Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 14, 2007 3:28 AM. The previous post in this blog was Waste of space. The next post in this blog is Nefarious no more. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Sunday, January 14, 2007

I'll say it again

Isn't this more important than streetcars and free wi-fi?

Comments (23)

Answer: Yes.

Follow up question: Does the violent crime rate correlate positively or negatively with the presence (or absence) of streetcars and wifi?

All the City Council cares about any more are streetcars and wifi. Basic government services are crumbling. There's talk of closing a police precinct in North Portland for lack of funds. There's no money for gang intervention. I'd say that's quite a positive correlation.


What would you have them do with all the money they'd save. IMO, the problem lies with the inability of socioeconomic reality at the lower end of the scale to stand up to "popular culture" with it's attendant irresponsible surreality. How does society, through government, remedy that without treading perilously close to, or on, individual freedoms? Is it appropriate, or even possible for government to teach morality?

Society establishes agreed upon rules for behavior and codifies them as laws. One of government's basic functions is to enforce those laws. The success or failure of that process is at least measurable. To the degree that governments fail, or, especially, refuse to enforce laws, substituting "programs" designed to reduce or obviate the need for enforcement, it arrogates judgements and decisions more properly made by society.

The results of government social programs are unpredictable at best. Statistics lie and bureaucracies manipulate statistics. Government intervention in the socioeconomic area has proven to be a blunt instrument with unpredictable results. When it works at all, the problem must be narrowly defined (segregation, e.g.) and even then the process is protracted and uneven. Often, it's difficult to say whether government intervention changed societal values or whether society just changed.

The issues (problem behaviors and attitudes) you raise in Portland may be too entrenched, reinforced (by the pervasive media) and diffuse to be effectively addressed at the city government level.

Mainly, government's penchant for throwing money at problems, even problems that aren't within their purview, is alive and thriving at city hall. It sometimes seems success is measured by funding and staffing levels - not results.

Working smart is just antithetical to bureaucratic cultures in general.

Any money saved by the city should go back to the people and neighborhoods closest to the problem, with as few strings as possible. I doubt Sten or Potter have ever been homeless or poor; nor have Sam, Dan or Randy ever been an etnhic or racial minority. Imposing their "solutions" in this context is like the US imposing democracy in Iraq - they may mean well, but they'll f**k it up.

I wonder what your ideas are?

Rr: a good post. I agree with your "success is measured by funding and staffing levels-not results". Examine the poor auditing we have with most of our local government entities. For example, review the required annual PDC reports on URA performance-none. The list goes on.

I agree keeping money and the issues with the neighborhoods "closet to the problem" isn't practiced enough. Trams, streetcars, and free wi-fi is not taking care of the task of simply running this city smoothly. We also need enforcement of our existing laws which is a part of attempting to reduce the social problems we have.

I forgot to mention in regards to "funding levels". The annual report on social services-taxpayer spending locally in the past year approached $82MILLION. (correct me if I am wrong, because my memory could be wrong) As Commissioner Sten reported 600 people on just the transitional housing issue were served within this amount. Another blog discussed this diparity between numbers served and dollars spent. Are we getting value for money spent?

Are we getting value for money spent?

I think a little clarification of and specificity to Portland city government's goals would go a long way toward answering that question. If they never define success, they'll never be held accountable. Absent that, we'll never be able to determine the "bang for the buck" factor.

First, though, we (the taxpayers) should address the important but seldom-asked question of what are the relative values (not costs) of the ever-multiplying range of "services" that the city has taken on (or over). I don't doubt that all of them fill a need, I just question whether those needs are prioritized. If there was ever a place for civic involvement, this is it. If you ask me, that's city government's FIRST responsibilty - to make it as easy as possible for ordinary citizens to have direct influence on policy. Neighborhood associations and activists by definition have a narrow focus and unavoidably filter their input through a relative few citizens. However well-meaning and altruistic they may be, the fact is that the pool of people from whom those citizens come is very small. The investment of time, the level of education, the familiarity with "process" required to have any effect assure that. The sheer volume of "stuff" emanating from the council and bureaus and their staffs (staves?) is overwhelming - even for those who might be able and are inclined to try. The result is a de facto oligarchy. That's just a sad fact.

One of the factors that enables this sorry state of affairs to persist, indeed thrive, (witness the re-election of Jack's favorite poster boy, Opie) is the lack of any honest, fearless, wide-ranging media scrutiny. Instead, we have a sycophantic, elitist, out-of-state-owned enabler of a daily paper.

It's enough to make you want to kick someone.

If you live in an American city and begin to forget the location of those critical fault lines of race, class and power, it will not be too much longer before another young black body appears on the street as a marker. Here. Just as you remember.

On the eve of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day we may consider that Dr. King did not undertake a cost-benefit analysis in order to understand the plight of the disenfranchised, nor did he insist upon adherence to an ideologically nuanced political or socioeconomic doctrine to guide human activity. Instead, he talked—relentlessly—about Love and Justice.

So many of the institutions we serve behave in selfish ways for selfish ends. But we need to remember that these institutions are made up of people, and if a people is mindful of a greater purpose, then their institutions cannot help but be moved in that direction. So I'm taking the day off tomorrow to think only about two things—Love and Justice—in the hope that when I return to work I will have some better marker for measuring our progress.

Speaking to rr's point, all the money in the world isn't going to stop some people from acting like idiots. But violent crime is down 19% over the past 12 years.

According to the Merc, the police said they're not going to close North, but try to redraw the precinct boundaries to better distribute police resources. To me, that makes sense - more sense than closing a precinct. Besides, North only has 11% of Type I crime now (as opposed to East Portland's 27%) - North needs to take on more territory to make it balanced.

You'd like more money for police. So would I. But there's no question there's less violent crime now than there used to be, even as the city has built streetcars and free wifi. Perhaps there would be even less crime if they hadn't built those things. But there's still less crime. Let's hope for continual improvement in the future.

Crime statistics? Fascinating. The fact is that gang activity, and particularly gang violence, has increased markedly in Portland in the past five years. And from all appearances, less is being done about it now than at any time since Bud Clark was mayor.

Sorry to go all data on you again, but your statement made me curious, so I looked up some data. I hope you and your readership will find it edifying.

This website:

contains info, broken down by county, of all juveniles in the court system. To quote the website, "the JJIS Youth & Referrals report contains statewide and county-specific reports describing offenses committed by juveniles and the characteristics of the juveniles committing those offenses for the reporting year."

Here's the data for Multnomah County of all criminal referrals from the years 1998-2005:

Year - Number of referrals
1998 - 3,714
1999 - 3,422
2000 - 3,342
2001 - 2,953
2002 - 2,864
2003 - 2,753
2004 - 2,692
2005 - 2,761

Now, there has not been much progress since 2002, I grant you, but its more a leveling off than a spike. We'll see what the 2006 numbers show when they come out.

Also, there's this:

"Between 1994 and 2000, the number of youth detentions dropped by half for all youth (from 1107 in 1994, to 478 in 2000), and by half for African American and Hispanic youth. During approximately the same period (from 1995 to 2000), the number of juveniles arrested for violent crimes dropped 24%, and the number of juveniles arrested for property crimes dropped 40%. The total crime rate for youth dropped 26% during this period."

The data show the youth crime problem is also much better than it was. Granted, we can do better, but to say there isn't progress is to deny the data.

Thank you for your time.

Repeating Jack, "statistics". If you are like myself and most of my friends, reporting crimes in this metro area has gone down. Ten, twenty years ago we would report a tagging crime, car break=in, street fight, a drug deal, etc. Many citizens don't even bother because of the revolving door issue.

I had a car break-in, in progress, eight years ago and called the police. They weren't even going to come until my wife yelled out (while she is on the phone) "They (the robbers) have a gun!" as I raced down the stairs carrying a gun. Police were there in about 2 minutes. This is after our immediate streets had numerous break-ins and the police would respond a day or two later.

I am not blaming the police particularly, but this becomes a question of enforcement that I mentioned in the blog above. Where does policy begin? It begins with citizens telling our politicians our positions. Then the politicians and bureaucrats need to follow through. I think the public has been speaking clearly, but I am hearing mostly "trams, street cars, and free wi-fi.

Reported crime is not real crime. Ask around about what's happening with gangs in Portland. It's not "leveling off."

Re: "Morgan",

To paraphrase Monty Python...

First Bruce: Is your name not TJ?

TJ: No, it's Morgan.

Second Bruce: That's going to cause a little confusion.

Third Bruce: Mind if we call you "TJ" to keep it clear?

Jack, I am not quite clear on your last post. Apparently you are saying that "reported crimes" are not down. I didn't serously mean to infer that "reported crime" numbers were down, but responding to Morgan, and in my estimation why they may be down because of non-reporting. I interpreted his"criminal referrals" as meaning "reported crimes", which by his numbers seemed to indicate they had gone down. But I think you are more correct that it is not "leveling off".

I do not know how to interprete your "reported crime is not real crime". Does that mean "real crime" is only that which is prosecuted and judged a crime? For me, I tend to be a little more flexible on what constitutes crime. Graffiti on walls, even though very seldom prosecuted, is a crime to me. And this thinking applies to many white collar crimes like Emily Boyles, etc.

Not all crimes are reported. And so statistics of reported crimes are not statistics of all real crimes.

My solution is very strict handgun and assault rifle control legislation. It may take a few decades for the results to show because it will take a major attitude adjustment as well as long term gun buy back campaignns to get people to get rid of their guns in this country. Of course, we have the precious Second Amendment and the NRA standing in the way. Strict gun control laws in England are a prime example that stirct gun control laws can put a curb on gun homicide. It would be a very long and difficult road, but we have to start someplace.

Handguns should be banned anywhere the speed limit is less than 60. You want to play Gunsmoke? Head out to the country.


It's been illegal for minors and felons to have handguns and assault rifles for several decades already. What makes you think a few additional decades will make any difference?

Oregon has yet to see a single occurrence of a licensed concealed weapon permit holder committing a crime with their handgun. The good guys aren't the problem.

The bad guys with guns are the problem, and most of them have already demonstrated a willingess to break the law. New laws won't help: more enforcement and stricter sentencing will.

In the absence of "real crime" statistics, why don't we just use a poll of speculative crime estimates from blog readers to formulate and evaluate public policy? In fact, why even collect "data," when you have such a wealth of anecdotes? Seems like a waste of precious tax dollars.

You're right. There's no growing gang problem in Portland, and nothing more the city should do about it. I take it all back.

"Between 1994 and 2000,

Do you have the numbers for 1912? They're about as relevant.

I don't understand the sentiments being expressed in this thread of late. I wanted to get the recorded data out there for Jack and his readership to evalute, which includes trends back to the last dozen years or so (basically, back to when the previous mayor first took office).

Now, I agree the data are not the only factor to be considered. There's also unreported crime, as Jack points out, and there's also the perception of feeling unsafe, which can't tie into any recorded data but is nevertheless important for the political and social implications of policy. That's a discussion worth having, especially if we want to do more to end the types of killing Jack originally posted about.

But I thought the data made a good starting point for discussion. I'm sorry it seems to have gotten people upset. I'll try to be more considerate in the future.

Handguns should be banned anywhere the speed limit is less than 60. You want to play Gunsmoke? Head out to the country.

I have to ask, do you really think the gang bangers will obey that law? Do they obey concealed laws now? Do they obey any laws now?


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics