Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 17, 2007 5:32 PM. The previous post in this blog was I'm like a magnet for this stuff. The next post in this blog is What does Hillary stand for?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Banished to the real estate section

I see that the O is bouncing their Portland City Hall reporters off that beat. In fact, all sorts of writers at that paper are reportedly having their jobs re-defined -- again.

Like most Advance (Newhouse) newspapers, the O is always shuffling its reporters around. Just when they start to learn the subjects on which they've been writing for a few years, off they are sent to some new, unfamiliar, and often heaven-forsaken assignment. One day you're covering Portland City Hall, the next day you're writing up the doings of the Gresham fire department. One day you're covering First Thursday, the next day you're an urban renewal expert. It's like term limits for politicians, only a lot shorter and less predictable.

Why do they do this? I have several theories. First, it keeps everyone in the organization constantly on the edge of their seats, thankful that they have a job in the wonderful Newhouse family, and ever mindful of what can happen if they don't do as they're told. Thoughts like "You want a start a union?" are replaced by "Do your kids eat a lot?"

Second, the constant, mindless rotation ensures that the reporters are never smarter about their beats than their editors, which effectively prevents the writers from developing their own angles and perspectives on stories for a long time. If the folks in the field don't know what they're doing, they'll have to call for help from the mothership on Broadway, which will always feed the approved spin.

And third (a related point), it enables the local political and business leaders to pull the wool over the newly reshuffled reporters' eyes. This comes in especially handy when the writers are about to identify the fallacies in the positions adopted on the publication's editorial page.

Overall, the game of musical beats keeps the paper nice and dumb, which is the way the Advance organization seems to like it best. Our sympathies to all the journalists who are being needlessly displaced -- and misplaced.

Comments (34)

Couldn't have put it better myself.

Thoughts like "You want a start a union?" are replaced by "Do you kids eat a lot?"

That nails it. Keep 'em guessing and keep 'em quiet.

Exactly correct.

The dissections of their motivation finds more thoughtiness than they show in any other facets. Such as performance, reader satisfaction, advertiser results, ...

Have you considered simply: Ineptitude.

Narrow-minded news for a nonexistent audience.

I dunno. On my relatively rare bus ride today, I sat next to an elderly gal who was deeply engrossed in her copy of the morning O.

Meanwhile, another source tells me that both Portland City Hall reporters requested that they be taken off that assignment. Interesting.

Unfortunately they haven't (to my knowledge anyway) rotated Betsy Hammond from her PERS beat. I know this is a tough battle, but in my opinion, Betsy Hammond is the most thoroughly inept, stupid, and incompetent reporter the "O" currently employs. She's the only person who can take a court ruling that's crystal clear and twist it up and make it unrecognizeable on the front page of the Metro section or, worse, the 'O' front page. If I weren't a student of the court's rulings on all things PERS, she could convince me that the most recent Court ruling concluded that PERS should simply rob, at gunpoint, all current employees to pay for current retirees. I could not believe what I was reading. Nor could any of the attorneys for either side or the Judge in the case - all of whom have gone out of their way to inform their clients that Betsy Hammond must have been writing about a case decided in another galaxy. She's that bad. She should be writing obits.

You are spot on, Jack.

I would add that the O needs to add "experts" like economists,
planners, attorneys, etc. when they delve in to those topics; even if the reporters weren't shuffled so often, because I have found many of the reporters covering city/region issues lacking research, knowledge of the issues they are reporting.

Also the O should consider the merits of reporter longevity. The history, nuisances of issues many times are left out because of a reporter's short life or experiences with the subject matter.

And Jonathan Nicholas moving to the editorial staff, as announced in one of his recent columns...who thought that was a good idea?

Really? Editorial, as in reporter? Wow, I hope Quarterflash's retirement plans are considered hard news.

No, I see it's that he'll be writing editorials. Just when I thought they were as out-of-touch as could be!

Well, you found an exception to my post regarding longevity. Nicholas is an example where longevity at the O has created a total mindset-beyond reporting and seeing both sides of an issue-and likely not a good addition to the editorial board. But, probably with these kind of credentials he'll fit right in.

Whatever the Stickels want, I'm sure...

Could be they are mostly Interns working to build diverse work histories and buy the O's constant shuffle as an effort in helping them achieve their goals.

When the newspapers bounce back (which could happen any day now) the dupes will have first position in the Newhouse Nutworks.

I don't remember any staffing reshuffle as widespread as this current round, but it's always been common for The Oregonian's beats to shift regularly. Ambitious reporters like to move up, reporters like to go where the action is (is it City Hall these days?), editors like to mix things up and sometimes people are exiled to beats or bureaus not of their choosing.

I spent 4 years at The O (many years ago) and worked three different beats. On the flip side, I've been working for Portland Public Schools for less than three years, and this will be the third set of reporters covering us. (We've had new reporters covering us from WW and The Trib, too, not to mention a revolving cast of characters at many of the TV stations).

I don't have much insight into the current round of assignments (my husband generally lives in his TV writing bubble on the 5th floor). But I know both reporters covering Portland schools asked to be taken off the beat, for good professional and personal reasons (or maybe they were tired of me. . . ). We'll miss Paige and Scott -- they had done their homework and knew where to look for stories, people and the numbers -- but I have no reason to expect the new reporters are anything but pros.

As far as "keeping everyone on the edge of their seats" and thankful to work for the Newhouses -- I'd guess newspaper reporters reading the wires on massive layoffs at urban newspapers around the country are already on the edge of their seats. The O's reporters, however, do take comfort in publisher Fred Stickel's promise not to lay off any fulltime reporter for economic reasons. That promise is about as rare in newspaper newsrooms these days as a non-union shop.

I rest my case.

Jonathan Nicholas, plagiarist at large, writing editorials? Beautiful.

http://h8land.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html

Non-union newsrooms = clerks writing news stories and not getting paid reporters' wages.

Pay inequity sucks. When women reporters aren't paid as much as their male counterparts, this also sucks. Unions are helpful in this sort of matter.

Then you have Tom Hallman and his parking spot, paid for by the subject of one of his puff pieces. Yet he doesn't lose his job over this.

Then you have reporters who only leave the building for press junkets, otherwise they're in the Velvet Coffin with their telephones.

I comprende the plight of papers, and the 'news industry,' facing the fullspeed internets bulldozer levelling their redoubts indubitably; but, their lust for power of ruling news control, beyond council or conciliation, offered and opportune, now is suffocating them in their sans serif, unrelieved, and no mercy comes paying them forward.
The world was theirs if they had shared and shared in it; now they're not the world's.
---

Call it like you see him, but I like Jonathan N.-nuh-nuh-nuhnn's snap crackle period. The one time we met dodging left-right-left-right going opposite ways through a doorway, I stopped him and asked why he came to this Oregon place, I was born here, what's his excuse? And he's the only one who ever answered it my way, as if it's the most casually obvious thing -- and it is: "Because of the land, just look at its greatness and spirit." See, nothing about 'the people here,' although that is logically sequitor.
--

Talk of B. Hammond, the house organista, reminds me of another tale. She worked there, and a mainstay, quite a while and one time put a 5,000-word trompe double-truck on a topic, (I won't disclose), and she left some things out. Deep deep background things I happened to know -- by magic, (believe this word 'magic' or you're lost). She was very well versed, and completely stunned when I offered her verses she had left out. So we confabbed a half day(!) -- extraordinary, and she queried less what I knew than how I knew it. If she'd believed in magic from the get-go, we'd have finished in short half-an-hour. Her byline, and presence in the building, was never seen again, from that day on. Years later I realized she had been victim of surveillance recording the conference room, and had overqualified herself for servile silence by talking to me. I'm sorry, Miss X, I was partly to blame and I never had got that remorsed.
---

It goes on. The beat that beats-all is the new rave in The City, a tickling trick Willy Week might right steal from the old dogged blue Village Voice: Ask a Mexican!

Ya' gotta love comedy: How the News Works. Funny papers.

Really? Editorial, as in reporter?

Reporters writing editorials...sounds like the standard for the Oregonian news pages to me.


Every day thousands of scared, uneducated folks struggle to bring unions to their work place in an attempt to improve their situation. Do you think maybe the reporters ought to pull their suspenders up and fight for themselves.

Union! Union! Union! (all Norma Rae here...)

Unemployment! Unemployment! Unemployment!

Oh, right. There's that.

I posted some suggestions for Thee O's reporters on my blog. And gave you a shout-out.

The Oregonian: where sexual harassers are rewarded with better jobs, decent reporters are banished to the burbs, plagiarists are promoted to the editorial board, cub reporters are brought in at higher salaries than experienced staff, and columnists don't know how to do Google searches.

If ever there was a workplace in need of a union, this is it. (Some long-time Portland residents may recall the brutal history of union busting at the O.)

And now comes the Portland Public Schools PR flack flattering the next batch of reporters (who she hopes will be as amenable to her spin as the last batch), sucking up to Mr. Stickel on behalf of her husband, and disparaging unionism all in one broad stroke.

Anyone at the O who trust's Stickel's "promise" better make sure their resume is in good shape.

I don't quite get that. By tradition, reporters, who get out in the real world with real people, where travel is broadening, exposure to various cultures and different ways and idioms, so then are more experienced and know more, than stick-in-the-mud if not dog-in-the-manger curmudgeon, then gruff, editorial writers.

Example, the editorializer whose "yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus," has harped on grandparents' heart strings with sentiment strokes, over a century -- schmaltz max and pure poppycock, but reverie of 'the way it should be that I'd like to remember,' so contagious among aging consciousnesses. Whereas, Virginia's parents or any cub reporter, about the same age and a younger generation, if asked about Santa by the kid, would whack her with rude tough-love truth -- 'no, kid, there ain't no Santa, get over it and get to sleep, or else you'll get a stocking of coal for your Santa sass, what, do you think gift wrap grows on trees?'

Or, second example of reporter turning into editorializer in a single person, is Mark Twain. He had his chops when he had fresh material, piloting up and down the mighty Mississip -- too thick to drink, too thin to plough. Adventures aplenty, ferrying Civil War gunpowder and mortars up and down, boatloads you hope don't explode, dodging zinging rifle balls from shoreline snipers. Then he gets old and all moralistic, how slavery is inhuman and war is never right: ideal editorial lecturing candidate.

It's to be hoped reporters may write editorials -- they flex, they know more and are accurate. After too long preaching to the buyer, editorialists get set in their legends in their own mind -- witness: the dunkirks on Broadway, brain-stale biscuits for Bush, still fighting the last war; or, witness: me, I suppose.

So here comes neighborhood bicycling Nicholas, here comes hope, I hope. If anything, his fault might be nuance where nagging's the need. Pioneer raw-landed types talk and take rough stuff, not lyrics.

Besides, Nicholas ain't no reporter. He's a gossip and gwendolyn, griffyn and gayday, if he goes to stone it's the gargoyle's gout. He doesn't endorse candidates, he endorses democracy in its idyll idea. Much butter, no peanuts -- smear without the crunch. It's a wonder he can rope and ride, he's probably one of them there whisperers.

And besides all that, why the gaffaws? He sure can't do no worse. Newspapers are dead and gone, anyway, it could be fitting a couplet to rhyme on the headstone.

'I don't quite get that, for Jon's reprise of Jack's remark: "Really? Editorial, as in reporter?"'

"nuisances of issues "

Freudian slip, Jerry?

It does seem that many can't be bothered with parsing issues.

And I agree that independent experts are needed. The way it is now, a compromised cop, judge or prosecutor can control conversation for years and years, becuase whistle blowers are attacked and discredited and the folks at the O don't seem to care about doing the research that will yield the real story.

In the words of Randy Leonard,
"I don't want to alienate myself by taking a principaled stance"

I frimly believe our local "journalists" are petrified of being alienated should they accurately report and clash with the ,,,shall we say official agenda?

I don't know if it's just me; but does anyone else find it amazing that someone as irrelevent as Johnathan Nicholas is going to write editorials for the "O"? I've always wondered why they even employ this guy. And who reads him?
Oh - and let's not forget the ECONOMICS of newspapers these days are going down the tubes. Just today, the Wall Street Journal was reporting that many real estate brokerages are shifting their advertising dollars to the internet. Kiss that sunday real estate section goodbye in the "O" in months to come. Especially with a growing number of homes on the market in this area and lower sales numbers.

"... someone as irrelevent as Johnathan Nicholas" Actually, most of the entire "O" is irrelevant and has been for some time. I haven't subscribed to the O for 5 or 6 years.

While Fred Stickel tries to keep the "O" afloat most of society is moving on. And as long as they continue their consistent presentation of biases, and denying that they exist and not changing, more and more readers will abandon the "O" habit.

In the early to mid 20th Century, the railroad tycoons didn't grasp the simple concept that their industry was about transporting people and materials, NOT about being a railroad. Otherwise, they would have seen the need to adapt to the new technologies emerging at the time (see Trucks and Airplaines).

What's so hard about giving us the NEWS in a daily NEWSpaper?

Tensk-

All I was trying to say is that reporting the news and giving your opinion (editorializing) are two separate things. Some O writers routinely editorialize outside of the op-ed page...and that distorts the real news.

Roger that. Maybe we're seeing Truth in Labeling starting?

Cynthia: "nuisances of issues", sorry I don't spell check, but I like the Freudian Slip better than the intent.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009

The Occasional Book

Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 220
At this date last year: 67
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics