Palin's unblinking certitude gave way at other times in the interview to a striking imprecision, as when she struggled to respond to Couric's suggestion that the $700-billion bailout might be better funneled through middle-class families instead of Wall Street firms.
"That's why I say I, like every American I'm speaking with, we're ill about this position that we have been put in . . ." Palin began, before meandering off in fruitless pursuit of coherence.
But I'll let the governor speak for herself:
" . . . where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the healthcare reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh -- it's got to be all about job creation too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade, we've got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, um, scary thing, but 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We've got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that."
Comments (25)
WTF? Now we know why they have been keeping a muzzle on her. This just keeps getting "better" every day. If it wasn't for the fact that she could be one heart beat away from the presidency it would be funny. It's scary...really scary.
Seeing the youtube snippets of that interview yesterday were shocking. We can thank Katie Couric for pressing Palin to speak beyond her generic, well-rehearsed talking points.
With this additional insight into Palin, I think I now understand McCain's wish to postpone the presidential debate... to reschedule it over the VP debate to prevent Palin from EVER being showcased before the election.
“A McCain aide [said] that the campaign is proposing to the Presidential Debate Commission and the Obama camp that if there's no bailout deal by Friday, the first presidential debate should take the place of the vice presidential debate, currently scheduled for October 2 in St. Louis. Under this scenario, the vice presidential debate would be rescheduled for a date yet to be determined, and take place in Oxford, Miss., where the first presidential debate is currently slated to be held.”
This goes waaaay beyond dogmatic faith to something akin to Devil-worshipping frenzy.
Reasoning or pleading with people who obsess about The Rapture is futile. They are going to vote for Palin-McCain because they welcome the end of life on earth as we know it.
"This just keeps getting "better" every day." I thought that said "batty-er."
---
While she's nursing while she's making election points while she's in an 'live' interview, when the baby starts teething, it compounds the genius of the focus focus focus. Anyone? Anyone?
Well, we know she is against sin. And against taxes. Does this explain why is against syntaxes?
Actually, it seems to me that she meandered off into a fruitful pursuit of incoherence. That she, exploring the vast tundras of torpid thought that lie beneath her surface, struck the mother lode of incoherence, the ANWR, if you will, of verbal gas.
Is there any professional team comprised of a lawyer an appraiser a real estate agent and a tax accountant (let alone individually) that would urge a retail home buyer (provided with low interest rates) to nevertheless pay no more for a home than what a wealthy investor might pay for that same property? You are quite right that Sara Palin does not make the cut, to pass every professional test . . . simultaneously (can anyone?). She is, after all, not trained as a professional nor does she hold herself out as one. If all these important matters were left in the hands of experts would we be better off? I recall an effort to make, for example, membership in the bar a prerequisite to being a legislator in Oregon. Would that be an OK precondition?
I am just quibbling with the argument, not expressing support.
Let's not forget that 18 USC 1014 remains on the books, regarding over valuation of the collateral, not the debtor's FICO score. The seller got the money and the so-called buyer got debt. If one looks at purely equitable considerations, as between buyer and seller, would it not be fairer that a bad deal by a retail buyer who had relied on professionals should retain a superior claim in an action to void a bad purchase agreement? If so, how much weight (if any at all) would you ascribe to a claim that such a determination would mess up a whole lot of investment-backed expectations of rich folks who also have teams of politicians in their back pocket, and front pocket?
A proliferation of professionals should collectively look upon a mirror and recite "mirror, mirror on the wall . . . "
I, of course, view legislative initiatives to remedy predatory lending as a subterfuge to avoid addressing predatory pricing of anything purchased at the retail level by anyone that relies on credit as a necessity to obtain an essential good or service. Housing is an essential good, not a luxury (at least for the most basic of homes below 1200 square feet). Ergo, if there is aid for lending terms for home ownership it should be confined to a first mortgage and should be no greater than triple the median private sector annual wage and any break on interest rates should be coupled with a requirement that such break not result in a higher price.
Err, pdxnag, I think Jim is complaining about the readability of your post, not engaging in ad hominem. It's hard to determine just what your point is up there, as it seems to wander into several subjects and focus on none. Very literary and stream-of-consciousness, but not very clear. Could you maybe reiterate your point more concisely, please?
