
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,800 unique visits a day, and more than 44,000 page views a week (as of October 26). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Dom Martinho, Tinto 2005
Chateau St. Jean, Cabernet, California 2007
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2007
Revelry, The Reveler, 2007
Joseph Drouhin, Chablis 2006
Altos Las Hormigas, Mendoza Malbec 2008
Alodio, Ribeira Sacra Mencia 2007
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2008
Kiona, Lemberger 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Paranga, Kir-Yianni 2005
L. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Rose 2007
Gloria Ferrer, Sonoma Brut
Kirkland, Napa Valley Meritage 2006
Abacela, Tempranillo 2006
Woodward Canyon, Columbia Valley Red
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2007
Mas Donis Barrica, Celler de Capcanes Red, 2005
Three Rivers, Merlot 2006
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Lezaun, Rosado, Navarra
Lezaun, Red, Navarra
Hedges, Three Vineyards, Red Mountain 2005
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Vega Sindoa, Cabernet-Tempranillo 2006
Inama, Soave Classico 2007
Alois Lageder, Lagrein Rosato 2008
Broglia, Gavi 2007
Marqués de Cáceres, Rioja Rose 2008
Spaltagna, Riserva Pinot Noir 2008
Portuga, Rose 2008
Warre's Warrior Port
Lange, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Guiraud, Le G, 2007
Falset, Garnacha Rose, Montsant 2006
Castello di Bossi, Chianti Classico 2004
Domaine Chandon, Pinot Noir, La Riviere Sonoma 2006
Brazin, Old Vine Zinfandel, Lodi 2006
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2006
Casillero del Diablo, Cabernet 2007
Gentil Hugel, Alsace 2006
Mesoneros de Castilla, Ribero del Duero, Rosado 2008
Cor, Momentum 2007
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2006
Rubico, Lacrima di Morro d'Alba 2007
Gilstrap Brothers, Reserve Merlot 2003
Conundrum 2007
Chandler Reach, 36 Red
Santa Rita, Reserve Cabernet 2005
Marietta, Old Vine Red Lot 47
L'Ecole No. 41, Recess Red 2006
Dom Martinho, Red 2004
Beaulieu, Georges Latour 1994
Caymus, Cabernet 1995
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2005
Bergevin Lane, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2005
Savigny-les-Beaune, Les Lavieres 2003
David Hill, Reserve Merlot, Rogue Valley 2006
Educated Guess, Cabernet 2006
Maquis Lien, Red 2005
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2007
David Hill, Farmhouse White
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Marques de Casa Concha, Cabernet 2005
Santi, Sortesele Pinot Grigio 2006
Al Muvedre, Tinto Joven 2006
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2006
Gritti, Ca' Andrea, Umbria red 2005
Altos de Luzon, Jumilla 2004
Thomas Leithner, Zweigelt 2004
Cain Cuvee NV 3
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot 2003
Meridian, Sauvignon Blanc 2005
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2003
Paringa, Shiraz 2005
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 64
At this date last year: 28
Total run in 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (16)
Why are we opposed to a Wal-Mart, but cool with a 24 Hour Fitness? (I'm opposed to Wal-Marts, but would at least like to see some consistency as it relates to huge chains.)
Posted by Dave J. | May 9, 2007 9:33 AM
It's no wonder Portland is going broke. When are we, as a city, going to join together and elect some decent people?
Posted by Joey Link | May 9, 2007 9:34 AM
I'm much more in favor of Wal-Mart's than 24 Hour Fitnesses. At least people with low SES factors can benefit from low cost goods.
Posted by Joey Link | May 9, 2007 9:37 AM
From the article - "With the parking garage as a requirement, appraiser PGP Valuation of Portland said $600,000 would be a fair sale price to ensure a reasonable profit to developers."
My question - since when is the city in the business of ensuring profits for private companies?
If that is now city policy, I can't wait to see all the Fortune 500 companies pouring into the area...
Posted by Larry K | May 9, 2007 9:51 AM
Only trendy chains are ok...(ie: Ikea)
And I cannot imagine them giving a break to someone because of a parking garage. Doesnt that break some "cars are evil" planning commandment or something?
And "reasonable profit for developers"??? Huh? Too bad other businesses in the city arent given such elegant considerations. Like the Schumachers.
Posted by Jon | May 9, 2007 10:02 AM
The nonprofit Planned Parenthood doesn't need a subsidy because it's not in the business of making money.
Classic.
Posted by Jon | May 9, 2007 10:04 AM
In today's O a commentary defending the status quo PDC says that the current "independence" has the PDC commissioners taking "responsibility" for the agency spending whereas the city council would not.
What a completely concocted farce.
"Responsibility"? Yeah right. How is that? It aint the PDC commissioner's money, they approve millions for spending on anything without any consequences and no one ever gets a full accounting of who gets the money or what it actually buys. This must be one of those imaginary things.
Like "accountability" that we hear so much about but rarely witness in action.
There is either some seriously entrenched corruption in this town or wholesale group incompetence, or both.
Whatever the mix there certainly is not a shred of fiduciary responsibility demonstrated by ANYONE at the PDC.
26-92, taking the money reigns away from the anointed and appointed PDC commissioners, should pass by a huge margin if there is any sanity left in Portland at all.
If something so obviously dysfunctional can be sustained by such blatant disregard for the truth then we have reached a point where our institutions are so saturated with conflicts of interest that any opposition to the status quo is futile.
Hopefully Portlanders will slap real hard at those perpetrating the status quo and pass 26-92 by a wide margin.
Yes 71% No 29% = Oregonian, shut up.
Posted by Howard | May 9, 2007 10:37 AM
How is a powerful mayor any better than a powerful commissioner?
Just curious how we think that putting all the power in one person is better than all the power in a few people.
Either way - they have all the power!
Posted by Quad | May 9, 2007 11:40 AM
JK: What about an ordinary, low cost, surface parking lot like Freddies and that natures’s clone over on Interstate?
Note: structured parking is many times more expensive than a surface lot. That is why it is not normally built outside of core areas and why PDC has to give away land to encourage such economically bad construction. It is just another of the many little costs of high density that is forced on all of us.
Increasing the cost of every element of driving, including parking, is part of Metro’s plan of turning up the heat on drivers in their nutty scheme to get us to waste time, money and energy on toy trains and buses. (Of course they are too deep into their religious, delusional zealotry to actually look at the data to show what a bad decision this is.) See DebunkingPortland.com
Put PDC budget under city council and this crap will stop. If it didn’t, it would be a prime topic at every public appearance of every council member: “Hey, Eric how come you voted to give another million to Homer?”
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | May 9, 2007 12:08 PM
Hey, you PDC-haters! All is not lost. You didn't read all the way down to the end of the story:
If the project's profit exceeds 15 percent, then the developers may have to repay the city up to the land's $2.2 million market value.
Beneficiaries of such public largesse will no doubt be scrupulously checking the books. That way, when it's time to make that repayment, the check will be in the mail the very next day.
Right?
Posted by Roger | May 9, 2007 2:28 PM
The developers will charge so much in phony overhead costs this project will never make a profit that increases the PDC's revenue from the property beyond the phony appraised (and sale) price of $600,000.
Posted by Doug in SW | May 9, 2007 3:37 PM
Regardless of all the usual stuff, isn't anyone else cheesed off about putting up a monument to a former Los Angeles Laker?
Posted by Gil Johnson | May 9, 2007 10:49 PM
Oh, come on now! Haven't you guys been paying attention?
Big boxes are only evil on the WEST side of the river, where PDC's expensive taxpayer-funded consultant studies confirm that they suck the wind out of the nearby locally-owned and operated small businesses which are our primary source of jobs. On the EAST side of the river, PDC's expensive taxpayer-funded consultant studies say they will NOT suck the wind out of the nearby locally-owned and operated small businesses which are our primary source of jobs.
These are the best consultant studies our tax dollars can buy. Show a little respect, here, will ya?
Posted by dyspeptic | May 9, 2007 11:11 PM
Regardless of all the usual stuff, isn't anyone else cheesed off about putting up a monument to a former Los Angeles Laker?
Why? The owner of that establishment can idolize whomever he wants, right?
Posted by Jon | May 10, 2007 8:00 AM
You know, I heard a rumor today that this place is actually owned by Magic Johnson. Or he is involved somehow with building it...anyone know of any truth to that? Because if its true...why the heck should taxpayers help out some millionaire ex ball player make some more money?
Posted by Jon | May 10, 2007 11:14 AM
"..why the heck should taxpayers help out some millionaire ex ball player make some more money?"
Because that's what the movers and shakers at the PDC think they are supposed to do.
Play like they big developers themselves with the taxpayers money. It's a wonderful life. They can play with taxpayer's money as if it were theirs but they take no personal risk or responsibility for anything.
And with their lavish salaries and benefits the PDC hierarchy also enjoys the fruits of the taxpayers labor.
Posted by Howard | May 10, 2007 3:24 PM