This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 2, 2006 8:23 AM.
The previous post in this blog was 7.2-Up.
The next post in this blog is Can't find a citation for this one.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Interesting tidibit at the end of this story on LocalNewsDaily:
OHSU staff will begin riding the tram in mid-December.
It will open to the public in late January.
Six weeks to have it all to themselves. And promptly thereafter, the whining by OHSU will begin. "There are too many tourists... We have to restrict the public to our off-hours... We need to give rush-rush priority seating to OHSU personnel and patients... Especially the ones using the three new surface lots down in SoWhat as a park-and-ride..."
You paid for much of it, Portlanders, and technically you own it. But. There's always a but.
Comments (18)
More cynical OHSU employees assume "allowing" staff to ride the tram before the general public is more in the spirit of laboratory mice, or canaries in the mines.
$2 to $5, and the tri met pass won't work?? seriously?? (I really did think it was going to be the same price as a tri met pass, and I do think they should keep it at that). I had planned to use it for dates, recreation, etc. This was my consolation prize because in all honesty I think that, for the non-OHSU public, it will be a fun recreational amenity for Portland. Not that it was worth it for that, but only because it's been built and there's no more choice. It is very upsetting that they seem to be selling out and going to condos instead of the "10,000 jobs" that will probably never materialize. Toy for condo dwellers, I guess. Tram to OHSU to hike Terwilliger. Tram to OHSU to skateboard down. Tram to OHSU to bike down. (etc etc.) Because of what might be the rapid conversion of purpose in the district (to condos), maybe it will end up being very little an OHSU thing.
How many blocks does OHSU really have reserved?----honest question, because I don't know. I heard a couple of weeks ago that they had only 3 blocks locked up. I would imagine that if they don't own it as of right now, there's no guarantee all the rest won't end up condos.
The original sales point for SoWa at planning "charrettes" (or "charades") was that it would be 10,000 jobs and 3,000 living units. That was a big part of how they got it through the public process to this point, cause it was only recently that council and planning staff started saying that they might change the balance to residential. Gee, it doesn't take much pressure to get council and planning staff to cave on a fundamental premise, eh? This change means 10,000 + NEW, DE NOVO cars in the region (condos), compared to what new jobsites would so----that is, help distribute a set number of cars to more jobsites. A huge setback to Portland air quality because of smog, benzene levels, etc. to the area.
To me, this conversion of purpose taints the process almost as much as any of the other well known problems in the SoWa planning process. It muted a lot of potential public criticism.
So I'm just getting my skateboard lubed up, after years of retirement. But I'm very sorry it will be so expensive. (I'm sure if $2 to $5 has been stated, it will end up at $7 or so dollars for the non-condo, non-OHSU public. (I'm sure they'll take care of the condo owners with cheaper tram rides----too good of a selling point until they get all the condos sold, and the developers have SUCH good city council contacts).
Knowing how controversial the public funding for the Tram is today, I wonder if OHSU would choose to build it exclusively with their own funds, if they had it to do over again.
BONUS: They could charge non-OHSU employees Disneyland ticket prices, having a monopoly on Tram Rides.
PORTLAND BONUS: They probably could have "purchased" $57 million worth of land for $9.99 without a public hearing.
Here's what I don't quite get about all the anti-OHSU talk: It is an inanimate public corporation without a brain or will.
It is exclusively controlled by it's president at the pleasure of it's board of directors, who sit at the pleasure of the governor.
Each of those living entities has a human identity. That is, a handful of people control what OHSU does.
Confusing the entity with the people who control it, simply displaces all power and responsiblity into an unidentifiable fog and serves to obscure the fact that specific people are completely responsible for all the actions attributed to OHSU.
Where ya been? We've been doing it for years. On the tram, it was Kohler, Homer Williams, Goldschmidts (both), Lindberg, Francesconi, and their dupes, Vera and Sten. "High-tech jobs, affordable housing," it was all bullsh*t. It was a ludicrous, out-of-scale condo farm with a toy tram to match the toy streetcar.
Speaking of names, now Sam the Tram has taken up the mantle, but unlike his former boss, he's totally aware and in on the scam.
Most embarrassing moment in 30 years of Portland history, and that's saying a lot.
Woodburn Bob wrote: "Here's what I don't quite get about all the anti-OHSU talk: It is an inanimate public corporation without a brain or will."
I think it is okay, and sometimes quite useful, to talk about institutional patterns of behavior, and characterize them qualitatively in certain ways. I'm willing to say "the Soviet Union" was a monster, "Nazi Germany was racist", "the City is obsessed with high rise condos", etc. Sure, it is personification and not completely correct, but everyone knows that you're talking about patterns of behavior of an insitution or entity.
Where ya been? We've been doing it for years. On the tram, it was Kohler, Homer Williams, Goldschmidts (both), Lindberg, Francesconi, and their dupes, Vera and Sten. "High-tech jobs, affordable housing," it was all bullsh*t. It was a ludicrous, out-of-scale condo farm with a toy tram to match the toy streetcar.
Speaking of names, now Sam the Tram has taken up the mantle, but unlike his former boss, he's totally aware and in on the scam.
Most embarrassing moment in 30 years of Portland history, and that's saying a lot.
Posted by Jack Bog
yeah, and now your fireman randy has his new vintage choo-choo's approved in on nov.29 to match all the other toys.
Can't wait 'til the city's annual financial statements come out. Should be any day now. I suspect the appetite for toys may subside somewhat if anyone takes those seriously.
There's no question, Jack, you've relentlessly covered the specific players from city/local government and from developer/magnate circles regarding SoWa and the tram. Forgive me, I've only been reading your blog about 6 months.
I'd simply like to also see illumination of who's in the shadows behind the OHSU curtain.
For instance, if you conger up a general idea of what the public expects OHSU to be, what is the relationship between that idea and the specific people with ultimate authority over the stewardship of that more than $1 Billion per year Oregon PUBLIC corporation.
Here's OHSU's board. I can only wonder what and who these people actually represent.
Everyone at OHSU ultimately answers to Dr. Robertson now. He answers to the board. To whom do they answer?
$1 Billion seems like real money to me. Maybe I'm naïve, but where does that sum go each year? More importantly, who decides?
Boards are funny. Technically the CEO reports to the board, but the board members are typically really busy or really old and tired. A lot of what they hear from staff is often thoroughly pre-digested, and they can be led and misled. They also have their own constituencies and interests that they bring to the table, and good bureaucrats know how to play those cards hard and well.
At OHSU, I suspect the power base is about a dozen of the old guy doctors, a bunch of moneyed people from the West Hills, the governor, a few of the puppets in the Legislature, and a handful of top administrators, at least one of whom is grossly overpaid -- all of whom hate public scrutiny.
Seeing Charles Wilhoite, the second-newest member of the PDC board, on the OHSU board is not a confidence-inspiring moment.
I was erroneously trying to fit what I see at OHSU into the model of a Machiavellian monarchy.
I can see that a closeted oligarchy dancing to the music of Byzantine group dynamics would be a more realistic model.
I guess my wish is to read a crushing exposé along the lines of Watergate, the S&L scandal or Enron, where in fact something much more mundane is at play.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (18)
More cynical OHSU employees assume "allowing" staff to ride the tram before the general public is more in the spirit of laboratory mice, or canaries in the mines.
Posted by Amanda Fritz | December 2, 2006 9:56 AM
Jack cited:
"three new surface lots down in SoWhat as park-and-ride"
Wouldn't it be more accurate to describe these SoWhat parking lots as "PORK-and-ride" ???
Just a thought, considering all the public money that has gone into this "amenity."
Posted by oregbear | December 2, 2006 11:49 AM
Just remember folks--the more OHSU rides, the more they pay.
IIRC, after the first year (or 3 years, something like that), the operating costs are allocated to OHSU based on ridership.
How long before OHSU gets sick of cutting checks and decides that the operating costs should be shared by all?
Posted by Garage Wine | December 2, 2006 12:55 PM
And the public can ride the tram for the low, low price of $2 to $5 per trip (depending, I guess, on how deep a budget hole they have to fill).
Posted by Ken | December 2, 2006 1:29 PM
$2 to $5, and the tri met pass won't work?? seriously?? (I really did think it was going to be the same price as a tri met pass, and I do think they should keep it at that). I had planned to use it for dates, recreation, etc. This was my consolation prize because in all honesty I think that, for the non-OHSU public, it will be a fun recreational amenity for Portland. Not that it was worth it for that, but only because it's been built and there's no more choice. It is very upsetting that they seem to be selling out and going to condos instead of the "10,000 jobs" that will probably never materialize. Toy for condo dwellers, I guess. Tram to OHSU to hike Terwilliger. Tram to OHSU to skateboard down. Tram to OHSU to bike down. (etc etc.) Because of what might be the rapid conversion of purpose in the district (to condos), maybe it will end up being very little an OHSU thing.
How many blocks does OHSU really have reserved?----honest question, because I don't know. I heard a couple of weeks ago that they had only 3 blocks locked up. I would imagine that if they don't own it as of right now, there's no guarantee all the rest won't end up condos.