Thanks for watching my back, Alan. No offense intended, pdxnag. I want to understand what you're saying, but I don't know all them $10 words. And Latin is, well, Latin to me.
Think about it. She could be the one who has the authority to push the button and fulfill her Biblical destiny.
I am sure she and those like her would interpret this as "the will of God". After all, what source other than God could pull this lady out of obscurity and place her as second chair on a once-dead political campaign only to see them score an upset win. Additionally, after that extremely series of events, Palin's finger on the button would require McCain to become incapacitated and/or dead, which would be just one more 'coincidence' leading up to Armageddon for us all.
Hilarious moment in SNL's Tina Fey number this weekend: after "Katie Couric" repeats a question for the third try, "Sarah" responds: "Katie, I want to use a lifeline."
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (25)
WTF? Now we know why they have been keeping a muzzle on her. This just keeps getting "better" every day. If it wasn't for the fact that she could be one heart beat away from the presidency it would be funny. It's scary...really scary.
Posted by Usual Kevin | September 26, 2008 3:59 AM
Seeing the youtube snippets of that interview yesterday were shocking. We can thank Katie Couric for pressing Palin to speak beyond her generic, well-rehearsed talking points.
With this additional insight into Palin, I think I now understand McCain's wish to postpone the presidential debate... to reschedule it over the VP debate to prevent Palin from EVER being showcased before the election.
“A McCain aide [said] that the campaign is proposing to the Presidential Debate Commission and the Obama camp that if there's no bailout deal by Friday, the first presidential debate should take the place of the vice presidential debate, currently scheduled for October 2 in St. Louis. Under this scenario, the vice presidential debate would be rescheduled for a date yet to be determined, and take place in Oxford, Miss., where the first presidential debate is currently slated to be held.”
Posted by PdxMark | September 26, 2008 4:18 AM
Lipstick doensn't cover up the fact that Palin is DUMMER than a sack full of anvils.
Posted by KISS | September 26, 2008 5:05 AM
It's okay I'm sure she'll nail the swimsuit competition and the talent portion.
Posted by tom | September 26, 2008 6:09 AM
You know, I was going vote for Obama anyway, but I wasnt really convinced she was all that bad until now. Wow.
Posted by Jon | September 26, 2008 6:19 AM
I remember cramming for tests. Sometimes you just vomited back everything, whether it was in the right blank or not.
Posted by Alan Cordle | September 26, 2008 6:21 AM
If you want to truly understand the Palin mania, check out the Rapture Ready website, particularly "The Rapture Index":
http://www.raptureready.com/
This goes waaaay beyond dogmatic faith to something akin to Devil-worshipping frenzy.
Reasoning or pleading with people who obsess about The Rapture is futile. They are going to vote for Palin-McCain because they welcome the end of life on earth as we know it.
Posted by Grumpy | September 26, 2008 7:07 AM
"It's okay I'm sure she'll nail the swimsuit competition and the talent portion. "
Awesome, simply awesome.
Posted by Bpaul | September 26, 2008 7:29 AM
"This just keeps getting "better" every day." I thought that said "batty-er."
---
While she's nursing while she's making election points while she's in an 'live' interview, when the baby starts teething, it compounds the genius of the focus focus focus. Anyone? Anyone?
Posted by Tenskwatawa | September 26, 2008 7:36 AM
Well, we know she is against sin. And against taxes. Does this explain why is against syntaxes?
Actually, it seems to me that she meandered off into a fruitful pursuit of incoherence. That she, exploring the vast tundras of torpid thought that lie beneath her surface, struck the mother lode of incoherence, the ANWR, if you will, of verbal gas.
Posted by ejs | September 26, 2008 7:40 AM
If Palin is dumber than "a sack full of anvils"; how dumb is McCain for selecting her for v/p?
blzzard of words... speaking in tongues, continued.
Posted by portland native | September 26, 2008 7:42 AM
Sarah Palin, making Dan Quayle look good all month.
Posted by Alan DeWitt | September 26, 2008 8:58 AM
Is there any professional team comprised of a lawyer an appraiser a real estate agent and a tax accountant (let alone individually) that would urge a retail home buyer (provided with low interest rates) to nevertheless pay no more for a home than what a wealthy investor might pay for that same property? You are quite right that Sara Palin does not make the cut, to pass every professional test . . . simultaneously (can anyone?). She is, after all, not trained as a professional nor does she hold herself out as one. If all these important matters were left in the hands of experts would we be better off? I recall an effort to make, for example, membership in the bar a prerequisite to being a legislator in Oregon. Would that be an OK precondition?
I am just quibbling with the argument, not expressing support.
Let's not forget that 18 USC 1014 remains on the books, regarding over valuation of the collateral, not the debtor's FICO score. The seller got the money and the so-called buyer got debt. If one looks at purely equitable considerations, as between buyer and seller, would it not be fairer that a bad deal by a retail buyer who had relied on professionals should retain a superior claim in an action to void a bad purchase agreement? If so, how much weight (if any at all) would you ascribe to a claim that such a determination would mess up a whole lot of investment-backed expectations of rich folks who also have teams of politicians in their back pocket, and front pocket?
A proliferation of professionals should collectively look upon a mirror and recite "mirror, mirror on the wall . . . "
I, of course, view legislative initiatives to remedy predatory lending as a subterfuge to avoid addressing predatory pricing of anything purchased at the retail level by anyone that relies on credit as a necessity to obtain an essential good or service. Housing is an essential good, not a luxury (at least for the most basic of homes below 1200 square feet). Ergo, if there is aid for lending terms for home ownership it should be confined to a first mortgage and should be no greater than triple the median private sector annual wage and any break on interest rates should be coupled with a requirement that such break not result in a higher price.
Posted by pdxnag | September 26, 2008 9:00 AM
I'm not sure who is less understandable: Palin or pdxnag.
Posted by Jim | September 26, 2008 9:51 AM
Think about it. She could be the one who has the authority to push the button and fulfill her Biblical destiny.
Posted by DB | September 26, 2008 10:09 AM
Jim,
Here is a link to what some folks describe as ad hominem.
Posted by pdxnag | September 26, 2008 11:02 AM
Err, pdxnag, I think Jim is complaining about the readability of your post, not engaging in ad hominem. It's hard to determine just what your point is up there, as it seems to wander into several subjects and focus on none. Very literary and stream-of-consciousness, but not very clear. Could you maybe reiterate your point more concisely, please?
Posted by Alan DeWitt | September 26, 2008 11:14 AM
Thanks for watching my back, Alan. No offense intended, pdxnag. I want to understand what you're saying, but I don't know all them $10 words. And Latin is, well, Latin to me.
Posted by Jim | September 26, 2008 12:13 PM
Think about it. She could be the one who has the authority to push the button and fulfill her Biblical destiny.
I am sure she and those like her would interpret this as "the will of God". After all, what source other than God could pull this lady out of obscurity and place her as second chair on a once-dead political campaign only to see them score an upset win. Additionally, after that extremely series of events, Palin's finger on the button would require McCain to become incapacitated and/or dead, which would be just one more 'coincidence' leading up to Armageddon for us all.
Or something like that...
Posted by none | September 26, 2008 2:41 PM
My ramble should have said "extremely UNLIKELY series of events".
Posted by none | September 26, 2008 2:42 PM
Moving on to the swimsuit competition, here it is...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YYplAoEdDs
Posted by nuovorecord | September 26, 2008 3:03 PM
"Thanks for watching my back, Alan."
No worries. I prefer flamewars that are actually on purpose. :-)
Posted by alan DeWitt | September 26, 2008 7:32 PM
If Palin is going to launch all missiles, wouldn't it make sense to run up the U.S. Treasury Debt as high as we can before the end days?
A round of drinks for everybody in the country: UNCLE SAM IS BUYING.
Posted by Mister Tee | September 27, 2008 7:20 AM
As Putin rears his head, Palin heads her rear.
Posted by Bark Munster | September 27, 2008 10:19 AM
Hilarious moment in SNL's Tina Fey number this weekend: after "Katie Couric" repeats a question for the third try, "Sarah" responds: "Katie, I want to use a lifeline."
Posted by Allan L. | September 28, 2008 5:13 PM