
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,900 unique visits a day, and more than 53,000 page views a week (as of October 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Marques de Casa Concha, Cabernet 2005
Santi, Sortesele Pinot Grigio 2006
Al Muvedre, Tinto Joven 2006
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2006
Gritti, Ca' Andrea, Umbria red 2005
Altos de Luzon, Jumilla 2004
Thomas Leithner, Zweigelt 2004
Cain Cuvee NV 3
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot 2003
Meridian, Sauvignon Blanc 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Paringa, Shiraz 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2005
Kris, Pinot Grigio 2006
Silvan Ridge, Pinot Gris 2006
Fife, Mendocino Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
Castle Rock, Cabernet, Paso Robles 2005
Willakenzie, Pinot Gris 2006
The Show, Cabernet 2005
Essencia Valdemar, Rioja Rose 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Beaulieu Vineyard. Napa Valley Cabernet 2004
Irony, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2003
Rosenblum, Petite Sirah, Heritage Clones 2005
Fra Guerau, Montsant 2002
Barefoot Chardonnay
Kana, Syrah 2004
Castell Salegg, Chardonnay, Alto Adige 2004
Fetish, The Watcher Shiraz 2004
Gold Note, Fair Play Zinfandel 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Canoe Ridge Estate Cabernet 2003
Ponzi, Pinot Noir 2004
Red Diamond, Merlot 2003
Mateus, Rose
Benton Lane Pinot Noir 2004
Penya Cadiella Vins de Comtat 2003
Kamiak, Cellar Select Red 2003
Anselmi, San Vincenzo 2005
Rubrato, Aglianico dei Feudi di San Gregorio 2004
Le Grand Noir (Black Sheep) Cabernet-Shiraz
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2005
Los Vascos, Cabernet, Reserve 2004
Jackaroo, Shiraz 2003
Paul Jaboulet Aine, Crozes Hermitage Syrah, "La Jalet," 2001
Paul Jaboulet Aine, Cotes du Rhone, "Parallele '45,'" 2003
Rolf Binder, Barossa Valley Shiraz 2003
Oyster Bay, Sauvignon Blanc 2006
Woodbridge Chardonnay 2005
Barnard & Griffin, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2004
Quinto do Carmo, Alentejano Red 2000
Forefathers, Alexander Valley Cabernet 2001
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 28
At this date last year: 102
Total run in 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (22)
Maybe 10 PSU students share the rent at one of these units--amazing location for keggers!!
Posted by jimbo | August 16, 2008 8:48 AM
Are they asking the typical first, last and security deposit? If so, it could take over nine grand just to move in. Yowzer.
And on Belmont? Why there isn't a Brooks Brothers store for miles.
Posted by Gil Johnson | August 16, 2008 8:48 AM
Is this Manhattan?
No, this is not Manhattan and SE Belmont is no Greenwich Village. Anyone willing to pay that much to live within a few blocks of a iconic cultural hubbub like, er, Zupans is what might have once been referred to as a "rube."
Posted by Where am I? | August 16, 2008 9:39 AM
Let's see, $3,175 a month -- at 6.5% interest, that's the equivalent of a $502,317 mortgage -- but of course, with none of the tax benefits of ownership.
But this way Homer still has to pay the property taxes. Which appear to be the usual arrangement.
Posted by john rettig | August 16, 2008 10:09 AM
That sort of rent would require a six-figure gig, wouldn't it? And if you're making six-figures, why on Earth would you rent? Especially in Portland.
Can't wait to see what happens when all of the existing condo stock comes on-line. At least they'll all be linked by streetcar.
Posted by Chris Snethen | August 16, 2008 10:23 AM
That should make it easier for the FDIC to audit the REO records.
Posted by Mister Tee | August 16, 2008 10:31 AM
why on Earth would you rent? Especially in Portland.
Well, for one: If you expect to have it see it offered at 25% less next year, why not?
Posted by john rettig | August 16, 2008 11:38 AM
As I was saying to another underpaid professional the other day , it is gonna be sweet when
Homer and his kind have to give all these buildings back to the banks , and they will write off a bunch of dead paper , and rent the stuff in our price range.Hey Homer , thanks for my future imported marble counertops!
Posted by billb | August 16, 2008 11:50 AM
I see a sweet deal with the State in this. A lease for use as transitional housing of reformed criminals, like the sex offenders in Wheeler Co. This, of course when the spendy condos sit vacant and devalue accordingly. Oops, there goes the neighborhood. But wait, aren't all the commuters going urban? Maybe there is a market? But not at those dollars. I think the definition of urban blight just expanded. But they do have granite countertops.
Posted by genop | August 16, 2008 1:10 PM
Suggest you tour these before you comment on the fit and finish. First hand report to me was that they lowballed it considerably compared to similarly priced units elsewhere in the region.
I think the choice about sell vs rent has to do with the owner's tax preferences, not marketability. This is a Jack question, but doesn't the rental income loss result in a better tax play for the developer?
Would love to have someone total up all the subsidies to real estate developers in this town from all public sources, breaking out tax expenditures. If it were up to me, the authors of all these transfers of wealth from a struggling community to the already rich would go to jail for a long, long, long time, as would the recipients.
Posted by equal time | August 16, 2008 3:48 PM
If you expect to have it see it offered at 25% less next year, why not?
Touche.
Posted by Chris Snethen | August 16, 2008 5:41 PM
If an investor wants to invest in a rental and wants his money back in ten years then a ball-park value for the unit would be $3,175 times 120, or $381,000.
Just search on property + "capitalization rate"
To get to the $500,000 price, as a rental, the rent would have to be closer to $4,167 per month.
BTW, $381,000 is real close to 75% of $500,000. Good guess.
What would the market rate rent be for the property?
equal time -- "rental income loss"
That issue, as per a federally related contract to deliver affordable housing, was addressed in S50763 Wilsonville Heights Assoc., Ltd. v. Dept. of Rev.
Are these Luxury condos just stealth units for the homeless? Funny.
Posted by pdxnag | August 16, 2008 6:54 PM
"And if you're making six-figures, why on Earth would you rent?"
Why on earth would anyone in PDX decide to become a loanowner when renting is so much more affordable?
Posted by squezzed | August 16, 2008 6:55 PM
Why on earth would anyone in PDX decide to become a loanowner when renting is so much more affordable?
Well, for one thing, rent inevitably increases over the years, while a mortgage does not (as long as you don't borrow against equity).
Posted by Gil Johnson | August 16, 2008 10:09 PM
Over $3,000/mo for rent? Thats insane. I have rented a 3 bedroom 1500 sqft townhouse in Beaverton for the last 15 years. It was $650/month when I moved in, and it just went up to $725 last month. Personally, I think renting has been ok, for me anyway.
Yes, I know I have basically thrown my money away. But buying just has never panned out for us. The closest we came was approval for $250k a few years back, but the payment would have been over $1600/mo.
Not happening.
Posted by Jon | August 17, 2008 12:15 AM
Watch out for those granite counter tops. They are full of radon.
Posted by portland native | August 17, 2008 9:49 AM
And the city council is concerned about affordable housing.
Posted by Dave Lister | August 17, 2008 11:07 AM
Gil, gil, gil, like many a loanowner you are clearly not familiar with inflation and "real" money. I'd rather pay rent on someone else's depreciating asset than throw it away on a mortgage. I rent a 3 BR house in Sunnyside for 1200. In 2000 we payed 1100.
PDX will see 50% REAL decline in housing prices over the next 3-5 years. Anyone who bought in the past 3 years is going be very sorry.
Posted by squeezed | August 17, 2008 12:59 PM
PDX will see 50% REAL decline in housing prices over the next 3-5 years. Anyone who bought in the past 3 years is going [to] be very sorry.
Do you mean, "Based on a number of factors, the likelihood is"?
Sure we're probably in for further sliding, but c'mon, nobody knows the future with the absolute certainty you betray.
Posted by Pete | August 17, 2008 3:49 PM
"Do you mean, "Based on a number of factors, the likelihood is"?"
Inflation is running at ~6%. If inflation remains at current levels PDX will have a 30% haircut in 5 years without any change in nominal prices.
"but c'mon, nobody knows the future with the absolute certainty you betray."
I'm pretty damn certain.
Posted by squeezed | August 18, 2008 10:34 AM
You're lost in the math, Squeezed. Yawn.
Posted by Jim | August 18, 2008 12:13 PM
Gil wrote:
"Well, for one thing, rent inevitably increases over the years, while a mortgage does not (as long as you don't borrow against equity)."
Only a portion of rent is the mortgage. Operating expenses and property taxes go up over time when you own too. If the rental housing market sucks the rent might go down (like in the last 7-8 years) but your mortgage, water, sewer, garbage, property taxes, etc. will never go down. Renting gives you flexibility to move and if taxes go through the roof in the town you are in you can bail out quickly.
Posted by John | August 18, 2008 3:26 PM