Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 23, 2007 12:02 PM. The previous post in this blog was The driver on the bus goes "No, no, no....". The next post in this blog is Glaring omission. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Make the PDC serve the poor

On my recent trip home from the Sunshine State, I spent some quality time with the Saturday Miami Herald. It's an excellent paper. One of the prominent stories that day was about complaints that the city's urban renewal agency spends all of its money on toney playgrounds for the rich -- drifting far from its supposed mission of bringing the poorer quarters of the city back to life.

"Hmmmm," I thought as I pushed the seat back on the plane. "Where have I heard that before?"

Back to Portland, I see that there's still serious talk of a proposed charter change that would rearrange the pecking order in the Rose City's urban renewal barnyard. The bone of contention at the moment is how much control the City Council gets over the runaway board and staff of the Portland Development Commission.

I favor more council control rather than less, but what real difference does that make? What's really wrong in Portland is the self-same thing that's wrong in Miami. Programs originally designed to help the poor are being subverted to create rich enclaves with all sorts of fancy amenities that even the average Portlander, much less the downtrodden, will never get to enjoy.

If we're going to have a charter change about urban renewal, Portland, let's make it a meaningful one. Rather than debate the deck chair locations on the Titanic, why not get to the iceberg that we've hit? Let's change the city charter to require that no major PDC project be undertaken unless it is demonstrated that the primary purpose and effect of the project will be to make a substantial improvement to the lives of Portland residents who are living in poverty. Without a clear re-direction such as this, it doesn't matter who's the budget boss -- all we'll get is one SoWhat after another, until the municipal bankruptcy hits.

Comments (19)

Like how about a citywide vote on the creation of new urban renewal districts?

Four major changes should occur regarding PDC.
First, as stated above, there should be a city wide vote on the creation of any new urban renewal districts with a stipulated district program, identification of projects within the proposed district, and actual project budgets including ALL costs over the projected life of the URA, including financing costs presented to the voters.

Secondly, if the program(s)and project(s) change through the course of a URA designated period by over 10% (in substance and/or costs), a public vote is required.

Third, if the URD is extended beyond it's projected completion date, then a public vote is required for the extension with all the above mentioned requirements.

Fourth, if any program/projects of any URA changes by over 10% without a public vote, then any public official that is accountable (board, council, committee voting, order signing, public endorsements, etc.) for such "oversight" is accountable for the costs of the "oversight". Now, that will make sure there is no "under-the-table accounting", "number fudging", etc.

What is amazing is that even Gresham rquires public voting on Urban Renewal Districts. And if you research Urban Renewal throughout the US you will find much more control of the use of Urban Renewal to meet the intent/legislation that has been enacted for Urban Renewal.

Read Oregon Urban Renewal statutes and you will be hard pressed to find most of Portland URD's meeting the criteria within the ORS. We already have laws that are being misinterpreted. Where is our state legislature, besides our City Councils?

First, as stated above, there should be a city wide vote on the creation of any new urban renewal districts with a stipulated district program, identification of projects within the proposed district, and actual project budgets including ALL costs over the projected life of the URA, including financing costs presented to the voters.

How exactly could you ID projects and project budgets when that's not how URAs are created? You don't know ahead of time what projects will make use of tax-increment financing over the course of the life of the URA.

the PDC, when i examine it, seems a borderline criminal organization. it has falsified documents and creatively cooked books on a number of occasions.

how can this be allowed to happen, without even so much as a penalty, or legal consequences?

I'm not sure that regularly running to the voters is necessary. What is necessary is that some sort of study be done before each project is undertaken to gauge the impact of the project on the agency's goals. Sort of like an environmental impact statement, which is common.

And the goals need to be tightened up. They should be tied to helping people who need help -- not just "areas," which fat cat developers can glom onto, but people.

Getting decent retail on MLK Blvd. is what urban renewal is supposed to be about. Theaters and aerial trams in yuppie condo forests are not. The voters do need to make that clear, and soon.

Jerry, if there was a city-wide vote for urban renewal areas, nobody outside the proposed area would vote for it.

I like Jack's idea about helping people, not areas, but we wouldn't be talking about this if the PDC staff were honest, responsible stewards of our tax dollars. Instead, it seems that they simply find ways to give our property taxes to "fat cats" in exchange for better jobs with the same fat cats.

The tools (no pun intended) are already there to solve the problems at PDC. The Mayor and City Council can put anyone they want in charge there. We should vote them out if they don't fix the PDC.

Urban renewal should happen where citizens not PDC fat cats think it should happen. Funds should be should be based on need and preferrable given only once. We should nix given large sums of money to any high-rise condo developer in this city. Our city councilors are right to rein in the PDC.

b!x: All proposed URDs in the CoP must have proposed budgets in the consideration by City Council to adopt an URD. The problems has been that the proposed budgets have been fictional and additional projects/costs can easily be added, many times without Council approval. All projects within an URD must have identified sources of funding such as TIF, or federal or state sources.

In the SoWhat URD there has been eight amendments to the original URD adoption. We all know about the tram cost increases from the original "idea cost" for the tram at $3M, then $8.5M , then.......Plus, there has been several project additions and cost increases for other item. Example, the trolley extension just on the second phase to Bancroft cost taxpayers an additional $3M from the orignal project budget. Admentment 8 cost the Portland taxpayers an additional $43M for tram cost overruns and other cost overuns, all from the general fund. I was only throwing out concepts to try to get a handle on the problems of urban renewal. Maybe the 10% number might be too restrictive. And I didn't mean to imply that we should be "running to the voters" all the time. Just once would be a gain.

Jim, your theory that no one outside a proposed URD would vote for a URD is not necessarily true. Gresham and other cities when all voters vote on a URD have passed the creation of URDs; and nationally too. And since all the voters/taxpayers of a city pay for an URD, doesn't it make since that the voters should decide if it is feasible, makes good social sense, and the projects meet the intent of state statutes concerning UR? Since City Council, PDC, and other city bureaus are so politicised, I think we should consider having a check and balance from voters/taxpayers. Sorry, they have not administered the use of urban renewal for the greater good, but only for some. Even the economic "trickle down" theory applied to urban renewal has not shown great results here in Portland. Claiming that a project has created so many dollars of other investments without any kind of auditing as we see so often by PDC and the press is suspect.

Jack, you wrote... "If we're going to have a charter change about urban renewal, Portland, let's make it a meaningful one."

Then, you wrote... "no major PDC project be undertaken unless it is demonstrated that the primary purpose and effect of the project will be to make a substantial improvement to the lives of Portland residents who are living in poverty."

Even within these two good points I see a "Grand Canyon" worth of wiggle room for our existing CoP and PDC leadership. I would anticipate their interpretation of "a substantial improvement" would include helping their favorite developer, and assert, loudly for everyone to hear, "THIS HELPS PORTLAND" when it CANNOT be shown to "make a substantial improvement..."

Let me vote... besides, my kids are still upset that a part of their allowance is going to the Tram Tax.

C'mon, Jack... They'll just continue what they're doing and call it "trickle down".

We need a ward system, by population, for the council, and city-wide votes on each URD. They should be required to provide auditable impact statements that tell voters how much in basic services the rest of us will be giving up in order to set aside those TIF funds for fancy new development.

Studies are useless because they are all cooked to order. Remember how they did a study on the impact of a big box store in industrial NW and the finding was that it would suck the wind out of neighborhood retail such as that on 23rd and 21st? Then a few years later they are proposing to put big box retail in industrial inner East. Another study is done, and, what do you know? The finding is that it will NOT suck the wind out of nearby neighborhood retail.

Another great 180 was the reservoir burial. First a study is done that says only burial will make them safe. But, against all odds, the denizens of city hall eventually figure out exactly how unpopular this idea is. A new study is commissioned for a sum at least equal to the median Portland household income. What do you know? Leaving them open is the best approach.

They'll just continue what they're doing and call it "trickle down".

So we should just let them continue to do what they're doing to Portland without any justification at all? At least let's force them to expose themselves as the liars they are.

How is the public going to be represented within the UR world, if we can't occasionally vote on UR that takes over 1/3 of the Portland's city budget, and additionally takes millions of tax dollars from police, fire, schools, road maintenance, etc.? Are we to depend on City Council? Are we to depend on Urban Renewal Advisory Committees made up of mostly the property owners/stake holders within an URA? Where is the public represented?

Take for example a recent change in process by the City Council on UR budgets. For the SoWhat URAC, who is suppose to review the budget, ask questions, define budget expenditures, etc. The Council has decided to review and make final PDC/URD budgets in less than a month without SoWhat's URAC response to a budget proposal that isn't even established in even near-final form. Citizen involvement? Get real.

The thought that all we need to do with PDC, urban renewal is to cinch up the belt a little tighter is false. It makes sense, if we are going to make a change, to make it a "meaningful one" as Jack writes. But I feel that I may be in support of a more meaningful, deeper change than Jack envisions.

Thank you Jack.

If you ask, your ears will burn to the stories out there regarding PDC and the “help” given low income people and minorities over the years in Portland.

A few examples:

1. The grandchildren of families moved from the Coliseum area have long and bitter family stories of the moves of houses, businesses and churches. Key to that is the belief that promises made were not kept and low prices given families for “black removal” … errr … “urban renewal”.

2. Yes Emanuel Hospital now owns the block from Williams to Vancouver on Russell… But what most don’t remember is that that block, once a center of Black business in Portland, has been empty since the mid 1960’s even though it was supposed to see “economic development” long long ago.

3. Story after story revolves around preference for new out of area businesses getting loans quickly after years of locals trying to get support. The other common element: the businesses trying to get help represent low income communities, especially minorities, but not exclusively racial minorities.

4. Want a loan along Mississippi Avenue during the last three decades? Better wait until someone tracking their tanning capability buys the property, especially if they are from out of state.

5. The Delta’s, a chapter of a black sorority, owns property at the corner of Albina and Ainsworth. They’d like to put a community center there on the old gas station. Gee wonder why they can’t get support or loans for what is becoming a hot property area?

6. For some reason a development/enterprise zone moves along NE Killingsworth to 14th then skips over to 17th to continue. Several of the owners of the properties in that gap have noticed that they share a common heritage as well as a historic difficulty in getting loans and business support from the powers that be downtown.

Yes there is a race card played here. It fits the experience for so many people over the years it can simply not be ignored. And the PDC and other in Portland are long overdue in addressing it directly.

“help” given low income people and minorities over the years in Portland.

The South Auditorium Urban Renewal Area destroyed a working class Italian neighborhood...replacing it with sterile high rises (I used to live there) that have now thrown out their long-term renters to convert the units to more profitable condos.

Serve the poor?

Sounds like that old Twilight Zone episode where the aliens arrive on earth to "serve mankind"...on their menu!

I went to a journalism workshop last summer with two dozen reporters and producers from all over the country, and one remarkable thing about it was that in every city represented at the workshop a "Development Commission" had been busted for stealing money and/or misrouting tax funds for illegal purposes. And the guilty parties were actually prosecuted.

About 20 different cities in total. We're talking coast to coast corruption kicked over into the realm of law enforcement. As opposed to the sort of "philosophical corruption" we're talking about here (rich v. poor?), which is entirely legal.

There's just as much dirt as there is cash in them thar renewal districts....

Maybe we should deputize each other and start issuing toy guns?

Lisaloving: there must not have been ONE Oregonian reporter at the workshop. They can't even connect the dots. Consider last two weeks and especially last weekends Oregonians coverage on the tram. It was a totally PR job with no referral to the fact that it has been the most controversial project of the decade that symbolizes so many things about our region and city government. "If you don't write about it, it is not news"-this is the Oregonians motto.

Jack, don't be a sell out. All urban renewal is bad. If you require that it substantially help people living in poverty, they will just dress up projects to look like they help the poor. But who will make the profits building the projects? Who will make the profits on the real estate deals? Not people living in poverty.

If you require that urban renewal promote retail on MLK, you will create subsidized competitors against existing retailers and no one will ever build a retail shop on MLK again without subsidies.

Urban renewal lets government pick winners and losers, and when you give government that kind of power you are asking for trouble. Columbia Sportswear gets run out of town but Homer Williams wonders why anyone thinks Portland has an unfriendly business climate.

Even requiring that people vote on urban-renewal projects before they can be approved won't necessarily help. Planners will just design enough projects to help enough wealthy interests so that they can finance an expensive campaign for the program.

Urban renewal and tax-increment financing should be banned, period.

It was a totally PR job with no referral to the fact that it has been the most controversial project of the decade that symbolizes so many things about our region and city government. "If you don't write about it, it is not news"-this is the Oregonians motto.

Oh, I don't know. The couple of billion or so that we're spending to tart up the transit mall has to count as "controversial" too...though, like you say, if it ain't in the Oregonian it ain't news.

I protested to them that not only didn't they talk about my bus line's service being gutted (#14), but they even left us off their map that showed bus changes...and the argument I got back was there wasn't ROOM to include the 2nd Avenue route to which we've been exiled. (Exile on 2nd Avenue? Isn't that a Stones hit? Help me out here, McDonald.)

You gotta laugh. But the really funny thing is I'm reading "Urban renewal lets government pick winners and losers, and when you give government that kind of power you are asking for trouble." and I'm nodding yup, uh-huh...but then I read who posted it and no way can I agree with that guy.

Except maybe sometimes I can.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009

The Occasional Book

Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 285
At this date last year: 137
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics