businesses.
Posted by Steve | May 12, 2009 8:44 AM
I guess since the Burnside Bridge head is still an empty lot, "the powers that still be" feel compelled to build something, anything, anywhere, just to waste our money. I am guessing that there is very little if any neighborhood association activity in that area of Portland so the potential for citizen opposition is minimal.
Warning to small business owners; be careful if you oppose this. The big boys can play nasty and rough.
Posted by portland native | May 12, 2009 9:09 AM
I love putting two quotes from the article side by side. Here's the Mayor of Kansas City talking about the project: "It's never going to make money. I can't imagine how it could make money."
Here's one of our people: "Interesting, it appears to be successful here," said Tom Miller, chief of staff for Mayor Sam Adams. "But if you want to cookie-cutter it and drop it into Portland, it will fail."
So our people look, but do not see. Then they have the audacity to warn that a similar project here in Portland could fail unless they put their own special stamp on it.
Then it hits me all over again: Success is not the goal. That's a real world pursuit. This is about a success in their minds. This is about things that appear successful long enough to point to and say, "See, there's our vision."
Who cares if the masses flock to it? Who cares if the city has to raid the general fund? How are mere citizens supposed to understand the greatness that goes on in these people's heads?
Posted by Bill McDonald | May 12, 2009 9:20 AM
Backers are promising a "uniquely Portland" development. Will it include:
Brew pubs? Sure, but out of state chains to compete with the local, independent ones; pubs to sell inferior brews to people who don't know the difference but want to have the brew pub experience.
Food cart corral? No way.
Whimsical bike racks? Probably not.
Dress code? Most likely. In Kansas City the dress code banned caps worn backwards, chains or necklaces worn by men, untucked shirts, white T-shirts, work boots and long, baggy clothing. The city council responded last month by passing a dress code ordinance for businesses given city tax abatements or incentives. The ban is now limited to no work boots or flip flops, no undershirts and no sports attire in certain businesses. What will it be in Portland? No bike shoes? No facial piercings? No facial tats? No pink, purple, green or other unnaturally-hued hair?
Posted by A Hopeful | May 12, 2009 9:43 AM
Bill McDonald for Mayor of Portland!
Posted by portland native | May 12, 2009 9:45 AM
Those junkie politicians and local mega-CofC types are confusing vision with hallucination. The public has to quit supplying them with the monies and offices that they use to support that habit.
They're so infatuated (or is it saturated) with the rush that swirls around the art of seduction, that whatever rationality they may have once possessed is tragically impaired, if not permanently damaged.
What a bunch of narcissistic knuckleheads and smarmy thieves.
Your city's been stolen from you. Take it back. Quit playing monty with them. Change the game. The Recall should be just for starters.
Posted by Mojo | May 12, 2009 9:49 AM
Now we need a CoP employee recall ordinance for Tom Miller and a slew of others.
Posted by lw | May 12, 2009 9:49 AM
This is getting looney.
The multiple failures of Urban Renewal schemes in the Portland region is in fact the failure of our planning which insists we much continue subsidizing the mixed use/ high density Centers and Corridors approach that continually fails.
The widespread recognition that these Urban Renewal schemes are corrupted boondoggle makers while at the same time remaining loyal to the central planning fantasy is irrational.
Yet over at BlueOregon,
http://www.blueoregon.com/2009/05/portland-livability-and-land-use.html#comments
,they're trying to trumpet the beauty of our land use planning as if it's all coming together.
It's pure insanity and Metro et al are beyond help.
South Waterfront, the ultimate fiscal mess and boondoggle that Metro land use planning spawns, should have been a final lesson and a genesis for turning in a new direction.
Not hardly.
In stark contrast to reality, Metro has released an executive summary of a report yet to be written, that calls for much more of the same "successes" their "Centers and Corridors" have been.
The inability for the public at large to grasp what is happening dooms us to be repeating the SoWa, Beaverton Round, Cascade Station, Convention Center schemes for another decade or two.
Posted by Ben | May 12, 2009 10:01 AM
I think Bill would make a great mayor. No offense, cc.
Posted by Jim | May 12, 2009 10:01 AM
Dress code? Most likely. In Kansas City the dress code banned caps worn backwards, chains or necklaces worn by men, untucked shirts, white T-shirts, work boots and long, baggy clothing. The city council responded last month by passing a dress code ordinance for businesses given city tax abatements or incentives. The ban is now limited to no work boots or flip flops, no undershirts and no sports attire in certain businesses. What will it be in Portland? No bike shoes? No facial piercings? No facial tats? No pink, purple, green or other unnaturally-hued hair?
Are you kidding? This is Portland...with a dress code like that how would they get any staff to run the place?
Posted by Jon | May 12, 2009 10:18 AM
I want to take this opportunity to remind people to check out "The Great American Jobs Scam" (available at Powells):
http://www.powells.com/biblio?show=HARDCOVER:USED:9781576753156:9.95
Great book on the many techniques used to peddle nonsense like this. Think of it as an inoculation against the real Swine Flu -- grifters making you sick by robbing you blind.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | May 12, 2009 10:19 AM
"narcissistic knuckleheads"
Perfect!
Posted by David E Gilmore | May 12, 2009 10:37 AM
If there is a live entertainment district and it does have a dress code, some group will probably organize a "uniquely Portland" naked bike ride around the edge of the district in protest, during peak business hours of course.
Posted by A Hopeful | May 12, 2009 10:41 AM
If I owned a restaurant or a bar within two miles of the Rose Quarter, I'd be screaming bloody murder about it.
With Fireman Pelé on the council? LOL, as the kids say. You might as well write a letter requesting daily fire inspections for the next decade.
Posted by Dave J. | May 12, 2009 10:58 AM
Imagine the impact if any of this energy and public funding was used to do things that were actually good for the community?
Posted by dyspeptic | May 12, 2009 11:48 AM
Tax excrement financing. Priceless.
Posted by Bill Holmer | May 12, 2009 12:54 PM
hey can we put this cordish thingee in SOWA , it's empty too. It's got a streecar to nowhere already.... maybe some hookers can fill homer's condo
see-thru towers.
Posted by billb | May 12, 2009 2:25 PM
When I saw the Kansas City pictures it reminded me of Back to the Future II when Biff Tannen took over the town. Or maybe Potterville, in It's a Wonderful Life.
If I wanted to live in Atlantic City, I'd move there.
Posted by NW Portlander | May 12, 2009 2:49 PM
Tax excrement financing. Priceless.
That one also came courtesy of Bill McDonald.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 12, 2009 4:31 PM