

We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get! If you'd like to advertise without going through the Blogads system, that's do-able, too. Just e-mail us here for more information.
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 54
At this date last year: 50
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (28)
Now we've heard for a call for this idea from both the liberal side (Thomas Friedman) and the conservative side(Charles Krauthammer).
Posted by Paul G | June 7, 2008 2:20 PM
Actually, this is an idea which has been floating around for awhile. At least since the beginning of the Clinton administration.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/17/AR2006101701327.html
Posted by ejs | June 7, 2008 2:23 PM
I recall Neil Goldschmidt floating something similar when he was Jimmy Carter's transportation secretary. I think the price point/floor was a buck a gallon.
Posted by Eric Berg | June 7, 2008 2:34 PM
If you want less of something, tax it.
But don't miss the point and purpose and that to get us out of cars, electric or otherwise.
Posted by Abe | June 7, 2008 3:47 PM
Here's another novel idea: allow the United States to NOT be the only country that isn't allowed to tap its own resources. Every barrel we extract from our own wells is one less we are paying the Arabs for.
Posted by butch | June 7, 2008 3:52 PM
Maybe. More likely it winds up in the global market, which doesn't help us much.
Posted by Jack Bog | June 7, 2008 3:59 PM
I'm (obviously) no expert, but does anyone know why our government can't establish its own wells and refinery strictly and exclusively to stock the strategic petroleum reserve?
At the current rate (until suspended in May) of 70,000 barrels per day we were putting into it, that - at $130 per barrel - comes to $9,100,000.00 per day, or nearly $3.5 billion per year we are paying to foreign countries for their oil just to stock our reserve. Maybe it wouldn't effect our price at the pump, but at the very least that is a sizable chunk of cash not going into the coffers 'hostile' governments.
Posted by butch | June 7, 2008 4:34 PM
But there's good money in refining it here and selling it elsewhere. It doesn't matter how much we produce domestically, the fuels are global commodities, and they're going to end up going where the willing buyers are.
Posted by Paul G | June 7, 2008 4:54 PM
Krauthammer: At $4, it is a world transformed. Americans become rational creatures. Mass transit ridership is at a 50-year high. Driving is down 4 percent. (Any U.S. decline is something close to a miracle.) Hybrids and compacts are flying off the lots. SUV sales numbers are in free fall.
JK: Why is any of this (except, possibly hybrids) a good thing?
* Mass transit merely has the other taxpayers pick up 80% of the cost. It is slow and inconvenient. Why is this good?
* Driving down 4% means, as part of that, people not being able to do things, go places or take the vacation that they wanted to. Why is this good?
* compacts are small and therefore less safe, other things being equal. Why is this good?
* Why are less SUVs a good thing?
What he misses, is the fact that high prices bring in new supply. Coal to oil conversion is now price competitive as is tar sands. At some point these will ramp up supply and provide a price ceiling - probably around $60/bbl. Of course the other cause of high prices is the government’s blocking of drilling.
Krauthammer: Remember that "love affair" with SUVs? Love, it seems, has its price too.
JK: It’s not love, its utility.
Krauthammer: You want more fuel-efficient cars? Don't regulate. Don't mandate. Don't scold. Don't appeal to the better angels of our nature. Do one thing: Hike the cost of gas until you find the price point.
JK: Or, you could choose freedom and let people make their own choices and pay their own costs. Which will give us what the people actually want instead of what the planers (in this case congress’ puppet masters) claim the people want.
Krauthammer: Unfortunately, instead of hiking the price ourselves by means of a gasoline tax that could be instantly refunded to the American people in the form of lower payroll taxes,
Jk: Low income people pay very little payroll tax, so this another progressive screw the poor measure.
Krauthammer: For 25 years and with utter futility, I have been advocating the cure: a U.S. energy tax as a way to curtail consumption and keep the money at home.
JK: Why didn’t you advocate ALLOWING domestic supply to increase?
