Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 14, 2007 4:24 PM. The previous post in this blog was Traveler's aid. The next post in this blog is The dirt on Rudy G.. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

While you're up

I see that the girls and boys down in Salem are talking about making some changes to the state's elections. I hope the talk eventually leads to a fix for this.

Comments (10)

Jack: I am sure lots of us would like that changed. Here's the rub: it fixed a real problem. An outright repeal could mean a return of the countless Republicans showing up to nominate a Nader-type candidate (or even the D's doing the same for a conservative candidate), even though they've already selected their nominee and just doing so to rig the process in their favor . The way it is now, politicians are disadvantaged. The way it was, we all were.

So my question for you is this (and even if you disagree with my premise): what is your alternative solution?

Let party members sign petitions for independent candidates. Or else you can stick your party where the sun don't shine.

If we had write-in only for the general election it would remove many opportunities for official mischief. The party's could figure out all on their own how not to dilute their own party votes by convincing all but one of their own to announce that they are not running. This would not be a "Nader-style" problem, would it? I voted for Nader last time. The cost of including his name on the ballot must have been really, really high given the urgency to exclude whole signature sheets. One write-in line is cheaper.

Initiatives don't matter if folks don't comply with existing law, so it is largely a pointless exercise. Except where someone has to craft rule that is so narrowly tailored to particularized facts that even an imbecile cannot ignore it -- just as a workaround to some prior judicial contortion of a well reasoned, but general, rule.

But Jack, why should as a party member, should I be able to select my candidate AND an independent or 3rd party candidate?

C'mon, you're not the average blogger. It's easy to talk about problems, unlike some you have the intellect to consider a solution. Let's have it.

Political parties are just as private as Microsoft or Exxon or Google (conceptually at least, assuming no social investing with public guaranteed investment dollars). Should we commit public resources to aid Microsoft shareholders in holding elections for board members? Perhaps at the convention center, on the public dime? Should the legislature draft a law that says an investor can invest in any one of the three (for simplicity) but not two or more at any one time?

The target is political parties, and the vote for government. The right to associate or not associate with whom one chooses is far broader -- but it is the relation to the vote for political officials that would enable a slightly speedier resolution in court; maybe 4 years rather than 6 to 10 to the US Supreme Court.

Is the difference between Microsoft and the Libertarian Party (as representatives of classes) a distinction without a difference or a distinction who's sole purpose is to manipulate the outcome in favor the dominant party who may also presently hold office and thereby the initiative to act arbitrarily to boot? The court would look at the seriousness of the "burden" as compared to the posited governmental interest in limiting the right to associate. (Imagine it was Microsoft that obtained a law that said it's investors could not also invest in other companies, and that the power of the state should be used to go on phishing expeditions into private investors personal finances to enforce that limit, on Microsoft's behalf on the "State's" behalf.)

I could have used membership in one religion to the exclusion of others too, with state power to extract a profession of faith or non-faith, as an alternative sort of association where official mischief could go way overboard.

Jesse, OK -- let's have some more of the "I'm dumb because I say I'm dumb" argument, as an argument, for argument sake. The above reasoning, in isolation, is just gibberish, I admit it; can you prove me right?

"But Jack, why should as a party member, should I be able to select my candidate AND an independent or 3rd party candidate?"

Jesse, the bill in question was either an inept or a malicious solution to this "problem".

It is well documented here and elsewhere that this law makes it impossible for a major-party voter to participate in their party's nomination process for one race and also nominate an independent candidate for a different race that also appears on their partisan primary ballot. It does not matter if the voter abstains from voting in the related primary race, or even if the voter abstains from all partisan primary races on their ballot. Even if the major party voter returns a blank ballot in an election for which they have received a partisan ballot, that voter is considered to have participated in their party's nomination process for every partisan primary race on their ballot, and thus their participation in any other nomination process is made void.

(This is not in dispute. If you wish to dispute the facts I have stated in the paragraph above, then go do your homework first: Read the law and talk to your county elections supervisor. I have.)

