We've got some Martha Stewart stuff around our house. The Mrs. subscribes to one of the Martha magazines. But beyond that, we haven't succumbed much to Martha-ism -- neither during her time in custody nor during her time at large in the general population.
And so it was with a bit of surprise that we found this in our mailbox last week:
It's a DVD of Martha, apparently gushing over recipes that she got from her mom growing up. And along with it, a bunch of paperwork, including a cover letter that informed us:
What a rip! You can keep the DVD as a free gift, or send it back. Gee, Martha, if you don't get it back from us, what are the chances that you're not going to send us more and start pumping out the invoices? "Now I'm stuck," the Mrs. told me. "Whether I want it or not, either way I have to deal with this stupid-a*s thing."
And so she dutifully cut the label off the infernal reply form and mailed it back to Martha:
Is this what it takes to make money these days? How far we have fallen.
Comments (15)
I don't think it's legal to send something out unsolicitated which will obligate you to future purchases. Even if they say you can return the future ones. Anybody else agree with me?
Yeah, I had a magazine do a similar thing, and I just ignored everything they sent, kept what was interesting and recycled the rest. After 3-4 issues, and 6-8 invoices they stopped sending the stuff I hadn't subscribed to.
I expected them to threaten to send me to collections, but they never did.
Marie Claire did just that to my daughter, sending her one magazine and many, many invoices, which she ignored. Then she got a note from a "collection agency" warning her how her credit would be ruined if she didn't pay for a subscription that she never requested. She wrote back to the "collection agency" threatening to sue them for harassment if they didn't stop demanding that she pay for something she didn't order. We haven't heard from them since, but poor Hearst Communications must be in dire straits if they need to resort to such tactics to make a few bucks.
Business Week tried that sort of crap on me a year or so ago after my subscription expired. I simply ignored their renewal invoices and a final phony "collection letter".
National Geographic did this with a DVD that we were given the choice of purchasing or returning. We didn't do either and we get these letters from a collection agency trying to collect the 9.95 we "owe" on the DVD we never asked for to begin with.
The company I was working for in 1980 looked into this. You cannot send out anything that is unsolicited and expect payment if it not returned. You cannot obligate the recipient to future purchases, period. It is illegal.
I researched this with the Oregon Attorney Generals office several years back when my elderly parents kept receiving Reader Digest goods and a book club kept sending the monthly books.
The AG office said keep the goods, don't reply and probably they'll desist from sending the goods; and it is illegal in our state for them to do so if no signed agreement was ever made. Three years later they finally stopped.
JK: Did anyone read that last line (underlined) in the letter?
That sentence refers only to "this special DVD" - not the stream of future DVD's they admit that they'll churn out every 2-3 months, that you can bet will also be billed and dunned if you don't pay or return it.
Jack is right on with this one. Are you defending the practice, Jim?
As a practical matter, do you think that would stop them from sending more and dunning you mercilessly for all of them?
As a former member of the Bedford, Ny "community" I can say, without hesitation, nor equivocation, do not under any circumstances trust any and everything from that neck of the woods.
39 USC sec. 3009 (1994) Mailing of Unordered Merchandise-
(a) Except for
(1) free samples clearly and conspicuously marked as such, and
(2) merchandise mailed by a charitable organization soliciting contributions, the mailing of unordered merchandise or of communications prohibited by subsection (c) of this section constitutes an unfair method of competition and an unfair trade practice in violation of section 45 (a)(1) of title 15.
(b) Any merchandise mailed in violation of subsection (a) of this section, or within the exceptions contained therein, may be treated as a gift by the recipient, who shall have the right to retain, use, discard, or dispose of it in any manner he sees fit without any obligation whatsoever to the sender. All such merchandise shall have attached to it a clear and conspicuous statement informing the recipient that he may treat the merchandise as a gift to him and has the right to retain, use, discard, or dispose of it in any manner he sees fit without any obligation whatsoever to the sender.
(c) No mailer of any merchandise mailed in violation of subsection (a) of this section, or within the exceptions contained therein, shall mail to any recipient of such merchandise a bill for such merchandise or any dunning communications.
(d) For the purposes of this section, “unordered merchandise” means merchandise mailed without the prior expressed request or consent of the recipient.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
I don't think it's legal to send something out unsolicitated which will obligate you to future purchases. Even if they say you can return the future ones. Anybody else agree with me?
Posted by consumer advocate | December 8, 2008 10:44 AM
Yeah, I had a magazine do a similar thing, and I just ignored everything they sent, kept what was interesting and recycled the rest. After 3-4 issues, and 6-8 invoices they stopped sending the stuff I hadn't subscribed to.
I expected them to threaten to send me to collections, but they never did.
Posted by Mike | December 8, 2008 11:06 AM
Mike-
Marie Claire did just that to my daughter, sending her one magazine and many, many invoices, which she ignored. Then she got a note from a "collection agency" warning her how her credit would be ruined if she didn't pay for a subscription that she never requested. She wrote back to the "collection agency" threatening to sue them for harassment if they didn't stop demanding that she pay for something she didn't order. We haven't heard from them since, but poor Hearst Communications must be in dire straits if they need to resort to such tactics to make a few bucks.
Posted by E | December 8, 2008 11:42 AM
Yep, if someone sends you something unsolicited then it is yours to keep and they can't charge you for it.
If you're concerned then use Handbrake to convert the DVD to a computer or iPod file and send the thing back.
Posted by Swede | December 8, 2008 11:48 AM
Did anyone read that last line (underlined) in the letter?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | December 8, 2008 11:52 AM
You may keep the free gift and if they dun you, they violate the state unlawful trade practices act. http://www.usps.com/postalinspectors/fraud/merch.htm
Posted by genop | December 8, 2008 11:56 AM
Business Week tried that sort of crap on me a year or so ago after my subscription expired. I simply ignored their renewal invoices and a final phony "collection letter".
Posted by Dave A. | December 8, 2008 12:27 PM
National Geographic did this with a DVD that we were given the choice of purchasing or returning. We didn't do either and we get these letters from a collection agency trying to collect the 9.95 we "owe" on the DVD we never asked for to begin with.
Posted by Tom | December 8, 2008 1:10 PM
The company I was working for in 1980 looked into this. You cannot send out anything that is unsolicited and expect payment if it not returned. You cannot obligate the recipient to future purchases, period. It is illegal.
Posted by Dave Lister | December 8, 2008 5:42 PM
As a practical matter, do you think that would stop them from sending more and dunning you mercilessly for all of them?
Posted by Jack Bog | December 8, 2008 5:56 PM
I researched this with the Oregon Attorney Generals office several years back when my elderly parents kept receiving Reader Digest goods and a book club kept sending the monthly books.
The AG office said keep the goods, don't reply and probably they'll desist from sending the goods; and it is illegal in our state for them to do so if no signed agreement was ever made. Three years later they finally stopped.
Posted by lw | December 8, 2008 7:17 PM
I think they would probably stop, by why not encourage them to stop by filling their postage paid return envelope with rocks...
Posted by Michael | December 8, 2008 8:47 PM
JK: Did anyone read that last line (underlined) in the letter?
That sentence refers only to "this special DVD" - not the stream of future DVD's they admit that they'll churn out every 2-3 months, that you can bet will also be billed and dunned if you don't pay or return it.
Jack is right on with this one. Are you defending the practice, Jim?
Posted by john rettig | December 8, 2008 11:44 PM
As a practical matter, do you think that would stop them from sending more and dunning you mercilessly for all of them?
As a former member of the Bedford, Ny "community" I can say, without hesitation, nor equivocation, do not under any circumstances trust any and everything from that neck of the woods.
Posted by Ian | December 9, 2008 12:00 AM
We covered this in Doug Newell's contracts class:
39 USC sec. 3009 (1994) Mailing of Unordered Merchandise-
(a) Except for
(1) free samples clearly and conspicuously marked as such, and
(2) merchandise mailed by a charitable organization soliciting contributions, the mailing of unordered merchandise or of communications prohibited by subsection (c) of this section constitutes an unfair method of competition and an unfair trade practice in violation of section 45 (a)(1) of title 15.
(b) Any merchandise mailed in violation of subsection (a) of this section, or within the exceptions contained therein, may be treated as a gift by the recipient, who shall have the right to retain, use, discard, or dispose of it in any manner he sees fit without any obligation whatsoever to the sender. All such merchandise shall have attached to it a clear and conspicuous statement informing the recipient that he may treat the merchandise as a gift to him and has the right to retain, use, discard, or dispose of it in any manner he sees fit without any obligation whatsoever to the sender.
(c) No mailer of any merchandise mailed in violation of subsection (a) of this section, or within the exceptions contained therein, shall mail to any recipient of such merchandise a bill for such merchandise or any dunning communications.
(d) For the purposes of this section, “unordered merchandise” means merchandise mailed without the prior expressed request or consent of the recipient.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode39/usc_sec_39_00003009----000-.html
Can't speak for its currentness. Godspeed.
Posted by law talking guy | December 9, 2008 8:05 AM