Here's some choice sandwich loaf for you: The taxpayer-financed Portland Convention Center Hotel project is "on life support" and "[i]If the [Metro] council is not willing to approve the additional time and money Thursday, the concept of a publicly financed hotel probably will die."
Now, that's comedy. The thing has stunk to high heaven for 18 years, and still somehow has never been killed off, but this Thursday, we really mean it, this could be the end?
In your dreams.
They'll just keep putting it off, putting it off... Sooner or later the public will get sufficiently distracted that the Metro gang will make one of the Old Boys even richer on the little taxpayer's dime by building this white elephant. The people who stand to make their millions off the project -- old Hank Ashforth, one of the architecture dandy firms, and probably Hoffman Construction -- they know how to keep hanging around. Unlike the regular people who have to give up a chunk of their lives to sit in endless meetings in order to fight irresponsible junk like this proposal, for the proponents it's just all in a day's work.
Or a year's.
Or a decade's.
Comments (12)
The voters will never approve another Metro bond measure in the future if Metro wastes money on this project.
After testifying at the Metro hearing against this project, I was taken aback when businessman Roy Jay later testified that we hotel critics should stop complaining and support the project.
Jay said, "We are team players in this city.” I didn't know that.
Too bad that in this case our "team" will be playing a losing game by trying to salvage the $90 million original convention center funding and the $116 million expansion funding by raising another $244 million more for this hotel project. I guess our "team" doesn't understand the concept of sunk costs.
Here's my take on the numbers: The admitted taxpayer subsidy for the new hotel is around 8 million a year, so adding the bullshit tax that will probably come to 12 million. That's around 1 million a month or rounding down a little, $30,000 a day. If the rooms are $200 a night, we would be kicking in 150 rooms worth of money out of 600 proposed, so that's exactly 25%. Now of course our government officials are pro-business and all about fairness, right? So that means, all we have to do is pay the other hotels that already exist in this town whatever 25% of their room rentals would be each and every day. Then everything will work out great. The free market is a wonderful thing, isn't it?
Kinda like the 205 MAX line. Voted down twice, yet still being built. (As an aside, I'm curious how all the greenies feel about the 50 or so old growth Doug Firs that were mowed down for this boodoggle--- way to go Metro! You really seem to care about the environment.)
It'll be a while, but this hotel will be subsidized and built on our dime.
...curious how all the greenies feel about the 50 or so old growth Doug Firs that were mowed down for this boodoggle...
I'm not a supporter of this MAX line, but where, pray tell would one find "old growth" firs on the I-205 corridor? And what age would you define "old growth" to be?
"And the more griping about everything, with its attendant delays, means the costs will go up,"
Hey, do you understand this is a bad idea contrived to cover-up for another bad idea, the convention center?
Please kill it and stop wasting our time. No one wants it beside Metro and POVA for their own self-interest, yet we keep this thing alive until in a weak moment they slip it on the taxpayers.
City after city has shown this is a money-losers, yet the locals haev enough hubris to believe they are different.
Sam, the scam already has plans for the city and PDC to bankroll this white elephant. As for the voters, they're so DUM they vote yes on everything.Must be that BULL RUNS water.
The key stat is the number of days the politicians' hotel would really be bringing in a single extra dollar to Portland. In other words, the big conventions that won't come now. Once we got past the help this would give to local construction unions, I bet that would still only happen on around 65 days of the year and that's being wildly optimistic. It could be far less. We're not talking about Vegas here. So what takes place on the other 300 days? The new pretend hotel would just be taking business away from the hotels that are already built. And not only that, it could offer a discount based on the fact that they're subsidized by the taxpayers, and losing money anyway. The end result is we could lose real hotels, and then wonder why downtown seems more empty.
The most aggravating part of this is when the politicians pretend they're acting for wise, noble reasons. They are not.
I guess I never understood the benefits of a convention center. I always assumed it was to bring people into an area for economic purposes. Using that premise, a baseball stadium with a guaranteed 81 dates a year, averaging 20,000 per game would bring 1.6 million people to an area. Would the convention center even with a spiffy hotel match this number?
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (12)
The voters will never approve another Metro bond measure in the future if Metro wastes money on this project.
Posted by J | September 25, 2007 9:10 AM
After testifying at the Metro hearing against this project, I was taken aback when businessman Roy Jay later testified that we hotel critics should stop complaining and support the project.
Jay said, "We are team players in this city.” I didn't know that.
Too bad that in this case our "team" will be playing a losing game by trying to salvage the $90 million original convention center funding and the $116 million expansion funding by raising another $244 million more for this hotel project. I guess our "team" doesn't understand the concept of sunk costs.
Posted by Steve Buckstein | September 25, 2007 10:11 AM
And the more griping about everything, with its attendant delays, means the costs will go up, and provide grist for the gripe mill. Perfect!
Posted by Jonathan Radmacher | September 25, 2007 10:20 AM
Here's my take on the numbers: The admitted taxpayer subsidy for the new hotel is around 8 million a year, so adding the bullshit tax that will probably come to 12 million. That's around 1 million a month or rounding down a little, $30,000 a day. If the rooms are $200 a night, we would be kicking in 150 rooms worth of money out of 600 proposed, so that's exactly 25%. Now of course our government officials are pro-business and all about fairness, right? So that means, all we have to do is pay the other hotels that already exist in this town whatever 25% of their room rentals would be each and every day. Then everything will work out great. The free market is a wonderful thing, isn't it?
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 25, 2007 10:29 AM
Kinda like the 205 MAX line. Voted down twice, yet still being built. (As an aside, I'm curious how all the greenies feel about the 50 or so old growth Doug Firs that were mowed down for this boodoggle--- way to go Metro! You really seem to care about the environment.)
It'll be a while, but this hotel will be subsidized and built on our dime.
Posted by Chris McMullen | September 25, 2007 10:37 AM
...curious how all the greenies feel about the 50 or so old growth Doug Firs that were mowed down for this boodoggle...
I'm not a supporter of this MAX line, but where, pray tell would one find "old growth" firs on the I-205 corridor? And what age would you define "old growth" to be?
Posted by PMG | September 25, 2007 11:06 AM
"And the more griping about everything, with its attendant delays, means the costs will go up,"
Hey, do you understand this is a bad idea contrived to cover-up for another bad idea, the convention center?
Please kill it and stop wasting our time. No one wants it beside Metro and POVA for their own self-interest, yet we keep this thing alive until in a weak moment they slip it on the taxpayers.
City after city has shown this is a money-losers, yet the locals haev enough hubris to believe they are different.
Posted by Steve | September 25, 2007 12:31 PM
Sam, the scam already has plans for the city and PDC to bankroll this white elephant. As for the voters, they're so DUM they vote yes on everything.Must be that BULL RUNS water.
Posted by KISS | September 25, 2007 1:54 PM
The key stat is the number of days the politicians' hotel would really be bringing in a single extra dollar to Portland. In other words, the big conventions that won't come now. Once we got past the help this would give to local construction unions, I bet that would still only happen on around 65 days of the year and that's being wildly optimistic. It could be far less. We're not talking about Vegas here. So what takes place on the other 300 days? The new pretend hotel would just be taking business away from the hotels that are already built. And not only that, it could offer a discount based on the fact that they're subsidized by the taxpayers, and losing money anyway. The end result is we could lose real hotels, and then wonder why downtown seems more empty.
The most aggravating part of this is when the politicians pretend they're acting for wise, noble reasons. They are not.
Posted by Bill McDonald | September 25, 2007 1:59 PM
I guess I never understood the benefits of a convention center. I always assumed it was to bring people into an area for economic purposes. Using that premise, a baseball stadium with a guaranteed 81 dates a year, averaging 20,000 per game would bring 1.6 million people to an area. Would the convention center even with a spiffy hotel match this number?
Posted by Gil Slater | September 25, 2007 3:59 PM
J: The voters will never approve....
I'm sure these words will live on long enough for you to regret them.
Posted by John Rettig | September 25, 2007 6:22 PM
In today's snOregonian, Rod Park wants to delay the hotel vote to see if someone else besides METRO can help pay for it.
It's a done deal now, they want it.
Posted by Steve | September 27, 2007 8:19 AM