Krauthammer: Announce a schedule of gas-tax hikes of 50 cents every six months for the next two years. And put a tax floor under $4 gasoline, so that as high gas prices transform the U.S. auto fleet, change driving habits, and thus hugely reduce U.S. demand -- and bring down world crude oil prices -- the American consumer and the American economy reap all of the benefit.
JK: Why didn’t you advocate ALLOWING domestic supply to increase?
However, I’ll concede that a price floor would provide some certainty for new investment in expensive new plants like coal to oil, more tar sands and domestic drilling. But not $4, instead figure out the price/bbl that will allow coal to oil and Montana fields etc to MAKE A KILLING and guarantee that price for a FEW years (5?) with a variable import tax. I would expect gas at around ½ of today’s price with this scheme.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | June 7, 2008 6:24 PM
We should have started taxing the heck out of it on September 12, 2001. It's a little late now. The damage has been done.
Posted by Chris Snethen | June 7, 2008 7:25 PM
We should have started taxing the heck out of it on September 12, 2001. It's a little late now. The damage has been done.
So true.
I do wonder though, if setting a bottom for gas at $5.00/gallon might work. Then if oil prices drop, it lets the U.S. increase its revenue and start investing in mass transit or paying off the national debt.
And if oil prices increase, it doesn't affect the public, because we're already accustomed to high gas prices, and the government eats the margins.
And look, as long as we're in Iraq, can't we start commandeering some oil fields. Jesus Christ, this President sucks. If we're going to be A-holes and just invade another country for no reason, then we might as well go the extra step and start taking their cool s*** as well.
Posted by Justin | June 8, 2008 6:38 AM
Funny that I should stumble upon your blog and read this. My husband was just explaining to me how we need to tax the gas from the Middle East.
Posted by lou | June 8, 2008 7:10 AM
There is an email floating around that suggests maybe we should charge the same price for bushels of wheat to the Arabs that they are charging us for a barrel of oil.
Might not be a bad idea. I bet oil would come down.
Posted by Jon | June 8, 2008 8:20 AM
"But there's good money in refining it here and selling it elsewhere."
I think unrefined products are what gets shipped. We barely have enough refining capacaity for our needs.
I could go for a tax, IF it was used for some sort of energy developement. However, we have had god-knows how many presidents and congresses since 1972 and nothing. And I am not hearing anything from Obama or McCain.
Posted by Steve | June 8, 2008 10:03 AM
Do a Harry Truman, the man republicans so admire. Nationalize the refineries and let the government set the prices.
Posted by KISS | June 8, 2008 12:40 PM
I was talking about a price floor for oil about six months ago... turns out it's an astonishingly stupid idea.
Let's say pre-tax gas is $3.50, and we set a price floor of $5.00... thus a tax of $1.50.
What happens? The price of pre-tax gas shoots up to $5.00, and the tax drops to zero.
Remember: the world oil supply is controlled by a cartel. The people that Governor Brian Schweitzer (D-MT) calls "a group of sheiks, dictators, rats, and crooks." And he's an Arabic-speaking friend of the Saudi royal family.
Posted by Kari Chisholm | June 8, 2008 1:32 PM
Justin: Then if oil prices drop, it lets the U.S. increase its revenue and start investing in mass transit . . .
JK: What would that accomplish?
Mass transit costs more than driving.
Mass transit uses more energy than small cars (small cars are the real hope to save energy.)
Mass transit wastes people’s time.
Light rail is a total waste, The proposed Vancouver extension will cost over $2 for each passenger carried each mile. That is so much more than the cost of driving that gas would have to ger close to $100/gal to match it.
See PortlandFacts.com for the details.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | June 8, 2008 2:27 PM
Jeebus...Has anybody paid any attention to Europe?
This is exactly why they are paying the equivalent of up to $8 per gallon of petrol.
D'oh....
Posted by godfry | June 8, 2008 2:53 PM
I think part of the tax revenues generated in the euro's high price of petrol goes for supporting some of their social programs. I am sure if we had gas taxes like theirs our Democratics would be using it likewise.
Posted by pdxjim | June 8, 2008 4:50 PM
And if they had our prices, the Autobahn would be in gridlock.
Posted by godfry | June 8, 2008 5:53 PM
godfry: Jeebus...Has anybody paid any attention to Europe?
JK:Yeah transit isn’t faring much better there. In the 20 year period from 1980 to 2000, rail was down 23%, Bus&Coach, down 27% and Tram plus Metro was down 21.4%. In that period, auto trips hit 78.3% of travel miles.
See: DebunkingPortland.com/Transit/EuroTranistShareLoss.htm
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | June 8, 2008 7:24 PM
Nice mixing of unrelated statistics, JK.
Please express your statistics in the same comparable measure, please.
Posted by godfry | June 8, 2008 8:07 PM
godfry: Please express your statistics in the same comparable measure, please.
JK: It’s all listed in the source, which you apparently didn’t bother to check:
Over the twenty year period from 1980 to 2000, the following changes in EU15 market shares occurred, as a percentage of total passenger transport in passenger-kilometers:
Rail travel deceased ....................23% ....from...... 8.2 to 6.2% of total.
Bus & Coach travel deceased .......27% ....from.... 11.6 to 8.5% of total.
Tram & Metro travel deceased ......21.4% ..from.... 1.4 to 1.1% of total.
Passenger car travel increased .....23% ....from.... 76.4 to 78.3% of total.
Notice that even, in 1980, auto travel accounted for over 3/4 of total passenger transport. How many planners told us that “everybody” uses transit in Europe? They were wrong yet again. (Are planners right about anything?)
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | June 8, 2008 11:21 PM
rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Give it up. Rightwing bluster ain't going to convince anyone who figured things out using facts, and it hasn't convinced yourselves or you wouldn't be still repeatingly mimicking repeating it.
No oil. Feriod. Live different ... or not at all.
The Oil Drum.COM/
Really, the thread jumped off the logical train of thought and took off into the bushes of nonsense, from the first statement that claims Friedman is liberal. He's so clueless he can't even find his way to the liberal campground, nevermind be in the crowd. Clueless = conservative = obsolete into extinction.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | June 8, 2008 11:34 PM
What do you know, when I read that article I saw the freemarket working likes it is suppose to. Why is it liberals see it as proving yet again we need to tax??
Oil is up so now consumers are driving less and demanding more fuel effecient cars from the automakers. No tax was needed for the gov't to spend on more pork barrel projects.
Posted by Darrin | June 9, 2008 9:11 AM
I find myself agreeing with Krauthammer. Hell must have frozen over.
Usually, I wouldn't even sink to using a Krauthammer column as toilet paper.
Posted by Deeds | June 9, 2008 1:13 PM
It is interesting that the debate seems to be reliance on fossil fuel versus peak oil. As JK states, personal mobility is the issue. For uncounted eons, mankind has enjoyed the liberty to transport himself where ever he wanted to go - via walking, riding on an animal, boating, rail, road, whatever; the theme is the same - "I will go where I want, when I want" not where or how the government dictates.
The peak oil / mass transit crowd has it all wrong - people, especially Americans, want the freedom to go where they want to go without the constraints of mass transit. That is why transit account for less than 5% of peak hour trips. Whether
by oil, electricity, hydrogen, or some unforseen fuel, man will find a way.
Posted by Gerry | June 9, 2008 9:20 PM
How to get even with Saudi Arabia (remember., these are the sc****gs that sent the 19 hijackers to our country which brought about 9-11). Tell the bastards they either drop the price per barell down to $1.00 per., or we'll give them a naval blockade and stop every ship trying to enter or leave that god forsaken country. If the scumbags don't like it., then we should use our tomahawk cruise missiles and target one of their refineries per hour until they "come to Jesus". I predict., they will come to 'Jesus" real fast after they lose their 3rd refinery just like the God damn J**s came to Jesus after we dropped the 2nd big one on Nagasaki.
A Loyal American., Unfortunately., there aren't too many of us left nowadays. Nowadays all we have are pussies.
GC
Posted by George Callas | June 18, 2008 1:29 PM