Thus, this law prevents some people from participating in the single nomination process of their choice on a per-race basis, unless they accept voluntary disenfranchisement from all issues in even-year May elections. Since there are almost always non-partisan issues at stake in any May election, this is a large and undue burden.

(The other option for a major-party voter is to re-register as nonpartisan, of course.)

This is not a fair solution. It is a terrible solution to the "problem"... which itself is basically imaginary.

Remember, this is a nomination process. We're not talking about voting here, where a rule of "one voter, one vote" is the gold standard. We're talking about simply adding people to a ballot.

Nomination is not election; nomination is simply a process for presenting options for the voters to choose among. There is no reason to restrict a registered voter to nominating just one person for a race: If I think there are several people who might do a good job as Mayor of Portland*, there is no reason why I should not be able to help nominate them all for the ballot. The election is when we can each decide if we prefer Mayor Bogdanski to Mayor Williams or Mayor Peek, or if we'd rather have Mayor Fritz. But when it comes to nomination, the more the merrier.

Nomination processes are meant to widen the field of choices, and voting processes are meant to narrow them back down. Confusing the two processes - as this law does - puts our democracy in peril.

As for a better solution, that's really freakin' easy. I can think of several better solutions:
a) Let the parties police their own members' participation. If the Republicans see that Lars Larson** has signed a nomination petition to put Lon Mabon on the ballot for Governor as an independent, they can eject him from the party if they want to. Or not. And if the Greens don't want nonmembers packing their nomination convention, they can ask for ID at the door and check it against their membership list. It's not my problem, and it's certainly not the State's problem.
b) Let the parties run their whole nomination process themselves. If the Democrats want to field just one candidate, let them figure out who it should be. Why are we spending the tax dollars of the 23% or so voters who are not a member of any party on printing, stuffing, and counting separate ballots for the major parties' internal processes? Personally, I'd like a refund.
c) Make every nomination process the same. Make every candidate, no matter which party they are or are not a member of, return a signature sheet that contains the same minimum number of nomination signatures. Registered voters may sign for as many as they like. All candidates with valid nomination sheets go one one open primary ballot, and the top two votegetters run off in the general election.

Optionally, we could amplify any of the above with:

d) Prohibit the State from tracking an individual's party membership, except when the individual is a candidate for partisan elected office. The parties can track their own membership. After all, do we really want the State tracking our political associations?

Not so hard.

See, you're falling into a logical trap here. What you state in your first post in this thread is that Democrats had a problem with Republicans acting in support of the Greens. But the Democratic Party has no business saying what citizens who are not its members do on their own time... and much less business saying what participation the Greens are allowed to solicit. It's called the right of free association, and the legislature has interfered with it.

Here's an assignment for you: find me a Green or an Independent who voted for this law. Once you've tried to do that, tell me who you think this law really protects.

Because this law is not about protecting citizens, independents, or minor parties from major-party interference. This law is a collaboation between the major parties to use State power to further entrench their dominance by stifling the nomination of independent candidates.

And that ain't right.

*: If I lived in Portland, which I don't.
**: If he lived in Oregon, which apparently he doesn't.

"why should as a party member, should I be able to select my candidate AND an independent or 3rd party candidate?"

Well then by that logic, why should a non-party member be able to sign multiple nomination petitions for different candidates to the same office.

If Candidate X and Candidate Y are both gathering signatures to garner independent nominations for governor and I sign petitions for each, I must be getting "two primary votes" again.

Is the Secretary of State going to check and catalogue every nomination signature (rather than conduct a random sample) to prevent this travesty from occuring?

Somehow, I doubt it.

The majority party gets to pick their candidate, and then have a say as to who is to run agaisnt them? Talk about stacking the deck...

Open primaries are a really, really bad idea.

Thank you, Alan, for that excellent post. There is a big difference between nominating someone and electing someone, and for the major parties to use their government power to exclude third-party candidates from the ballot is criminal.

And Jesse Cornett, you of all people should know better than to make that argument.

Thanks, Allan. Some of what you said was covered here previously, but not in such fine style.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics