Today I feel as though I am getting my country back.
It's a tragedy what's been done to it, but I'll take it back. I still believe in it. I want to do whatever my part might be in helping it get back on its feet. I think most people do.
It usually takes a disaster to get folks to face up to their weaknesses. We have reached that stage now, which is the first step toward healing.
Today a man who is half African and half white is being elected President of the United States.
It is a big day, to be sure. But the true enormity of it is beyond my vocabulary. Maybe 100 years from now, historians will describe it just right. Let's hope they can say, at the very least, that it was a true turning point for the better.
I just returned from voting here in NJ. I waited in line for the first time ever. People seemed truly hopeful and excited to be there. I know I was. I left the polls happy that I had a chance to be part of such a historic day.
The efficacy of the the last 8 years will not be turned back by this new administration, whomever it turns out to be.
Returning the country to the constitutional law will not happen. Once the rules are usurped never again will they be returned by any administration.
e.g. the way the books are cooked with unemployment, and the cooked books on inflation.
So be it Obama or McCain nothing changes, and in four years the echos of this campaign shall start anew with the same clamor and frustration.
I was going to chide you for an improper use of enormity.
However, I notice that Webster has now decided it's OK to use it to mean "really f---ing big" instead of the old-school "outrageous, improper, vicious, or immoral act."
I'm sure that someday Webster will decide that "niggard" is a racist term.
I can only pray that you will be correct in voting this man in. From what I've seen, he is being voted in because he promised things (health care, college education, tax credits) that I don't think he'll be able to keep (or do). I think he is being voted in because he's black. I think he is being voted in because he's not a republican. I sincerely fear for the future of our nation so I pray that I'm wrong about this man. Experience and history tell me I'm not wrong about this man, but time will tell. Now, like those before me who had the Bush derangement syndrome, I will have the Obama derangement syndrome.
I am looking forward to an Obama presidency, but we don't know that much about him, and I fear that he'll overreach and divide the country even more than it is now. I pray your optimism is justified. What this country needs now more than ever is someone who will give us hope.
I seriously hope Obama wins, but I am not quite ready to call it a done deal, what with all those people voting and the ballots not having been counted yet.
If for some reason Obama should lose there would be unprecedented civil unrest, and a country more deeply divided than ever before in our history. This would be especially true if McCain won enough electoral votes while losing the popular vote, or if McCain won the election by a very slim margin. I could only imagine the conspiracy spin that would come from left leaning news sources and blog sites to incite that unrest. I seriously hope Obama wins too, but for different reasons.
Jack,
While I share your sentiments, don't count your eggs until they hatch. Lots of Diebold machines to break down, lots of voter frustration due to standing in line for hours. Lots can happen, but let's hope for the best, and then we can get on with putting things right.
The stories I expected to hear about this guy and his followers are already rolling in. With his untouchable status as far as negative media goes, I'm sure for every story we here there are quite a few more. I was very unhappy to hear about the Bush shenanigans in 2000 and 2004 and this is no different, though I'm sure you guys will find a way to defend your own and make it seem OK.
"...if McCain won enough electoral votes while losing the popular vote..."
So exactly like the last election? I'd be more worried about the reverse, McCain winning a majority of the votes but losing the electoral count. The right wingers love their hate, and they sound ready to take up arms to "correct" the election.
I sincerely hope for those who feel like native oregonian, that an O administration can fill that half empty glass up. It won't be enough to be better than Bush, that bar is quite low. Our mass cynicism is not inherent in our character, but has grown from frustration and impotence to effect meaningful change. What does the promise of an "O" admin. bring? Only a glimmer of hope and thank God it springs eternal. Now if only we can make it happen rather than wait and see. Participatory democracy? That would be nice for a change.
whoever will take over in January will face many hard challenges. it wont be a picnic for sure. if it does not work out for next 4 years, i might move to another country. i will not watch news tonight. I will check the Oregonians tomorrow morning.
THAT's exactly IT !!! 'They' SOUND scary. PANIC!, everybody. FREEZE where you are. Freeze your brain with FEAR -- don't think.
For instance, it appears that the threats to bomb Iran we've all heard SO MUCH about, are threats aimed at American citizens, not at Iranians. 'THEY' are NOT going to bomb Iran, but instead, ARE going to shock-and-awe YOU to believe they might be foolish and insane enough to do it.
(This Kissinger 'geopolitical' Doctrine was stated in those exact plain words, in 1972, and used ever since. Read THIS, Dubya's handlers are it, use it, and train him.)
Sure, sure, insane fools can fake competence to get elected. . . NOT! If 'they' are in office, elected, and you are not, then 'they' are smart enough to be at least one jump ahead of you ... so if 'they' are insane fools, what does that make you?
The 'crazy' idea PUBLICIZED to 'bomb Iran' is the fear meme to freeze brains. (Especially paralyze Congress brains to not think about Bush LIARS, war crimes, betrayal, TREASON.) In fact, Iran is not bombed, and I expect not going to be bombed.
Whereas, Georgia was bombed. Kazakstan was bombed. Pakistan is being bombed. Tibet/Nepal are being bombed. Syria is being bombed, just last week. And nobody heard announcement about any of it, all NOT publicized.
I think the touted, brandished, publicized terrifyings of Obama are supposed to incapacitate and isolate him wrapped in a blanket of 'their' Secret Service overprotection to keep him out of touch with normal ordinary people and reality. I doubt 'their' scare works the way 'they' mean; I think Obama's got some soul. America's soul. 'You GOT to have some SOUL! HOTTT Mercy, it's the Wolfman Jack speaking.'
You're supposed to obsess to think 'they' sound ready to take up arms, take you on, take you out. We've heard so much of it.
You'd better think about what we haven't heard. Haven't heard a squeak out of the present Chimp ... and the threats of danger against him because of the traitors' secrets he holds that 'they' intend go with him in his coffin.
Think about it. . . using your brain, not 'their' blowhard b.s.
"Get your country back? When was your country socialist/marxist? You must mean 'get the country you always wanted.'"
This country has always worked better under a kind of mixed economy: mostly capitalist wtih modest regulation where it counts and a progressive tax code, with tax revenue building the infrastructure that gives everyone a shot at prosperity. That's not socialism or communism. It's good old fashioned pragmatism. And THAT's the country I want back. (Plus the country that used to at least understand and try to abide by its Constitution.)
This country has always worked better under a kind of mixed economy: mostly capitalist wtih modest regulation where it counts and a progressive tax code, with tax revenue building the infrastructure that gives everyone a shot at prosperity. That's not socialism or communism. It's good old fashioned pragmatism. And THAT's the country I want back. (Plus the country that used to at least understand and try to abide by its Constitution.)
I can agree with that. Unfortunately, that's not what Obama and the D's in congress want to do. Too far to either extreme is bad for America. I was one of the few R's who didn't think it was a good thing that we controlled the white house and both chambers of congress.
You do NOT know what "Obama and the D's" want to do, and you do NOT know what they are going to do. But broadcast voices put ideas in your ears.
You do NOT know what "extreme" is.
Your statements about incomplete political understanding, appear as a symptom to indicate that you need to look between your ears for the missing understanding.
sa, what "infrastructure", programs, government entitlements are you talking about that has decreased in government attempts to solve, or has decreased in dollars spent (inflated dollars or otherwise)? I'm sure you can name a few, but in large majority all these "infrastuctures" have increased in numbers and dollars, both under Clinton and Bush-16 years.
I believe that ian's (correct) point is that "African" is not a synonym for "black." There are millions of "white" Africans who would be amused by the description of Obama as "half African, half white."
Wednesday will come, the sun will rise in the East and set in the West, hopefully I will awake, and I will have the sage wisdom of my now mother-in-law, "Same s**t, different day."
yes. It's something of a mixed combination of identifiers. If Obama's father had been from France, would we term him half European? I doubt it.
A small point, I guess, but one thing that will hopefully come from this moment is a deeper reflection on ethnicity, racial identifiers, and perceptions. Obama's father was a black African from Kenya, and I think calling Obama 'half African' relies on assumptions of what that means, rather than the more nuanced reality.
Bill Orreilly said today that his campaign will be studied for 30 years by future candidates. It was the single greatest campaign in US History. I agree with this. It is a great sign that this is a man who wants to win....and has the vigor & strength & BRAINS to do it. Expect press pow-wows like Kennedy did in 61-62-63.
No plants-No planned questions. This is what we needed after 8 long tough years of the idiot and the gangster operating out of 1600 Penn Ave. I'm excited. Jan can't come soon enough.
I just fear his safety.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (32)
AMEN
Posted by phil | November 4, 2008 5:15 AM
I just returned from voting here in NJ. I waited in line for the first time ever. People seemed truly hopeful and excited to be there. I know I was. I left the polls happy that I had a chance to be part of such a historic day.
Posted by Annie | November 4, 2008 6:02 AM
The efficacy of the the last 8 years will not be turned back by this new administration, whomever it turns out to be.
Returning the country to the constitutional law will not happen. Once the rules are usurped never again will they be returned by any administration.
e.g. the way the books are cooked with unemployment, and the cooked books on inflation.
So be it Obama or McCain nothing changes, and in four years the echos of this campaign shall start anew with the same clamor and frustration.
Posted by KISS | November 4, 2008 6:29 AM
I was going to chide you for an improper use of enormity.
However, I notice that Webster has now decided it's OK to use it to mean "really f---ing big" instead of the old-school "outrageous, improper, vicious, or immoral act."
I'm sure that someday Webster will decide that "niggard" is a racist term.
Posted by Garage Wine | November 4, 2008 6:44 AM
Half African and half white? Not to be a pest, Jack, but care to re-think that one?
Posted by ian | November 4, 2008 7:18 AM
I can only pray that you will be correct in voting this man in. From what I've seen, he is being voted in because he promised things (health care, college education, tax credits) that I don't think he'll be able to keep (or do). I think he is being voted in because he's black. I think he is being voted in because he's not a republican. I sincerely fear for the future of our nation so I pray that I'm wrong about this man. Experience and history tell me I'm not wrong about this man, but time will tell. Now, like those before me who had the Bush derangement syndrome, I will have the Obama derangement syndrome.
Posted by native oregonian | November 4, 2008 7:19 AM
Experience and history tell me I'm not wrong about this man
What does your experience and history tell you about GW Bush?
Posted by Also native | November 4, 2008 8:10 AM
I am looking forward to an Obama presidency, but we don't know that much about him, and I fear that he'll overreach and divide the country even more than it is now. I pray your optimism is justified. What this country needs now more than ever is someone who will give us hope.
Posted by Musician | November 4, 2008 8:36 AM
Half African and half white? Not to be a pest, Jack, but care to re-think that one?
Well, his dad was Kenyan, you know.
Posted by Dave J. | November 4, 2008 9:01 AM
I seriously hope Obama wins, but I am not quite ready to call it a done deal, what with all those people voting and the ballots not having been counted yet.
Posted by none | November 4, 2008 9:36 AM
Get your country back? When was your country socialist/marxist?
You must mean "get the country you always wanted."
Posted by TomTerrific | November 4, 2008 9:41 AM
If for some reason Obama should lose there would be unprecedented civil unrest, and a country more deeply divided than ever before in our history. This would be especially true if McCain won enough electoral votes while losing the popular vote, or if McCain won the election by a very slim margin. I could only imagine the conspiracy spin that would come from left leaning news sources and blog sites to incite that unrest. I seriously hope Obama wins too, but for different reasons.
Posted by Gibby | November 4, 2008 9:51 AM
Jack,
While I share your sentiments, don't count your eggs until they hatch. Lots of Diebold machines to break down, lots of voter frustration due to standing in line for hours. Lots can happen, but let's hope for the best, and then we can get on with putting things right.
