This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 26, 2008 8:53 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Slight delay in the bad news.
The next post in this blog is Clutch player.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
A couple of alert readers, fearing that holiday merriment might not raise our blood pressure to its accustomed Christmas week levels, have sent along links to the latest "urban renewal" malarkey from the City of Portland. It seems the city's genius negotiators are getting ready to buy the Main Post Office at a price that includes a 50 percent premium above market value. This, of course, comes at a time of plummeting real estate values, which seems more than a little counterproductive.
But hey. Why get upset? This is standard procedure for Portland. And it's only half the story. The other half will be when they declare the site "blighted" and sell it to Homer Williams, Hank Ashforth, Joe Weston, or some such scoundrel for $1. Maybe throw in 10 or 15 years of tax abatements, too.
Then the Post Office will be promptly demolished, and a soulless, fake New York will be erected on the site. The good-paying, blue-collar postal jobs will be moved out of the city, to some place like Woodburn. Retirees from Orange County will move in and live their streetcar lives. And if you're downtown on a Saturday and want to mail a package, you won't be able to.
This is classic "urban renewal" progress in Portland. And with the brief moment of sanity known as the Potter administration ending in a few days, this sort of thing is going to be going hot and heavy from here on out -- all the way to the inevitable bankruptcy down the road.
Comments (24)
Well, at least we'll get an over-priced baseball stadium for the Paulson boys to make a few bucks and then leave.
All that stuff they said about Bush being stupid - I think we are about to hit a new low-water mark with this regime and Sammy/Randy.
What I find especially distressing about the appraisals is that they arrive at current market value by considering future zone changes. There is no assurance the zone changes will happen, and from the Post Office's standpoint, they have no control over the zone change process.
The appraisal community should be ashamed of this kind of thing. But they sold their souls to devil a long time ago, unfortunately.
How out of touch are these guys? Man, that's almost a redundant question isn't it? I'm in Beaverton so this doesn't affect me directly but I don't understand how Portlanders let this happen. How come there aren't riots in the street? We're overdue for a revolution.
Oops, I'm wrong in the previous post. The zone changes tie in with the 50% premium the City will pay, not to the appraised value. So sorry. But appraisals often do assume future zone changes that may not happen, and that is very wrong.
PDC has explained the 50 percent bonus as a way of reflecting future property value, since it will be several years before the Postal Service vacates the site.
If property values grow at 6 percent a year (which is the typical long-run average), then, to justify the premium it would have to be 7 years before the USPS vacates the site.
And, if the appraisals already account for the delay, then PDC would be double counting.
It's funny that PDC will nickel and dime private property owners for property they take, but pay top dollar to the Feds.
Wow, this is astonishing in it's stupidity and blatant shafting of the taxpayer. It's amazing how the PDC and local officials can negotiate deals that they would never commit their personal money or their own private businesses to.
Again, this shows the absolute hypocrisy of the PDC, local elected officials, etc. They put on this song and dance about affordable housing, but they are going to push the biggest employer of middle class incomes in the PDC out to east Portland so they can build luxury condos.
I hope that "The good-paying, blue-collar postal jobs will be moved out of the city, to some place like Woodburn" is just a lame attempt at humor on your part.
Much more likely is that a new postal plant will be built near PDX which, of course, is in the city. Most intercity mail moves by air; plus, the Postal Service has been in negotiations with the Port of Portland for a site near the airport for several years.
I'm not as pessimistic as Jack, ultimately it depends what goes in its place. Most of the facility is warehouse and if an office complex or something similar emerges it could be like a new Montgomery Park. With that said, if past performance is any indication, I'm not overly optomistic.
Portland downtown is kind of like a long term momentum play, stretching several decades, where state and federal subsidies are essiential to propping up an economy that depends on steadily expanding public debt. Eventually, the place gets too dense and retiree-led immigration slows, and the momentum play ends in a longterm secular decline, relatively speaking. For taxpayers, it is a matter of getting out of real property positions before the momentum peaks.
It also depends on Metro continuing to stifle local community development in the suburbs outside of Portland. Indeed, Metro may begin to lose some grip soon as the state-wide Big Look task force lobbies for shifting some development decisions back to local government and away from the unique Metro government body.
Actually, all things considered, the best place for the main post office is near the main city rail yard. Moving heavy paper (mail) on airplanes is absurd and is just another reflection of policies made and distorted thanks to cheap energy.
We're in the recession-fueled dip in oil prices, but that will only last as long as demand destruction dominates and our economy is shrinking and taking the rest of the world with it. Eventually countries with productive capacity will emerge from this slump and be bidding up the price of oil again, which is probably entering its decline right about now -- a decline that even the IEA estimates might be as great as 10% a year. Oil prices will be volatile in the up direction just as they are currently in a deep dip.
Moreover, any serious response aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions starts by cutting flying first.
So, no, don't move the post office away from the rail yard.
George Anonymuncule Seldes: Eventually countries with productive capacity will emerge from this slump and be bidding up the price of oil again, which is probably entering its decline right about now -- a decline that even the IEA estimates might be as great as 10% a year. Oil prices will be volatile in the up direction just as they are currently in a deep dip.
Moreover, any serious response aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions starts by cutting flying first. JK: Ahh, both popular delusions in one post.
The world is not running out of oil. The USA is NOT running out of oil, only out of oil that the greens and Ds will let us use..
Then there is the hundreds of years of supply of shale oil, tar sands and oil from coal (Hitlar ran a war on this one.)
Relax, the world is only ending in the scheme of the hucksters trying to get rich from fooling you and scaring children.
This is all about as depressing as the snow that still continues to fall from the sky at my house, right now!
And I can do about as much to change the weather as I can do about the on going scamming that goes on at city hall.
You may be right canucken...a good revolution may be in order.
Now where did I put my pitch fork?
Wait , I've got it , we turn the
post office into a convention center hotel and put a TRAM over the river , this involves all of mayor Adams favorite things in one ball of yarn. go kitty go !
Logistics: the bulk of what comes into and goes out of the city isn't carried by train any more, so it's inefficient to do the aggregating and distributing in the heart of town.
Rumor control at the Post Office is that they are eyeballing Colwood, and an area near Cascade Station.
We (the P.O.) need a huge facility to bring on line the next round of automation. There are three facilities near PDX, the PACC, AMF (Airport Post Office) and the Mount Hood facility there which handles alot of the mail that is automated. I work at another such plant. This only makes sense if the Post Office wants to put all its eggs in one basket.
The automation facility in question needs to be multi-floor, and at least 5 football fields in size. (Look up FSS on Youtube) Downtown can't do that. The thinking is a grand sized consolidation of operations and going to the new method of sortation.
I hope that helps a bit. I hope it goes through because I would be able to cut a huge commute in half.
After reading Roy's post, one can conclude that the Postal Service will have a surplus property downtown that it will need to unload when it builds a more efficient facility near the airport.
That would seem to put PDC in the driver's seat on this deal. Instead of offering 50% more than market value for the old post office, they should be offering 50% less.
Hauling mail from the airport downtown, and then back to the airport is an expensive, tedious operation.
Stuck on the Banfield? How about the bridge lifts on I-5 and the Willamette?
Wait, the noise and congestion for the neighbors of downtown and Northeast Portland.
Moving large trucks downtown and around the region is expensive, consuming resources and time-commodities the Postal Serivce cannot afford to waste.
Do not forget security-it will be easier to address security challenges from a facility better fitted than the corner of the Broadway and Lovejoy ramps.
A 46+ year old building erected on a landfill.
Transportation by trucks and planes is cost effective and efficient from a location less subject to the challenges of rail-a generation past.
Every time a truck idles on the highway, waiting in traffic a flight is missed and processing increases. Is this the most cost-effective use of resources?
Gil has it right. When the USPS is ready to give it up, some investor or developer will be willing to buy it at some price that will define is worth. The PDC initiative is a ridiculous waste.
Will PDC/USPC pay the real estate transfer tax that Sam wants to initiate? Probably not. Let free enterprise buy it and the real value will be established and not the political process. Then the transfer tax will be paid.
Then the Post Office will be promptly demolished, and a soulless, fake New York will be erected on the site...Retirees from Orange County will move in and live their streetcar lives. And if you're downtown on a Saturday and want to mail a package, you won't be able to.
Hm, sounds a whole lot like east Clark County, with its soulless subdivisions of cookie-cutter McMansions, where you can be sure of living on a cul-de-sac, but walking out to buy groceries, a cup of coffee, or to get a prescription filled? Bwahahahaha! You fool!
Oh sorry, these subdivisions obviously reflect the Will of the People, the Magic of Marketplace, the Genius of Free Enterprise.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (24)
Well, at least we'll get an over-priced baseball stadium for the Paulson boys to make a few bucks and then leave.
All that stuff they said about Bush being stupid - I think we are about to hit a new low-water mark with this regime and Sammy/Randy.
Posted by Steve | December 26, 2008 9:19 AM
Other issues aside, the right situs for the city's main post office is at or near the airport.
Posted by Allan L. | December 26, 2008 9:25 AM
What I find especially distressing about the appraisals is that they arrive at current market value by considering future zone changes. There is no assurance the zone changes will happen, and from the Post Office's standpoint, they have no control over the zone change process.
The appraisal community should be ashamed of this kind of thing. But they sold their souls to devil a long time ago, unfortunately.
Posted by Musician | December 26, 2008 9:40 AM
How out of touch are these guys? Man, that's almost a redundant question isn't it? I'm in Beaverton so this doesn't affect me directly but I don't understand how Portlanders let this happen. How come there aren't riots in the street? We're overdue for a revolution.
Posted by canucken | December 26, 2008 9:49 AM
Oops, I'm wrong in the previous post. The zone changes tie in with the 50% premium the City will pay, not to the appraised value. So sorry. But appraisals often do assume future zone changes that may not happen, and that is very wrong.
Posted by Musician | December 26, 2008 9:54 AM
PDC has explained the 50 percent bonus as a way of reflecting future property value, since it will be several years before the Postal Service vacates the site.
If property values grow at 6 percent a year (which is the typical long-run average), then, to justify the premium it would have to be 7 years before the USPS vacates the site.
And, if the appraisals already account for the delay, then PDC would be double counting.
It's funny that PDC will nickel and dime private property owners for property they take, but pay top dollar to the Feds.
Posted by Garage Wine | December 26, 2008 10:07 AM
Wow, this is astonishing in it's stupidity and blatant shafting of the taxpayer. It's amazing how the PDC and local officials can negotiate deals that they would never commit their personal money or their own private businesses to.
Again, this shows the absolute hypocrisy of the PDC, local elected officials, etc. They put on this song and dance about affordable housing, but they are going to push the biggest employer of middle class incomes in the PDC out to east Portland so they can build luxury condos.
Posted by Ted | December 26, 2008 10:16 AM
I hope that "The good-paying, blue-collar postal jobs will be moved out of the city, to some place like Woodburn" is just a lame attempt at humor on your part.
Much more likely is that a new postal plant will be built near PDX which, of course, is in the city. Most intercity mail moves by air; plus, the Postal Service has been in negotiations with the Port of Portland for a site near the airport for several years.
Posted by Old Postie | December 26, 2008 10:17 AM
I'm not as pessimistic as Jack, ultimately it depends what goes in its place. Most of the facility is warehouse and if an office complex or something similar emerges it could be like a new Montgomery Park. With that said, if past performance is any indication, I'm not overly optomistic.
Posted by Todd Hawes | December 26, 2008 11:03 AM
the right situs for the city's main post office is at or near the airport.
And that is why, exactly?
Posted by Jack Bog | December 26, 2008 12:22 PM
Portland downtown is kind of like a long term momentum play, stretching several decades, where state and federal subsidies are essiential to propping up an economy that depends on steadily expanding public debt. Eventually, the place gets too dense and retiree-led immigration slows, and the momentum play ends in a longterm secular decline, relatively speaking. For taxpayers, it is a matter of getting out of real property positions before the momentum peaks.
It also depends on Metro continuing to stifle local community development in the suburbs outside of Portland. Indeed, Metro may begin to lose some grip soon as the state-wide Big Look task force lobbies for shifting some development decisions back to local government and away from the unique Metro government body.
Posted by Bob Clark | December 26, 2008 12:32 PM
Actually, all things considered, the best place for the main post office is near the main city rail yard. Moving heavy paper (mail) on airplanes is absurd and is just another reflection of policies made and distorted thanks to cheap energy.
We're in the recession-fueled dip in oil prices, but that will only last as long as demand destruction dominates and our economy is shrinking and taking the rest of the world with it. Eventually countries with productive capacity will emerge from this slump and be bidding up the price of oil again, which is probably entering its decline right about now -- a decline that even the IEA estimates might be as great as 10% a year. Oil prices will be volatile in the up direction just as they are currently in a deep dip.
Moreover, any serious response aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions starts by cutting flying first.
So, no, don't move the post office away from the rail yard.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | December 26, 2008 1:35 PM
Is there still a rail yard there?
Posted by Jack Bog | December 26, 2008 1:44 PM
George Anonymuncule Seldes: Eventually countries with productive capacity will emerge from this slump and be bidding up the price of oil again, which is probably entering its decline right about now -- a decline that even the IEA estimates might be as great as 10% a year. Oil prices will be volatile in the up direction just as they are currently in a deep dip.
Moreover, any serious response aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions starts by cutting flying first.
JK: Ahh, both popular delusions in one post.
The world is not running out of oil. The USA is NOT running out of oil, only out of oil that the greens and Ds will let us use..
Then there is the hundreds of years of supply of shale oil, tar sands and oil from coal (Hitlar ran a war on this one.)
Relax, the world is only ending in the scheme of the hucksters trying to get rich from fooling you and scaring children.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | December 26, 2008 2:19 PM
JK: A site that the post office could own would be Colwood gold course. Anyone want to bet on what is going on in the back rooms right now?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | December 26, 2008 2:20 PM
This is all about as depressing as the snow that still continues to fall from the sky at my house, right now!
And I can do about as much to change the weather as I can do about the on going scamming that goes on at city hall.
You may be right canucken...a good revolution may be in order.
Now where did I put my pitch fork?
Posted by portland native | December 26, 2008 2:53 PM
Wait , I've got it , we turn the
post office into a convention center hotel and put a TRAM over the river , this involves all of mayor Adams favorite things in one ball of yarn. go kitty go !
Posted by billb | December 26, 2008 3:00 PM
why
Logistics: the bulk of what comes into and goes out of the city isn't carried by train any more, so it's inefficient to do the aggregating and distributing in the heart of town.
Posted by Allan L. | December 26, 2008 3:18 PM
Rumor control at the Post Office is that they are eyeballing Colwood, and an area near Cascade Station.
We (the P.O.) need a huge facility to bring on line the next round of automation. There are three facilities near PDX, the PACC, AMF (Airport Post Office) and the Mount Hood facility there which handles alot of the mail that is automated. I work at another such plant. This only makes sense if the Post Office wants to put all its eggs in one basket.
The automation facility in question needs to be multi-floor, and at least 5 football fields in size. (Look up FSS on Youtube) Downtown can't do that. The thinking is a grand sized consolidation of operations and going to the new method of sortation.
I hope that helps a bit. I hope it goes through because I would be able to cut a huge commute in half.
Posted by Roy | December 26, 2008 8:13 PM
After reading Roy's post, one can conclude that the Postal Service will have a surplus property downtown that it will need to unload when it builds a more efficient facility near the airport.
That would seem to put PDC in the driver's seat on this deal. Instead of offering 50% more than market value for the old post office, they should be offering 50% less.
Who else is gonna buy the place?
Posted by Gil Johnson | December 26, 2008 8:49 PM
Hauling mail from the airport downtown, and then back to the airport is an expensive, tedious operation.
Stuck on the Banfield? How about the bridge lifts on I-5 and the Willamette?
Wait, the noise and congestion for the neighbors of downtown and Northeast Portland.
Moving large trucks downtown and around the region is expensive, consuming resources and time-commodities the Postal Serivce cannot afford to waste.
Do not forget security-it will be easier to address security challenges from a facility better fitted than the corner of the Broadway and Lovejoy ramps.
A 46+ year old building erected on a landfill.
Transportation by trucks and planes is cost effective and efficient from a location less subject to the challenges of rail-a generation past.
Every time a truck idles on the highway, waiting in traffic a flight is missed and processing increases. Is this the most cost-effective use of resources?
Just some thoughts.
reese
Posted by reese | December 26, 2008 8:55 PM
Gil has it right. When the USPS is ready to give it up, some investor or developer will be willing to buy it at some price that will define is worth. The PDC initiative is a ridiculous waste.
Posted by Allan L. | December 26, 2008 10:31 PM
Will PDC/USPC pay the real estate transfer tax that Sam wants to initiate? Probably not. Let free enterprise buy it and the real value will be established and not the political process. Then the transfer tax will be paid.
Posted by Lee | December 27, 2008 10:05 PM
Then the Post Office will be promptly demolished, and a soulless, fake New York will be erected on the site...Retirees from Orange County will move in and live their streetcar lives. And if you're downtown on a Saturday and want to mail a package, you won't be able to.
Hm, sounds a whole lot like east Clark County, with its soulless subdivisions of cookie-cutter McMansions, where you can be sure of living on a cul-de-sac, but walking out to buy groceries, a cup of coffee, or to get a prescription filled? Bwahahahaha! You fool!
Oh sorry, these subdivisions obviously reflect the Will of the People, the Magic of Marketplace, the Genius of Free Enterprise.
Posted by joebob | December 29, 2008 1:15 PM