This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 25, 2007 9:35 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Like baloney?.
The next post in this blog is More changes afoot.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
You're not the only one getting a kicker from the State of Oregon:
The state has about 60 department heads who will get raises of 21 percent to 24 percent over the next two years, Kulongoski announced Monday. Nearly 4,800 state managers will see their salaries rise 11 percent to 16 percent.
Plus, don't forget, a generous pension and oh, the fringe benefits!
Comments (15)
Well, at least it's "for the children".
Not mine, of course - but for those of the vast, underpaid bureaucracy of state government.
Poor babies.
I wonder how much scientific research Teddy did on the subject of whether this increase will actually increase the retention rate among these irreplaceable dept. heads and managers. Which professional consulting firm looked at this move with a view to its likely effectiveness? What evaluation was done to determine the value of the alleged purpose relative to spending these monies elsewhere? Was this a priority over schools? I'll bet Teddy just couldn't restrain himself and shot from the hip on this one.
Nice to see that not all stereotypes are false - maybe just backward - spend and tax; it's the Democrat way.
Considering the scopes of responsibility and size of budgets administered (as reported in this morning's Big Zero) then the new salaries don't seem unreasonable. Even with the benefit package.
Of course the big increases look bad in comparison with other public employee raises and of course they'll be compared with "average Oregonians". And of course there will be lots of debate about whether or not they're really needed to attract top people. But realistically, a $150K annual income just isn't that big a deal anymore - just ask a tax preparer.
The problem is the continuing growth of public-funded programs - examples of which are regularly discussed on this site. Social engineering and a Nanny State don't come cheap.
Boy, Ted sure thinks the gravy train is a-rolling. Amazing how short-sighted these guys are. We staff and give evryone raises and then, boom, we are in a financial crisis to support deserving state workers, have no money for schools/police and need to raise taxes. The hits just keep coming.
The worst part about this is not the inflated salaries, but the concomitantly inflated PERS retirement benefits, that will continue for the life once these folks retire. The money would have been better spent on training replacements - preferably relatively new hires who are on the new "tier three" retirement plan, which is much more like a defined contribution plan. What a waste.
WHAT generous pension?!? Got news for you folks -- the old PERS I and II are no more, people hiring into the state now get dumped into PERS III, basically just your basic, stripped-down defined contribution plan. No defined benefit at all. When the economy tanks for good, thanks to Chimpy and peak oil, a PERS III pension will be worth very little.
I believe the Tier III plan includes both a defined benefit component(1.5% of ending salary per year of service) and defined contribution component (guaranteed minimum annual return on contributions), with contributions to both accounts paid by the government employer.
Richard, you are correct. My point was to disagree with George, who stated the pension component was gone. Tier III still includes a generous defined benefit (pension) component, unlike most private sector retirement plans. Contributions to Tier III are not made by the employee through payroll deduction, but are paid by the government employer (funded by taxes, fees, etc) above and beyond salary, unlike most private employment arrangements.
I work for the Department of Human Services/Mental Health and Addiction Services, and let me tell you, I'm no fat cat state employee. After 4 yrs, I make about $26,000/yr. My PERS check (I am Tier II) will be MAYBE $1000, after taxes and health insurance. I don't sit behind a desk taking a break the minute it is your turn in line - I deal with behavioral emergencies that have put me in the ER twice this year, along with the other times I have been bit, had coffee thrown on me, been spit on, etc. Don't judge all state workers by what you see at the DMV.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
Well, at least it's "for the children".
Not mine, of course - but for those of the vast, underpaid bureaucracy of state government.
Poor babies.
I wonder how much scientific research Teddy did on the subject of whether this increase will actually increase the retention rate among these irreplaceable dept. heads and managers. Which professional consulting firm looked at this move with a view to its likely effectiveness? What evaluation was done to determine the value of the alleged purpose relative to spending these monies elsewhere? Was this a priority over schools? I'll bet Teddy just couldn't restrain himself and shot from the hip on this one.
Nice to see that not all stereotypes are false - maybe just backward - spend and tax; it's the Democrat way.
Posted by rr | September 25, 2007 11:57 AM
Considering the scopes of responsibility and size of budgets administered (as reported in this morning's Big Zero) then the new salaries don't seem unreasonable. Even with the benefit package.
Of course the big increases look bad in comparison with other public employee raises and of course they'll be compared with "average Oregonians". And of course there will be lots of debate about whether or not they're really needed to attract top people. But realistically, a $150K annual income just isn't that big a deal anymore - just ask a tax preparer.
The problem is the continuing growth of public-funded programs - examples of which are regularly discussed on this site. Social engineering and a Nanny State don't come cheap.
Posted by RonaldM | September 25, 2007 12:04 PM
Boy, Ted sure thinks the gravy train is a-rolling. Amazing how short-sighted these guys are. We staff and give evryone raises and then, boom, we are in a financial crisis to support deserving state workers, have no money for schools/police and need to raise taxes. The hits just keep coming.
Posted by Steve | September 25, 2007 12:27 PM
Sounds like he is bumping up some pensions for people about to retire.
And attracting top people? One would think that the benefits and PERS would be enough for that.
Posted by Jon | September 25, 2007 1:09 PM
Is it odd that the State's tax revenues increased about 20%, and the pay raises match and the recent States budget spending increased 20%? Magic.
It my axiom that whatever tax/fee increases we have "for the children", for "public safety", that is all seems to go to pay raises.
Posted by Jerry | September 25, 2007 1:22 PM
These people (Ted, I mean) are their own worst enemy.
Posted by Allan L. | September 25, 2007 3:34 PM
We will see the "wisdom" of these pay raises next year when the RECESSION hits Oregon.
Posted by Dave A. | September 25, 2007 5:51 PM
The worst part about this is not the inflated salaries, but the concomitantly inflated PERS retirement benefits, that will continue for the life once these folks retire. The money would have been better spent on training replacements - preferably relatively new hires who are on the new "tier three" retirement plan, which is much more like a defined contribution plan. What a waste.
Posted by Frank | September 25, 2007 6:21 PM
WHAT generous pension?!? Got news for you folks -- the old PERS I and II are no more, people hiring into the state now get dumped into PERS III, basically just your basic, stripped-down defined contribution plan. No defined benefit at all. When the economy tanks for good, thanks to Chimpy and peak oil, a PERS III pension will be worth very little.
Posted by George Seldes | September 25, 2007 10:51 PM
basically just your basic, stripped-down defined contribution plan.
Welcome to reality.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2007 8:45 AM
BTW, I'm sure most of the agency heads are under the old system.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2007 8:47 AM
I believe the Tier III plan includes both a defined benefit component(1.5% of ending salary per year of service) and defined contribution component (guaranteed minimum annual return on contributions), with contributions to both accounts paid by the government employer.
Posted by Molly | September 26, 2007 9:10 AM
Molly, I think you meant paid by the tax payers of the state.
Posted by Richard/s | September 26, 2007 9:38 AM
Richard, you are correct. My point was to disagree with George, who stated the pension component was gone. Tier III still includes a generous defined benefit (pension) component, unlike most private sector retirement plans. Contributions to Tier III are not made by the employee through payroll deduction, but are paid by the government employer (funded by taxes, fees, etc) above and beyond salary, unlike most private employment arrangements.
Posted by Molly | September 27, 2007 5:38 AM
I work for the Department of Human Services/Mental Health and Addiction Services, and let me tell you, I'm no fat cat state employee. After 4 yrs, I make about $26,000/yr. My PERS check (I am Tier II) will be MAYBE $1000, after taxes and health insurance. I don't sit behind a desk taking a break the minute it is your turn in line - I deal with behavioral emergencies that have put me in the ER twice this year, along with the other times I have been bit, had coffee thrown on me, been spit on, etc. Don't judge all state workers by what you see at the DMV.
Posted by jake | October 10, 2007 12:07 PM