Pay tax on your kicker -- even if you didn't get it!
The Oregon income tax "kicker" saga is generating new surprises by the hour. Now comes word that even those who didn't get their "kickers" are receiving notices (Form 1099-G's) from the state Department of Revenue showing that they received them! One reader so affected writes:
I also received a 1099-G, even though I was a paper filer who fell victim to TurboTax's error. I made my case to the DOR, and they said "no luck" because I paper-filed. If I had e-filed, they may have cut me a kicker check due to the TurboTax error. I still think it's very unfair to treat electronic and paper filers differently, although I see the DOR's point that I had a chance to review a printed return, whereas e-filers did not.
Anyway, back to the 1099-G, yes it lists the amount that my kicker SHOULD HAVE been as a state income tax refund. But I also have a letter from the DOR, which I received back when others were receiving their kicker checks, that states this amount can be considered a charitable contribution to the state school fund and is tax deductible. In that case, aren't they handling this correctly? That is, even though the tax refund never came, isn't it no different than if they cut me a kicker check then I turned right back around and donated the entire amount to charity?
Unlike the case of those who received their "kicker" checks late, in this case the state's issuing a 2007 1099-G form may be right. But it sets up an interesting dynamic for some people. If they itemized their deductions in 2006 and don't itemize them in 2007, they'll have to pay federal tax on their "kicker," even though they never got it. If you don't itemize in 2007, you won't get to deduct your charitable contribution of the "kicker," but if you itemized in 2006, generally speaking your "kicker" has to be reported as income for federal tax purposes.
What's the opposite of a loophole -- a black hole?
Comments (10)
But they did "get it" from the State of Oregon's perspective. It was credited to their tax I.D. and (per the taxpayer's direction) it was donated to a worthy charitable cause (the schools).
They simply need to list it as a charitable donation, right?
But, since technically, the money was donated in 2007, they should send the 1099G to everyone. It is just that some people have a letter stating that they donated the money in 2007, but it may get "undonated" and sent to them in 2008.
Paying tax on the kicker is the civic equivalent of eating your own vomit.
I'm not too keen on this simile, but I think that collecting tax on a kicker is the equivalent of eating one's own vomit. The state hurled up the previously consumed taxes. Fortunately, the state kicker is not income for state purposes, and so this is not an issue.
Our mini-schnauzer approves. But she is also attracted to feline and goose feces, so i don't think she can be considered a judge of good tax policy or prose.
The State of Oregon is brining the wounds of those who "inadvertently" donated their kicker when they send them a 1099-G without first having explained how so many filers could have made (roughly) the same mistake. I'm not suggesting either the State or Intuit is at fault, but it seems like there must be some redress for some of the paper filers if ALL of the e-filers were offered a chance to revise and amend their returns.
I'm more annoyed by the idea that the State of Oregon can cap how much of our Federal Income tax is deductible...Paying tax on money the Feds already confiscated is just plain wrong. It is certainly more pervasive than the estate tax, and you can't solve the problem with more insurance.
If they don't itemize, they don't get to deduct charitable contributions.
True enough, but wouldn't you itemize unless the standard deduction is bigger than the aggregate of your deductible expenses? If so, then arguably you get the deduction either way.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (10)
But they did "get it" from the State of Oregon's perspective. It was credited to their tax I.D. and (per the taxpayer's direction) it was donated to a worthy charitable cause (the schools).
They simply need to list it as a charitable donation, right?
Posted by Mister Tee | February 8, 2008 5:09 PM
But, since technically, the money was donated in 2007, they should send the 1099G to everyone. It is just that some people have a letter stating that they donated the money in 2007, but it may get "undonated" and sent to them in 2008.
Posted by Mike | February 8, 2008 5:12 PM
Paying tax on the kicker is the civic equivalent of eating your own vomit.
Posted by Sam | February 8, 2008 6:27 PM
They simply need to list it as a charitable donation
If they don't itemize, they don't get to deduct charitable contributions.
Posted by Jack Bog | February 8, 2008 7:17 PM
Paying tax on the kicker is the civic equivalent of eating your own vomit.
I'm not too keen on this simile, but I think that collecting tax on a kicker is the equivalent of eating one's own vomit. The state hurled up the previously consumed taxes. Fortunately, the state kicker is not income for state purposes, and so this is not an issue.
Posted by Jack Bog | February 8, 2008 7:35 PM
I agree with Jack on the mixed simile.
Our mini-schnauzer approves. But she is also attracted to feline and goose feces, so i don't think she can be considered a judge of good tax policy or prose.
The State of Oregon is brining the wounds of those who "inadvertently" donated their kicker when they send them a 1099-G without first having explained how so many filers could have made (roughly) the same mistake. I'm not suggesting either the State or Intuit is at fault, but it seems like there must be some redress for some of the paper filers if ALL of the e-filers were offered a chance to revise and amend their returns.
I'm more annoyed by the idea that the State of Oregon can cap how much of our Federal Income tax is deductible...Paying tax on money the Feds already confiscated is just plain wrong. It is certainly more pervasive than the estate tax, and you can't solve the problem with more insurance.
Posted by Mister Tee | February 8, 2008 9:11 PM
"Fortunately, the state kicker is not income for state purposes, and so this is not an issue."
How about this then: the IRS collecting a tax on the Oregon kicker is like George Bush eating Ted Kulongoski's vomit?
You're welcome.
Posted by Sam | February 9, 2008 9:44 AM
If they don't itemize, they don't get to deduct charitable contributions.
True enough, but wouldn't you itemize unless the standard deduction is bigger than the aggregate of your deductible expenses? If so, then arguably you get the deduction either way.
Posted by Allan L. | February 9, 2008 10:49 AM
So Jack. Turbo Tax or Tax Cut?
Posted by Todd H. | February 9, 2008 11:42 AM
Boxers.
Posted by Jack Bog | February 11, 2008 1:15 AM