
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,800 unique visits a day, and more than 44,000 page views a week (as of October 26). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Dom Martinho, Tinto 2005
Chateau St. Jean, Cabernet, California 2007
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2007
Revelry, The Reveler, 2007
Joseph Drouhin, Chablis 2006
Altos Las Hormigas, Mendoza Malbec 2008
Alodio, Ribeira Sacra Mencia 2007
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2008
Kiona, Lemberger 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Paranga, Kir-Yianni 2005
L. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Rose 2007
Gloria Ferrer, Sonoma Brut
Kirkland, Napa Valley Meritage 2006
Abacela, Tempranillo 2006
Woodward Canyon, Columbia Valley Red
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2007
Mas Donis Barrica, Celler de Capcanes Red, 2005
Three Rivers, Merlot 2006
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Lezaun, Rosado, Navarra
Lezaun, Red, Navarra
Hedges, Three Vineyards, Red Mountain 2005
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Vega Sindoa, Cabernet-Tempranillo 2006
Inama, Soave Classico 2007
Alois Lageder, Lagrein Rosato 2008
Broglia, Gavi 2007
Marqués de Cáceres, Rioja Rose 2008
Spaltagna, Riserva Pinot Noir 2008
Portuga, Rose 2008
Warre's Warrior Port
Lange, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Guiraud, Le G, 2007
Falset, Garnacha Rose, Montsant 2006
Castello di Bossi, Chianti Classico 2004
Domaine Chandon, Pinot Noir, La Riviere Sonoma 2006
Brazin, Old Vine Zinfandel, Lodi 2006
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2006
Casillero del Diablo, Cabernet 2007
Gentil Hugel, Alsace 2006
Mesoneros de Castilla, Ribero del Duero, Rosado 2008
Cor, Momentum 2007
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2006
Rubico, Lacrima di Morro d'Alba 2007
Gilstrap Brothers, Reserve Merlot 2003
Conundrum 2007
Chandler Reach, 36 Red
Santa Rita, Reserve Cabernet 2005
Marietta, Old Vine Red Lot 47
L'Ecole No. 41, Recess Red 2006
Dom Martinho, Red 2004
Beaulieu, Georges Latour 1994
Caymus, Cabernet 1995
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2005
Bergevin Lane, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2005
Savigny-les-Beaune, Les Lavieres 2003
David Hill, Reserve Merlot, Rogue Valley 2006
Educated Guess, Cabernet 2006
Maquis Lien, Red 2005
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2007
David Hill, Farmhouse White
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Marques de Casa Concha, Cabernet 2005
Santi, Sortesele Pinot Grigio 2006
Al Muvedre, Tinto Joven 2006
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2006
Gritti, Ca' Andrea, Umbria red 2005
Altos de Luzon, Jumilla 2004
Thomas Leithner, Zweigelt 2004
Cain Cuvee NV 3
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot 2003
Meridian, Sauvignon Blanc 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Paringa, Shiraz 2005
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 64
At this date last year: 28
Total run in 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (17)
Waaaaait a minute - he's paying the assessed value? What's the catch? Something seems fishy here....
Posted by LarryK | May 23, 2007 12:39 PM
I think it says he's paying the appraised value.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 1:02 PM
What seems fishy is this:"Brown said the $4.7 million from the land sale would help pay back a loan the city took out to extend the streetcar tracks into RiverPlace."
"The $6 million loan is due in June 2008. Brown said he isn't sure yet how the remaining $1.3 million will be repaid."
Why doesn't the city assess the cost of the street car track extension to developments served by the street car?
Property at appraised value plus street car service - for free = yipee!
Oh yeah and the city will need to come up with another 1.3mil to pay off the loan for track extension serving the future condo.
DON'T SEEM RIIIGHT!
Posted by genop | May 23, 2007 1:12 PM
Also in the news yesterday in the Tribune: "Public ridership of the Portland Aerial Tram once again has dipped below the 15 percent level used to determine how much the city would pay to build and operate the project."
http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=117979041183515800
Thank you, Tram Adams. The solution? Run the damn thing MORE often, on Sundays, the only day the neighborhood had any rest from the intrusion. Unsurprisingly, the city lied yet again. FTT!
Posted by tanska | May 23, 2007 1:24 PM
Nothing else really matters in Portland right now except making developer weasels rich. All the rest is really beside the point.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 1:33 PM
Does anybody else find it remarkable that there was only one bidder for that parcel? For riverfront acreage in a booming part of the city? At a reasonable price?
Posted by Roger | May 23, 2007 1:48 PM
Who knows? Maybe it's because there's a fat deal worked out with Homer for the construction of the project, which realistically no one else can expect to get. It pencils out for him with all his connections, but perhaps for no one else.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 1:51 PM
Although the RFP was reissued to exclude the two outside developers who originally submitted a bid, this deal is about the best the PDC has done as far as the public interest is concerned. Imagine, a developer actually paying for land, union labor, etc. IMHO, PDC is trying to reverse public opinion that it's flowing our tax money to HW and JO.
Posted by jim | May 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Also, anyone want to bet that the building is going to end up being taller than 15 stories?
Posted by jim | May 23, 2007 2:11 PM
Jack, a considerable reason for how only one bidder-Homer-is awarded the right to purchase parcel 8 is the proforma, purchase requirements that Larry Brown and PDC required for the site. If you read the PDC requirements it narrowly focuses the project to what PDC perceives is the right uses for the site.
This PDC "narrow scope" of uses was recently questioned at a recent URAC meeting, and asked why the free market can't be more of a deteriment of property development which could conceiveably achieve higher prices on land/projects. Of course PDC likes to control all aspects of use, type, density, if housing units-costs, parking, design, etc. For parcel 8 PDC wanted housing, so many units, types of units, etc.
This is a major reason why interest from developers is very limited. And like a PDC staff member and a planning bureau staff member said not so long ago: "we like working with Homer because he talks the planning hype, and knows all the in's and outs of city government; he's a player". PDC just writes the script so that just one or a few can play the game.
Posted by Lee | May 23, 2007 2:28 PM
They'll all burn some day.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 2:31 PM
There may be a question about who's the hand and who's the puppet.
There's no question about where the finger goes, though.
Roll up your sleeve and bend over.
Posted by rr | May 23, 2007 4:06 PM
The 1.3 million shortfall is, as usual, understated. Note that the city also built roads and cleaned up asbestos contamination left behind by PPL, so there's also some sunk costs for both of these items.
And has anyone ferreted out what this line was getting at: "As part of the deal, they'd [Williams and Dame] also get exclusive rights to buy a two-acre site known as Parcel 3 across the street."
Posted by John Rettig | May 23, 2007 7:24 PM
Why bother understanding it? It will never change. Potter hasn't changed it, and Mayor Opie or Mayor Tram will just make it worse. It's the same old story, only now nobody has to pay Goldshmidt (I don't think). By the time the population wakes up (if ever), it will be too late to save the place.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 23, 2007 7:34 PM
It is interesting that exclusive rights to Parcel 3 was part of the deal for Parcel 8. PDC's Larry Brown and Rachel Blakeman never told the SoWhat URAC anything about this "deal" in any of the so-called updates at several URAC meetings.
Time for an investigation.
How can a citizens committee have any oversight when PDC staff doesn't present the whole picture. And even if we were presented the picture-SoWhat.
Posted by Jerry | May 23, 2007 10:41 PM
I believe it is time for the city auditor, city attorney, then the Multnomah Co. DA, then the FBI to investigate this Parcel 3 and Parcel 8 arrangement. Certainly the Oregonian knew nothing about it, or it would have been reported.
Posted by Lee | May 23, 2007 10:45 PM
The SoWhat URAC certainly never heard about the RFP for Parcel 8 including "exclusive rights" to Parcel 3. I wonder if any of the earlier interested bidders knew of any kind of promise like this, and in writing. If not, it seems legal action on their part would be justified. I'm sure that with City Council having more "control" over PDC, that they will be doing their job of beginning the investigation. ?
Posted by Jerry | May 23, 2007 10:54 PM