Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 29, 2007 11:18 AM. The previous post in this blog was Gig of the Month. The next post in this blog is That's... o.k., because he's good enough, he's smart enough.... Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, January 29, 2007

Bad to worse?

The Electoral College is a drag, but I don't think this is the answer. Although it would clearly be a field day for lawyers -- could even result in a Bush v. Gore-style constitutional crisis.

Comments (17)

State legislatures are given broad Consitutional authority to appoint electors:

Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors. . .

Most states employ a "winner-take-all" strategy where the candidate who wins the state gets all the electors. But a few (Maine, maybe others?) assign electors based on proportional voting. Legislatures don't even have to hold a popular vote -- they can assign electors themselves. So on the surface, I can't see any Constitutional prohibition against the idea of assigning them based on the national vote.

In terms of substance, I don't think it solves the problem. When the 2000 election was close in the electoral college, it resulted in litigation. If a future election is close in the popular vote, it will result in litigation.

What would really help is some true bipartisanship around voting integrity and protecting ALL votes that are cast, regardless of whether they are from the inner-city poor or suburban dads or gun-owning country folks. There is no excuse for the US not to be leading the world in terms of a voting system that gets it right the first time, every time.

So on the surface, I can't see any Constitutional prohibition against the idea of assigning them based on the national vote.

Swell, but don't you think that somebody's going to come up with a colorable court challenge? And that it's going to be stuck somewhere in the judicial system during the next election?

The last thing we need is one more cloud over the elections process. I'm with Miles -- much more useful than some clever "end run" around the existing rules is serious improvement in basic reliability of registration and vote counting.

It might be helpful to have a better understanding of why our elections are so closely contested. Clues about this can probably be found in the demographics of who votes and who abstains, in the way campaigns are funded and run, and in the perception that both major parties are much the same. But close votes make fraud much easier, and I would venture to guess that no voting system devised and run by humans can get it right the first time, at least for some of those times when there is no statistically meaningful margin of victory.

"But Oregon's status could change under a pending bill in the Legislature that would award the state's seven electoral votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote nationally, regardless of who wins the state."

What. The. %$*&?

In an age where undetectable wholesale election fraud is possible, that's a really, really bad idea. It would place our electoral votes, our only representation in the choice of President, completely at the mercy of 49 other state electoral processes that we don't control.

The current system sucks to be sure, but at least there's some compartmentalization to it. Electoral fraud in just one state won't necessarily swing the whole contest.

(If we're going to change the system, it would be better to split our electoral votes proportionally to the popular vote in our own state.)

Alan has an excellen point. Oregon's vote-by-mail system may be one of the few left that has some shred of integrity to it. Throwing our little bucket of extracted voter juice into the national pool would dilute it beyond recognition.

I would venture to guess that no voting system devised and run by humans can get it right the first time

What I struggle with is this: How many online stock trades are made every day? How many transactions does Fred Meyer's process every day? How many checks does Bank of America process every day (Google says over 30 million)? What is the margin of error for these processes? It's very, very small.

Now, why can't some of this technology and these systems be applied to the 100 million or so votes cast every four years?

"It's very, very small."

Yes, but it's not zero. That's the problem with really close elections.


OK, so the private firms regularly tabulate and collate data much more accurately than do counties, states, etc. But, if they don't do it perfectly, then we shouldn't try to adopt better means and methods?

Or have you already judged this matter?

Yes, but it's not zero.

Oh, well then; so private firms and institutions regularly tabulate and collate data much more accurately than do counties, states, etc. But, if they don't do it perfectly, then we shouldn't try to adopt better means and methods because we'll never reduce the error rate to zero?

Or have you already judged this matter?

do you hear an echo?


Errr, rr, while putting words in someone else's mouth is a long and distinguished tradition on teh intarnets, I don't think that's what Allan was trying to say.

He appears to me to have been saying that when you're talking about elections with millions of votes cast, even very small nonzero error rates may not be close enough. (According to Wikipedia, Gregiore won Washington in 2004 by 0.0045%; if the actual error rate is 0.005% then the result has no meaning whatsoever.) However, I do not imagine him to be saying that trying for better error rates is futile.

Anyway, counting 30 million personally-identifiable things every day for profit is a much different task than counting 150 million purposely anonymous things in one day, once every four years, at taxpayer expense. BoA's process gets a lot more testing every week than any election system gets in a year.

This method of reforming the electoral college is reminiscent of the way Oregon pioneered the way toward direct election of senators. This was a part of the "Oregon system" which included initiative, referendum, and recall.

Thank's to third-party state legislator William U'Ren, initiative and referendum were added to Oregon's constitution in 1902, primaries in 1904, and recall in 1908.

Prior to 1913, U.S. senators were elected by state legislatures. In 1907, U'Ren maneuvered the Oregon legislature to force it to always elect to the U.S. senate whoever got the popular vote (which until then was advisory if a popular vote was made at all). Some twenty-nine states followed Oregon's lead, and by 1913 Congress passed the 17th amendment requiring all states to directly elect senators.

The electoral college is archaic and should be replaced. This may be the way to do it.


Thanks for sharing what "appears to be" your insight.

I'm sure that the words you, in your infinite wisdom, put in Allan's mouth are much more succinct and accurate than mine. Never mind the point of my comment.

Oh, and it's Gregoire...

Of course, details like that are unimportant - as long as the result is correct.

Don't make me post this comment twice!

rr: Hey, I'm all for tradition. :-) So what was your point?

Responding (on my own behalf, thankyouverymuch) to what Miles said, I think Oregon has adopted those systems where possile. Hand-marked, optically-scanned ballots seem pretty reliable as far as counting goes. I'm pretty sure those are now in use statewide.

The real killer problem that makes vote-counting harder than banking, though, is the requirent for anonymity: secret ballots are hard to track.

If you're a bank scanning checks, any mistakes can (and probably will) be caught by the other bank, the check issuer or the check recipient when they each balance their accounts. When a mistake becomes apparent, the paper trail will clearly lead back to the problem's origin, and the problem can be corrected if the banks happen to believe in the quaint old idea of customer service.

With voting, though, that can't happen. As we discussed here last year, ballots are de-identified after they arrive at an Oregon county election office, and before they are counted. That makes the sort of error-checking the banks do - giving the issuer feedback about the transaction's results - just about impossible.

So anyway. I think Oregon has nailed two aspects of a good voting system: encouraging high turnout, and quick accurate counts. (There's more work to be done, but it's in areas like registration processes where technological solutions are not necessarily helpful.) The last thing I want to see is our pretty good system drowned out by whatever noisy crap the other 49 states might be doing with their voting systems - systems that I have no say in.

I'l grant that this is a well-meaning proposal, but it's misguided and definitely not a win for Oregonians.

I'm amused by this proposal - mostly by the audacity and simplicity of it.

But imagine for a moment that the overall national vote total in 2000 was roughly as close as the one in Florida.

Officially, Bush beat Gore in Florida by 537 votes out of 5,963,110 cast - or 47.8468% to 48.8378%.

Extrapolated to the national vote total, that's 51,482,914 votes to 51,473,423 votes -- a margin of 9,491 votes.

We'd have a national recount -- which would be a horrifying, heart-wrenching, process... one in which every state would apply their own laws, their own standards, their own procedures.

If we move to a national vote, we need a national vote-counting law. Take the townships, counties, and states out of it. One law, one standard, one technology, one process.

The point I was trying to make is that we have a long ways to go on error rates before we're at a "reasonable" level, and I think the technology exists in the private sector to help. I'm always amazed by the number of votes that "switch" in a recount. How is that happening? Why is that happening?

Kari is right -- if the popular vote is ever that close, we're doomed. But a few hundred million from the feds could significantly improve the vote-counting systems we have in most states.

This isn't a national vote, this merely requires Oregonians to disenfranchise themselves and support whoever wins the popular vote total in the remaining 49 states.

We might as well just abstain and let the rest of the country pick the President, because we're too pissed off about Bush winning in 2000 to ever vote again.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics