
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,900 unique visits a day, and more than 53,000 page views a week (as of October 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Marques de Casa Concha, Cabernet 2005
Santi, Sortesele Pinot Grigio 2006
Al Muvedre, Tinto Joven 2006
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2006
Gritti, Ca' Andrea, Umbria red 2005
Altos de Luzon, Jumilla 2004
Thomas Leithner, Zweigelt 2004
Cain Cuvee NV 3
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot 2003
Meridian, Sauvignon Blanc 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Paringa, Shiraz 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2005
Kris, Pinot Grigio 2006
Silvan Ridge, Pinot Gris 2006
Fife, Mendocino Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
Castle Rock, Cabernet, Paso Robles 2005
Willakenzie, Pinot Gris 2006
The Show, Cabernet 2005
Essencia Valdemar, Rioja Rose 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Beaulieu Vineyard. Napa Valley Cabernet 2004
Irony, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2003
Rosenblum, Petite Sirah, Heritage Clones 2005
Fra Guerau, Montsant 2002
Barefoot Chardonnay
Kana, Syrah 2004
Castell Salegg, Chardonnay, Alto Adige 2004
Fetish, The Watcher Shiraz 2004
Gold Note, Fair Play Zinfandel 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Canoe Ridge Estate Cabernet 2003
Ponzi, Pinot Noir 2004
Red Diamond, Merlot 2003
Mateus, Rose
Benton Lane Pinot Noir 2004
Penya Cadiella Vins de Comtat 2003
Kamiak, Cellar Select Red 2003
Anselmi, San Vincenzo 2005
Rubrato, Aglianico dei Feudi di San Gregorio 2004
Le Grand Noir (Black Sheep) Cabernet-Shiraz
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2005
Los Vascos, Cabernet, Reserve 2004
Jackaroo, Shiraz 2003
Paul Jaboulet Aine, Crozes Hermitage Syrah, "La Jalet," 2001
Paul Jaboulet Aine, Cotes du Rhone, "Parallele '45,'" 2003
Rolf Binder, Barossa Valley Shiraz 2003
Oyster Bay, Sauvignon Blanc 2006
Woodbridge Chardonnay 2005
Barnard & Griffin, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2004
Quinto do Carmo, Alentejano Red 2000
Forefathers, Alexander Valley Cabernet 2001
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 28
At this date last year: 102
Total run in 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (12)
I think this is great news!
The group of local residents and business owners organized and conducted a positive and reasoned campaign to save their neighborhood.
The property owner's contention that only a big box will work for retail is a flawed argument. Big box stores destroy local economies.
Thank goodness that this one is stopped...for now.
Posted by Anne Kilkenny | October 3, 2007 7:22 AM
Just drive to Eastport Plaza, if you have the sudden urge to buy poorly made Chinese crap.
Posted by stan | October 3, 2007 8:08 AM
I'm no fan of those stores either and I never shop them. But as more and more of our local job base degrades to minimum wage, where are people supposed to shop? Trader Joe's?
Posted by Dave Lister | October 3, 2007 8:20 AM
There are already two other Walmarts on 82nd...do they really need another?
And the Eastport...dont go there after dark. Go to the Clackamas store instead.
As for "poorly made Chinese crap"...that is anywhere, not just Walmart.
Posted by Jon | October 3, 2007 8:31 AM
Awesome news!
Let it ring clear to businesses everywhere: unless you adhere to the leftist values of Portland's elites, you and your jobs are not welcome here!
Unless you operate in a fashion we deem acceptable, and unless your products further the goals of the ruling class, we not only don't want you, but we will make it impossible for you to do business here if you actually try.
Funny, isn't it, that this is almost inditinguishable from the economic plank of the fascist model.
Posted by Rob Kremer | October 3, 2007 8:40 AM
Brought to you by the people who killed the proposed McDonald's on Hawthorne because it wasn't 'earthy' enough. They don't have a McFalafel after all....
Posted by butch | October 3, 2007 9:16 AM
" As for "poorly made Chinese crap"...that is anywhere, not just Walmart. "
Unfortunately, Jon is right about that.
The problem with the site is that for almost any decent sized big box style development (100,000 sq. ft or more), the developer is going to need a zoning change.
I just moved out of the Roseway nab and no matter what they decide to put there traffic will be a serious concern and they are going to have to have the neighbors on board.
Posted by stan | October 3, 2007 9:17 AM
So we are supposed to get on the train to kill Wal-Mart, but bow and support Costco?
Costco is for the poor ol' rich folk and Wal-Mart is for the down N outers...Now that is reasonable and fair..NOT!
Posted by KISS | October 3, 2007 9:23 AM
So we are supposed to get on the train to kill Wal-Mart, but bow and support Costco?
And Ikea. Genuflect now!
Posted by Jon | October 3, 2007 10:17 AM
I hear they are putting a few more "big box stores"...including new Costco...at Cascade Station. Along with Ikea, I wonder what that will do for traffic?
Posted by Jon | October 3, 2007 10:24 AM
Anybody who comes away from this story thinking that the fight against this conditional-use permit had only an anti-Walmart component doesn't know squat about this neck of the woods.
There were some freaky Sandinistas around waving signs about evil Walmart, but they were far outnumbered by frequent Walmart shoppers opposed to altering the zoning from 60,000 to 240,000 square feet, and the increased number of vehicle trips in this stretch of 82nd. There were also significant numbers of neighbors who have lived near the site for decades and who attribute a variety of ailments, including a rather high rate of cancer in Madison South, to the presence of the toxic landfill on which the development was to be built. From what many of these folks told me, they were concerned with the developer's engineering reports referring to the need to drive long pilings down into the base of the landfill, which would have been a requirement of the increased mass of the 240,000 square-foot plan.
Of course there are always a few wingnuts, demanding that the landowner turn the land into a wildlife refuge, or wanting to find a way to require him to build a New Seasons, or Mercy Corps, or something lefty and "green." The driving force behind the 2,000 or so neighbors who banded together to fight this, in my view anyway, were people worried about the traffic impact and waking up the radon pool down under the driving range.
This is not a neighborhood of trust-funders with time on their hands to rail against Walmart, but working people who know that their neighborhood already has enough problems, without adding this one.
Posted by Ambrose Burnside | October 3, 2007 5:43 PM
Well put General.
If a neighborhood doesn't want that type of development I support them fully. Zoning should be locally controlled by the people who are directly impacted.
What I object to is when the politicos manipulate zoning based on their particular biases; Ikea good, Wal-Mart bad, for example.
Posted by Dave Lister | October 4, 2007 8:30 AM