

We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get! If you'd like to advertise without going through the Blogads system, that's do-able, too. Just e-mail us here for more information.
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 54
At this date last year: 50
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (24)
Well, at least we'll get an over-priced baseball stadium for the Paulson boys to make a few bucks and then leave.
All that stuff they said about Bush being stupid - I think we are about to hit a new low-water mark with this regime and Sammy/Randy.
Posted by Steve | December 26, 2008 9:19 AM
Other issues aside, the right situs for the city's main post office is at or near the airport.
Posted by Allan L. | December 26, 2008 9:25 AM
What I find especially distressing about the appraisals is that they arrive at current market value by considering future zone changes. There is no assurance the zone changes will happen, and from the Post Office's standpoint, they have no control over the zone change process.
The appraisal community should be ashamed of this kind of thing. But they sold their souls to devil a long time ago, unfortunately.
Posted by Musician | December 26, 2008 9:40 AM
How out of touch are these guys? Man, that's almost a redundant question isn't it? I'm in Beaverton so this doesn't affect me directly but I don't understand how Portlanders let this happen. How come there aren't riots in the street? We're overdue for a revolution.
Posted by canucken | December 26, 2008 9:49 AM
Oops, I'm wrong in the previous post. The zone changes tie in with the 50% premium the City will pay, not to the appraised value. So sorry. But appraisals often do assume future zone changes that may not happen, and that is very wrong.
Posted by Musician | December 26, 2008 9:54 AM
PDC has explained the 50 percent bonus as a way of reflecting future property value, since it will be several years before the Postal Service vacates the site.
If property values grow at 6 percent a year (which is the typical long-run average), then, to justify the premium it would have to be 7 years before the USPS vacates the site.
And, if the appraisals already account for the delay, then PDC would be double counting.
It's funny that PDC will nickel and dime private property owners for property they take, but pay top dollar to the Feds.
Posted by Garage Wine | December 26, 2008 10:07 AM
Wow, this is astonishing in it's stupidity and blatant shafting of the taxpayer. It's amazing how the PDC and local officials can negotiate deals that they would never commit their personal money or their own private businesses to.
Again, this shows the absolute hypocrisy of the PDC, local elected officials, etc. They put on this song and dance about affordable housing, but they are going to push the biggest employer of middle class incomes in the PDC out to east Portland so they can build luxury condos.
Posted by Ted | December 26, 2008 10:16 AM
I hope that "The good-paying, blue-collar postal jobs will be moved out of the city, to some place like Woodburn" is just a lame attempt at humor on your part.
Much more likely is that a new postal plant will be built near PDX which, of course, is in the city. Most intercity mail moves by air; plus, the Postal Service has been in negotiations with the Port of Portland for a site near the airport for several years.
Posted by Old Postie | December 26, 2008 10:17 AM
I'm not as pessimistic as Jack, ultimately it depends what goes in its place. Most of the facility is warehouse and if an office complex or something similar emerges it could be like a new Montgomery Park. With that said, if past performance is any indication, I'm not overly optomistic.
Posted by Todd Hawes | December 26, 2008 11:03 AM
the right situs for the city's main post office is at or near the airport.
And that is why, exactly?
Posted by Jack Bog | December 26, 2008 12:22 PM
Portland downtown is kind of like a long term momentum play, stretching several decades, where state and federal subsidies are essiential to propping up an economy that depends on steadily expanding public debt. Eventually, the place gets too dense and retiree-led immigration slows, and the momentum play ends in a longterm secular decline, relatively speaking. For taxpayers, it is a matter of getting out of real property positions before the momentum peaks.
It also depends on Metro continuing to stifle local community development in the suburbs outside of Portland. Indeed, Metro may begin to lose some grip soon as the state-wide Big Look task force lobbies for shifting some development decisions back to local government and away from the unique Metro government body.
Posted by Bob Clark | December 26, 2008 12:32 PM
Actually, all things considered, the best place for the main post office is near the main city rail yard. Moving heavy paper (mail) on airplanes is absurd and is just another reflection of policies made and distorted thanks to cheap energy.
We're in the recession-fueled dip in oil prices, but that will only last as long as demand destruction dominates and our economy is shrinking and taking the rest of the world with it. Eventually countries with productive capacity will emerge from this slump and be bidding up the price of oil again, which is probably entering its decline right about now -- a decline that even the IEA estimates might be as great as 10% a year. Oil prices will be volatile in the up direction just as they are currently in a deep dip.
Moreover, any serious response aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions starts by cutting flying first.
So, no, don't move the post office away from the rail yard.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | December 26, 2008 1:35 PM
Is there still a rail yard there?
Posted by Jack Bog | December 26, 2008 1:44 PM
George Anonymuncule Seldes: Eventually countries with productive capacity will emerge from this slump and be bidding up the price of oil again, which is probably entering its decline right about now -- a decline that even the IEA estimates might be as great as 10% a year. Oil prices will be volatile in the up direction just as they are currently in a deep dip.
Moreover, any serious response aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions starts by cutting flying first.
JK: Ahh, both popular delusions in one post.
The world is not running out of oil. The USA is NOT running out of oil, only out of oil that the greens and Ds will let us use..
Then there is the hundreds of years of supply of shale oil, tar sands and oil from coal (Hitlar ran a war on this one.)
Relax, the world is only ending in the scheme of the hucksters trying to get rich from fooling you and scaring children.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | December 26, 2008 2:19 PM
JK: A site that the post office could own would be Colwood gold course. Anyone want to bet on what is going on in the back rooms right now?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | December 26, 2008 2:20 PM
This is all about as depressing as the snow that still continues to fall from the sky at my house, right now!
And I can do about as much to change the weather as I can do about the on going scamming that goes on at city hall.
You may be right canucken...a good revolution may be in order.
Now where did I put my pitch fork?
Posted by portland native | December 26, 2008 2:53 PM
Wait , I've got it , we turn the
post office into a convention center hotel and put a TRAM over the river , this involves all of mayor Adams favorite things in one ball of yarn. go kitty go !
Posted by billb | December 26, 2008 3:00 PM
why
Logistics: the bulk of what comes into and goes out of the city isn't carried by train any more, so it's inefficient to do the aggregating and distributing in the heart of town.
Posted by Allan L. | December 26, 2008 3:18 PM
Rumor control at the Post Office is that they are eyeballing Colwood, and an area near Cascade Station.
We (the P.O.) need a huge facility to bring on line the next round of automation. There are three facilities near PDX, the PACC, AMF (Airport Post Office) and the Mount Hood facility there which handles alot of the mail that is automated. I work at another such plant. This only makes sense if the Post Office wants to put all its eggs in one basket.
The automation facility in question needs to be multi-floor, and at least 5 football fields in size. (Look up FSS on Youtube) Downtown can't do that. The thinking is a grand sized consolidation of operations and going to the new method of sortation.
I hope that helps a bit. I hope it goes through because I would be able to cut a huge commute in half.
Posted by Roy | December 26, 2008 8:13 PM
After reading Roy's post, one can conclude that the Postal Service will have a surplus property downtown that it will need to unload when it builds a more efficient facility near the airport.
That would seem to put PDC in the driver's seat on this deal. Instead of offering 50% more than market value for the old post office, they should be offering 50% less.
Who else is gonna buy the place?
Posted by Gil Johnson | December 26, 2008 8:49 PM
Hauling mail from the airport downtown, and then back to the airport is an expensive, tedious operation.
Stuck on the Banfield? How about the bridge lifts on I-5 and the Willamette?
Wait, the noise and congestion for the neighbors of downtown and Northeast Portland.
Moving large trucks downtown and around the region is expensive, consuming resources and time-commodities the Postal Serivce cannot afford to waste.
Do not forget security-it will be easier to address security challenges from a facility better fitted than the corner of the Broadway and Lovejoy ramps.
A 46+ year old building erected on a landfill.
Transportation by trucks and planes is cost effective and efficient from a location less subject to the challenges of rail-a generation past.
Every time a truck idles on the highway, waiting in traffic a flight is missed and processing increases. Is this the most cost-effective use of resources?
Just some thoughts.
reese
Posted by reese | December 26, 2008 8:55 PM
Gil has it right. When the USPS is ready to give it up, some investor or developer will be willing to buy it at some price that will define is worth. The PDC initiative is a ridiculous waste.
Posted by Allan L. | December 26, 2008 10:31 PM
Will PDC/USPC pay the real estate transfer tax that Sam wants to initiate? Probably not. Let free enterprise buy it and the real value will be established and not the political process. Then the transfer tax will be paid.
Posted by Lee | December 27, 2008 10:05 PM
Then the Post Office will be promptly demolished, and a soulless, fake New York will be erected on the site...Retirees from Orange County will move in and live their streetcar lives. And if you're downtown on a Saturday and want to mail a package, you won't be able to.
Hm, sounds a whole lot like east Clark County, with its soulless subdivisions of cookie-cutter McMansions, where you can be sure of living on a cul-de-sac, but walking out to buy groceries, a cup of coffee, or to get a prescription filled? Bwahahahaha! You fool!
Oh sorry, these subdivisions obviously reflect the Will of the People, the Magic of Marketplace, the Genius of Free Enterprise.
Posted by joebob | December 29, 2008 1:15 PM