Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 29, 2007 11:13 AM. The previous post in this blog was Have a great weekend. The next post in this blog is Would you believe?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Saturday, December 29, 2007


A federal judge's ruling suspending Oregon's domestic partnership law, which was supposed to take effect this coming Tuesday, is a bitter disappointment to so many people. Thank goodness, it is only a temporary setback. Even if the folks seeking to overturn the law get the matter on the ballot, Oregonians will vote to support it. And so by this time next year, if not sooner, there will be domestic partnerships in this state, as there should be.

That's cold comfort today, of course.

One maddening question that bothered me when I first heard about the judge's injunction yesterday -- it must have been an oral ruling, as I don't see links to a written opinion anywhere -- was how he could forbid implementation of a state law that had been duly enacted, just because of some hassle over signatures on petitions seeking to repeal that law. Upon further reflection, I see how the judge could reach that conclusion. Under Oregon law, if I'm getting this right, when enough signatures are turned in to challenge a new statute by referendum, the law is automatically suspended until the ballot measure is voted on. (That is, unless the legislature had declared an emergency, which it apparently did not do in this case.) And so if the opponents' signatures are good, which they claim they are, there will be no domestic partnerships until after the November election, anyway.

Seen in this light, the judge's action yesterday is at least slightly less outrageous than it first sounded. But it's still a shock. And of course, highly ironic coming from a Bush appointee, what with the administration's supposed deep respect for the sanctity of the actions of state elections officers.

The other thing I'll say is how once again, the electoral process in this country is showing itself to be badly, badly deficient. Not only can't we count votes securely and honestly -- we can't even agree on how to check the signatures on the petitions by which we decide what we'll be voting on. Nearly every election -- even every potential election -- turns out to be a lawsuit. It's a disgrace.

Comments (23)

The Secretary of State doesn't count every signature on the petitions. Instead, they use "statistical sampling" and then a mathematical formula to extrapolate the outcome.

Then, no matter how close the extrapolated tally (96 votes, in this case), there is no mechanism to require an actual hand count.

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

Kind of like Florida, without actually counting the votes even once.

I don't think any administration should have respect for state officials who are violating the constitutional rights of their state's citizens. I'm sorry to hear you believe it's ok, as long as the ends are ones with which you agree.

"Oregonians will vote to support it"

on what do you base this conclusion? given a second chance to reject "gay marriage" I expect the outcome to be the same.

And you are wrong, my bigoted friend.

As you brought up Jack, this really exposes the issue (finally) of signature counting/verifying and some possible major flaws in the process. (Not to mention all the shady stuff that happens when gathering signatures.)

There has to be a better way...but what would it be?

By the way, I love your new header picture!

but what would it be?

It would probably have something to do with that crazy thing that the kids are talking about... something called a "computer."

something called a "computer."

Doesn't that seem a little ironic, considering that computerized voting machines turn out to be one thing that just doesn't work? And boy, I knew I didn't like initiatives, and now it seems that referenda really suck, too.

Thank you, Jack. It is a bitter disappointment, especially since during the whole Measure 36 campaign we were told to go get civil unions or domestic partnerships, but not marriage. And that's what we've done, but now we're told again, no. It is cold comfort, to wait, yet more. And you're right, it will all work out. But I think about what could be done with all of that money and energy and hours that we'll spend to get there, and how many couples will be faced with the inequities that become painfully apparent in times of life and death, and it's just darn hard to be patient.

I hear you.

I've got a hunch that they don't have the signatures, and this will be over by spring break. But if they get their election, it will be over 30 days thereafter.

computerized voting machines turn out to be one thing that just doesn't work?

It would if somebody good were put in charge of designing it.

Let's hope the the voting public finally understands what the folks who oppose this law are about.

Even if the folks seeking to overturn the law get the matter on the ballot, Oregonians will vote to support it.

Maybe they will; maybe they won't. The main problem here is that they weren't given the opportunity to vote. I suspect that's what really ticks folks off. It's sort of like the Tram and light rail. You never got to vote on the Tram, and way back when you were allowed to vote on light rail, it was passed once, then extensions were rejected twice.

Of course, Those Who Know Best found ways to circumvent the expressed will of the voters, and so keep building rail.

The domestic partnership thing was, I think, viewed by many as yet another arrogant move by government. The perception may not be accurrate in this case, as although voters rejected marriage, they did leave the option of domestic partnership open.

At the same time, given the history of past governmental actions, it's easy enough to see why some may view this as yet another attempt to do an "end run" around the voters.

It's time to face facts: government in Oregon has a long track record of doing what voters have specifically told them that we don't want them to do. As a result, there's a complete lack of trust in Oregon government. And that lack of trust has been earned.

At this point, anything they do will be justifiably viewed with suspicion.

It's all about the word "marriage," dude. And that is not what this is. If it makes it to a vote, domestic partnerships will pass, just like Measure 49 did. But hey, God's People can waste their time if they like. It's good that they're keeping busy.


Is it bigoted to point out that statistical sampling was the method used to determine the petitioners fell short by 116 signatures out of 63,000 submitted?

There is no "recount" available under Oregon Statutes despite the fact the "sampling" margin of error is much higher than 116/63,000.

Why? Because many signatures are disqualified simply because the signature card on file at the elections office (some of which were signed decades ago) don't match the signature on the petition.

My signature has evolved over the last 20 years (as evidenced by the fact my ballot was rejected for the most recent mail-in election). That evolution is more pronounced when I'm standing up outside a grocery store with a bag full of groceries in my left hand while the signature gatherer holds the petition and I sign with my right hand.

The Secretary of State's office has broad discretion in deciding upon how to use statistical sampling. They used this discretion to keep this petition off the ballot because they fear the outcome would mirror M36.

AHH come one Jack, The real story is not this one, the "o" and you have been skunked...AGAIN!

The main problem here is that they weren't given the opportunity to vote.

I just don't get it. Why do people think they want to vote on everything? I thought our government was through elected representatives. On the surface, the objection seems disingenuous: It's not that they didn't get to vote, but rather that they don't like the outcome. (I'm not addressing the narrower issue of government ignoring a specific initiative or referendum result. That doesn't seem right either. As long as we have these awkward plebiscites they should be respected.)

The law allows certain ways to attest to your signature if there are questions. In a normal election, they are required to contact you if your signature is rejected. Here, they not only failed to contact anyone, but they didn't even allow the exact same evidence to be presented that they would accept in a normal election. The courts will decide if they were right to apply one standard in an election and a different one in a petition. That's the essence of this case: was the state wrong to apply a different standard.

An further, you must admit that it is troubling that if people presented the same evidence for a petition signature that would have been accepted for a ballot signature then if the county clerks rejected it while they still had a couple weeks left before their final numbers had to be in, then why? Anyway, it all comes down to standards, and the question that will be answered is: "Are there laws that block counties from using the same signature verification process?" If not, the next question is, "Should the counties have applied the same standard or are they within their rights not to?" And lastly, "If they are within their rights not to but the people came to them (eliminating the counties from even having to call) why would they, servants of the people, refuse to correct a correctible error?" It's one thing to say, "We don't have to call" on a petition signature rejection, but entirely another to say that when a person shows up on their own you can turn them away when they've got the same proof that works for a ballot signature proof! The courts, I hope, will take this up and decide it.

It's called all men are created equal, dude.

why does government spend so much time, money and effort attempting to oversee, define and control marriage, I wonder?

I am not a supporter of gay rights, but I do not understand the logic behind this effort to force a vote on the issue. If by chance the vote actually ends up recinding the domestic partnership law, then gay rights groups would most likely revert back to efforts to somehow nulify Measure 36 and work again for gay marriage. By leaving civil unions in place, over time the concept becomes more concrete and more difficult to ratch up to actual equality in marriage. The end effect would be that hetros marry and homos have civil unions (or whatever they may be called). If such a system was left in place for say 20-30 years, it would be VERY difficult to pass gay marriage laws - the mantra will be: the system works, why change it?

As to ecohuman's comments on government intrusion into our lives - I am the executor of the estate of a relative, and it is amazing all of the government agencies that must be dealt with to settle the estate and file all of the paperwork required to "unwind" the government's involvement in every aspect of a person's life (and death).

I just don't get it. Why do people think they want to vote on everything? I thought our government was through elected representatives.

Nope. In Oregon, we have this thing known as the initiative process. It's like we have a comination of representative government and direct democracy. I believe that there is a trend toward direct democracy in the state - purely because our elected officials choose to do stuff that people don't like.

Personally, I have no beef with the domestic partnership arrangement. But the fact of the matter is that Oregon politicians have such an egregious history of telling voters to screw off that I think it has now become almost a knee-jerk reaction to take a second look at whatever junk they're pushing.

You made it clear that you didn't want more light rail. They stopped asking your opinion, and built it out anyway. I think a lot of people see the incredible waste of funds toward fixed-rail, trams, "couplets", reservoir covers, Homer Williams, secret meetings, an estimated 180,000 drivers' licenses handed over to illegal aliens, and yadda yadda...and I think that all of that stuff combined tells people that their elected representatives don't give a rat's heinie.

That doesn't inspire trust, which leads to a strong desire for oversight in the form of direct democracy.

And you are wrong, my bigoted friend.


You know, just to back this way the heck up, I am not sure the Federal Court even has the standing to be interfering in matters of states rules around referendum initiatives. The Right has come a long way since the 60s when all they could spout was state's rights. Now the feds seem to forget that the USA is a Republic and not a Federal Govt dominates all political body.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics