With 62 days to go before a formal recall effort against Portland's mayor can begin, the state's criminal investigation into his sexual relationship with a teenaged boy -- and possibly other, related matters -- continues. It's been going on for more than three months. What is taking so long?
Certainly it doesn't take more than three months to collect all the evidence about what went on, in the City Hall men's room and elsewhere, between the mayor and his underage or barely legal boyfriend. Is the investigation expanding into more issues? Is the announcement of the outcome being timed for tactical advantage?
Certainly Attorney General John Kroger is a politically savvy fellow, with ambitions beyond his current, already lofty office. It does not seem likely that he would bring a he-said-he-said case against the mayor, or litigate the issue of whether tongue-kissing alone is "sex." Regardless of the criminal statutes, however, he could write a scathing report on various mayoral misdeeds that would be eminently quotable in a TV recall campaign ad.
It's stunning that Kroger already holds the power of political life and death over the mayor of Portland. It will be interesting indeed to see what he does with it, and when.
Comments (15)
Has it occurred to anyone else that Creepy wouldn't go quietly and has let people know that?
I mean there's no telling what he could spill if he faces a successful career ending recall and get pissed.
It's entirely plausible, in this naysayers opinion, that Creepy has let it be known that he better have enough support to remain, or he'll be taking down a few others and the web they enjoy as he leaves.
Some of those threatened by the idea of a Creepy loose cannon may be well connected to Kroger and others.
Easy it would be for them to pitch to Kroger the need to avoid a collapse of the stabilizing power structure during these unstable economic times.
It would then so seem like the right thing to do.
For the taxpaying public's own good.
And in this regard, maybe Creepy is too big to fail?
I think when push comes to shove people with money won't cross Adams and his defense will be much better funded than the recall effort. Sucky but true.
While you wait and listen to the "Jeopardy" theme play on a constant loop, for some insight read Chapter Five of "Convictions" by John Kroger: "The Human Factor"
An excerpt:
"To this day I have no idea whether or not I made the right decision in Dora's case. I will always be glad that I began my career by erring, if err I did, on the side of trust, compassion, and empathy. I am also sure, however, that if I had faced the same case years later, after hearing hundreds of defendants tell bullshit stories, I almost certainly would have indicted her.
You may be on to something, but I am hoping that Kroger will see that we need the web, which I once heard as a house of cards held together with crazy glue, to collapse, in order to even speak about some of the worst systematic problems in the state. I feel confident Kroger is smart enough to move beyond the role of "player" fairly quickly. I think the public will love him more as an intellectual super hero.
I think they are all tied to the Goldschmidt cabal, and he is waiting orders. Nobody gets elected to higher office in this city/state without the "gold" blessing.
Chicago-- Would that be a bad thing if he took more fools down with him? Portland politics are a complete mess and a national joke. I wouldn't mind an overhaul of City Hall.
Lets talk reality here, Kroger nails Sam...we get Randy.
Then the nightmare continues,what a F-BOMB,for us all then..140,000 Dollar crappers, Merritt/MSL/ hotels we can't fill for maybe three years/ bigger union control...SAM HAS TO BE RECALLED, there must be a message sent or, we really then can only complain here, and never get a pothole filled on Holgate.
On OPB's "Think Out Loud" the other morning, Kroger was asked a couple of times about the investigation (at the end of the episode). After giving the usual spiel about being "tight-lipped" on criminal investigations and wanting to do a "very thorough" investigation when asked when the investigation would wrap up, the host summarized some questions about protocols on potential conflicts of interest (mentioning a shared political consultant). He said he didn't think he had a conflict.
He wouldn't even comment about whether he was directly involved in the investigation, which just seems fishy.
"He wouldn't even comment about whether he was directly involved in the investigation, which just seems fishy."
I'm not so sure. He can't very well answer some questions about the investigation and not answer others; if he does, the absence of an answer in and of itself becomes revealing.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 32
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
Has it occurred to anyone else that Creepy wouldn't go quietly and has let people know that?
I mean there's no telling what he could spill if he faces a successful career ending recall and get pissed.
It's entirely plausible, in this naysayers opinion, that Creepy has let it be known that he better have enough support to remain, or he'll be taking down a few others and the web they enjoy as he leaves.
Some of those threatened by the idea of a Creepy loose cannon may be well connected to Kroger and others.
Easy it would be for them to pitch to Kroger the need to avoid a collapse of the stabilizing power structure during these unstable economic times.
It would then so seem like the right thing to do.
For the taxpaying public's own good.
And in this regard, maybe Creepy is too big to fail?
Posted by Chicago, Oregon | April 29, 2009 5:45 PM
I think when push comes to shove people with money won't cross Adams and his defense will be much better funded than the recall effort. Sucky but true.
Posted by Snards | April 29, 2009 6:07 PM
A government of men or laws?
Posted by Mister Tee | April 29, 2009 6:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYYczqJZjFg
Posted by Brian Morisky | April 29, 2009 7:08 PM
I voted for Mr Kroger, sad to say I have lost all hope in his pursuing the mis-deeds of your mayor.
Posted by Jerry | April 29, 2009 8:13 PM
The answer might be here (scroll down to paragraph 2). Or not.
http://wweek.com/editorial/3524/12477/
Posted by A Hopeful | April 29, 2009 8:51 PM
Nah.
Posted by Jack Bog | April 29, 2009 8:56 PM
While you wait and listen to the "Jeopardy" theme play on a constant loop, for some insight read Chapter Five of "Convictions" by John Kroger: "The Human Factor"
An excerpt:
"To this day I have no idea whether or not I made the right decision in Dora's case. I will always be glad that I began my career by erring, if err I did, on the side of trust, compassion, and empathy. I am also sure, however, that if I had faced the same case years later, after hearing hundreds of defendants tell bullshit stories, I almost certainly would have indicted her.
Posted by Mojo | April 29, 2009 9:50 PM
Chicago,
You may be on to something, but I am hoping that Kroger will see that we need the web, which I once heard as a house of cards held together with crazy glue, to collapse, in order to even speak about some of the worst systematic problems in the state. I feel confident Kroger is smart enough to move beyond the role of "player" fairly quickly. I think the public will love him more as an intellectual super hero.
Posted by Cynthia | April 29, 2009 9:55 PM
I think they are all tied to the Goldschmidt cabal, and he is waiting orders. Nobody gets elected to higher office in this city/state without the "gold" blessing.
Posted by Jon | April 29, 2009 10:24 PM
Chicago-- Would that be a bad thing if he took more fools down with him? Portland politics are a complete mess and a national joke. I wouldn't mind an overhaul of City Hall.
Posted by Brian | April 30, 2009 6:10 AM
#1
Lets talk reality here, Kroger nails Sam...we get Randy.
Then the nightmare continues,what a F-BOMB,for us all then..140,000 Dollar crappers, Merritt/MSL/ hotels we can't fill for maybe three years/ bigger union control...SAM HAS TO BE RECALLED, there must be a message sent or, we really then can only complain here, and never get a pothole filled on Holgate.
Posted by Jack Peek | April 30, 2009 9:15 AM
On OPB's "Think Out Loud" the other morning, Kroger was asked a couple of times about the investigation (at the end of the episode). After giving the usual spiel about being "tight-lipped" on criminal investigations and wanting to do a "very thorough" investigation when asked when the investigation would wrap up, the host summarized some questions about protocols on potential conflicts of interest (mentioning a shared political consultant). He said he didn't think he had a conflict.
He wouldn't even comment about whether he was directly involved in the investigation, which just seems fishy.
Posted by darrelplant | April 30, 2009 10:40 AM
"He wouldn't even comment about whether he was directly involved in the investigation, which just seems fishy."
I'm not so sure. He can't very well answer some questions about the investigation and not answer others; if he does, the absence of an answer in and of itself becomes revealing.
Posted by John | April 30, 2009 8:44 PM
And now for more on the story:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2009/04/mayor_sam_adams_beau_breedlove.html
Posted by PDX Native | May 1, 2009 12:59 AM