Save your screen -- swallow beverage fully before reading
Portland's mayor, Sam the Tram, suddenly says that he's fed up with all the "cheap, ugly housing" that's being built in town. It appears he's more partial to the expensive, ugly housing that his developer masters tend to favor. There's a problem, though, that the mayor apparently isn't noticing -- the expensive stuff isn't selling any more. And so if you want the almighty "density" and "infill," cheap and ugly is pretty much all that's left.
For a Portland official to use the word "ugly" when referring to the Soviet-style human warehouses that the city planning army demands is refreshing. Alas, it's accompanied by the ever-present lie:
Metro estimates that around 300,000 new housing units must be built in the metropolitan area in coming decades to accommodate the new people projected to move here. Portland has historically taken a disproportionately large percent of the new residents, and Adams does not expect that to change even if SB 907 does not pass.
As has been noted on this blog time and again, the City of Portland's population has grown in recent years at an annual rate of approximately 1.3 percent. The metropolitan area's population has grown at an annual rate of about 1.7 percent. Portland has not been taking more than a proportionate share of the population growth.
But thanks to our fearless local politicians, it has built more than its fair share of ugly housing. Nothing can stop those Hoffman Construction cranes when they're hungry. Go by streetcar!
Comments (14)
So they:
1)want to encourage developers to tear down the single-family homes in my neighborhood and put in triplexes. (That's what my zoning is designed to do.)
2) And they cry no end about the lack of affordable housing.
But they don't want "cheap, ugly housing."
Then how about an emergency "down-zone" of my formerly single family neighborhood? That would encourage more quality housing.
If you want affordable housing, expand the UGB and allow more traditional suburban housing to be built. It's an inconvenient truth....
Housing is kept artificially expensive by our revered land use system. Then we have to subsidize new affordable projects to the tune of tens of thousands per unit.
"... accommodate the new people projected to move here."
NO!
Change the projection. The projection's basis is detached from empirical changes in reality.
I think that the 'main' of the baseline was established in 40-year forecasts extended from 1985 trend numbers -- but,
1) some 'minor' parts and some forecasts have been updated, inconsequentially however, in such respects as the 1990 and/or 2000 censusses (censi?) yet with new skewed margins added in those data, and
2) my facile figures (offhand) as "40-year" and "1985" can actually be 'fudged' plus-or-minus as a '30-' or '50-year' range extended from '1980' or '2000' or in-between, or more or less, without altering the essence of my point that the multi-year process of stakeholder committees choosing and normalizing their base data matrix, finally, means that any forecasts by it are necessarily behind the curve (or obsolete) the instant they are issued formally.
In short: The literal future is NOT the figurative forecast.
* National (and world) population growth has slowed since 1990.
* Economic activity has shifted importantly since 1990, (most simplistically said: from manufacturing to service 'industry;' or said: from veritable bricks-and-mortar locations -to- virtual cyberspace anywhere and everywhere, and nowhere).
* Personal opportunity and quality of life is, since 1990, made more by age and attitude and less by longitude and latitude.
* People these days (and foreseen) don't physically re-locate as much as we psychologically re-orientate.
* There is less leverage advantage by regional disparity of real estate prices, so no more 'selling high' in inflated California, then 'buying in low' in deflated Oregon. Indeed, homes aren't selling anywhere and hardly anyone can afford (if they can find) financing to buy 'somewhere else.' (A prime example of recent reality we know and live in, being 5 or 10 years ahead of the most recent out-of-date 'projections.')
* Adult children are moving back in (or never left) living with their parents (now approaching retirement, or in it).
And surely each of us can add personal experience and knowledge to the list of how things have changed in reality, since the projections' baselines were adopted, (whether 1985 or 1995 or 2005). CHANGE the PROJECTION of Portland's housing demand, and supply, for 2010 (or 2020 or 2030 ....)
In fact, today (post-Bush) we can discard or at least discount every socio-demographic 'projection' derived from pre-Bushbutchery. The normalized sociology now is over the top, beneath contempt, and off the chart. Perverse is the new normal. There's no centerline 'middle class' human values between the polarized population extremes.
On the other hand, the latest 10- or 20-year digitized base data, and trend projections, are an order of magnitude, (or two or three, i.e., 10 to 1000) times veritably more accurate concerning inanimate physical phenomena and developments, such as the planet's remaining petroleum, atmosphere (and therefor climate) dynamics, sea level, polar ice amounts, (rain) forest extents, fresh water measures, food farming capacity, and the dollar denomination of China's ownership of America.
I gotta point out: The proposed development at 33rd and Broadway is significantly better looking then the Albina wasteland that exists today. You can argue about how much better, but you can't honestly claim it's worse.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (14)
So they:
1)want to encourage developers to tear down the single-family homes in my neighborhood and put in triplexes. (That's what my zoning is designed to do.)
2) And they cry no end about the lack of affordable housing.
But they don't want "cheap, ugly housing."
Then how about an emergency "down-zone" of my formerly single family neighborhood? That would encourage more quality housing.
If you want affordable housing, expand the UGB and allow more traditional suburban housing to be built. It's an inconvenient truth....
Housing is kept artificially expensive by our revered land use system. Then we have to subsidize new affordable projects to the tune of tens of thousands per unit.
Posted by Snards | April 13, 2009 1:40 PM
"For a Portland official to use the word "ugly" when referring to the Soviet-style human warehouses that the city planning army demands is refreshing"
Thank you so much for this comment. Amen. Thank you.
Posted by D | April 13, 2009 2:25 PM
Jack
Did you create the graphic above? And if so, what is the name of the font you used for the headline. Thanks.
Mike
Posted by mp97303 | April 13, 2009 2:41 PM
"... accommodate the new people projected to move here."
NO!
Change the projection. The projection's basis is detached from empirical changes in reality.
I think that the 'main' of the baseline was established in 40-year forecasts extended from 1985 trend numbers -- but,
1) some 'minor' parts and some forecasts have been updated, inconsequentially however, in such respects as the 1990 and/or 2000 censusses (censi?) yet with new skewed margins added in those data, and
2) my facile figures (offhand) as "40-year" and "1985" can actually be 'fudged' plus-or-minus as a '30-' or '50-year' range extended from '1980' or '2000' or in-between, or more or less, without altering the essence of my point that the multi-year process of stakeholder committees choosing and normalizing their base data matrix, finally, means that any forecasts by it are necessarily behind the curve (or obsolete) the instant they are issued formally.
In short: The literal future is NOT the figurative forecast.
* National (and world) population growth has slowed since 1990.
* Economic activity has shifted importantly since 1990, (most simplistically said: from manufacturing to service 'industry;' or said: from veritable bricks-and-mortar locations -to- virtual cyberspace anywhere and everywhere, and nowhere).
* Personal opportunity and quality of life is, since 1990, made more by age and attitude and less by longitude and latitude.
* People these days (and foreseen) don't physically re-locate as much as we psychologically re-orientate.
* There is less leverage advantage by regional disparity of real estate prices, so no more 'selling high' in inflated California, then 'buying in low' in deflated Oregon. Indeed, homes aren't selling anywhere and hardly anyone can afford (if they can find) financing to buy 'somewhere else.' (A prime example of recent reality we know and live in, being 5 or 10 years ahead of the most recent out-of-date 'projections.')
* Adult children are moving back in (or never left) living with their parents (now approaching retirement, or in it).
And surely each of us can add personal experience and knowledge to the list of how things have changed in reality, since the projections' baselines were adopted, (whether 1985 or 1995 or 2005). CHANGE the PROJECTION of Portland's housing demand, and supply, for 2010 (or 2020 or 2030 ....)
In fact, today (post-Bush) we can discard or at least discount every socio-demographic 'projection' derived from pre-Bushbutchery. The normalized sociology now is over the top, beneath contempt, and off the chart. Perverse is the new normal. There's no centerline 'middle class' human values between the polarized population extremes.
On the other hand, the latest 10- or 20-year digitized base data, and trend projections, are an order of magnitude, (or two or three, i.e., 10 to 1000) times veritably more accurate concerning inanimate physical phenomena and developments, such as the planet's remaining petroleum, atmosphere (and therefor climate) dynamics, sea level, polar ice amounts, (rain) forest extents, fresh water measures, food farming capacity, and the dollar denomination of China's ownership of America.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | April 13, 2009 3:38 PM
I gotta point out: The proposed development at 33rd and Broadway is significantly better looking then the Albina wasteland that exists today. You can argue about how much better, but you can't honestly claim it's worse.
Posted by BJC | April 13, 2009 8:09 PM
Tensky,
That last sentence hurt.
Posted by Ben | April 13, 2009 9:44 PM
Just ditch the UGB...it is whats keeping housing prices artificially high. The City of Portland and METRO must be stopped!
Posted by WestsideGuy | April 13, 2009 11:55 PM
Just ditch the UGB...METRO must be stopped!
Now, you can't have both. Which is it you are advocating?
Posted by john rettig | April 14, 2009 12:11 AM
Mike: The font is Creepy Regular:
http://www.hauntedillinois.com/fonts.php
Posted by Jack Bog | April 14, 2009 1:33 AM
I know what Mayor Pedo is thinking: Little pink houses for you and me. (Sincere apologies to John Mellencamp.)
Posted by RJBob | April 14, 2009 9:06 AM
Creepy Regular? Could there be a better-named font for any Sam Adams-related communication? Maybe Creepy Extra Bold.
Posted by RJBob | April 14, 2009 9:12 AM
Jack
Thx for the link
Mike
Posted by mp97303 | April 14, 2009 12:27 PM
Looks more like extra-bold creepy dingbat sans (morals) to me.
Posted by veiledorchid | April 14, 2009 3:13 PM
"Portland's mayor, Sam the Tram, suddenly says that he's fed up with all the cheap, ugly housing that's being built in town".
I'd like a second opinion on the matter. How about Randy Gragg...
Posted by MJ | April 15, 2009 12:52 PM