We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,900 unique visits a day, and more than 53,000 page views a week (as of October 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Marques de Casa Concha, Cabernet 2005
Santi, Sortesele Pinot Grigio 2006
Al Muvedre, Tinto Joven 2006
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2006
Gritti, Ca' Andrea, Umbria red 2005
Altos de Luzon, Jumilla 2004
Thomas Leithner, Zweigelt 2004
Cain Cuvee NV 3
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot 2003
Meridian, Sauvignon Blanc 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Paringa, Shiraz 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2005
Kris, Pinot Grigio 2006
Silvan Ridge, Pinot Gris 2006
Fife, Mendocino Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
Castle Rock, Cabernet, Paso Robles 2005
Willakenzie, Pinot Gris 2006
The Show, Cabernet 2005
Essencia Valdemar, Rioja Rose 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Beaulieu Vineyard. Napa Valley Cabernet 2004
Irony, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2003
Rosenblum, Petite Sirah, Heritage Clones 2005
Fra Guerau, Montsant 2002
Barefoot Chardonnay
Kana, Syrah 2004
Castell Salegg, Chardonnay, Alto Adige 2004
Fetish, The Watcher Shiraz 2004
Gold Note, Fair Play Zinfandel 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Canoe Ridge Estate Cabernet 2003
Ponzi, Pinot Noir 2004
Red Diamond, Merlot 2003
Mateus, Rose
Benton Lane Pinot Noir 2004
Penya Cadiella Vins de Comtat 2003
Kamiak, Cellar Select Red 2003
Anselmi, San Vincenzo 2005
Rubrato, Aglianico dei Feudi di San Gregorio 2004
Le Grand Noir (Black Sheep) Cabernet-Shiraz
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2005
Los Vascos, Cabernet, Reserve 2004
Jackaroo, Shiraz 2003
Paul Jaboulet Aine, Crozes Hermitage Syrah, "La Jalet," 2001
Paul Jaboulet Aine, Cotes du Rhone, "Parallele '45,'" 2003
Rolf Binder, Barossa Valley Shiraz 2003
Oyster Bay, Sauvignon Blanc 2006
Woodbridge Chardonnay 2005
Barnard & Griffin, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2004
Quinto do Carmo, Alentejano Red 2000
Forefathers, Alexander Valley Cabernet 2001
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 28
At this date last year: 102
Total run in 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
Why are you trying to drive up the cost of my new couch?
Posted by Chris Snethen | July 30, 2007 3:17 PM
http://www.pdc.us/new/releases/2005/1020.asp
For what it's worth, the fifth paragraph in this PDC document states that IKEA will pay significant property taxes.
Posted by Nick | July 30, 2007 3:18 PM
i would assume it just depends on how the lease is structured. in that sense, they don't have any particular edge over any other business that leases their space.
Posted by george | July 30, 2007 3:24 PM
Is the issue that the PoP is exempt from property taxes on the property it holds? If so, how does that work when, say, it rents out offices in the building it owns in Portland? I'm totally ignorant about this. Maybe there's some mechanism like the income tax's URBIT for exempt entities? Or maybe the PoP could pull a Portland General and collect taxes under its lease, but then keep the money and not remit it to the taxing entity?
Posted by Allan (Nineskwatawa) L. | July 30, 2007 4:02 PM
How would the lease terms affect this? If the Port owns the land, how does it become taxable? Maybe Ikea will pay tax on the value of their building only?
Posted by Jack Bog | July 30, 2007 4:02 PM
Real property is taxable when owned by tax exempt entities (such as a governmental agency) BUT used for private purposes. It is USE not OWNERSHIP that prevails in these situations. Both the land and the improvements would be taxable. In the case of use of part of a building and/or part of land area, a proportionate share of the property would be taxable. The Port would have had the obligation to notify Multnomah County when the leased was signed, and to deliver a copy of the lease to the County Tax Assessor. Of course, if by chance the lease was recorded with the County, the Tax Assessor would have been notified by the fact of that recording.
Posted by Diana | July 30, 2007 4:30 PM
The valuation of the land would be interesting. Has it ever been sold in an arm's length deal? Maybe a long time ago...
Posted by Jack Bog | July 30, 2007 4:35 PM
If they are doing a land lease Like McD or Burger King, they usually pay on the improvements part of the prop tax.
I assume PoP doesn't pay prop taxes on land? I don't know PoP's tax status.
Posted by Steve | July 30, 2007 4:51 PM
Don't be too confident in the ability of the MultCo Dept of Assessment & Taxation to "dig too deep" when the use of formerly exempt property changes and becomes taxable. There isn't, or, apparently, wasn't, any mechanism for cross-checking from permits or licenses 3-4 years ago when I discovered that a a fully taxable funeral home, which had been built on the property-tax-exempt cemetery land, (in your neighborhood, Jack) wasn't being taxed. Only my tip led the county, 9 years after the fact, to put the "new" business on the property tax rolls.
Posted by cullygirl | July 30, 2007 5:49 PM
I seem to remember that the POP transferred development rights to all property in that area to Bechtel or some other megacorp in exchange for building the light rail extension to the airport. That way the extension was "free" or at least according to Mike Thorne, the POP bighead at the time.
Posted by Paul | July 31, 2007 8:14 AM
"IKEA will pay significant property taxes"
"significant"?
That's that mean? Heck, they could have a huge exemption and still pay "significant" taxes.
Posted by Ben | July 31, 2007 8:23 AM
What's that mean?
Posted by Ben | July 31, 2007 8:24 AM
The land that IKEA is on and that whole Cascade Station was part of a "trade" with Bechtel corp for Redline MAX. Not sure how that factors in to this discussion, but wanted to see if anyone else has insight.
Posted by dieselboi | July 31, 2007 8:39 AM
For what it's worth, the fifth paragraph in this PDC document states that IKEA will pay significant property taxes.
Right...because the PDC is usually so honest with the public...
Posted by Jon | July 31, 2007 10:01 AM
"Right...because the PDC is usually so honest with the public..."
Exactly and they couldn't be anymore clear than "significant"?
They could have said IKEA will pay routine or normal or regular property taxes.
The only possible reason they did not is that they did not want the public to know of the significantly reduced property taxes IKEA will pay.
Posted by Ben | August 1, 2007 9:40 AM