Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 23, 2008 5:48 PM. The previous post in this blog was Some like it hot. The next post in this blog is The fine print on the Sauvie bridge move. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Blast from the (recent) past

Portland "voter-owed elections" convict Volodymyr Golovan, currently among us on probation, has taken to the internet to reassert his innocence in the scandal involving fake signatures he produced for former City Council candidate Lucinda Tate. Golovan's got a lengthy diatribe about the case, including complaints about at least one of the lawyers involved, posted on this website.

Comments (10)

New "evidences". How about a new translators?

Mister Tee,
Could I ask you what exactly you mean by "How about a new translators?" If I am not mistaken, when people try to reproach someone by mentioning translators, they show some disrespect to the fact that someone's native language (meaning the language of the country he/she was born in) is not English. Am I correct? That reminded me of one incident that happened to me when I lived in Ukraine before moving to USA. I traveled in Strasbourg. I wanted to ask 2 French men for directions, and I asked them in English. They looked at me with disrespect, and one of them asked the second man in English: “How do you call somebody who speaks 3 languages?”, and he answered: “Trilingual”. The first one continued: “How about someone who speaks 2 languages?”, and the second guy answered: “Bilingual”. The first guy asked again: “How about someone who speaks only one language?”, and the second one said: “An American” and they both laughed.
I smiled and patiently explained them that they were wrong: there are different representatives in each nation: someone knows several languages, geography and history of different countries, and someone doesn’t know, doesn’t want to know and is proud of it, and makes spelling mistakes in his own language – the only one he/she knows. I told them the history of their area (Strasbourg is a capital of Alsace – a region that is located in contemporary France but it used to belong to Germany as well, that is why majority of Alsace population speaks French, German and some English) and spoke to them a little in French and German. Both men immediately changed their attitude towards me. They explained me the directions, apologized to me, told me that they were ashamed of the joke and took off. Only then I realized that I never told them that I was from Ukraine and not from USA. They probably thought that I was an American because I defended the intelligence of Americans so strongly.
Please let me know what you think about this incident.
BTW: If I am not mistaken, our English teacher told us in the second grade of Ukrainian school that an indefinite article “a” is not used with nouns in plural, that is why the phrase “How about a new translators?" is not correct. Am I right? Unless of course it’s a misprint, just like on the above mentioned website.
Mister Tee, have you analyzed the content of the website that Jack mentioned here? What do you think about it?

You got caught forging signatures and gaming the VOE system. If you want to whine about your conviction in a public blog, you will be ridiculed.

Your post is full of grammar and usage errors ("After the new evidences were discovered" should read "after new evidence was discovered"), you ought to have native English speaker proofread it before posting. In fact, you have not provided any new evidence, just innuendo.

And your letter to the OSB sounds like it was written for Pravda. It also reveals your Chamber of Commerce position to be both self-serving and harmful to the community: why allow your so called supporters to be tarred with the brush of your crimes? Your just stigmatizing those whom you pretend to serve.

You're done in this town. Move on. Maybe Emilie will let you sleep on her sofa.

Mister Tee,
Thank you for your comment. Also, thank you for proofreading. You can go either way in a free country – make fun of someone’s errors and misprints or contact the organization and point the errors to them, and I am sure your efforts will be appreciated.
I am not afraid of being ridiculed. There are two major types of readers – whiners and critical thinkers, with a number of people in between. Whiners are very unhappy people who don’t like the government, the economy; they don’t like their relatives because they are too greedy, their boss because he is an idiot, the rain because it is too wet, the ice because it is too slippery etc. I wouldn’t worry about being ridiculed by them because everybody understands that their opinion is lighter than emptiness. On the other hand, if a critical thinker obtains some public record materials, makes analyses of facts and evidence, comes to a different opinion than mine and points that out to me – I will only thank him for that.
You are right about the innuendo part – there are not many materials on the above mentioned website, and unfortunately not all the materials mentioned are available for public at this point. If you read the site attentively, there is enough information there for critical thinkers to analyze, come to certain conclusions, compare them with the “official” coverage of certain mainstream media companies and with my conclusions, and come up with their own opinion. Everybody can get some of the mentioned materials from the internet.
I hope that some critical thinkers will take it even to the next step and spend their time to get the trial record and other public records and newspaper articles, analyze them, and compare their findings with “official” version and my version – and their educated opinion will be very valuable to the public.
Speaking about the harm to the community… I think that the most harm to the community is done when an “official” agency makes a mistake, an “official” mainstream media creates a public opinion that supports “official” agency, and some individuals from the public agree with everything. It is understandable if the public is afraid of retaliation, just like during the communist regime, but if a certain individual from the public in a free country simply doesn’t want to make his/her own analyses and challenge the “official” version – that is when the harm to the community is done. If an “official” mistake lets criminals go free and commit more crimes – that’s when the harm to the community is done, but when an alternative media uncovers the mistake and helps bringing the justice – it’s a great service to the community.
I think that alternative media was created because some critical thinkers understood that sometimes an “official” version is not completely right.
And your letter to the OSB sounds like it was written for Pravda. I don’t know exactly what that means but hopefully you came to such conclusion after carefully reading all the information on the site and comparing all your findings with “official” and my versions. If this is the case, I would like to thank you for your comment. In future, if you could analyze the facts that were analyzed on the website and present your opinion described in details, I believe it would be more beneficial to the public.
Thank you and good luck.


I think you are suffering more from cultural ignorance than the language barrier. In my opinion, you do yourself a disservice to pursue the "didn't do it" or "I was framed" defense.

Why? Because you were convicted of a crime by a jury who was far better informed of the nuances/facts of the case than the general public. The rest of us will assume you are guilty as charged.

More importantly, many of us think you gamed the VOE system and enabled Emilie Boyles to qualify for $145,000 that she didn't deserve. In short, you defrauded PORTLAND TAXPAYERS out of $145,000, much of which remains outstanding.

If you want to suggest that you didn't forge signatures, then say "I didn't forge signatures".

If you want to suggest that you didn't certify that each signature you gathered was accompanied with a $5.00 dollar contribution, then say "I didn't front any $5 contributions knowing that Emilie would refund them upon cashing her VOE check".

If you can't make both of the above declarations then STFU and move on.

Better yet, quit lying about what happened, admit you did it, say your sorry, and try to conduct yourself in strict compliance with the law in the future.

Americans can forgive just about any transgression when somebody is willing to show they have learned from their mistakes. We don't forgive people who maintain their innocence in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Clearly, you're a smart guy. Your English is certainly better than my Russian. But you insult my intelligence with your straw man defense and contrived theory of your false prosecution.

Mister Tee,
Thank again for your comment.
If the issue of my guilt or innocence is insulting your intelligence and doesn't allow you to carefully examine what is described on the website - let's just drop it for now. Is there anything else in your opinion that is worth investigating or checking upon that is written there? Do you think it might be useful for the public to at least read through some of the newspaper articles and listen to the trial testimonies and compare it to what is written before denying the whole thing?

If you want to suggest that you didn't forge signatures, then say "I didn't forge signatures."

If you want to suggest that you didn't FALSELY certify that each signature you gathered was accompanied with a $5.00 dollar contribution, then say "I didn't front any $5 contributions knowing that Emilie would refund them upon cashing her VOE check."

If you can't make both of the above declarations then STFU and move on.


Thank you for your comment.
I believe it would be more valuable if you could find "both of the above declarations" YOURSELF after carefully examining the website, newspaper articles and other public information.
It's a paradox but I still didn't find the opinion of critical thinkers for the following questions from the above comment: "Is there anything else in your opinion that is worth investigating or checking upon that is written there? Do you think it might be useful for the public to at least read through some of the newspaper articles and listen to the trial testimonies and compare it to what is written before denying the whole thing?"

Prince Vlad:

You've got blood on your hands and teeth, and there is a woman lying dead at your feet with puncture wounds in her neck.

We're just asking you to say you're not a vampire while the villagers sharpen a wooden stake. And you reply with a diatribe about how poorly vampires have been portrayed by the media and the church.

If you aren't willing to say "I did not violate the law", then everything else is epilogue.

Did you forge the signatures? Yes or no.

If you can't say no, then you're wasting your time here. Maybe try BlueOregon: I'm sure a more nuanced version of the Truth would play better over there.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend

The Occasional Book

Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 377
At this date last year: 237
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics