The federal government will be handing out free money to all but the richest of us in a few months -- the so-called "stimulus payments" that are supposed to restore our confidence in the economy and get us spending money again. For most folks, the check will come to several hundred dollars, which I'm sure the oil companies will gobble up by Fourth of July as gas prices hit $4 a gallon. Congress should have decided just to send the money to Exxon directly.
Anyway, in order to get the money, it appears that you have to file a federal 2007 tax return. And a lot of people who are eligible to get the checks aren't otherwise required to file a return because they don't make enough taxable income to warrant filing.
Those folks will want to file a return for 2007 sometime soon, in order to be sure they get their "stimulus" money in May or June. For example, an elderly person who lives solely off Social Security benefits doesn't usually have to file a tax return, but this year he or she will want to, just to get a "stimulus" check of $300.
The IRS announced yesterday that people with no taxable income can even file their returns for this purpose electronically, entering $1 as their adjusted gross income. Apparently, the IRS computers won't take zero income as a valid entry.
Leaving aside what dubious fiscal policy this gimmick is, something tells me it is going to be a confusing mess before it's all over.
Comments (12)
of course its going to be a crazy mess! It involves the government and the IRS...need I say more?
Of course it doesn't HAVE to involve the government...this may be every bit as screwed up as the TurboTax "Please Keep My Oregon Kicker" software problem.
It's actually pretty straightforward -- the explanations are more complicated than the form. I've already helped two people who only have Social Security income (which normally means you don't call it income for tax purposes and don't have to file).
Just as a side note, people who have no income of any kind will not get a stimulus payment. So it's the very richest and the very poorest who are being left out.
So it's the very richest and the very poorest who are being left out.
Er... "very richest" is kind of misleading. Single people with $87K income or more are completely cut out of the loop, for example.
That's a comfortable salary, to be sure, and they (er, we) don't really need $600 (any more than a single person making $75K does).
But we're also not exactly what I'd call the "very richest" in the country. It's not like we're partying with Paris or anything. Most of us are just trying to pay our bills like everyone else -- and our bills are sometimes a little higher than most. Higher incomes don't always translate to higher wealth.
I'm not looking for (and certainly not expecting any) sympathy here. It'd just be nice once in a while not to be cast in with "those rich people" upon whom scorn is so readily heaped.
I agree with you about that "richest" category. All I was pointing out was that, in addition to the "richest of us" mentioned in Jack's original post, the people who have no income at all are completely left out.
I'll take this funny money. If the economy recovers as it usually does with these extra dollars, paying back debt like PDX governments' should become easier. As for oil companies, they will benefit but mostly it will be the nationally state owned oil outfits like those of the OPEC members and Russia. The big western world oil companies only own about 20% of the world's oil reserves anymore (per Wall Street Journal, yesterday I think it was). Their refining margins should be down this year relative to last year as the cost of crude is up more than gasoline price. If the oil companies don't still make good profit, it might not be such a good thing as it could reflect a significant worldwide recession.
Welfare recipients are required to report all income no matter where it comes from. This money is then deducted from the benefits such as food stamps and SSI. Also, Oregon Health Plan premiums are set according to this income. The government giveth and the government taketh away!
Wait. This is really an early refund of a tax credit on your 2008 taxes calculated based on your 2007 tax figures. Cynical thought: is the current administration robbing the next administration for an election year boost? Yes? Yes! Crap.
So I'm going to get my $300 bucks; I'll patriotically (?) spend it on foreign oil and imported goods. Then, come 2008, I'll need a reminder why there's no money for federally funded programs, like VA hospitals, assistance and social security. Will Prez Bush be there for that? No. If McCain is President, will he accept responsibility as the new leader of the party? Doubtful, even if this crooked credit helps the Grand Ol' Party.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (12)
of course its going to be a crazy mess! It involves the government and the IRS...need I say more?
Posted by gas additive | March 4, 2008 6:29 AM
What about minor dependent children? Can they file and get stimulated?
Posted by Allan L. | March 4, 2008 6:56 AM
Of course it doesn't HAVE to involve the government...this may be every bit as screwed up as the TurboTax "Please Keep My Oregon Kicker" software problem.
Posted by PMG | March 4, 2008 7:07 AM
Don't make a fuss, get out there and Stimulate!
Its simple, a no interest and no payment for 90 days, Best Buy credit card will give you that new 72" flat panel TV with surround sound package today.
Don't forget to get permission from your apartment manager before drilling holes in the bedroom wall.
Oh, excuse me. How do you like it?
Posted by Abe | March 4, 2008 7:20 AM
Do you want fries with that?
Posted by Brothers | March 4, 2008 7:37 AM
It's actually pretty straightforward -- the explanations are more complicated than the form. I've already helped two people who only have Social Security income (which normally means you don't call it income for tax purposes and don't have to file).
Just as a side note, people who have no income of any kind will not get a stimulus payment. So it's the very richest and the very poorest who are being left out.
Posted by bbc | March 4, 2008 8:21 AM
Er... "very richest" is kind of misleading. Single people with $87K income or more are completely cut out of the loop, for example.
That's a comfortable salary, to be sure, and they (er, we) don't really need $600 (any more than a single person making $75K does).
But we're also not exactly what I'd call the "very richest" in the country. It's not like we're partying with Paris or anything. Most of us are just trying to pay our bills like everyone else -- and our bills are sometimes a little higher than most. Higher incomes don't always translate to higher wealth.
I'm not looking for (and certainly not expecting any) sympathy here. It'd just be nice once in a while not to be cast in with "those rich people" upon whom scorn is so readily heaped.
Posted by David Wright | March 4, 2008 9:51 AM
David,
I agree with you about that "richest" category. All I was pointing out was that, in addition to the "richest of us" mentioned in Jack's original post, the people who have no income at all are completely left out.
Posted by bbc | March 4, 2008 10:10 AM
I'll take this funny money. If the economy recovers as it usually does with these extra dollars, paying back debt like PDX governments' should become easier. As for oil companies, they will benefit but mostly it will be the nationally state owned oil outfits like those of the OPEC members and Russia. The big western world oil companies only own about 20% of the world's oil reserves anymore (per Wall Street Journal, yesterday I think it was). Their refining margins should be down this year relative to last year as the cost of crude is up more than gasoline price. If the oil companies don't still make good profit, it might not be such a good thing as it could reflect a significant worldwide recession.
Posted by Bob Clark | March 4, 2008 10:51 AM
What about minor dependent children? Can they file and get stimulated?
No.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 4, 2008 12:05 PM
Welfare recipients are required to report all income no matter where it comes from. This money is then deducted from the benefits such as food stamps and SSI. Also, Oregon Health Plan premiums are set according to this income. The government giveth and the government taketh away!
Posted by Wes Soderbqck | March 4, 2008 3:59 PM
Free money! Free money! Free money!
Wait. This is really an early refund of a tax credit on your 2008 taxes calculated based on your 2007 tax figures. Cynical thought: is the current administration robbing the next administration for an election year boost? Yes? Yes! Crap.
So I'm going to get my $300 bucks; I'll patriotically (?) spend it on foreign oil and imported goods. Then, come 2008, I'll need a reminder why there's no money for federally funded programs, like VA hospitals, assistance and social security. Will Prez Bush be there for that? No. If McCain is President, will he accept responsibility as the new leader of the party? Doubtful, even if this crooked credit helps the Grand Ol' Party.
Free money? Or are we just robbing ourselves?
Posted by Chris Coyle | March 4, 2008 8:01 PM