Combine the blind deregulation-privatization zeal of the Reagan years with the incompetence of Bush Jr., and you get a collapse of the entire financial system. Hang on tight, America. We may well be going far beyond a "mild recession."
Comments (15)
Mild Recession? Another DUH moment from higher education. I read that with the government take-over of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the national debt will double. Anther bail-out for the fat cats.
As for blame, the dimmos and repug presidents of late are guilty as hell. No leadership and pandering to the big money contributors caused this. With out regulation the free-for-all is taking it's toll. Enron was the sneeze with the foreboding of the flu about to hit.
The next president, McCain or Obama, will not be capable of adequately handling of this coming disaster.
Not to mention, Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac is rife with Enron-like accounting practices and scandal -- to the tune of $40 billion. Run and staffed by a myriad of ex-Clinton administration members.
Funny how the media pretty much buried that story. It's much more fun to blame Bush for hay fever and bad coffee.
Actually, it was Lyndon B. Johnson who began the privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so as to get some of the debt off the federal government's books at the time. LBJ was actually a democrat. The past two administrations have both been asleep at the wheel with regard to these institutions, as the former was asleep with regard to domestic energy supply another big problem currently. Former Fed chief Greenspan warned of the Fannie and Freddie Mac overextended debt situations way back in the 90s even. Of course, Greenspan is kind of a goof too. At the height of the housing boom back in 2005, for instance, he's telling people to take advantage of adjustable rate mortgages versus conventional 30 year mortgages.
Well guess were headed towards more socialism for awhile until we get tired of that. Ying and Yang.
It would be interesting if this managed to double the national debt as the national debt was already on track to nearly double during Bush's term. Quadrupling an already high national debt in that period would be quite an achievement.
A few years ago I believe about twenty percent of federal revenue was spent on servicing the national debt. How long can it be before the government defaults?
Is it time to start converting investments to gold, or just go straight to stockpiling food?
One thing you repugs don't like to remember is that the old jelly bean from California was the great deregulator and less government proclaimer.
He was the great commentator as he spun the wool over the eyes of public.
It's actually not that bad. If Fannie and Freddie go under, the government just creates another government agency and uses that entity to provide loans.
Fannie and Freddie are privately held companies not government agencies. Google GSE and read up a bit.
True. But initially they were government agencies. The U.S. only let the GSE's go public a couple years after creating them.
My guess is the government is willing to let them go bankrupt, wiping out shareholders, and then it will provide them just enough liquidity for them to continue buying "safe" loans. But they won't provide enough money for the GSE's to actually make any type of profit.
I'm guessing it will end up costing taxpayers a couple hundred billion dollars. Which, you know, is what, a couple weeks in Iraq?
"But they won't provide enough money for the GSE's to actually make any type of profit."
Money from the window at 2% being leveraged up 10x to lend at 5% won't make money?
"I'm guessing it will end up costing taxpayers a couple hundred billion dollars."
China and Russia are FNM and FREs largest creditors. Are they going to continue to take a bath in agencies and treasuries? At some point its game over (for living beyond our means).
Money from the window at 2% being leveraged up 10x to lend at 5% won't make money?
I don't think they actually got access to the Discount window. I think that was just a rumor, the Fed floated to see how the market would respond. And the Euro promptly shot through the roof. So I'm betting it doesn't happen.
At some point its game over (for living beyond our means).
The Brad Delong link was the most accurate description of the current "crisis" that I've read. Clearly, Freddie and Fannie have benefitted from their implicit association with the U.S. Treasury without any direct outlay of taxpayer funds(even the cost's of their regulator, OFHEO is charged to the GSE's).
And Fannie and Freddie have paid billions in federal taxes since becoming public stock companies, in addition to being the go to "affordable housing" piggy bank for billions of dollars worth of Congressional mandates.
If the implicit guarantee is going to survive, this crisis of confidence needs a more explicit "backstop" to butress investor confidence during America's mortgage meltdown. Without that, the likelihood of true nationalization is much more likely (Paulson's "squirtgun vs. bazooka analogy is correct, if less than artfully drawn).
The CalculatedRisk author offered this observation (which I agree with):
The irony of the "subprime" situation, it seems to me, is that we probably all would have been better off if the GSEs had gotten into it in a big way. If the GSEs had been able to create a market in "vanilla" subprime--fixed rates, no prepayment penalties, careful documentation requirements, competitive pricing--and forced their seller/servicers into a "subprime box," the subprime loan market would have been a lot better off. The "pseudo-Maes and Macs" have never really been very good at providing the kind of market discipline within their purview that the real Mae and Mac have. But we wanted "innovation" and "choice" and "flexibility," not domesticated subprime and "alt" financing with low margins, uniform loan terms, and front and side airbags.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
Mild Recession? Another DUH moment from higher education. I read that with the government take-over of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the national debt will double. Anther bail-out for the fat cats.
As for blame, the dimmos and repug presidents of late are guilty as hell. No leadership and pandering to the big money contributors caused this. With out regulation the free-for-all is taking it's toll. Enron was the sneeze with the foreboding of the flu about to hit.
The next president, McCain or Obama, will not be capable of adequately handling of this coming disaster.
Posted by KISS | July 11, 2008 9:17 AM
Not to mention, Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac is rife with Enron-like accounting practices and scandal -- to the tune of $40 billion. Run and staffed by a myriad of ex-Clinton administration members.
Funny how the media pretty much buried that story. It's much more fun to blame Bush for hay fever and bad coffee.
Posted by Chris McMullen | July 11, 2008 10:07 AM
Actually, it was Lyndon B. Johnson who began the privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so as to get some of the debt off the federal government's books at the time. LBJ was actually a democrat. The past two administrations have both been asleep at the wheel with regard to these institutions, as the former was asleep with regard to domestic energy supply another big problem currently. Former Fed chief Greenspan warned of the Fannie and Freddie Mac overextended debt situations way back in the 90s even. Of course, Greenspan is kind of a goof too. At the height of the housing boom back in 2005, for instance, he's telling people to take advantage of adjustable rate mortgages versus conventional 30 year mortgages.
Well guess were headed towards more socialism for awhile until we get tired of that. Ying and Yang.
Posted by Bob Clark | July 11, 2008 10:26 AM
It would be interesting if this managed to double the national debt as the national debt was already on track to nearly double during Bush's term. Quadrupling an already high national debt in that period would be quite an achievement.
A few years ago I believe about twenty percent of federal revenue was spent on servicing the national debt. How long can it be before the government defaults?
Is it time to start converting investments to gold, or just go straight to stockpiling food?
Posted by JerryB | July 11, 2008 10:35 AM
One thing you repugs don't like to remember is that the old jelly bean from California was the great deregulator and less government proclaimer.
He was the great commentator as he spun the wool over the eyes of public.
Posted by KISS | July 11, 2008 10:38 AM
Its greed that got us and we been had!
If you are looking for the culprit try the bathroom mirror as odds are you will find one there.
Posted by Abe | July 11, 2008 11:00 AM
It's actually not that bad. If Fannie and Freddie go under, the government just creates another government agency and uses that entity to provide loans.
Posted by Justin | July 11, 2008 11:34 AM
"another government agency"
Fannie and Freddie are privately held companies not government agencies. Google GSE and read up a bit.
"the government just creates another government agency and uses that entity to provide loans."
Where does all this money come from? Taking on FNM and FREs debt will double total government debt to 11 trillion dollars.
Posted by squeezed | July 11, 2008 1:11 PM
Fannie and Freddie are privately held companies not government agencies.
As is obvious from the day's headlines, that's not really true.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 11, 2008 1:25 PM
Fannie and Freddie are privately held companies not government agencies. Google GSE and read up a bit.
True. But initially they were government agencies. The U.S. only let the GSE's go public a couple years after creating them.
My guess is the government is willing to let them go bankrupt, wiping out shareholders, and then it will provide them just enough liquidity for them to continue buying "safe" loans. But they won't provide enough money for the GSE's to actually make any type of profit.
I'm guessing it will end up costing taxpayers a couple hundred billion dollars. Which, you know, is what, a couple weeks in Iraq?
Posted by Justin | July 11, 2008 2:20 PM
"But they won't provide enough money for the GSE's to actually make any type of profit."
Money from the window at 2% being leveraged up 10x to lend at 5% won't make money?
"I'm guessing it will end up costing taxpayers a couple hundred billion dollars."
China and Russia are FNM and FREs largest creditors. Are they going to continue to take a bath in agencies and treasuries? At some point its game over (for living beyond our means).
Got euros?
Posted by squeezed | July 12, 2008 10:47 AM
Brad DeLong's take on fannie and freddie:
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/07/every-time-i-tr.html
Posted by squeezed | July 12, 2008 1:12 PM
Money from the window at 2% being leveraged up 10x to lend at 5% won't make money?
I don't think they actually got access to the Discount window. I think that was just a rumor, the Fed floated to see how the market would respond. And the Euro promptly shot through the roof. So I'm betting it doesn't happen.
At some point its game over (for living beyond our means).
Agred. But I think this is a good thing.
Posted by Justin | July 12, 2008 2:51 PM
So, for the moment it's 15 Billion.
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/
But yeah, that number is likely to grow.
Posted by Justin | July 13, 2008 6:44 AM
The Brad Delong link was the most accurate description of the current "crisis" that I've read. Clearly, Freddie and Fannie have benefitted from their implicit association with the U.S. Treasury without any direct outlay of taxpayer funds(even the cost's of their regulator, OFHEO is charged to the GSE's).
And Fannie and Freddie have paid billions in federal taxes since becoming public stock companies, in addition to being the go to "affordable housing" piggy bank for billions of dollars worth of Congressional mandates.
If the implicit guarantee is going to survive, this crisis of confidence needs a more explicit "backstop" to butress investor confidence during America's mortgage meltdown. Without that, the likelihood of true nationalization is much more likely (Paulson's "squirtgun vs. bazooka analogy is correct, if less than artfully drawn).
The CalculatedRisk author offered this observation (which I agree with):
The irony of the "subprime" situation, it seems to me, is that we probably all would have been better off if the GSEs had gotten into it in a big way. If the GSEs had been able to create a market in "vanilla" subprime--fixed rates, no prepayment penalties, careful documentation requirements, competitive pricing--and forced their seller/servicers into a "subprime box," the subprime loan market would have been a lot better off. The "pseudo-Maes and Macs" have never really been very good at providing the kind of market discipline within their purview that the real Mae and Mac have. But we wanted "innovation" and "choice" and "flexibility," not domesticated subprime and "alt" financing with low margins, uniform loan terms, and front and side airbags.
Posted by Mister Tee | July 15, 2008 8:53 PM