Posted by smarana | November 4, 2008 10:08 AM
The stories I expected to hear about this guy and his followers are already rolling in. With his untouchable status as far as negative media goes, I'm sure for every story we here there are quite a few more. I was very unhappy to hear about the Bush shenanigans in 2000 and 2004 and this is no different, though I'm sure you guys will find a way to defend your own and make it seem OK.
Posted by Joey Link | November 4, 2008 10:09 AM
I hope Obama wins, but it's just the beginning. We have a long way and a lot of work to bring this country round right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwcgoUYpBF8
Posted by abs | November 4, 2008 10:12 AM
"...if McCain won enough electoral votes while losing the popular vote..."
So exactly like the last election? I'd be more worried about the reverse, McCain winning a majority of the votes but losing the electoral count. The right wingers love their hate, and they sound ready to take up arms to "correct" the election.
Posted by JerryB | November 4, 2008 10:16 AM
I sincerely hope for those who feel like native oregonian, that an O administration can fill that half empty glass up. It won't be enough to be better than Bush, that bar is quite low. Our mass cynicism is not inherent in our character, but has grown from frustration and impotence to effect meaningful change. What does the promise of an "O" admin. bring? Only a glimmer of hope and thank God it springs eternal. Now if only we can make it happen rather than wait and see. Participatory democracy? That would be nice for a change.
Posted by genop | November 4, 2008 10:39 AM
The right wingers love their hate, and they sound ready to take up arms to "correct" the election.
There's no way myself or any of the hundreds of gun owners I call friends would take up arms to put McCain in the office. Ron Paul, maybe.
Posted by Joey Link | November 4, 2008 10:42 AM
whoever will take over in January will face many hard challenges. it wont be a picnic for sure. if it does not work out for next 4 years, i might move to another country. i will not watch news tonight. I will check the Oregonians tomorrow morning.
Posted by H | November 4, 2008 10:55 AM
An e-mail from a faraway friend first thing this morning says it all:
"Can you smell what history is cooking!!!"
pretty good stuff.
Posted by jimbo | November 4, 2008 10:56 AM
"... they sound ready to take up arms ...."
THAT's exactly IT !!! 'They' SOUND scary. PANIC!, everybody. FREEZE where you are. Freeze your brain with FEAR -- don't think.
For instance, it appears that the threats to bomb Iran we've all heard SO MUCH about, are threats aimed at American citizens, not at Iranians. 'THEY' are NOT going to bomb Iran, but instead, ARE going to shock-and-awe YOU to believe they might be foolish and insane enough to do it.
(This Kissinger 'geopolitical' Doctrine was stated in those exact plain words, in 1972, and used ever since. Read THIS, Dubya's handlers are it, use it, and train him.)
Sure, sure, insane fools can fake competence to get elected. . . NOT! If 'they' are in office, elected, and you are not, then 'they' are smart enough to be at least one jump ahead of you ... so if 'they' are insane fools, what does that make you?
The 'crazy' idea PUBLICIZED to 'bomb Iran' is the fear meme to freeze brains. (Especially paralyze Congress brains to not think about Bush LIARS, war crimes, betrayal, TREASON.) In fact, Iran is not bombed, and I expect not going to be bombed.
Whereas, Georgia was bombed. Kazakstan was bombed. Pakistan is being bombed. Tibet/Nepal are being bombed. Syria is being bombed, just last week. And nobody heard announcement about any of it, all NOT publicized.
I think the touted, brandished, publicized terrifyings of Obama are supposed to incapacitate and isolate him wrapped in a blanket of 'their' Secret Service overprotection to keep him out of touch with normal ordinary people and reality. I doubt 'their' scare works the way 'they' mean; I think Obama's got some soul. America's soul. 'You GOT to have some SOUL! HOTTT Mercy, it's the Wolfman Jack speaking.'
You're supposed to obsess to think 'they' sound ready to take up arms, take you on, take you out. We've heard so much of it.
You'd better think about what we haven't heard. Haven't heard a squeak out of the present Chimp ... and the threats of danger against him because of the traitors' secrets he holds that 'they' intend go with him in his coffin.
Think about it. . . using your brain, not 'their' blowhard b.s.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | November 4, 2008 11:24 AM
In some way my LINK didn't work.
TRY THIS.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | November 4, 2008 11:27 AM
"Get your country back? When was your country socialist/marxist? You must mean 'get the country you always wanted.'"
This country has always worked better under a kind of mixed economy: mostly capitalist wtih modest regulation where it counts and a progressive tax code, with tax revenue building the infrastructure that gives everyone a shot at prosperity. That's not socialism or communism. It's good old fashioned pragmatism. And THAT's the country I want back. (Plus the country that used to at least understand and try to abide by its Constitution.)
Posted by sa | November 4, 2008 11:30 AM
This country has always worked better under a kind of mixed economy: mostly capitalist wtih modest regulation where it counts and a progressive tax code, with tax revenue building the infrastructure that gives everyone a shot at prosperity. That's not socialism or communism. It's good old fashioned pragmatism. And THAT's the country I want back. (Plus the country that used to at least understand and try to abide by its Constitution.)
I can agree with that. Unfortunately, that's not what Obama and the D's in congress want to do. Too far to either extreme is bad for America. I was one of the few R's who didn't think it was a good thing that we controlled the white house and both chambers of congress.
Posted by Joey Link | November 4, 2008 11:37 AM
You do NOT know what "Obama and the D's" want to do, and you do NOT know what they are going to do. But broadcast voices put ideas in your ears.
You do NOT know what "extreme" is.
Your statements about incomplete political understanding, appear as a symptom to indicate that you need to look between your ears for the missing understanding.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | November 4, 2008 1:15 PM
sa, what "infrastructure", programs, government entitlements are you talking about that has decreased in government attempts to solve, or has decreased in dollars spent (inflated dollars or otherwise)? I'm sure you can name a few, but in large majority all these "infrastuctures" have increased in numbers and dollars, both under Clinton and Bush-16 years.
Posted by Lee | November 4, 2008 1:16 PM
0oO0Oo0ooOO00o <---- Look! Chickens!
I hope you're right, but let's hold the champagne until a bit later, m'kay? :-)
Posted by Alan DeWitt | November 4, 2008 2:43 PM
Dave J.,
I believe that ian's (correct) point is that "African" is not a synonym for "black." There are millions of "white" Africans who would be amused by the description of Obama as "half African, half white."
What a hope-filled day!
Posted by Scott | November 4, 2008 2:57 PM
Wednesday will come, the sun will rise in the East and set in the West, hopefully I will awake, and I will have the sage wisdom of my now mother-in-law, "Same s**t, different day."
Posted by jyah13 | November 4, 2008 3:00 PM
yes. It's something of a mixed combination of identifiers. If Obama's father had been from France, would we term him half European? I doubt it.
A small point, I guess, but one thing that will hopefully come from this moment is a deeper reflection on ethnicity, racial identifiers, and perceptions. Obama's father was a black African from Kenya, and I think calling Obama 'half African' relies on assumptions of what that means, rather than the more nuanced reality.
Posted by ian | November 5, 2008 12:18 PM
Swell. You're a genius. Are we done now?
Posted by Jack Bog | November 5, 2008 12:48 PM
Bill Orreilly said today that his campaign will be studied for 30 years by future candidates. It was the single greatest campaign in US History. I agree with this. It is a great sign that this is a man who wants to win....and has the vigor & strength & BRAINS to do it. Expect press pow-wows like Kennedy did in 61-62-63.
No plants-No planned questions. This is what we needed after 8 long tough years of the idiot and the gangster operating out of 1600 Penn Ave. I'm excited. Jan can't come soon enough.
I just fear his safety.
Posted by realdon | November 5, 2008 11:28 PM