wouldn't failing to answer the survey but using up the postage just waste City money?
What exactly is the problem with the survey? It's the one used by the City Auditor's Office every year to track progress on bureau performance indicators. It's a very well done instrument and process, actually. The question set is pretty stable, which makes trend analysis much easier.
Why'd you throw it away, Dave? Would you vote to discontinue the survey process if you were on Council?
Torrid,
I didn't throw it away, I recycled it; there's a difference.
Frankly, I had no input. Other than turning on the tap and having the water come out and flushing the toilet and having the water go down, I have had no interaction with any city bureaus or services. I suspect that's the case with most folks.
If I were on the council, and I wouldn't be auditor because I don't have the CPA credential, I don't know if I would do surveys or not. It would depend on my bureau assignments and whether I thought surveying was required.
Mr TJ, again your bias shows. I think the majority of questions are what do you think of what we are giving you. Not one question on do you think you pay too much or do you think we are wasting money on something.
It is a self-serving exercise that will be buried if they don't like the results. So why fill it out?
Huh? I'm wondering who is showing the bias here. Other than question 20, the questions seem quite reasonably worded.
This is a survey intended to gauge your satisfaction with city services. Other folks who want to know about whether taxes are too high are asking the sort of questions you want.
As for the results being buried, issue a FOIA my friend. You may dislike government, but you can always open and look inside, particularly in Portland.
"This is a survey intended to gauge your satisfaction with city services."
I understand the goals, but why not ask more over-arching questions like do we think they are spending money? In addition, if you used FOIA, they would make it as hard as possible (i.e. give you raw unprocessed data) to determine the results of a survey they didn't want you to know.
That is how govt works here. As an example, if Sam wants to know how much people like light-rail, he will ask the 5% who ride light rail, which is not a representative sample.
As for the results being buried, issue a FOIA my friend. You may dislike government, but you can always open and look inside, particularly in Portland.
Oh, how typical of our local apologists.
a) Steve's "biased".
b) Steve "...dislike(s) government...".
and
c) Filing a FOIA request is the simple, easy way to find out those things which any citizen has a right to know about their city's inner workings - WITHOUT using a crowbar.
d) "c" is "particularly" easy here in Portland. Naturally!
For which city bureau did you say you worked, paul?
Steve, you don't even know what you're talking about. The survey has been issued annually for YEARS, and the results of every single one have been extensively published in the annual Service Efforts and Accomplishments report, which marks and evaluates the progress of most City bureaus. They are available at portlandonline.com, no FOIA needed. Go to the appendix for the raw results.
Dave--I know you recycled it, but as far as the Auditor's office is concerned it's the same thing. Not using the services mentioned in the survey is not only a valid answer that is just as valuable as if you had, it makes filling the survey out much quicker for you. The survey isn't bureau-based; it's citywide. The bureaus don't actually have anything to do with it; it's all the Auditor's office.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (14)
That printed out well. Now, if you'll just give us address on the return envelope, we can ALL get busy.
Posted by rr | August 10, 2007 12:00 PM
Who do you think you are, Emilie Boyles?
Posted by Jack Bog | August 10, 2007 12:04 PM
I got mine yesterday. It's in the recycle bin.
Posted by Dave Lister | August 10, 2007 12:22 PM
They ought to give you a $5 coupon off your sewer bill if you fill it out and return it.
Seriously.
Posted by Jack Bog | August 10, 2007 12:24 PM
Maybe we should organize a movement to write "F THE TRAM" in big letters across it and send it back in the free "business reply mail."
Posted by Jack Bog | August 10, 2007 12:25 PM
wouldn't failing to answer the survey but using up the postage just waste City money?
What exactly is the problem with the survey? It's the one used by the City Auditor's Office every year to track progress on bureau performance indicators. It's a very well done instrument and process, actually. The question set is pretty stable, which makes trend analysis much easier.
Why'd you throw it away, Dave? Would you vote to discontinue the survey process if you were on Council?
Posted by torridjoe | August 10, 2007 2:27 PM
Torrid,
I didn't throw it away, I recycled it; there's a difference.
Frankly, I had no input. Other than turning on the tap and having the water come out and flushing the toilet and having the water go down, I have had no interaction with any city bureaus or services. I suspect that's the case with most folks.
If I were on the council, and I wouldn't be auditor because I don't have the CPA credential, I don't know if I would do surveys or not. It would depend on my bureau assignments and whether I thought surveying was required.
Posted by Dave Lister | August 10, 2007 3:29 PM
wouldn't failing to answer the survey but using up the postage just waste City money?
Yeah, Dave. Why didn't you fill it out and return it so they could waste it themselves. They're very efficient at waste.
Plus, what's wrong with it - it's what we've always done?
Jeez, if you have to ask...
Posted by rr | August 10, 2007 3:36 PM
"What exactly is the problem with the survey?"
Mr TJ, again your bias shows. I think the majority of questions are what do you think of what we are giving you. Not one question on do you think you pay too much or do you think we are wasting money on something.
It is a self-serving exercise that will be buried if they don't like the results. So why fill it out?
Now get back to work :}
Posted by Steve | August 10, 2007 4:20 PM
Steve,
Huh? I'm wondering who is showing the bias here. Other than question 20, the questions seem quite reasonably worded.
This is a survey intended to gauge your satisfaction with city services. Other folks who want to know about whether taxes are too high are asking the sort of questions you want.
As for the results being buried, issue a FOIA my friend. You may dislike government, but you can always open and look inside, particularly in Portland.
Posted by paul | August 10, 2007 4:32 PM
"This is a survey intended to gauge your satisfaction with city services."
I understand the goals, but why not ask more over-arching questions like do we think they are spending money? In addition, if you used FOIA, they would make it as hard as possible (i.e. give you raw unprocessed data) to determine the results of a survey they didn't want you to know.
That is how govt works here. As an example, if Sam wants to know how much people like light-rail, he will ask the 5% who ride light rail, which is not a representative sample.
Posted by Steve | August 10, 2007 4:53 PM
As for the results being buried, issue a FOIA my friend. You may dislike government, but you can always open and look inside, particularly in Portland.
Oh, how typical of our local apologists.
a) Steve's "biased".
b) Steve "...dislike(s) government...".
and
c) Filing a FOIA request is the simple, easy way to find out those things which any citizen has a right to know about their city's inner workings - WITHOUT using a crowbar.
d) "c" is "particularly" easy here in Portland. Naturally!
For which city bureau did you say you worked, paul?
...it is to laugh
Posted by rr | August 10, 2007 5:21 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/13/real_estate/public_transit_commutes/index.htm
Posted by Ed | August 10, 2007 10:01 PM
Steve, you don't even know what you're talking about. The survey has been issued annually for YEARS, and the results of every single one have been extensively published in the annual Service Efforts and Accomplishments report, which marks and evaluates the progress of most City bureaus. They are available at portlandonline.com, no FOIA needed. Go to the appendix for the raw results.
Dave--I know you recycled it, but as far as the Auditor's office is concerned it's the same thing. Not using the services mentioned in the survey is not only a valid answer that is just as valuable as if you had, it makes filling the survey out much quicker for you. The survey isn't bureau-based; it's citywide. The bureaus don't actually have anything to do with it; it's all the Auditor's office.
Posted by torridjoe | August 11, 2007 11:27 AM