Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 9, 2007 1:59 PM. The previous post in this blog was Go figure. The next post in this blog is LaMarcus's heart. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, April 9, 2007

Whoop this

Just what I wanted on a Monday afternoon -- a robo-phone call from Bud Clark urging me to vote no on Portland charter reform. It's almost enough to make me want to vote yes.

Almost.

Comments (2)

Some comments may have been lost (at least temporarily) due to a server failure on April 14, 2007.

What did it say?

(If you can bring yourself to relive the experience.)

Posted by b!X | April 9, 2007 2:15 PM

I got one today too.

The combination of Budster and Amanda opposing the balott measures means I'll vote for them.

Posted by Nonny Mouse | April 9, 2007 2:34 PM

Since my spam call blocker picked it up first, I caught only the tail end. I came in in the middle of something about consolidating too much power in one place. The final point was that we've already voted no on this a large number of times -- the exact number he gave may have been 11, I'm forgetting already -- and that we need to vote no one more time.

Caller ID said "Out of area." Thanks, Bud.

Posted by Jack Bog | April 9, 2007 2:35 PM

Whoop Hoop! Now that brings back some memories.

Posted by jason | April 9, 2007 4:04 PM

I got one too and am very disappointed that the no folks, of which I am one, decided to use that tactic.

But please, despite your irritation, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

There's a reason Portland's big business interests and real estate developers are in favor of this charter change.

Under the new form, they will be buying lunch for one, rather than five.

Posted by Dave Lister | April 9, 2007 5:04 PM

If they really want to buy lunch for someone, they can have a pizza delivered to my house. I can't offer them any "promotion of industry" money or sell them some surplus property, but boy do I love pizza.

Posted by b!X | April 9, 2007 5:14 PM

"There's a reason Portland's big business interests and real estate developers are in favor of this charter change.
Under the new form, they will be buying lunch for one, rather than five."

This is the same sort of logic that brought us "You're either with us, or you're with the terrorists."

Business is for the charter change because it will save $millions.

Posted by Frank | April 9, 2007 6:01 PM

I got the same phone call. I was hoping it was a call from my significant other who is traveling abroad, and I miss quite a bit. I raced to the phone in sweet anticipation, but instantly deflated when I heard the recording... "be sure to drink your ovaltine."

Whoop this, Bud!

Posted by Gretchen | April 9, 2007 6:08 PM

Why don't all of you in favor of the present form of city government address the obvious political reasons why the commissioners are not in favor of change? Any one, any one, Beuller.

Posted by Richard S/ | April 9, 2007 6:22 PM

The existing form of government may not be ideal, but it does make it harder for the skids to get greased for any particular boondoggle. Given that we have too many boondoggles now, why should we make the process any easier? The "Five Mayor" form of government has made it possible to at least slow the pace of growth for PDC's diversion of public funds to already-rich private pockets. If the current Mayor had had the powers created by these measures, his "Nothing to see here, folks, just move along now," response to questions about PDC would have been the beginning and end of that story.

Posted by dyspeptic | April 9, 2007 6:52 PM

WWP received that voice message, too. Just for fun, we spent a few moments to transcribe it:

Hi, this former Mayor Bud Clark. Sorry to bother you, but I need your help to protect Portland’s future.

As you may know, there is going to be an election next month. One of the measures on the ballot, Measure 26-91, would change Portland’s form of government, taking power from our elected city council and giving it to the mayor.

Well, I was the mayor, and I can tell you that this measure would put far too much power in the hands of one person. It would make it easier for special interests to influence city government. What’s worse, Measure 26-91 drastically reduces citizens’ ability to have a voice in city hall.

Portlanders have been asked this question seven times, and each time they have said no. Please join me in saying no one more time. Vote no on Measure 26-91 when you get your ballot.

Thanks for your time.

Whoop, whoop!

Yep. He really said that.

Posted by Worldwide Pablo | April 9, 2007 7:32 PM

dyspeptic - there's no evidence that our form of city government makes it "harder for the skids to get greased". If anything, the opposite is true - these guys become the sultans of their city fiefdoms, and the other sultans are reluctant to criticize, lest the reciprocal spotlight gets shown on them. Arguably, this makes it easier for the skids to get greased. Of course, if we would elect an auditor that was worth a %#*!, we would have much cleaner skids altogether.

Posted by Frank | April 9, 2007 7:42 PM

The fact that the Arlington Club set is in favor of the change is a clear sign that it would make greasing the skids easier.

Posted by Jack Bog | April 9, 2007 9:35 PM

What Frank said. it's funny that good thinking Portlanders are supposed to be against this because the big money PBA is for it.

It's ok that the big money public employees unions are against it. Not that they're just carrying water for their two potential mayors in waiting.

Big money influence is ok as long as it's your big money influence.

Posted by jj | April 9, 2007 10:03 PM

Why the commissioners are not in favor of the change? Because they are proud of the city we have, and recognize it got that way partly because individuals on the Council, in the bureaus, and in the citizenry have many opportunities to make a positive difference here. Under the proposed form of government, we're being asked to put all our eggs in the one basket, betting we can attract and vote in a Mayor who knows what s/he is doing - and that s/he will do it while still taking into consideration the desires of each one of 500,000 people. Without always favoring one stakeholder group over another (for instance, the people/groups that helped elect him/her). That doesn't seem as likely to me (or to the opposing commissioners), as five elected officials with power being able to work with a wider range of interests and citizens.

Posted by Amanda Fritz | April 9, 2007 10:20 PM

What sort of checks and balances are there when power resides with only one person? Sorta smacks of dictatorial powers for Mayor Pothole doesn't it?

Posted by R.J. | April 9, 2007 10:35 PM

Hey now, that's not nice. It's Mayor McPothole.

Posted by Jack Bog | April 9, 2007 10:38 PM

Business is for the charter change because it will save $millions.

This is a lie being told by the charter reform advocates. There are no magical savings that will happen under the new system that cannot happen under the current system. Reform advocates are pointing to two unrelated items to construct this lie: 1) a benchmarking survey by the Hackett Group and 2) inefficient use of City-owned space.

Regarding the Hackett survey, it was a comparison of current City business practices to "world class" private businesses, in preparation for the purchase of a new financial software system. Surprise, surprise, it found that City government is less efficient than "world class" businesses. The survey had nothing to do with the form of government, and the City is going to reap savings from the new financial system, no matter what the form of government is.

Regarding the use of City space, it's again irrelevant to the charter. The city rents private office space even though there is vacant, city-owned space available. It's idiotic, but you wanna know who's to blame? The Mayor, who insisted that his "visioning" staff be located in private space. The Mayor also joined Saltzman in voting to put the sustainability office in the EcoTrust building. So not only is it a lie to say that changing the form of government would mitigate this problem, the change could make it worse since the Mayor is the problem!

Finally, changing the form of government will cost at least $1 million more per year since the Council will need to create a new budget office that is independent of the Mayor. One manager and eight financial analysts gets you to $1 million pretty darn quick.

I don't care if the Arlington set is for this or against it, as currently drafted it's an asinine idea.

Posted by City Observer | April 9, 2007 11:28 PM

It's also dull as all get-out. It never had a chance of passing, and it's going to go down hard. Shake me, wake me when it's over...

Posted by Jack Bog | April 9, 2007 11:33 PM

Business is for the charter change because it will save $millions.

There's been absolutely no case made for that claim. And there's nothing structurally wrong with our current form of government, "Frank," that precludes finding and instituting ever greater efficiencies in how we operate. City government has been doing that for years, and will continue to do so.

Where the "waste" comes in is where resources are allocated, and when they're allocated to serve poltical agendas that don't serve the common good. You can, at the operational level, save money --and trees-- by printing both sides of the paper...but, in the end, it's what's in those reports that spells the difference between good responsive government and waste and fraud.

Making the trains run on time --and more efficiently-- is all well and good, but it's where the trains are headed that's really important. And the question we need to ask ourselves is how we can best --as citizens-- have input into where those tracks are laid.

Posted by Frank Dufay | April 10, 2007 2:40 AM

"There are no magical savings that will happen under the new system that cannot happen under the current system."

How true. The savings that could happen, won't happen under these Commissioners. They won't voluntarily agree to consolidate-away part of their staff, resources and power. No magic there. I think you've made a good case for voting to *#%&-can this archaic wasteful system of government.

Posted by Frank | April 10, 2007 6:02 AM

Richard, you hit the nail on the head. However,some of the voters may need you to explain your perseptions.

Posted by David E gilmore | April 10, 2007 6:40 AM

I think you've made a good case for voting to *#%&-can this archaic wasteful system of government.

Its wasteful, sure. But giving Potter full control is like giving the fox the keys to the henhouse.

And "Big Business" says it may save millions, but for who? Surely not the taxpayers. And thats who the mayor is supposed to be interested in helping. Sadly, thats not the case.

Posted by Jon | April 10, 2007 7:42 AM

giving Potter full control is like giving the fox the keys to the henhouse.

Of course, this isn't about him (except in the sense that he's being a schmuck in the public discussion about it).

Think of an mayor in recent history which you hated. Goldschmidt? Ivanice? Clark? Katz?

Would you want that mayor to have a pot of money for the "promotion of industry" (currently the Council decides on this as a whole)? Would you want that mayor to be able to sell off surplus city property (currently the Council decides on this as a while)?

Would you have that mayor to have an inbalance of power akin to the President casting 20 of the Senates votes all by himself?

Etc. etc.

Posted by b!X | April 10, 2007 8:16 AM

[Posted as indicated; restored later.]


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009

The Occasional Book

Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 119
At this date last year: 21
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics