Yesterday was a great day for the Blazers, but it was also a big one for Portland Commissioner Sam "the Tram" Adams. The stage has been set for him to do what he does best. Congratulations!
Comments (17)
Waaaaait a minute - he's paying the assessed value? What's the catch? Something seems fishy here....
What seems fishy is this:"Brown said the $4.7 million from the land sale would help pay back a loan the city took out to extend the streetcar tracks into RiverPlace."
"The $6 million loan is due in June 2008. Brown said he isn't sure yet how the remaining $1.3 million will be repaid."
Why doesn't the city assess the cost of the street car track extension to developments served by the street car?
Property at appraised value plus street car service - for free = yipee!
Oh yeah and the city will need to come up with another 1.3mil to pay off the loan for track extension serving the future condo.
DON'T SEEM RIIIGHT!
Also in the news yesterday in the Tribune: "Public ridership of the Portland Aerial Tram once again has dipped below the 15 percent level used to determine how much the city would pay to build and operate the project."
Thank you, Tram Adams. The solution? Run the damn thing MORE often, on Sundays, the only day the neighborhood had any rest from the intrusion. Unsurprisingly, the city lied yet again. FTT!
Does anybody else find it remarkable that there was only one bidder for that parcel? For riverfront acreage in a booming part of the city? At a reasonable price?
Who knows? Maybe it's because there's a fat deal worked out with Homer for the construction of the project, which realistically no one else can expect to get. It pencils out for him with all his connections, but perhaps for no one else.
Although the RFP was reissued to exclude the two outside developers who originally submitted a bid, this deal is about the best the PDC has done as far as the public interest is concerned. Imagine, a developer actually paying for land, union labor, etc. IMHO, PDC is trying to reverse public opinion that it's flowing our tax money to HW and JO.
Jack, a considerable reason for how only one bidder-Homer-is awarded the right to purchase parcel 8 is the proforma, purchase requirements that Larry Brown and PDC required for the site. If you read the PDC requirements it narrowly focuses the project to what PDC perceives is the right uses for the site.
This PDC "narrow scope" of uses was recently questioned at a recent URAC meeting, and asked why the free market can't be more of a deteriment of property development which could conceiveably achieve higher prices on land/projects. Of course PDC likes to control all aspects of use, type, density, if housing units-costs, parking, design, etc. For parcel 8 PDC wanted housing, so many units, types of units, etc.
This is a major reason why interest from developers is very limited. And like a PDC staff member and a planning bureau staff member said not so long ago: "we like working with Homer because he talks the planning hype, and knows all the in's and outs of city government; he's a player". PDC just writes the script so that just one or a few can play the game.
The 1.3 million shortfall is, as usual, understated. Note that the city also built roads and cleaned up asbestos contamination left behind by PPL, so there's also some sunk costs for both of these items.
And has anyone ferreted out what this line was getting at: "As part of the deal, they'd [Williams and Dame] also get exclusive rights to buy a two-acre site known as Parcel 3 across the street."
Why bother understanding it? It will never change. Potter hasn't changed it, and Mayor Opie or Mayor Tram will just make it worse. It's the same old story, only now nobody has to pay Goldshmidt (I don't think). By the time the population wakes up (if ever), it will be too late to save the place.
It is interesting that exclusive rights to Parcel 3 was part of the deal for Parcel 8. PDC's Larry Brown and Rachel Blakeman never told the SoWhat URAC anything about this "deal" in any of the so-called updates at several URAC meetings.
Time for an investigation.
How can a citizens committee have any oversight when PDC staff doesn't present the whole picture. And even if we were presented the picture-SoWhat.
I believe it is time for the city auditor, city attorney, then the Multnomah Co. DA, then the FBI to investigate this Parcel 3 and Parcel 8 arrangement. Certainly the Oregonian knew nothing about it, or it would have been reported.
The SoWhat URAC certainly never heard about the RFP for Parcel 8 including "exclusive rights" to Parcel 3. I wonder if any of the earlier interested bidders knew of any kind of promise like this, and in writing. If not, it seems legal action on their part would be justified. I'm sure that with City Council having more "control" over PDC, that they will be doing their job of beginning the investigation. ?
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (17)
Waaaaait a minute - he's paying the assessed value? What's the catch? Something seems fishy here....
Posted by LarryK | May 23, 2007 12:39 PM
I think it says he's paying the appraised value.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 1:02 PM
What seems fishy is this:"Brown said the $4.7 million from the land sale would help pay back a loan the city took out to extend the streetcar tracks into RiverPlace."
"The $6 million loan is due in June 2008. Brown said he isn't sure yet how the remaining $1.3 million will be repaid."
Why doesn't the city assess the cost of the street car track extension to developments served by the street car?
Property at appraised value plus street car service - for free = yipee!
Oh yeah and the city will need to come up with another 1.3mil to pay off the loan for track extension serving the future condo.
DON'T SEEM RIIIGHT!
Posted by genop | May 23, 2007 1:12 PM
Also in the news yesterday in the Tribune: "Public ridership of the Portland Aerial Tram once again has dipped below the 15 percent level used to determine how much the city would pay to build and operate the project."
http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=117979041183515800
Thank you, Tram Adams. The solution? Run the damn thing MORE often, on Sundays, the only day the neighborhood had any rest from the intrusion. Unsurprisingly, the city lied yet again. FTT!
Posted by tanska | May 23, 2007 1:24 PM
Nothing else really matters in Portland right now except making developer weasels rich. All the rest is really beside the point.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 1:33 PM
Does anybody else find it remarkable that there was only one bidder for that parcel? For riverfront acreage in a booming part of the city? At a reasonable price?
Posted by Roger | May 23, 2007 1:48 PM
Who knows? Maybe it's because there's a fat deal worked out with Homer for the construction of the project, which realistically no one else can expect to get. It pencils out for him with all his connections, but perhaps for no one else.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 1:51 PM
Although the RFP was reissued to exclude the two outside developers who originally submitted a bid, this deal is about the best the PDC has done as far as the public interest is concerned. Imagine, a developer actually paying for land, union labor, etc. IMHO, PDC is trying to reverse public opinion that it's flowing our tax money to HW and JO.
Posted by jim | May 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Also, anyone want to bet that the building is going to end up being taller than 15 stories?
Posted by jim | May 23, 2007 2:11 PM
Jack, a considerable reason for how only one bidder-Homer-is awarded the right to purchase parcel 8 is the proforma, purchase requirements that Larry Brown and PDC required for the site. If you read the PDC requirements it narrowly focuses the project to what PDC perceives is the right uses for the site.
This PDC "narrow scope" of uses was recently questioned at a recent URAC meeting, and asked why the free market can't be more of a deteriment of property development which could conceiveably achieve higher prices on land/projects. Of course PDC likes to control all aspects of use, type, density, if housing units-costs, parking, design, etc. For parcel 8 PDC wanted housing, so many units, types of units, etc.
This is a major reason why interest from developers is very limited. And like a PDC staff member and a planning bureau staff member said not so long ago: "we like working with Homer because he talks the planning hype, and knows all the in's and outs of city government; he's a player". PDC just writes the script so that just one or a few can play the game.
Posted by Lee | May 23, 2007 2:28 PM
They'll all burn some day.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 2:31 PM
There may be a question about who's the hand and who's the puppet.
There's no question about where the finger goes, though.
Roll up your sleeve and bend over.
Posted by rr | May 23, 2007 4:06 PM
The 1.3 million shortfall is, as usual, understated. Note that the city also built roads and cleaned up asbestos contamination left behind by PPL, so there's also some sunk costs for both of these items.
And has anyone ferreted out what this line was getting at: "As part of the deal, they'd [Williams and Dame] also get exclusive rights to buy a two-acre site known as Parcel 3 across the street."
Posted by John Rettig | May 23, 2007 7:24 PM
Why bother understanding it? It will never change. Potter hasn't changed it, and Mayor Opie or Mayor Tram will just make it worse. It's the same old story, only now nobody has to pay Goldshmidt (I don't think). By the time the population wakes up (if ever), it will be too late to save the place.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 7:34 PM
It is interesting that exclusive rights to Parcel 3 was part of the deal for Parcel 8. PDC's Larry Brown and Rachel Blakeman never told the SoWhat URAC anything about this "deal" in any of the so-called updates at several URAC meetings.
Time for an investigation.
How can a citizens committee have any oversight when PDC staff doesn't present the whole picture. And even if we were presented the picture-SoWhat.
Posted by Jerry | May 23, 2007 10:41 PM
I believe it is time for the city auditor, city attorney, then the Multnomah Co. DA, then the FBI to investigate this Parcel 3 and Parcel 8 arrangement. Certainly the Oregonian knew nothing about it, or it would have been reported.
Posted by Lee | May 23, 2007 10:45 PM
The SoWhat URAC certainly never heard about the RFP for Parcel 8 including "exclusive rights" to Parcel 3. I wonder if any of the earlier interested bidders knew of any kind of promise like this, and in writing. If not, it seems legal action on their part would be justified. I'm sure that with City Council having more "control" over PDC, that they will be doing their job of beginning the investigation. ?
Posted by Jerry | May 23, 2007 10:54 PM