
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,800 unique visits a day, and more than 44,000 page views a week (as of October 26). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Beaulieu, Georges De Latour Cabernet 1995
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, La Paulée, 2006
Woodbridge, Chardonnay
Paranga, Kir-Yianni 2005
L. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Rose 2007
Newman's Own, Cabernet 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Monte Antico, Toscana Red 2006
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Vins Auvigne, Macon-Fuisse 2007
Vina Gormaz, Tempranillo 2007
Chandon, Brut Classic
Dom Martinho, Tinto 2005
Chateau St. Jean, Cabernet, California 2007
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2007
Revelry, The Reveler, 2007
Joseph Drouhin, Chablis 2006
Altos Las Hormigas, Mendoza Malbec 2008
Alodio, Ribeira Sacra Mencia 2007
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2008
Kiona, Lemberger 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Gloria Ferrer, Sonoma Brut
Kirkland, Napa Valley Meritage 2006
Abacela, Tempranillo 2006
Woodward Canyon, Columbia Valley Red
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2007
Mas Donis Barrica, Celler de Capcanes Red, 2005
Three Rivers, Merlot 2006
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Lezaun, Rosado, Navarra
Lezaun, Red, Navarra
Hedges, Three Vineyards, Red Mountain 2005
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Vega Sindoa, Cabernet-Tempranillo 2006
Inama, Soave Classico 2007
Alois Lageder, Lagrein Rosato 2008
Broglia, Gavi 2007
Marqués de Cáceres, Rioja Rose 2008
Spaltagna, Riserva Pinot Noir 2008
Portuga, Rose 2008
Warre's Warrior Port
Lange, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Guiraud, Le G, 2007
Falset, Garnacha Rose, Montsant 2006
Castello di Bossi, Chianti Classico 2004
Domaine Chandon, Pinot Noir, La Riviere Sonoma 2006
Brazin, Old Vine Zinfandel, Lodi 2006
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2006
Casillero del Diablo, Cabernet 2007
Gentil Hugel, Alsace 2006
Mesoneros de Castilla, Ribero del Duero, Rosado 2008
Cor, Momentum 2007
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2006
Rubico, Lacrima di Morro d'Alba 2007
Gilstrap Brothers, Reserve Merlot 2003
Conundrum 2007
Chandler Reach, 36 Red
Santa Rita, Reserve Cabernet 2005
Marietta, Old Vine Red Lot 47
L'Ecole No. 41, Recess Red 2006
Dom Martinho, Red 2004
Beaulieu, Georges Latour 1994
Caymus, Cabernet 1995
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2005
Bergevin Lane, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2005
Savigny-les-Beaune, Les Lavieres 2003
David Hill, Reserve Merlot, Rogue Valley 2006
Educated Guess, Cabernet 2006
Maquis Lien, Red 2005
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2007
David Hill, Farmhouse White
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 0
At this date last year: 0
Total run in 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (25)
It happens. holders bobble the ball all the time--you just only see the results when it's a miss, especially in a big-time game.
no, the game's not rigged. i generally find that every conversation i have, people fall into two camps--the ones who've never played the game at an advanced level are the only ones who'd even think it possible.
pro football history is full of stories of last-minute fumbles, bizarre interceptions, etc. it's a sport full of *elite* athletes, with *amazing* reaction times and abilities. things happen sometimes that don't seem possible for the average armchair quarterback.
Deion Sanders could, from a down stance, get up and run *twenty yards* in the time it take a dropped tennis ball to bounce. once. to give you an idea of how fast that is, go out in the yard and try it.
Tom Brady can throw a football 100 yards and hit a target one foot wide 99% of the time.
and so on. anybody who's even been *near* the field of an NFL game can tell you the competition is so fierce that to even hint of cheating by either team would get you beat up. badly.
Posted by Joe Smithson | January 21, 2007 7:36 PM
Sure.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 21, 2007 7:41 PM
There are far to many variables in an NFL game for it to be fixed. Besides, it's in the interest of the NFL to have fair competition. However, I will say that it seems certain players in all major sport leagues get special treatment. Did anyone catch that Blazer/Heat game last week and see some of the fouls Dwayne Wade got? Makes me red in the face.
Posted by TJ | January 21, 2007 7:46 PM
All it takes is one or two players on the take to affect the outcome of a game. And you guys are telling me that it can't happen? Human nature, folks.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 21, 2007 7:51 PM
I can throw a pigskin a quarter mile.
Posted by keith | January 21, 2007 8:40 PM
The pass interference no-call was extremely blatant, but refs do usually give the hometown crowd a few breaks. I thought there were a couple in the Chicago game as well. The Indy no-call was so obvious - and Nance and Simms folded by not pointing out how wrong it was.
I still felt the players decided the Indy game and it was incredible.
The announcers should have pointed out the difference in length on the kick-offs. Adam Vienteri(sp?) couldn't quite go deep enough while the Pats guy could. The kickoff returns damn near cost Indy the game.
Posted by Bill McDonald | January 21, 2007 8:45 PM
Jack, saying "all is it takes is one or two guys" shows you don't really understand the game. it's simply not that simple at all.
one reason (among many) is that too many factors are in play--one player doesn't control the outcome. people who watch and say "so and so cost us the game" ignore what it took to get to that point. another simple, practical reason--players are put on and off the field at a rapid pace, often only in for one or two plays--and they don't know when that will be.
never mind the mundane fact that if word ever got out that cheating occurred (and believe me, it would get out), there's be hell to pay.
so, keep believing in the theory.
Posted by Joe Smithson | January 21, 2007 8:56 PM
Does that one New England receiver's eyes always look like that? He looked wired out of his mind. I mean he looked Runaway Bride crazy.
Posted by Bill McDonald | January 21, 2007 9:36 PM
keep believing in the theory.
You're right. It would be impossible to fix the outcome of a football game.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 22, 2007 7:17 AM
Jack,
If football were fixed, the Saints would be in the Super Bowl.
Posted by jud | January 22, 2007 7:59 AM
If football were fixed, the outcome would be whatever was paid for.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 22, 2007 8:23 AM
Looking forward to seeing Manning lose the ultimate big game.
Posted by Bark Munster | January 22, 2007 10:26 AM
I watched the Saints/Bears yesterday at Claudia's Bar & Grill on SE Hawthorne. In the bathroom, some guy was going on about how the game was rigged for the Saints.
"But the Saints are losing," pointed out Some Other Guy.
"It's just a setup," said Conspiracy Man. "It makes for a better game. You watch the Saints make a great comeback in the fourth quarter."
It was a weird theory, but perhaps not as weird as an actual extended conversation among strangers in a men's room. Still, Conspiracy Man was nowhere to be found after the game.
Fixing a boxing match? Sure; the number of people needed to do that is exactly one and perhaps a couple more. Fixing a football game would take the complicity of quite a few more people, and the variables on a field are far more complex than just taking a dive.
Posted by Kevin | January 22, 2007 11:52 AM
"If football were fixed, the outcome would be whatever was paid for."
I'm all with you on this statement of the obvious, but there're at least two reasons I can't go there:
1) The Saints have become America's team, and nothing pulls heartstrings more (and sells more Reggie Bush uniforms) than the Saints in the Super Bowl.
2) You're talking about fixing a football game that requires at least 22 people on the field at once. Either you've got to pay off the most highly-paid people on the field to overcome the 20 or so others milling around, or you've got to pay a sufficient number of them to guarantee the outcome. In the first case, you lack control, and the amount of money it would take to pay off (say) Peyton Manning is going to be vastly outstripped by the potential loss because of his lack of control over the entire process. In the second case, the more people you pay, the more likely it is that someone will talk, either because it didn't go how they wanted, or because someone offered them more money for the dirt.
And these are just two of the many reasons it doesn't make sense. There are so many others that Occam's Razor would get dull cutting through them all.
It's okay to be tenacious in the face of overwhelming odds, but this illusion seems a little too fanciful to maintain.
Posted by Jud | January 22, 2007 12:07 PM
If the guy who dropped the two easy passes had held onto them, the Pats would have won. If you could have bought off just that one guy, you could have changed the outcome. Ditto for the refs -- only one or two are needed to change the outcome of a close game.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 22, 2007 12:22 PM
The fastest man in the entire NFL's secret is out -- mad weed -- and lots of it. See the Falcons' Michael Vick trying and failing to sneak smoke through Hartsfield last week.
If the NFL got tough on cannabis, the only people left to play would be the new cheerleader and the water boy (who just got out of rehab).
Weed -- the official smoke of America's professional sports leagues.
Posted by Daphne | January 22, 2007 12:40 PM
Then I guess Tom Brady was in on the fix, because he threw the interception that sealed the game. And I guess the ENTIRE NE DEFENSE was in on the fix for letting Manning march down the field like a hot knife through butter for the winning score. And I guess several gamblers were in on it since you conveniently left out the blatant interference of Dallas Clark in the end zone as he was forced to catch a TD pass with one hand.
Just because something is possible doesn't mean it has any basis whatsoever in reality.
Posted by Mike | January 22, 2007 12:40 PM
That's what they used to say about professional wrestling.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 22, 2007 12:42 PM
It would be pretty hard for someone interested in fixing a game to figure out which player would have to drop the ball at the key moment ... not impossible, but hard enough that he should get everything he gets from being able to fix it.
Oh, and nevermind that a test of Vick's water bottle returned no signs of any illegal substance. Good thing we don't jump to judgment.
Posted by Kevin | January 22, 2007 1:04 PM
Michael Vick's "Secure Water Bottle Safe" smelled of reefer, had residue of reefer in it and Vick refused (at first) to give it to an airport screener.
Hmmmm.....
Poor Kevin must have never been invited to an NFL or NBA party... Scores... VIP room... in the back... hanging with Charles Barkley... who loves Portland... where the cannabis smoke is so thick... you can't even see Z-Bo getting a double lap dance!
From male dancers, that is.
Weed. It's The Breakfast (lunch and dinner) of Champions!
Posted by daphne | January 22, 2007 4:32 PM
Jack, have another Merlot!!
Posted by Jim Golden | January 22, 2007 5:27 PM
Jack, you can say after the fact that paying off that one guy who dropped those two passes would have made the difference. But if you're a gambler, you can't possibly know that's the guy to pay off. I'm not saying that fixing games is impossible, but I think it's a lot harder than you're making it out to be. As was just pointed out, that game was incredibly close and came down to a collapsing defense and, in the end, an interception.
There's no way to know that you can control the outcome of the game by paying off this guy or that guy. You don't know who's going to get the pass. You don't know when those passes are going to come. The game is constantly adjusted by the coach, constantly adjusted by the quarterback, and constantly affected by conditions and injuries and the play of defenders and everything else. Sure, if you can look at the game in retrospect, you can see what the important plays are. But I think it would be an enormously difficult prospect to fix a game in advance.
Bad calls happen all the time. They happen in situations where they don't wind up affecting the outcome at all. The fact that they happen late in the game doesn't prove to me that they are evidence of tampering. As for the Romo kerfuffle? I don't believe there's any amount of money you could pay that guy to be the goat he now is. He makes plenty of money. He makes boatloads of money. Why is he going to go shopping for change from gamblers in order to make himself look like a choker -- to transform himself from a great player to a punch line? I don't believe it.
Posted by Linda | January 22, 2007 7:27 PM
Regarding Joe Smithson's comment:
No way! The best a quarterback can throw is about 80 yards, and I wouldn't expect them to hit a one foot wide target 99% of the time at 80 yards.
Posted by Scott | January 22, 2007 7:48 PM
NFL? How about the NBA?
Posted by Greg | January 23, 2007 2:50 PM
Poor Kevin ... he prefers evidence of crimes to speculation based on someone's nasal report or Daphne's ability to take examples of the behavior of some athletes and apply it to all athletes (particularly when it's between black athletes). If the bottle had been used for marijuana, there would be residue.
Posted by Kevin | January 23, 2007 5:52 PM