Here's what we've all been waiting for -- a huge 24 Hour Fitness club on MLK. The city's appraised the property at $2.2 million, but the Portland Development Commission would sell it to the developers for $600,000. The reason? A fitness club needs a parking garage.
Make sense to you?
Me neither.
But hey, this is urban renewal, where nothing ever makes sense except the private profit.
Oh, and there'd be some sort of shrine to Magic Johnson attached. Maybe that makes it o.k.
Comments (16)
Why are we opposed to a Wal-Mart, but cool with a 24 Hour Fitness? (I'm opposed to Wal-Marts, but would at least like to see some consistency as it relates to huge chains.)
From the article - "With the parking garage as a requirement, appraiser PGP Valuation of Portland said $600,000 would be a fair sale price to ensure a reasonable profit to developers."
My question - since when is the city in the business of ensuring profits for private companies?
If that is now city policy, I can't wait to see all the Fortune 500 companies pouring into the area...
And I cannot imagine them giving a break to someone because of a parking garage. Doesnt that break some "cars are evil" planning commandment or something?
And "reasonable profit for developers"??? Huh? Too bad other businesses in the city arent given such elegant considerations. Like the Schumachers.
In today's O a commentary defending the status quo PDC says that the current "independence" has the PDC commissioners taking "responsibility" for the agency spending whereas the city council would not.
What a completely concocted farce.
"Responsibility"? Yeah right. How is that? It aint the PDC commissioner's money, they approve millions for spending on anything without any consequences and no one ever gets a full accounting of who gets the money or what it actually buys. This must be one of those imaginary things.
Like "accountability" that we hear so much about but rarely witness in action.
There is either some seriously entrenched corruption in this town or wholesale group incompetence, or both.
Whatever the mix there certainly is not a shred of fiduciary responsibility demonstrated by ANYONE at the PDC.
26-92, taking the money reigns away from the anointed and appointed PDC commissioners, should pass by a huge margin if there is any sanity left in Portland at all.
If something so obviously dysfunctional can be sustained by such blatant disregard for the truth then we have reached a point where our institutions are so saturated with conflicts of interest that any opposition to the status quo is futile.
Hopefully Portlanders will slap real hard at those perpetrating the status quo and pass 26-92 by a wide margin.
Yes 71% No 29% = Oregonian, shut up.
JK: What about an ordinary, low cost, surface parking lot like Freddies and that natures’s clone over on Interstate?
Note: structured parking is many times more expensive than a surface lot. That is why it is not normally built outside of core areas and why PDC has to give away land to encourage such economically bad construction. It is just another of the many little costs of high density that is forced on all of us.
Increasing the cost of every element of driving, including parking, is part of Metro’s plan of turning up the heat on drivers in their nutty scheme to get us to waste time, money and energy on toy trains and buses. (Of course they are too deep into their religious, delusional zealotry to actually look at the data to show what a bad decision this is.) See DebunkingPortland.com
Put PDC budget under city council and this crap will stop. If it didn’t, it would be a prime topic at every public appearance of every council member: “Hey, Eric how come you voted to give another million to Homer?”
Hey, you PDC-haters! All is not lost. You didn't read all the way down to the end of the story:
If the project's profit exceeds 15 percent, then the developers may have to repay the city up to the land's $2.2 million market value.
Beneficiaries of such public largesse will no doubt be scrupulously checking the books. That way, when it's time to make that repayment, the check will be in the mail the very next day.
The developers will charge so much in phony overhead costs this project will never make a profit that increases the PDC's revenue from the property beyond the phony appraised (and sale) price of $600,000.
Oh, come on now! Haven't you guys been paying attention?
Big boxes are only evil on the WEST side of the river, where PDC's expensive taxpayer-funded consultant studies confirm that they suck the wind out of the nearby locally-owned and operated small businesses which are our primary source of jobs. On the EAST side of the river, PDC's expensive taxpayer-funded consultant studies say they will NOT suck the wind out of the nearby locally-owned and operated small businesses which are our primary source of jobs.
These are the best consultant studies our tax dollars can buy. Show a little respect, here, will ya?
You know, I heard a rumor today that this place is actually owned by Magic Johnson. Or he is involved somehow with building it...anyone know of any truth to that? Because if its true...why the heck should taxpayers help out some millionaire ex ball player make some more money?
"..why the heck should taxpayers help out some millionaire ex ball player make some more money?"
Because that's what the movers and shakers at the PDC think they are supposed to do.
Play like they big developers themselves with the taxpayers money. It's a wonderful life. They can play with taxpayer's money as if it were theirs but they take no personal risk or responsibility for anything.
And with their lavish salaries and benefits the PDC hierarchy also enjoys the fruits of the taxpayers labor.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (16)
Why are we opposed to a Wal-Mart, but cool with a 24 Hour Fitness? (I'm opposed to Wal-Marts, but would at least like to see some consistency as it relates to huge chains.)
Posted by Dave J. | May 9, 2007 9:33 AM
It's no wonder Portland is going broke. When are we, as a city, going to join together and elect some decent people?
Posted by Joey Link | May 9, 2007 9:34 AM
I'm much more in favor of Wal-Mart's than 24 Hour Fitnesses. At least people with low SES factors can benefit from low cost goods.
Posted by Joey Link | May 9, 2007 9:37 AM
From the article - "With the parking garage as a requirement, appraiser PGP Valuation of Portland said $600,000 would be a fair sale price to ensure a reasonable profit to developers."
My question - since when is the city in the business of ensuring profits for private companies?
If that is now city policy, I can't wait to see all the Fortune 500 companies pouring into the area...
Posted by Larry K | May 9, 2007 9:51 AM
Only trendy chains are ok...(ie: Ikea)
And I cannot imagine them giving a break to someone because of a parking garage. Doesnt that break some "cars are evil" planning commandment or something?
And "reasonable profit for developers"??? Huh? Too bad other businesses in the city arent given such elegant considerations. Like the Schumachers.
Posted by Jon | May 9, 2007 10:02 AM
The nonprofit Planned Parenthood doesn't need a subsidy because it's not in the business of making money.
Classic.
Posted by Jon | May 9, 2007 10:04 AM
In today's O a commentary defending the status quo PDC says that the current "independence" has the PDC commissioners taking "responsibility" for the agency spending whereas the city council would not.
What a completely concocted farce.
"Responsibility"? Yeah right. How is that? It aint the PDC commissioner's money, they approve millions for spending on anything without any consequences and no one ever gets a full accounting of who gets the money or what it actually buys. This must be one of those imaginary things.
Like "accountability" that we hear so much about but rarely witness in action.
There is either some seriously entrenched corruption in this town or wholesale group incompetence, or both.
Whatever the mix there certainly is not a shred of fiduciary responsibility demonstrated by ANYONE at the PDC.
26-92, taking the money reigns away from the anointed and appointed PDC commissioners, should pass by a huge margin if there is any sanity left in Portland at all.
If something so obviously dysfunctional can be sustained by such blatant disregard for the truth then we have reached a point where our institutions are so saturated with conflicts of interest that any opposition to the status quo is futile.
Hopefully Portlanders will slap real hard at those perpetrating the status quo and pass 26-92 by a wide margin.
Yes 71% No 29% = Oregonian, shut up.
Posted by Howard | May 9, 2007 10:37 AM
How is a powerful mayor any better than a powerful commissioner?
Just curious how we think that putting all the power in one person is better than all the power in a few people.
Either way - they have all the power!
Posted by Quad | May 9, 2007 11:40 AM
JK: What about an ordinary, low cost, surface parking lot like Freddies and that natures’s clone over on Interstate?
Note: structured parking is many times more expensive than a surface lot. That is why it is not normally built outside of core areas and why PDC has to give away land to encourage such economically bad construction. It is just another of the many little costs of high density that is forced on all of us.
Increasing the cost of every element of driving, including parking, is part of Metro’s plan of turning up the heat on drivers in their nutty scheme to get us to waste time, money and energy on toy trains and buses. (Of course they are too deep into their religious, delusional zealotry to actually look at the data to show what a bad decision this is.) See DebunkingPortland.com
Put PDC budget under city council and this crap will stop. If it didn’t, it would be a prime topic at every public appearance of every council member: “Hey, Eric how come you voted to give another million to Homer?”
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | May 9, 2007 12:08 PM
Hey, you PDC-haters! All is not lost. You didn't read all the way down to the end of the story:
If the project's profit exceeds 15 percent, then the developers may have to repay the city up to the land's $2.2 million market value.
Beneficiaries of such public largesse will no doubt be scrupulously checking the books. That way, when it's time to make that repayment, the check will be in the mail the very next day.
Right?
Posted by Roger | May 9, 2007 2:28 PM
The developers will charge so much in phony overhead costs this project will never make a profit that increases the PDC's revenue from the property beyond the phony appraised (and sale) price of $600,000.
Posted by Doug in SW | May 9, 2007 3:37 PM
Regardless of all the usual stuff, isn't anyone else cheesed off about putting up a monument to a former Los Angeles Laker?
Posted by Gil Johnson | May 9, 2007 10:49 PM
Oh, come on now! Haven't you guys been paying attention?
Big boxes are only evil on the WEST side of the river, where PDC's expensive taxpayer-funded consultant studies confirm that they suck the wind out of the nearby locally-owned and operated small businesses which are our primary source of jobs. On the EAST side of the river, PDC's expensive taxpayer-funded consultant studies say they will NOT suck the wind out of the nearby locally-owned and operated small businesses which are our primary source of jobs.
These are the best consultant studies our tax dollars can buy. Show a little respect, here, will ya?
Posted by dyspeptic | May 9, 2007 11:11 PM
Regardless of all the usual stuff, isn't anyone else cheesed off about putting up a monument to a former Los Angeles Laker?
Why? The owner of that establishment can idolize whomever he wants, right?
Posted by Jon | May 10, 2007 8:00 AM
You know, I heard a rumor today that this place is actually owned by Magic Johnson. Or he is involved somehow with building it...anyone know of any truth to that? Because if its true...why the heck should taxpayers help out some millionaire ex ball player make some more money?
Posted by Jon | May 10, 2007 11:14 AM
"..why the heck should taxpayers help out some millionaire ex ball player make some more money?"
Because that's what the movers and shakers at the PDC think they are supposed to do.
Play like they big developers themselves with the taxpayers money. It's a wonderful life. They can play with taxpayer's money as if it were theirs but they take no personal risk or responsibility for anything.
And with their lavish salaries and benefits the PDC hierarchy also enjoys the fruits of the taxpayers labor.
Posted by Howard | May 10, 2007 3:24 PM