The democratic leadership in this country does not have the backbone to seek impeachment against elected officials who perpetrated these illegal and despicable acts under an American flag. It is now time for the International community to address these crimes by seeking indictments and trials for war crimes against top government officials; starting with Bush February 1, 2009
This is a hardball response to the killers of 3000 innocent Americans. This is a reponse to those who bragged about beheadding Daniel Pearl and setting up 9/11. Try coming to a NYC Firehouse and telling a firemen about the "war crimes" and see if you can sell it.
The treatment is an acceptible response to barbaric acts, and is OK with me. Maybe you want to let these killers out and move into your neighborhood. Let these animals know that the U.S. is going to do something more than having a Secretary of State moan and groan at the UN with no results.
Torture is a word made up of letters like any other word. And you could make those same letters spell the word urotter. And what is that? I mean, it would have to be some sort of large, powerful, savage and extinct bovine Sumerian otter. It doesn't even exist, and here liberals want to make it illegal. Typical.
It doesnt matter what we do. Some people think covering their heads and playing loud music is "torture" too.
We could send them to bed without dinner or give them a "time out", and they would still bitch.
Some people think covering their heads and playing loud music is "torture" too.
That would be the "people" who wrote the UN Convention Against Torture which the US is a signatory to, in which torture is defined as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession."
You can certainly inflict severe physical pain by playing music loud enough.
Question...now that we have to give Guantanamo prisoners lawyers & trials. This will undoubtedly be paid for by taxpayers. So by definition, are we all "sponsors of terrorism?"
Our tax dollars pay for the unprovoked, unilateral military attacks we've undertaken, as well as for the inhumane and degrading treatment of defenseless prisoners in our custody and under our control. If that's not supporting terrorism, I'm sure I don't know what is.
we can stop killing and torture, if we just do some killing and torture.
then, if they kill or torture us again, we'll kill or torture them to show that we will not stand for being killed or tortured.
then, and only then, will we be free from a world of killing and torture. and if terrorists think they can kill us more, think again. we will double-kill them. if they torture us, we will extra-torture them.
then, by god, we'll have peace. and if anybody attacks us, we'll kill them until they're peaceful. because we, as you know, are a peaceful people.
with the largest military budget in the world and the most nuclear weapons. and by the way, if any other countries want nuclear weapons, they can't have them. unless they buy the tech form us. if they don't, then they'rea terrorist state and we will attack them pre-emptively until they're peaceful.
No, it's called "justice". And I hope that they receive it.
I hope they have a plan for what to do with them once their trial is over. If they are found guilty, they will go to prison. (hopefully not on US soil though, as that will open another can of worms), but if they are found not guilty...then what? Are they getting citizenship? Will they get to sue? Or will they just push them out the courthouse door in Somewhere, USA and hope they dont do bad things while here? Most of their home countries dont want them back.
I find it hard to justify any type of torture. I try to examine myself in the worst of circumstances, wondering if it would be ever be OK with me under any circumstnaces. What if a criminal knew that a family member of mine was about to be brutally murdered? Would it be ok with me to do whatever was necessary to find out when and how, in order to stop it?
"This is a hardball response to the killers of 3000 innocent Americans."
All of those people in Gitmo for the last six years were involved in 9/11? Why not try, convict and punish them, like the 1993 WTC bombing perpetrators?
Oh yeah, because they have been tortured, so nothing they say is reliable, we'll never know whether they were involved or not with any certainty.
I give you twelve seconds of water torture before YOU confess to involvement in 9/11, BG. "Hardball" response? No, a it's BRAINLESS response.
We just plucked these people in Gitmo off the street, some in the U.S., tortured and held them. Ooh, we're so hard, or maybe just idiots. We'll never know if these people are criminals or not.
9/11 didn't transform the whole world into a perpetual French battlefield circa 1941, you geniuses, no matter what Chief Justice Roberts and Bill Kristol say. You can't just hold these people plucked off the street indefinitely. Duh.
"we can stop killing and torture, if we just do some killing and torture.
then, if they kill or torture us again, we'll kill or torture them to show that we will not stand for being killed or tortured.
then, and only then, will we be free from a world of killing and torture. and if terrorists think they can kill us more, think again. we will double-kill them. if they torture us, we will extra-torture them.
then, by god, we'll have peace. and if anybody attacks us, we'll kill them until they're peaceful. because we, as you know, are a peaceful people.
with the largest military budget in the world and the most nuclear weapons. and by the way, if any other countries want nuclear weapons, they can't have them. unless they buy the tech form us. if they don't, then they'rea terrorist state and we will attack them pre-emptively until they're peaceful."
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (19)
The democratic leadership in this country does not have the backbone to seek impeachment against elected officials who perpetrated these illegal and despicable acts under an American flag. It is now time for the International community to address these crimes by seeking indictments and trials for war crimes against top government officials; starting with Bush February 1, 2009
Posted by michael | June 16, 2008 6:32 AM
What would Neville Chamberlain say?
Posted by David E Giomore | June 16, 2008 7:24 AM
This is a hardball response to the killers of 3000 innocent Americans. This is a reponse to those who bragged about beheadding Daniel Pearl and setting up 9/11. Try coming to a NYC Firehouse and telling a firemen about the "war crimes" and see if you can sell it.
The treatment is an acceptible response to barbaric acts, and is OK with me. Maybe you want to let these killers out and move into your neighborhood. Let these animals know that the U.S. is going to do something more than having a Secretary of State moan and groan at the UN with no results.
Posted by brother gary | June 16, 2008 7:28 AM
Torture is a word made up of letters like any other word. And you could make those same letters spell the word urotter. And what is that? I mean, it would have to be some sort of large, powerful, savage and extinct bovine Sumerian otter. It doesn't even exist, and here liberals want to make it illegal. Typical.
Posted by telecom | June 16, 2008 9:17 AM
Let these animals know
Don't become one.
Posted by Jack Bog | June 16, 2008 9:23 AM
It doesnt matter what we do. Some people think covering their heads and playing loud music is "torture" too.
We could send them to bed without dinner or give them a "time out", and they would still bitch.
Posted by Jon | June 16, 2008 10:10 AM
That would be the "people" who wrote the UN Convention Against Torture which the US is a signatory to, in which torture is defined as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession."
You can certainly inflict severe physical pain by playing music loud enough.
Posted by darrelplant | June 16, 2008 11:07 AM
Torture is un-American.
"Land of the free and home of the brave" aren't just empty words. Torture is a cowardly act that has no place in my country.
If you have trouble with that, you're free to move to some other country that thinks torture is just fine.
Posted by Lev | June 16, 2008 11:30 AM
Every country has knuckle dragger's and the US is one of them...and some even post here.
Posted by KISS | June 16, 2008 11:56 AM
Question...now that we have to give Guantanamo prisoners lawyers & trials. This will undoubtedly be paid for by taxpayers. So by definition, are we all "sponsors of terrorism?"
Posted by Jon | June 16, 2008 12:55 PM
...are we all "sponsors of terrorism?"
No, it's called "justice". And I hope that they receive it.
Posted by John Rettig | June 16, 2008 12:58 PM
."..are we all "sponsors of terrorism?"
Our tax dollars pay for the unprovoked, unilateral military attacks we've undertaken, as well as for the inhumane and degrading treatment of defenseless prisoners in our custody and under our control. If that's not supporting terrorism, I'm sure I don't know what is.
Posted by Allan L. | June 16, 2008 2:03 PM
we can stop killing and torture, if we just do some killing and torture.
then, if they kill or torture us again, we'll kill or torture them to show that we will not stand for being killed or tortured.
then, and only then, will we be free from a world of killing and torture. and if terrorists think they can kill us more, think again. we will double-kill them. if they torture us, we will extra-torture them.
then, by god, we'll have peace. and if anybody attacks us, we'll kill them until they're peaceful. because we, as you know, are a peaceful people.
with the largest military budget in the world and the most nuclear weapons. and by the way, if any other countries want nuclear weapons, they can't have them. unless they buy the tech form us. if they don't, then they'rea terrorist state and we will attack them pre-emptively until they're peaceful.
Posted by ecohuman.com | June 16, 2008 3:33 PM
No, it's called "justice". And I hope that they receive it.
I hope they have a plan for what to do with them once their trial is over. If they are found guilty, they will go to prison. (hopefully not on US soil though, as that will open another can of worms), but if they are found not guilty...then what? Are they getting citizenship? Will they get to sue? Or will they just push them out the courthouse door in Somewhere, USA and hope they dont do bad things while here? Most of their home countries dont want them back.
Posted by Jon | June 16, 2008 3:49 PM
I find it hard to justify any type of torture. I try to examine myself in the worst of circumstances, wondering if it would be ever be OK with me under any circumstnaces. What if a criminal knew that a family member of mine was about to be brutally murdered? Would it be ok with me to do whatever was necessary to find out when and how, in order to stop it?
Probably.............
Gibby
Posted by Gibby | June 16, 2008 5:01 PM
John Rettig, plagiarism is very lame.
"No, it's called "justice". And I hope that they receive it."
That's an exact quote fromأسامة بن محمد بن عوض بن لادن also known as Usama Bin Laden.
Posted by squeezed | June 16, 2008 5:04 PM
"but if they are found not guilty...then what?"
Are you naive or what?
They will be shipped off to one of our lackeys...*cough*...allies...to be brutally tortured and/or killed.
Posted by squeezed | June 16, 2008 5:07 PM
They will be shipped off to one of our lackeys...*cough*...allies...to be brutally tortured and/or killed.
Well not if Mr. Obama is elected president, right? I thought he was against that.
I really doubt any of them will see a courtroom before January.
Posted by Jon | June 16, 2008 5:23 PM
"This is a hardball response to the killers of 3000 innocent Americans."
All of those people in Gitmo for the last six years were involved in 9/11? Why not try, convict and punish them, like the 1993 WTC bombing perpetrators?
Oh yeah, because they have been tortured, so nothing they say is reliable, we'll never know whether they were involved or not with any certainty.
I give you twelve seconds of water torture before YOU confess to involvement in 9/11, BG. "Hardball" response? No, a it's BRAINLESS response.
We just plucked these people in Gitmo off the street, some in the U.S., tortured and held them. Ooh, we're so hard, or maybe just idiots. We'll never know if these people are criminals or not.
9/11 didn't transform the whole world into a perpetual French battlefield circa 1941, you geniuses, no matter what Chief Justice Roberts and Bill Kristol say. You can't just hold these people plucked off the street indefinitely. Duh.
"we can stop killing and torture, if we just do some killing and torture.
then, if they kill or torture us again, we'll kill or torture them to show that we will not stand for being killed or tortured.
then, and only then, will we be free from a world of killing and torture. and if terrorists think they can kill us more, think again. we will double-kill them. if they torture us, we will extra-torture them.
then, by god, we'll have peace. and if anybody attacks us, we'll kill them until they're peaceful. because we, as you know, are a peaceful people.
with the largest military budget in the world and the most nuclear weapons. and by the way, if any other countries want nuclear weapons, they can't have them. unless they buy the tech form us. if they don't, then they'rea terrorist state and we will attack them pre-emptively until they're peaceful."
Very well said ecohuman.
Posted by Sam | June 16, 2008 10:09 PM