This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 2, 2008 8:13 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Major omission.
The next post in this blog is Welcome, New Seasons.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
A while back, the folks at Oregon Business magazine started sending me their magazine to see what I thought of it. Not every issue is a blockbuster, but the September edition just released has some interesting stuff in it.
One article is about the current status of Portland's South Waterfront (SoWhat) district. They don't exactly come out and pronounce it a failure, but they do allow as how fulfillment of the dreams and promises that were being thrown around down there four of five years ago is going to be deferred for a looooooooong time.
Included in the article are several assertions that seem highly suspicious. One has to wonder whether they have any fact-checkers at Oregon Business, and if so, what reliable support they have for these propositions, presented as facts by the article's author, Abraham Hyatt:
The promises were big: 5,000 jobs, thousands of residents, $1.9 billion worth of development.... One thousand jobs out of the promised 5,000 have materialized....
Condo sales in the past few years were booming and so tax revenue from South Waterfront has been strong — almost three times higher than what was expected....
Homer Williams, fellow South Waterfront developer Dike Dame — of Williams and Dame Development — and former PDC executive chairman Mark Rosenbaum are optimistic about what’s going to take place in that [five-year] time period. They embody the "South Waterfront is an investment that will take years to succeed" attitude that city leaders and developers have espoused from the beginning....
Really? A thousand new jobs (not ones that were already up on Pill Hill at OHSU), triple the projected tax revenues, and no one expected the cash flow to fund additional projects for nearly 10 years after construction started? None of that sounds right to me.
One thing Hyatt wrote that does ring true is that former Mayor Vera Katz refused to be interviewed for his story. I don't blame her. She and her then-chief of staff Sam Adams are more responsible for the financial mess down there than anyone else. When talk of SoWhat comes up, she should hang her head.
Comments (12)
Classic PDC propaganda.
And never ANY documentation accessable to back it up.
A thousand "new" jobs?
What a crock.
Triple the projected tax revenues?
That's hillarious given that the projected revenue was to have funded and completed ALL of the trasnportation improvements by FY 06-07.
They are at least $300 million short and will need another decade.
"no one expected the cash flow to fund additional projects for nearly 10 years after construction started?"
Blatant lying. The 1999 North Macadam Urban Renewal Plan had a 20 year budget and project plan that is now 100s of million upside down and many years behind schedule.
Sam Adams recently quietly aknowledged SoWa will need additional fees, new taxes and state and federal help in order to complete it.
Sad thing is we are going to throw more money at this project regardless of hwo much it sucks.
So instead of schools, road repairs, lowering water/sewer, we'l divert more to fix I-5 access ($200M), river front improvements ($120M) and justification for the streetcar and bridge(?)
Now that it seems like Sam/Randy are going to be calling the shots expect mroe of the same.
I was reading just that very article last night, and I found the blatant half-truths hard to swallow. A much sunnier view than the reality suggests. Of course, they failed to mention that OHSU pays no taxes other than on payroll taxes. And what about those thousands of biotech jobs that LIAR VERA promised?
Yes, Sam and Vera got swept up by the hype surrounding the biotech industry. A lot of other civic leaders around the country did as well.
In order for Vera to be a liar, she would have had to have known that the jobs wouldn't materialize no matter what. I just don't think that this was the case. This is just the story of another economic fad and fizzle.
Yes, the South Waterfront area needs more public infrastructre investments. Roads, sewers and parkes are currently inadequate. How is this different than any other part of the Central City?
Most of the infrastructure improvements listed in the comments predate SOWA and would have had to be built even if the waterfront had stayed as gravel parking lots and junkyards. I-5 access in this area has always been the pitts, and the City has been looking at revamping the ramps in this area for over thirty years now.
OHSU may be a non-profit state corporation, but they are still an economic driver for the city. Given that most corporations in the state pay little or no income tax anyway due to our state's creative tax laws, how is having OHSU as the main tenent any different than if it were somebody else?
Coincidentally, I was down in SoWhat just yesterday when I decided to turn off I-5 to have a look around.
It's pretty desolate down there. Not much going on.
I noticed a Vietnamese restaurant with the name Bambuza. I don't know what the name means, but it seemed awfully close to Bamboozle, which seems appropriate for the whole district (not the restaurant).
Lance,
Among other confusion about SoWa you drop the ball big time with taxes and OHSU.
OHSU pays no property taxes or City Business taxes or TriMet taxes either.
Far different than if it were somebody else.
Vera did know the biotech expansion was a farce. It was pointed out to her in excruciating detail just like the convention center Hotel is today.
But the current officials ignore the evidence and their fiduciary responsibilities.
Many other fatal flaws were raised as Vera pushed through the SoWa plan.
Your spin on the infrastructure is so jumbled and wrong it's not worth responding to.
The misinformation and cover up at the PDC is worse than ever with OHSU playing all sorts of shifting schemes too.
PDC Lance, maybe you haven't worked with the city long enough to know the past and even recent history of numbers used by the Planning Bureau, City Council, Mayor Katz, Sam Adams and even the PDC.
According to the North Macadam District Framework Plan and subsequently used in most of city presentations and news media clips henceforth, the projected jobs to be generated were 10,000 with 5,000 people living in the district.
There is no factual basis to the 1000 jobs created. Are they including construction jobs, or the jobs transferred from Pill Hill to the new OHSU sports club? There has not been one bio-tech job generated.
Mayor Katz and many of the staff used the 10,000/5,0000 numbers numerous times. They were contested numerous times on those numbers. They were contested on the claim that only about three to four 250ft to 350ft buildings would be built in all of the three north, central, south districts.
Lying is a strong word, but since so many aspects of SoWhat were challenged and the challenges are proving to be substantially more right than Katz and Sam and the rest, then the word begins to have validity.
Oregon Business also didn't research very deep, the truth is near the surface.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (12)
Classic PDC propaganda.
And never ANY documentation accessable to back it up.
A thousand "new" jobs?
What a crock.
Triple the projected tax revenues?
That's hillarious given that the projected revenue was to have funded and completed ALL of the trasnportation improvements by FY 06-07.
They are at least $300 million short and will need another decade.
"no one expected the cash flow to fund additional projects for nearly 10 years after construction started?"
Blatant lying. The 1999 North Macadam Urban Renewal Plan had a 20 year budget and project plan that is now 100s of million upside down and many years behind schedule.
Sam Adams recently quietly aknowledged SoWa will need additional fees, new taxes and state and federal help in order to complete it.
Posted by Howard | September 2, 2008 9:37 AM
Sad thing is we are going to throw more money at this project regardless of hwo much it sucks.
So instead of schools, road repairs, lowering water/sewer, we'l divert more to fix I-5 access ($200M), river front improvements ($120M) and justification for the streetcar and bridge(?)
Now that it seems like Sam/Randy are going to be calling the shots expect mroe of the same.
Posted by Steve | September 2, 2008 9:47 AM
According to Portland Maps, there are fewer than 20 businesses in SoWa.
And, I recall that OHSU threatened that it was going to get rid of 200-300 employees because the tort cap got lifted.
The 1,000 jobs figure would be a more believable if the article at least identified the what some of those new jobs are and where they came from.
Posted by Garage Wine | September 2, 2008 10:34 AM
I was reading just that very article last night, and I found the blatant half-truths hard to swallow. A much sunnier view than the reality suggests. Of course, they failed to mention that OHSU pays no taxes other than on payroll taxes. And what about those thousands of biotech jobs that LIAR VERA promised?
Posted by Dave A. | September 2, 2008 11:05 AM
"And what about those thousands of biotech jobs that LIAR VERA promised?"
Let's ask the LIARS expert, Tensky.
Posted by Howard | September 2, 2008 11:14 AM
Yes, Sam and Vera got swept up by the hype surrounding the biotech industry. A lot of other civic leaders around the country did as well.
In order for Vera to be a liar, she would have had to have known that the jobs wouldn't materialize no matter what. I just don't think that this was the case. This is just the story of another economic fad and fizzle.
Yes, the South Waterfront area needs more public infrastructre investments. Roads, sewers and parkes are currently inadequate. How is this different than any other part of the Central City?
Most of the infrastructure improvements listed in the comments predate SOWA and would have had to be built even if the waterfront had stayed as gravel parking lots and junkyards. I-5 access in this area has always been the pitts, and the City has been looking at revamping the ramps in this area for over thirty years now.
OHSU may be a non-profit state corporation, but they are still an economic driver for the city. Given that most corporations in the state pay little or no income tax anyway due to our state's creative tax laws, how is having OHSU as the main tenent any different than if it were somebody else?
Posted by Lance | September 2, 2008 12:45 PM
Coincidentally, I was down in SoWhat just yesterday when I decided to turn off I-5 to have a look around.
It's pretty desolate down there. Not much going on.
I noticed a Vietnamese restaurant with the name Bambuza. I don't know what the name means, but it seemed awfully close to Bamboozle, which seems appropriate for the whole district (not the restaurant).
Posted by none | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
There are too many dashes in that article. It makes the article read like a bunch of strung together twitter posts.
Posted by get off my grass | September 2, 2008 3:50 PM
For the record, "Lance's" comment was posted from a City of Portland computer.
At least it was during lunch hour.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 2, 2008 5:43 PM
Lance,
Among other confusion about SoWa you drop the ball big time with taxes and OHSU.
OHSU pays no property taxes or City Business taxes or TriMet taxes either.
Far different than if it were somebody else.
Vera did know the biotech expansion was a farce. It was pointed out to her in excruciating detail just like the convention center Hotel is today.
But the current officials ignore the evidence and their fiduciary responsibilities.
Many other fatal flaws were raised as Vera pushed through the SoWa plan.
Your spin on the infrastructure is so jumbled and wrong it's not worth responding to.
The misinformation and cover up at the PDC is worse than ever with OHSU playing all sorts of shifting schemes too.
Posted by Howard | September 2, 2008 5:47 PM
10,000 jobs were promised by Vera Katz.
Not 5,000. Big difference.
Posted by got logic? | September 2, 2008 7:57 PM
PDC Lance, maybe you haven't worked with the city long enough to know the past and even recent history of numbers used by the Planning Bureau, City Council, Mayor Katz, Sam Adams and even the PDC.
According to the North Macadam District Framework Plan and subsequently used in most of city presentations and news media clips henceforth, the projected jobs to be generated were 10,000 with 5,000 people living in the district.
There is no factual basis to the 1000 jobs created. Are they including construction jobs, or the jobs transferred from Pill Hill to the new OHSU sports club? There has not been one bio-tech job generated.
Mayor Katz and many of the staff used the 10,000/5,0000 numbers numerous times. They were contested numerous times on those numbers. They were contested on the claim that only about three to four 250ft to 350ft buildings would be built in all of the three north, central, south districts.
Lying is a strong word, but since so many aspects of SoWhat were challenged and the challenges are proving to be substantially more right than Katz and Sam and the rest, then the word begins to have validity.
Oregon Business also didn't research very deep, the truth is near the surface.
Posted by Lee | September 2, 2008 9:03 PM