Nothing gets our b.s. meter heated up faster than a mailer from the City of Portland or the Port of Portland. So imagine how off the charts it went when we recently got this one -- a joint mailer from both!
Oh boy, another "important discussion." We missed it. But what's it really about?
Hey, this is the Port of Portland talking. No surprise: The "plan" is to cut down those trees, chase away the wildlife, and install some more cranes to sit idle waiting for new shipments of cars that no one can sell at the moment. Or hey, how about another Ikea? And don't overlook the condo possibilities!
"Green, sustainable" Portland -- the word "hypocrisy" gets tossed around on the internet far too frequently, but in this case, it fits pretty well.
I love the black and white photo, and the angle showing all the "marine industrial" blight around the island. It screams, "This isn't worth it -- let us pave it!"
Here's a useful link to the Aubudon Society of Portland's website where the subject is addressed in greater depth and - once again - the pretense at hearings would appear to be smoke and mirrors:
"West Hayden Island is threatened by development. The Port of Portland took West Hayden Island under condemnation proceedings in 1992 for the purpose of building a giant 500-700 acre marine industrial complex. The Port is currently in the process of attempting to annex and rezone West Hayden Island to pave the way forward for this development. Audubon Society of Portland opposes this unnecessary destruction of critical wildlife habitat. Bob Sallinger is currently representing Audubon on a public advisory committee that will be reviewing the proposed annexation over an 18 month period extending from February 2009 through the spring of 2010.
"This is not the first time that the Port has initiated efforts to annex and rezone West Hayden Island."
When I first saw this photo and post, I automatically assumed there was a plan to build condos on Swan Island. Imagine my surprise when I read the word "cranes"...
Using all these recycled ideas for economic growth ought to count for something.
Honestly, I would prefer an LNG terminal. It would benefit consumers more than idle container facilities and millionaire longshoremen watching the clock.
Perhaps a good statement from the Port of Portland about how they expect lots more shipping cans or roll-on / roll-off cargo in the immediate future should preclude the chainsaws.
I believe we had a New York Times article linked here last week saying that the current cranes and RTGs idle more than they used to, and even roll/roll is down because no one is buying cars. Why the NY Times is reporting this before the Oregonian is beyond me, but that's what was linked...
Anyone on the Stevedores' scene want to enlighten us as to what is going down at the Port?
"" The City of Portland and Port of Portland worked with Portland State University’s Oregon Consensus Program to assess stakeholder needs and evaluate opportunities for a collaborative planning process...""
Preservation of this rare and precious area was considered a done deal for decades. All kinds of development was done protectively to respect that. What happened to "no net loss", which was a mantra in this town a few years ago. I don't remember a vote to get rid of it.
In my view, if the bureaucrats can short circuit the democratic process to bypass the public, it is time for the public to bypass the bureaucrats and go straight to the elected officials. The Port Board serves at the pleasure of Governor Ted Kulengoski. You can bet that this is not even on the table unless he's signed off on it. Call him today and tell him that squandering this unique remnant of the lower Columbia ecosystem is NOT ON THE TABLE.
Creating new habitat for endangered cranes....how $timulatingly greed -- er, green-ish.
Maybe they'll also toss some Willamette Valley grass seed into the asphalt and concrete cracks and add that up in terms of acreage. What the heck are they putting in that once-pure Bull Run water these daze?
Thanks for posting this, Jack. Special thanks to NW Portlander for the Audubon link!
Now back to my patent pending beta testing: an engine that runs on broken promises -- endless supply of fuel, highest milage in metro areas, near infinity around government installations, can time-travel from base on K Street.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (13)
Why do we need trees when we have green roofs?
Posted by A Hopeful | April 1, 2009 7:28 PM
I love the black and white photo, and the angle showing all the "marine industrial" blight around the island. It screams, "This isn't worth it -- let us pave it!"
Posted by Jack Bog | April 1, 2009 7:32 PM
How about a nice LNG terminal and storage facility?
Posted by Frank | April 1, 2009 8:03 PM
Here's a useful link to the Aubudon Society of Portland's website where the subject is addressed in greater depth and - once again - the pretense at hearings would appear to be smoke and mirrors:
http://www.audubonportland.org/issues/hayden
Here's an exerpt:
"West Hayden Island is threatened by development. The Port of Portland took West Hayden Island under condemnation proceedings in 1992 for the purpose of building a giant 500-700 acre marine industrial complex. The Port is currently in the process of attempting to annex and rezone West Hayden Island to pave the way forward for this development. Audubon Society of Portland opposes this unnecessary destruction of critical wildlife habitat. Bob Sallinger is currently representing Audubon on a public advisory committee that will be reviewing the proposed annexation over an 18 month period extending from February 2009 through the spring of 2010.
"This is not the first time that the Port has initiated efforts to annex and rezone West Hayden Island."
Posted by NW Portlander | April 1, 2009 9:17 PM
When I first saw this photo and post, I automatically assumed there was a plan to build condos on Swan Island. Imagine my surprise when I read the word "cranes"...
Posted by TKrueg | April 1, 2009 10:03 PM
Using all these recycled ideas for economic growth ought to count for something.
Honestly, I would prefer an LNG terminal. It would benefit consumers more than idle container facilities and millionaire longshoremen watching the clock.
Posted by Mister Tee | April 2, 2009 7:19 AM
Millionaire longshoremen? Tee, enlighten us with your anti-union screed.
Posted by TKrueg | April 2, 2009 9:46 AM
Perhaps a good statement from the Port of Portland about how they expect lots more shipping cans or roll-on / roll-off cargo in the immediate future should preclude the chainsaws.
I believe we had a New York Times article linked here last week saying that the current cranes and RTGs idle more than they used to, and even roll/roll is down because no one is buying cars. Why the NY Times is reporting this before the Oregonian is beyond me, but that's what was linked...
Anyone on the Stevedores' scene want to enlighten us as to what is going down at the Port?
Posted by MachineShedFred | April 2, 2009 10:21 AM
Based on the ability of Portland to lure long-term jobs, what exactly is PoP proposing to fill it with?
I guess the "build it and they will come" philospohy holds sway still.
I anticipate a zillion acres of razed earth with infrastructure and no jobs anyways.
Posted by Steve | April 2, 2009 11:23 AM
"" The City of Portland and Port of Portland worked with Portland State University’s Oregon Consensus Program to assess stakeholder needs and evaluate opportunities for a collaborative planning process...""
Sentences like that only give me a headache.
Posted by Dave | April 2, 2009 12:37 PM
Preservation of this rare and precious area was considered a done deal for decades. All kinds of development was done protectively to respect that. What happened to "no net loss", which was a mantra in this town a few years ago. I don't remember a vote to get rid of it.
In my view, if the bureaucrats can short circuit the democratic process to bypass the public, it is time for the public to bypass the bureaucrats and go straight to the elected officials. The Port Board serves at the pleasure of Governor Ted Kulengoski. You can bet that this is not even on the table unless he's signed off on it. Call him today and tell him that squandering this unique remnant of the lower Columbia ecosystem is NOT ON THE TABLE.
Posted by dyspeptic | April 2, 2009 12:53 PM
"Call him today and tell him that squandering this unique remnant of the lower Columbia ecosystem is NOT ON THE TABLE."
Would it do any good? They built 250-ft tall condos on the Willamette river bank in SoWa without a peep.
We've lost control of govt.
Posted by Steve | April 2, 2009 2:27 PM
Creating new habitat for endangered cranes....how $timulatingly greed -- er, green-ish.
Maybe they'll also toss some Willamette Valley grass seed into the asphalt and concrete cracks and add that up in terms of acreage. What the heck are they putting in that once-pure Bull Run water these daze?
Thanks for posting this, Jack. Special thanks to NW Portlander for the Audubon link!
Now back to my patent pending beta testing: an engine that runs on broken promises -- endless supply of fuel, highest milage in metro areas, near infinity around government installations, can time-travel from base on K Street.
Posted by Mojo | April 2, 2009 4:28 PM