This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 30, 2007 1:09 PM.
The previous post in this blog was The O loves Gordon.
The next post in this blog is Mean girl out.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
A reader points out that Ikea is sitting on land leased to it by the Port of Portland. Is there some mechanism whereby the store will pay property taxes, directly or indirectly? Or will it have freedom from taxes as an advantage over its taxpaying competitors?
Comments (15)
Why are you trying to drive up the cost of my new couch?
i would assume it just depends on how the lease is structured. in that sense, they don't have any particular edge over any other business that leases their space.
Is the issue that the PoP is exempt from property taxes on the property it holds? If so, how does that work when, say, it rents out offices in the building it owns in Portland? I'm totally ignorant about this. Maybe there's some mechanism like the income tax's URBIT for exempt entities? Or maybe the PoP could pull a Portland General and collect taxes under its lease, but then keep the money and not remit it to the taxing entity?
How would the lease terms affect this? If the Port owns the land, how does it become taxable? Maybe Ikea will pay tax on the value of their building only?
Real property is taxable when owned by tax exempt entities (such as a governmental agency) BUT used for private purposes. It is USE not OWNERSHIP that prevails in these situations. Both the land and the improvements would be taxable. In the case of use of part of a building and/or part of land area, a proportionate share of the property would be taxable. The Port would have had the obligation to notify Multnomah County when the leased was signed, and to deliver a copy of the lease to the County Tax Assessor. Of course, if by chance the lease was recorded with the County, the Tax Assessor would have been notified by the fact of that recording.
Don't be too confident in the ability of the MultCo Dept of Assessment & Taxation to "dig too deep" when the use of formerly exempt property changes and becomes taxable. There isn't, or, apparently, wasn't, any mechanism for cross-checking from permits or licenses 3-4 years ago when I discovered that a a fully taxable funeral home, which had been built on the property-tax-exempt cemetery land, (in your neighborhood, Jack) wasn't being taxed. Only my tip led the county, 9 years after the fact, to put the "new" business on the property tax rolls.
I seem to remember that the POP transferred development rights to all property in that area to Bechtel or some other megacorp in exchange for building the light rail extension to the airport. That way the extension was "free" or at least according to Mike Thorne, the POP bighead at the time.
The land that IKEA is on and that whole Cascade Station was part of a "trade" with Bechtel corp for Redline MAX. Not sure how that factors in to this discussion, but wanted to see if anyone else has insight.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
Why are you trying to drive up the cost of my new couch?
Posted by Chris Snethen | July 30, 2007 3:17 PM
http://www.pdc.us/new/releases/2005/1020.asp
For what it's worth, the fifth paragraph in this PDC document states that IKEA will pay significant property taxes.
Posted by Nick | July 30, 2007 3:18 PM
i would assume it just depends on how the lease is structured. in that sense, they don't have any particular edge over any other business that leases their space.
Posted by george | July 30, 2007 3:24 PM
Is the issue that the PoP is exempt from property taxes on the property it holds? If so, how does that work when, say, it rents out offices in the building it owns in Portland? I'm totally ignorant about this. Maybe there's some mechanism like the income tax's URBIT for exempt entities? Or maybe the PoP could pull a Portland General and collect taxes under its lease, but then keep the money and not remit it to the taxing entity?
Posted by Allan (Nineskwatawa) L. | July 30, 2007 4:02 PM
How would the lease terms affect this? If the Port owns the land, how does it become taxable? Maybe Ikea will pay tax on the value of their building only?
Posted by Jack Bog | July 30, 2007 4:02 PM
Real property is taxable when owned by tax exempt entities (such as a governmental agency) BUT used for private purposes. It is USE not OWNERSHIP that prevails in these situations. Both the land and the improvements would be taxable. In the case of use of part of a building and/or part of land area, a proportionate share of the property would be taxable. The Port would have had the obligation to notify Multnomah County when the leased was signed, and to deliver a copy of the lease to the County Tax Assessor. Of course, if by chance the lease was recorded with the County, the Tax Assessor would have been notified by the fact of that recording.
Posted by Diana | July 30, 2007 4:30 PM
The valuation of the land would be interesting. Has it ever been sold in an arm's length deal? Maybe a long time ago...
Posted by Jack Bog | July 30, 2007 4:35 PM
If they are doing a land lease Like McD or Burger King, they usually pay on the improvements part of the prop tax.
I assume PoP doesn't pay prop taxes on land? I don't know PoP's tax status.
Posted by Steve | July 30, 2007 4:51 PM
Don't be too confident in the ability of the MultCo Dept of Assessment & Taxation to "dig too deep" when the use of formerly exempt property changes and becomes taxable. There isn't, or, apparently, wasn't, any mechanism for cross-checking from permits or licenses 3-4 years ago when I discovered that a a fully taxable funeral home, which had been built on the property-tax-exempt cemetery land, (in your neighborhood, Jack) wasn't being taxed. Only my tip led the county, 9 years after the fact, to put the "new" business on the property tax rolls.
Posted by cullygirl | July 30, 2007 5:49 PM
I seem to remember that the POP transferred development rights to all property in that area to Bechtel or some other megacorp in exchange for building the light rail extension to the airport. That way the extension was "free" or at least according to Mike Thorne, the POP bighead at the time.
Posted by Paul | July 31, 2007 8:14 AM
"IKEA will pay significant property taxes"
"significant"?
That's that mean? Heck, they could have a huge exemption and still pay "significant" taxes.
Posted by Ben | July 31, 2007 8:23 AM
What's that mean?
Posted by Ben | July 31, 2007 8:24 AM
The land that IKEA is on and that whole Cascade Station was part of a "trade" with Bechtel corp for Redline MAX. Not sure how that factors in to this discussion, but wanted to see if anyone else has insight.
Posted by dieselboi | July 31, 2007 8:39 AM
For what it's worth, the fifth paragraph in this PDC document states that IKEA will pay significant property taxes.
Right...because the PDC is usually so honest with the public...
Posted by Jon | July 31, 2007 10:01 AM
"Right...because the PDC is usually so honest with the public..."
Exactly and they couldn't be anymore clear than "significant"?
They could have said IKEA will pay routine or normal or regular property taxes.
The only possible reason they did not is that they did not want the public to know of the significantly reduced property taxes IKEA will pay.
Posted by Ben | August 1, 2007 9:40 AM