Our troublemaker friend who's questioning whether anybody's riding the WES commuter train to Wislonville sends along another photo -- this one from the WES Tigard parking lot at 5 p.m. on Tuesday:
Comments (23)
Lighting looks about right for the time, but I can tell you that he is shooting from the far end of the parking lot, not that would make too much of a difference, since there only seem to be a few cars there.
First, 5pm is well after the first runs, so some cars are already gone from the lot.
Second, if you took the same shot looking south from the entrance, it would appear full.
How about numbers instead? Currently the lot is averaging 40 cars a day. The lot itself can only hold about one hundred cars. TriMet never anticipated high ridership here and only made the lot this large due to local pressure with fears that riders would be parking on city streets and thus impacting the local business community.
I went by this same lot at 4:15, there were just two more cars.
But I can tell you that this photo was not taken on Tuesday. There was a 50% blue sky at 5:00PM in Tigard. Also it is obvious where Alexander's 50 cars went; notice how the lot in the photo slopes down to the right, bottom corner-the lost 38 cars rolled down to the bottom right out of the picture.
Since the WES trains don't run during the middle of the day, why doesn't someone take a photo during their lunch hour? All of the morning riders cars will still be there since there haven't been any return trips, unless some WES riders are in the habit of riding into Beaverton at 6am and returning to Tigard by 9am.
I took the photo. It was 5:00 PM.
It had indeed clouded up.
Yeah sure there are some cars at the other end, by the train platform.
I pointed that out in the last pics.
So what?
Why would I take the pic from the other end and make the very few cars give a false impression the lot was full?
That's the kind of thing TriMet/Metro does with their propoganda.
If anyone has a beef with my pic angle you must really dislike what they tell you.
WES is a waste.
These pics and oousy ridership are demonstrative of the misrepresentation our planners, agencies and politicians use to advance boondoggles like this.
And even after they flop, by any genuine measurement of merit, they proceed with more of the same.
photographer: I only brought it up because it is fair to point out the perspective from which the photo is taken. This angle is beneficial to your point of view, whereas from the other end would be detrimental to your point of view. I don't really care one way or another so long as the train doesn't slow my morning commute. But, just because you took it doesn't mean there isn't some bias built in (conscious or subconscious). You have an agenda just like everybody else and it's important to be able to recognize the spin each person puts on their argument.
Those who ask why Tri-Met loves trains and hates busses don't see the big picture. Trains come with all those fancy planning and construction grants, and employ planners at HQ for years and years and years, and require lots and lots of consultants whi provide jobs later on in cvareer for lots of Tri Met employees. Trains also require a lot fewer operators per 100 passengers than buses do.
Trains are also "sexy". Busses are so last century.
Sarcasm mode "off".
Sadly, Tri Met really does not have much interest in opertaing a bus company, and more than a few of the directors have made that very clear.
My agenda is the truth.
TriMet's is not. They lied about WES from start to finish.
My perspective, however unrevealing of the few cars, aligns with the truth.
The ridership numbers are so low each rider calculates to cost around 270.00 each.
There is no benefit to this new line at all. It's just plain stupid.
Yet our bone headed planners and politicians, who do have a bias and agenda, lie about it's worth.
As a former homeowner in Tualatin, I testified at the Metro/TriMet/ODOT public comment meeting. It was clear from the almost complete lack of eye contact and the disinterested faces of the panel, that they were going to go ahead with this absurd BOONDOGLE no matter what the public said. It didn't really matter that I had the names of 30 homeowners from Wilsonville and Tualatin who said they had no real reason to ride this train EVER. Even the US DOT was very sceptical of TriMet's projected passenger numbers; but they built it anyway at huge cost. And we can see that it's a huge failure as far as moving any real numbers of passengers.
We can click our cameras any time of day....the only picture that will emerge is a consistent "no cars in the lot" and "no riders on WES".
Where is the outrage!!! The rail scam just rolls on....I-205.....Milwaukie.....streetcars. Quit electing these pathetic a...holes! Stop the F-ing insanity!
I'm not sold either way. I rode it the other day at about 9:30am and assumed it would be empty since it was after prime commuter hours and it was more than half full. What do the parking lot pictures prove? That people aren't driving to ride it?
Between each of those planter sets there are 14 spaces. Multiple it out. If you are standing on the end planter that you turn around at the bottom of the lot, looking north, all you are seeing are 42 empty spaces. If you're standing one planter north of the end, and those behind and out of frame are empty, that makes 56 spots empty.
Between each million TriMet wastes is the opportunity to provide better transit service to more people in more neighborhoods.
The incompetence and dishonesty that continues to perpetrate more of these rail transit boondoggles always has the defenders coming out of the woodwork with the gibberish.
I took WES on Tuesday, March 24, from Tualatin to Wilsonville, for reasons involving my commute that are somewhat unusual, and so they haven't been repeated. Anyway, the train each way was perhaps 2/3 full, and there seemed to be plenty of cars in the Wilsonville lot, and not as many in the Tualatin lot. I was pleasantly surprised that the train wasn't a "ghost town."
Also, it was faster than the SMART Wilsonville bus between Tualatin and Wilsonville, which winds around all over the place. It also gave some great views of the backs of Tualatin apartments, the edge of the Coffee Creek correctional facility, and a decrepit quarry/junk area somewhere between the two cities.
56 out of 103 spaces is a majority. You know, a majority in how having a majority in a chamber of legislature gives a political party dominance in agenda setting and procedures.
Of, but wait that does not apply to grown-up toy train tracks like the MAX in some peoples thinking. However, when it comes to issues like Gay Rights and Gay Marriage, then those same people who do not believe in majorities for disassembling grown-up toy train tracks are the ones screaming for their majority to ram it through.
I understand where some people are coming from. They want it both...Excuse me, ALL ways when it comes to their point of view. However, some people do their best in marginalizing and silencing the opposing point of view. Just like those good fascists Lenin, Stalin and every leader of the USSR.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 32
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (23)
Lighting looks about right for the time, but I can tell you that he is shooting from the far end of the parking lot, not that would make too much of a difference, since there only seem to be a few cars there.
Posted by jyah13 | April 9, 2009 9:56 AM
People do ride buses, though! Why don't they cut WES and maintain the bus service?
Posted by JC | April 9, 2009 10:16 AM
Clearly, this is the EXACT same photo that Governor Palin used back in May, to show that she...
Oh wait... wrong thread.
I'm totally amused by the "well, with this lighting, the photo was clearly take at 4:59 PM and NOT at 5" comments these sort of posts attract.
Posted by Markalope | April 9, 2009 11:27 AM
Obviously the problem is that all the workers who ride WES work the night shift. You just have to take your photo at the right time.
Posted by Darrin | April 9, 2009 11:30 AM
First, 5pm is well after the first runs, so some cars are already gone from the lot.
Second, if you took the same shot looking south from the entrance, it would appear full.
How about numbers instead? Currently the lot is averaging 40 cars a day. The lot itself can only hold about one hundred cars. TriMet never anticipated high ridership here and only made the lot this large due to local pressure with fears that riders would be parking on city streets and thus impacting the local business community.
Posted by Alexander | April 9, 2009 12:56 PM
I went by this same lot at 4:15, there were just two more cars.
But I can tell you that this photo was not taken on Tuesday. There was a 50% blue sky at 5:00PM in Tigard. Also it is obvious where Alexander's 50 cars went; notice how the lot in the photo slopes down to the right, bottom corner-the lost 38 cars rolled down to the bottom right out of the picture.
Posted by lw | April 9, 2009 1:35 PM
Sorry Alexander, I used 50 instead of your 40 cars.
Posted by lw | April 9, 2009 1:36 PM
Since the WES trains don't run during the middle of the day, why doesn't someone take a photo during their lunch hour? All of the morning riders cars will still be there since there haven't been any return trips, unless some WES riders are in the habit of riding into Beaverton at 6am and returning to Tigard by 9am.
Posted by Chad | April 9, 2009 2:06 PM
Hey,
I took the photo. It was 5:00 PM.
It had indeed clouded up.
Yeah sure there are some cars at the other end, by the train platform.
I pointed that out in the last pics.
So what?
Why would I take the pic from the other end and make the very few cars give a false impression the lot was full?
That's the kind of thing TriMet/Metro does with their propoganda.
If anyone has a beef with my pic angle you must really dislike what they tell you.
WES is a waste.
These pics and oousy ridership are demonstrative of the misrepresentation our planners, agencies and politicians use to advance boondoggles like this.
And even after they flop, by any genuine measurement of merit, they proceed with more of the same.
Posted by Photographer | April 9, 2009 2:54 PM
photographer: I only brought it up because it is fair to point out the perspective from which the photo is taken. This angle is beneficial to your point of view, whereas from the other end would be detrimental to your point of view. I don't really care one way or another so long as the train doesn't slow my morning commute. But, just because you took it doesn't mean there isn't some bias built in (conscious or subconscious). You have an agenda just like everybody else and it's important to be able to recognize the spin each person puts on their argument.
Posted by jyah13 | April 9, 2009 3:01 PM
Sarcasm mode "on".
Those who ask why Tri-Met loves trains and hates busses don't see the big picture. Trains come with all those fancy planning and construction grants, and employ planners at HQ for years and years and years, and require lots and lots of consultants whi provide jobs later on in cvareer for lots of Tri Met employees. Trains also require a lot fewer operators per 100 passengers than buses do.
Trains are also "sexy". Busses are so last century.
Sarcasm mode "off".
Sadly, Tri Met really does not have much interest in opertaing a bus company, and more than a few of the directors have made that very clear.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | April 9, 2009 3:04 PM
My agenda is the truth.
TriMet's is not. They lied about WES from start to finish.
My perspective, however unrevealing of the few cars, aligns with the truth.
The ridership numbers are so low each rider calculates to cost around 270.00 each.
There is no benefit to this new line at all. It's just plain stupid.
Yet our bone headed planners and politicians, who do have a bias and agenda, lie about it's worth.
Posted by Photographer | April 9, 2009 5:25 PM
As a former homeowner in Tualatin, I testified at the Metro/TriMet/ODOT public comment meeting. It was clear from the almost complete lack of eye contact and the disinterested faces of the panel, that they were going to go ahead with this absurd BOONDOGLE no matter what the public said. It didn't really matter that I had the names of 30 homeowners from Wilsonville and Tualatin who said they had no real reason to ride this train EVER. Even the US DOT was very sceptical of TriMet's projected passenger numbers; but they built it anyway at huge cost. And we can see that it's a huge failure as far as moving any real numbers of passengers.
Posted by Dave A. | April 9, 2009 6:08 PM
Spot on Dave
Posted by Photographer | April 9, 2009 6:39 PM
We can click our cameras any time of day....the only picture that will emerge is a consistent "no cars in the lot" and "no riders on WES".
Where is the outrage!!! The rail scam just rolls on....I-205.....Milwaukie.....streetcars. Quit electing these pathetic a...holes! Stop the F-ing insanity!
Posted by veiledorchid | April 9, 2009 7:10 PM
I'm not sold either way. I rode it the other day at about 9:30am and assumed it would be empty since it was after prime commuter hours and it was more than half full. What do the parking lot pictures prove? That people aren't driving to ride it?
Posted by Tim | April 9, 2009 7:40 PM
Don't worry about the high cost of this thing per ride. We can always cancel more bus lines that the working poor use, to make up for it.
Posted by Bill McDonald | April 9, 2009 9:18 PM
The photos get attenion, obvioulsy.
If you were on one train that was half full that means nothing.
The volunteers to did a full count that showed a sickly low ridership means a lot. The calculated cost per rider measns a lot.
TriMet should be sold.
Posted by Photographer | April 9, 2009 11:46 PM
Between each of those planter sets there are 14 spaces. Multiple it out. If you are standing on the end planter that you turn around at the bottom of the lot, looking north, all you are seeing are 42 empty spaces. If you're standing one planter north of the end, and those behind and out of frame are empty, that makes 56 spots empty.
The total lot size is 103 spaces.
Posted by Alexander | April 10, 2009 12:43 AM
Between each million TriMet wastes is the opportunity to provide better transit service to more people in more neighborhoods.
The incompetence and dishonesty that continues to perpetrate more of these rail transit boondoggles always has the defenders coming out of the woodwork with the gibberish.
Posted by Photographer | April 10, 2009 8:22 AM
Counting actual space numbers is gibberish?
Posted by Alexander | April 10, 2009 9:46 AM
I took WES on Tuesday, March 24, from Tualatin to Wilsonville, for reasons involving my commute that are somewhat unusual, and so they haven't been repeated. Anyway, the train each way was perhaps 2/3 full, and there seemed to be plenty of cars in the Wilsonville lot, and not as many in the Tualatin lot. I was pleasantly surprised that the train wasn't a "ghost town."
Also, it was faster than the SMART Wilsonville bus between Tualatin and Wilsonville, which winds around all over the place. It also gave some great views of the backs of Tualatin apartments, the edge of the Coffee Creek correctional facility, and a decrepit quarry/junk area somewhere between the two cities.
Posted by Gordon Howard | April 10, 2009 3:42 PM
Alexander,
56 out of 103 spaces is a majority. You know, a majority in how having a majority in a chamber of legislature gives a political party dominance in agenda setting and procedures.
Of, but wait that does not apply to grown-up toy train tracks like the MAX in some peoples thinking. However, when it comes to issues like Gay Rights and Gay Marriage, then those same people who do not believe in majorities for disassembling grown-up toy train tracks are the ones screaming for their majority to ram it through.
I understand where some people are coming from. They want it both...Excuse me, ALL ways when it comes to their point of view. However, some people do their best in marginalizing and silencing the opposing point of view. Just like those good fascists Lenin, Stalin and every leader of the USSR.
Do you know who these people are? I do.
Posted by YoungOregonMoonbat | April 11, 2009 12:14 AM