Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 23, 2008 5:48 PM. The previous post in this blog was Some like it hot. The next post in this blog is The fine print on the Sauvie bridge move. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Blast from the (recent) past

Portland "voter-owed elections" convict Volodymyr Golovan, currently among us on probation, has taken to the internet to reassert his innocence in the scandal involving fake signatures he produced for former City Council candidate Lucinda Tate. Golovan's got a lengthy diatribe about the case, including complaints about at least one of the lawyers involved, posted on this website.

Comments (10)

New "evidences". How about a new translators?

Mister Tee,
Could I ask you what exactly you mean by "How about a new translators?" If I am not mistaken, when people try to reproach someone by mentioning translators, they show some disrespect to the fact that someone's native language (meaning the language of the country he/she was born in) is not English. Am I correct? That reminded me of one incident that happened to me when I lived in Ukraine before moving to USA. I traveled in Strasbourg. I wanted to ask 2 French men for directions, and I asked them in English. They looked at me with disrespect, and one of them asked the second man in English: “How do you call somebody who speaks 3 languages?”, and he answered: “Trilingual”. The first one continued: “How about someone who speaks 2 languages?”, and the second guy answered: “Bilingual”. The first guy asked again: “How about someone who speaks only one language?”, and the second one said: “An American” and they both laughed.
I smiled and patiently explained them that they were wrong: there are different representatives in each nation: someone knows several languages, geography and history of different countries, and someone doesn’t know, doesn’t want to know and is proud of it, and makes spelling mistakes in his own language – the only one he/she knows. I told them the history of their area (Strasbourg is a capital of Alsace – a region that is located in contemporary France but it used to belong to Germany as well, that is why majority of Alsace population speaks French, German and some English) and spoke to them a little in French and German. Both men immediately changed their attitude towards me. They explained me the directions, apologized to me, told me that they were ashamed of the joke and took off. Only then I realized that I never told them that I was from Ukraine and not from USA. They probably thought that I was an American because I defended the intelligence of Americans so strongly.
Please let me know what you think about this incident.
BTW: If I am not mistaken, our English teacher told us in the second grade of Ukrainian school that an indefinite article “a” is not used with nouns in plural, that is why the phrase “How about a new translators?" is not correct. Am I right? Unless of course it’s a misprint, just like on the above mentioned website.
Mister Tee, have you analyzed the content of the website that Jack mentioned here? What do you think about it?

You got caught forging signatures and gaming the VOE system. If you want to whine about your conviction in a public blog, you will be ridiculed.

Your post is full of grammar and usage errors ("After the new evidences were discovered" should read "after new evidence was discovered"), you ought to have native English speaker proofread it before posting. In fact, you have not provided any new evidence, just innuendo.

And your letter to the OSB sounds like it was written for Pravda. It also reveals your Chamber of Commerce position to be both self-serving and harmful to the community: why allow your so called supporters to be tarred with the brush of your crimes? Your just stigmatizing those whom you pretend to serve.

You're done in this town. Move on. Maybe Emilie will let you sleep on her sofa.

Mister Tee,
Thank you for your comment. Also, thank you for proofreading. You can go either way in a free country – make fun of someone’s errors and misprints or contact the organization and point the errors to them, and I am sure your efforts will be appreciated.
I am not afraid of being ridiculed. There are two major types of readers – whiners and critical thinkers, with a number of people in between. Whiners are very unhappy people who don’t like the government, the economy; they don’t like their relatives because they are too greedy, their boss because he is an idiot, the rain because it is too wet, the ice because it is too slippery etc. I wouldn’t worry about being ridiculed by them because everybody understands that their opinion is lighter than emptiness. On the other hand, if a critical thinker obtains some public record materials, makes analyses of facts and evidence, comes to a different opinion than mine and points that out to me – I will only thank him for that.
You are right about the innuendo part – there are not many materials on the above mentioned website, and unfortunately not all the materials mentioned are available for public at this point. If you read the site attentively, there is enough information there for critical thinkers to analyze, come to certain conclusions, compare them with the “official” coverage of certain mainstream media companies and with my conclusions, and come up with their own opinion. Everybody can get some of the mentioned materials from the internet.
I hope that some critical thinkers will take it even to the next step and spend their time to get the trial record and other public records and newspaper articles, analyze them, and compare their findings with “official” version and my version – and their educated opinion will be very valuable to the public.
Speaking about the harm to the community… I think that the most harm to the community is done when an “official” agency makes a mistake, an “official” mainstream media creates a public opinion that supports “official” agency, and some individuals from the public agree with everything. It is understandable if the public is afraid of retaliation, just like during the communist regime, but if a certain individual from the public in a free country simply doesn’t want to make his/her own analyses and challenge the “official” version – that is when the harm to the community is done. If an “official” mistake lets criminals go free and commit more crimes – that’s when the harm to the community is done, but when an alternative media uncovers the mistake and helps bringing the justice – it’s a great service to the community.
I think that alternative media was created because some critical thinkers understood that sometimes an “official” version is not completely right.
And your letter to the OSB sounds like it was written for Pravda. I don’t know exactly what that means but hopefully you came to such conclusion after carefully reading all the information on the site and comparing all your findings with “official” and my versions. If this is the case, I would like to thank you for your comment. In future, if you could analyze the facts that were analyzed on the website and present your opinion described in details, I believe it would be more beneficial to the public.
Thank you and good luck.


I think you are suffering more from cultural ignorance than the language barrier. In my opinion, you do yourself a disservice to pursue the "didn't do it" or "I was framed" defense.

Why? Because you were convicted of a crime by a jury who was far better informed of the nuances/facts of the case than the general public. The rest of us will assume you are guilty as charged.

More importantly, many of us think you gamed the VOE system and enabled Emilie Boyles to qualify for $145,000 that she didn't deserve. In short, you defrauded PORTLAND TAXPAYERS out of $145,000, much of which remains outstanding.

If you want to suggest that you didn't forge signatures, then say "I didn't forge signatures".

If you want to suggest that you didn't certify that each signature you gathered was accompanied with a $5.00 dollar contribution, then say "I didn't front any $5 contributions knowing that Emilie would refund them upon cashing her VOE check".

If you can't make both of the above declarations then STFU and move on.

Better yet, quit lying about what happened, admit you did it, say your sorry, and try to conduct yourself in strict compliance with the law in the future.

Americans can forgive just about any transgression when somebody is willing to show they have learned from their mistakes. We don't forgive people who maintain their innocence in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Clearly, you're a smart guy. Your English is certainly better than my Russian. But you insult my intelligence with your straw man defense and contrived theory of your false prosecution.

Mister Tee,
Thank again for your comment.
If the issue of my guilt or innocence is insulting your intelligence and doesn't allow you to carefully examine what is described on the website - let's just drop it for now. Is there anything else in your opinion that is worth investigating or checking upon that is written there? Do you think it might be useful for the public to at least read through some of the newspaper articles and listen to the trial testimonies and compare it to what is written before denying the whole thing?

If you want to suggest that you didn't forge signatures, then say "I didn't forge signatures."

If you want to suggest that you didn't FALSELY certify that each signature you gathered was accompanied with a $5.00 dollar contribution, then say "I didn't front any $5 contributions knowing that Emilie would refund them upon cashing her VOE check."

If you can't make both of the above declarations then STFU and move on.


Thank you for your comment.
I believe it would be more valuable if you could find "both of the above declarations" YOURSELF after carefully examining the website, newspaper articles and other public information.
It's a paradox but I still didn't find the opinion of critical thinkers for the following questions from the above comment: "Is there anything else in your opinion that is worth investigating or checking upon that is written there? Do you think it might be useful for the public to at least read through some of the newspaper articles and listen to the trial testimonies and compare it to what is written before denying the whole thing?"

Prince Vlad:

You've got blood on your hands and teeth, and there is a woman lying dead at your feet with puncture wounds in her neck.

We're just asking you to say you're not a vampire while the villagers sharpen a wooden stake. And you reply with a diatribe about how poorly vampires have been portrayed by the media and the church.

If you aren't willing to say "I did not violate the law", then everything else is epilogue.

Did you forge the signatures? Yes or no.

If you can't say no, then you're wasting your time here. Maybe try BlueOregon: I'm sure a more nuanced version of the Truth would play better over there.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics