Google bait: Collider has secretly opened a black hole
A friend of mine suggested that I use my internet powers to start a baseless rumor, just to see what happens. So here goes: The Large Hadron Collider project is being terminated permanently because in its initial power-up phase, it already began a small black hole that will grow steadily but uncontrollably until it destroys the entire earth.
Comments (20)
The men in the black helocopters will be landing in your backyard in
I've been following this possibility on Coast to Coast radio late at night and one of the misconceptions is that we'd be able to tell right away. In other words, it really might have made a black hole and we don't know about it yet.
They even described how it would slowly grow over 4 years until we start feeling a lot of rumbling just before the earth was swallowed.
Have a nice day!
This is a perfect post for me because not understanding physics is one of my hobbies. I just wish I had known back in school how much B.S.-ing you could get away with.
One theoretical physicist - which just means that theoretically, he's a physicist - wrote that time doesn't exist. This was after a long study involving all kinds of funding. His conclusion? Time is just a series of "nows".
I'm not kidding. I could have worked in that field with slinging like that. His slinging definitely attained escape velocity.
My theory has never been proven wrong and it's simple:
The real story is always more amazing than anyone thought. I have listened to Stephen Hawking talk about String Theory and lots of other dimensions. Using a voice box, he described our universe as a stretched balloon or the shadows of a campfire flickering on the roof of a cave. Okay.
Just today I read about dark flow. Scientists have located clusters of galaxies that are moving uniformly in a direction that doesn't make sense. Here's the money line: They say the force pulling them is from outside the known universe. God, is that you?
Speaking of God, these scientists are definitely playing God with this collider in that the ratio of what could go wrong to the benefits of what they're trying to learn approaches infinity.
Making a starter black hole is a real concern and it already could have happened.
I say scrap it, and use it as a set in the next Austin Powers movie.
My understanding of black holes is that they're created when a star collapses and the mass overwhelms the atomic structure.
This link discusses the particle collisions happening all the time in the universe and concedes micro black holes could form but will quickly self-destruct. But are the conditions in this collider
the same as in the universe in general as they fire these beams at each other in head-on collisions in a magnetic field. Maybe.
The article mentions that they actually hope to see some of the signs of micro black holes self-destructing, so it's not like they're saying this thing won't create them.
Hey, I'm willing to take some chances in the name of science, but I think these were fair concerns to have, in case something went wrong.
By the way, the collider is down for repairs until Spring because something went wrong.
It has long been my contention the only logical explanation for why the leaders of the world (and of the United States economy) have let matters deteriorate to the point of self-destructive chaos is because they know an asteroid is going to destroy the planet anyway.
And, lo and behold, there it was on page eighteen of the NY Post a few months ago:
An asteroid capable of destroying the Earth has a 45,000 to one shot of hitting us in April 2036.
Stuck on page eighteen in the New York Post gave the story great credibility because, as every New Yorker knows, if it were total BS it would have appeared on Page One.
Then, this morning I found this link:
> They say the force pulling them is
> from outside the known universe.
No. They think the force pulling them is mass in our universe but beyond where we can see. We can only see back about 15 billion light-years (the age of the universe), but because the universe expanded very quickly in the beginning, exponentially ("inflation"), there is much more beyond our viewing horizon.
Thanks, that's a classic example of me misreading something. I see: the observable universe is limited by how long it's been since it started. We can't see the parts that are farther away than those light years can travel. Thanks for the correction.
Now I wonder what is so big that giant clusters of galaxies are being drawn to it? I can't imagine it being a black hole. Maybe it's a portal to somewhere else.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (20)
The men in the black helocopters will be landing in your backyard in
5...4...3...2...1
Posted by Mister Tee | September 28, 2008 6:51 PM
Given that we'll all just pop out in an alternate parallel universe, nobody will even realize it happened anyway. Happens all the time. Deja Vu.
Posted by PDX Native | September 28, 2008 7:04 PM
I've been following this possibility on Coast to Coast radio late at night and one of the misconceptions is that we'd be able to tell right away. In other words, it really might have made a black hole and we don't know about it yet.
They even described how it would slowly grow over 4 years until we start feeling a lot of rumbling just before the earth was swallowed.
Have a nice day!
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 28, 2008 7:07 PM
it would slowly grow over 4 years until we start feeling a lot of rumbling
You mean the thing can make chili?
Posted by Allan L. | September 28, 2008 7:33 PM
LHC Webcams:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
Posted by Rainfollower | September 28, 2008 7:52 PM
We may pop out in an alternate parallel universe however everything may be in reverse. That's scary.
Posted by Abe | September 28, 2008 8:40 PM
Would be more effective if you removed the "Google Bait" from the headline.
Posted by Jake | September 28, 2008 9:23 PM
We may pop out in an alternate parallel universe however everything may be in reverse. That's scary.
Would that mean Al Gore was POTUS, 9/11 never happened and the DOW would be at 18,000?
Posted by mp97303 | September 28, 2008 9:39 PM
.ti ot desu teg uoy ecno yracs os t’nsi esrever ni gniviL
Posted by PDX Native | September 28, 2008 9:54 PM
This is a perfect post for me because not understanding physics is one of my hobbies. I just wish I had known back in school how much B.S.-ing you could get away with.
One theoretical physicist - which just means that theoretically, he's a physicist - wrote that time doesn't exist. This was after a long study involving all kinds of funding. His conclusion? Time is just a series of "nows".
I'm not kidding. I could have worked in that field with slinging like that. His slinging definitely attained escape velocity.
My theory has never been proven wrong and it's simple:
The real story is always more amazing than anyone thought. I have listened to Stephen Hawking talk about String Theory and lots of other dimensions. Using a voice box, he described our universe as a stretched balloon or the shadows of a campfire flickering on the roof of a cave. Okay.
Just today I read about dark flow. Scientists have located clusters of galaxies that are moving uniformly in a direction that doesn't make sense. Here's the money line: They say the force pulling them is from outside the known universe. God, is that you?
Speaking of God, these scientists are definitely playing God with this collider in that the ratio of what could go wrong to the benefits of what they're trying to learn approaches infinity.
Making a starter black hole is a real concern and it already could have happened.
I say scrap it, and use it as a set in the next Austin Powers movie.
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 28, 2008 9:57 PM
If anybody is interested, this is easy to digest, and only one of many sources of layman information on the LHC:
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4109
Gaining an understanding of physics is actually very rewarding. And I'm not B.S.- ing
Posted by PDX Native | September 28, 2008 10:19 PM
My understanding of black holes is that they're created when a star collapses and the mass overwhelms the atomic structure.
This link discusses the particle collisions happening all the time in the universe and concedes micro black holes could form but will quickly self-destruct. But are the conditions in this collider
the same as in the universe in general as they fire these beams at each other in head-on collisions in a magnetic field. Maybe.
The article mentions that they actually hope to see some of the signs of micro black holes self-destructing, so it's not like they're saying this thing won't create them.
Hey, I'm willing to take some chances in the name of science, but I think these were fair concerns to have, in case something went wrong.
By the way, the collider is down for repairs until Spring because something went wrong.
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 28, 2008 11:04 PM
"...something went wrong"
Houston, we've got a problem.
Posted by Mister Tee | September 29, 2008 4:45 AM
It has long been my contention the only logical explanation for why the leaders of the world (and of the United States economy) have let matters deteriorate to the point of self-destructive chaos is because they know an asteroid is going to destroy the planet anyway.
And, lo and behold, there it was on page eighteen of the NY Post a few months ago:
An asteroid capable of destroying the Earth has a 45,000 to one shot of hitting us in April 2036.
Stuck on page eighteen in the New York Post gave the story great credibility because, as every New Yorker knows, if it were total BS it would have appeared on Page One.
Then, this morning I found this link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/dec/07/spaceexploration.research
which is talking about odds of 5,500 to 1. Though, it also brought the comforting news that we should know for sure by 2029 whaz up with that.
Posted by ejs | September 29, 2008 6:40 AM
You know if the end comes with us owing 10 to 20 trillion dollars that would be SWEET!
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 29, 2008 7:25 AM
I thought I had been living in a black hole/alternative universe for the last 8 years!
Posted by portland native | September 29, 2008 7:38 AM
> They say the force pulling them is
> from outside the known universe.
No. They think the force pulling them is mass in our universe but beyond where we can see. We can only see back about 15 billion light-years (the age of the universe), but because the universe expanded very quickly in the beginning, exponentially ("inflation"), there is much more beyond our viewing horizon.
Posted by David | September 29, 2008 7:59 AM
Thanks, that's a classic example of me misreading something. I see: the observable universe is limited by how long it's been since it started. We can't see the parts that are farther away than those light years can travel. Thanks for the correction.
Now I wonder what is so big that giant clusters of galaxies are being drawn to it? I can't imagine it being a black hole. Maybe it's a portal to somewhere else.
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 29, 2008 10:27 AM
OK, HG Wells Jr., didn't that War of the Worlds radio show teach you anything?
More better....
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM"
Posted by dyspeptic | September 29, 2008 11:08 AM
All I know about the collider, is it's dangerous to cross the beams. I learned that from Ghostbusters.
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 29, 2008 11:46 AM