The original sales point for SoWa at planning "charrettes" (or "charades") was that it would be 10,000 jobs and 3,000 living units. That was a big part of how they got it through the public process to this point, cause it was only recently that council and planning staff started saying that they might change the balance to residential. Gee, it doesn't take much pressure to get council and planning staff to cave on a fundamental premise, eh? This change means 10,000 + NEW, DE NOVO cars in the region (condos), compared to what new jobsites would so----that is, help distribute a set number of cars to more jobsites. A huge setback to Portland air quality because of smog, benzene levels, etc. to the area.
To me, this conversion of purpose taints the process almost as much as any of the other well known problems in the SoWa planning process. It muted a lot of potential public criticism.
So I'm just getting my skateboard lubed up, after years of retirement. But I'm very sorry it will be so expensive. (I'm sure if $2 to $5 has been stated, it will end up at $7 or so dollars for the non-condo, non-OHSU public. (I'm sure they'll take care of the condo owners with cheaper tram rides----too good of a selling point until they get all the condos sold, and the developers have SUCH good city council contacts).
Posted by insideouter | December 2, 2006 3:03 PM
Knowing how controversial the public funding for the Tram is today, I wonder if OHSU would choose to build it exclusively with their own funds, if they had it to do over again.
BONUS: They could charge non-OHSU employees Disneyland ticket prices, having a monopoly on Tram Rides.
PORTLAND BONUS: They probably could have "purchased" $57 million worth of land for $9.99 without a public hearing.
Posted by Bruce | December 2, 2006 3:50 PM
Here's what I don't quite get about all the anti-OHSU talk: It is an inanimate public corporation without a brain or will.
It is exclusively controlled by it's president at the pleasure of it's board of directors, who sit at the pleasure of the governor.
Each of those living entities has a human identity. That is, a handful of people control what OHSU does.
Confusing the entity with the people who control it, simply displaces all power and responsiblity into an unidentifiable fog and serves to obscure the fact that specific people are completely responsible for all the actions attributed to OHSU.
I vote you all start naming names.
Posted by WoodburnBob | December 2, 2006 5:38 PM
Tidbit schmidbit. I had this in October. ;)
Posted by b!X | December 2, 2006 7:20 PM
I vote you all start naming names.
Where ya been? We've been doing it for years. On the tram, it was Kohler, Homer Williams, Goldschmidts (both), Lindberg, Francesconi, and their dupes, Vera and Sten. "High-tech jobs, affordable housing," it was all bullsh*t. It was a ludicrous, out-of-scale condo farm with a toy tram to match the toy streetcar.
Speaking of names, now Sam the Tram has taken up the mantle, but unlike his former boss, he's totally aware and in on the scam.
Most embarrassing moment in 30 years of Portland history, and that's saying a lot.
Posted by Jack Bog | December 2, 2006 9:38 PM
Woodburn Bob wrote: "Here's what I don't quite get about all the anti-OHSU talk: It is an inanimate public corporation without a brain or will."
I think it is okay, and sometimes quite useful, to talk about institutional patterns of behavior, and characterize them qualitatively in certain ways. I'm willing to say "the Soviet Union" was a monster, "Nazi Germany was racist", "the City is obsessed with high rise condos", etc. Sure, it is personification and not completely correct, but everyone knows that you're talking about patterns of behavior of an insitution or entity.
Posted by insideouter | December 2, 2006 10:08 PM
Where ya been? We've been doing it for years. On the tram, it was Kohler, Homer Williams, Goldschmidts (both), Lindberg, Francesconi, and their dupes, Vera and Sten. "High-tech jobs, affordable housing," it was all bullsh*t. It was a ludicrous, out-of-scale condo farm with a toy tram to match the toy streetcar.
Speaking of names, now Sam the Tram has taken up the mantle, but unlike his former boss, he's totally aware and in on the scam.
Most embarrassing moment in 30 years of Portland history, and that's saying a lot.
Posted by Jack Bog
yeah, and now your fireman randy has his new vintage choo-choo's approved in on nov.29 to match all the other toys.
Posted by milk&jam | December 3, 2006 12:27 AM
Can't wait 'til the city's annual financial statements come out. Should be any day now. I suspect the appetite for toys may subside somewhat if anyone takes those seriously.
Posted by Jack Bog | December 3, 2006 12:34 AM
There's no question, Jack, you've relentlessly covered the specific players from city/local government and from developer/magnate circles regarding SoWa and the tram. Forgive me, I've only been reading your blog about 6 months.
I'd simply like to also see illumination of who's in the shadows behind the OHSU curtain.
For instance, if you conger up a general idea of what the public expects OHSU to be, what is the relationship between that idea and the specific people with ultimate authority over the stewardship of that more than $1 Billion per year Oregon PUBLIC corporation.
Here's OHSU's board. I can only wonder what and who these people actually represent.
Everyone at OHSU ultimately answers to Dr. Robertson now. He answers to the board. To whom do they answer?
$1 Billion seems like real money to me. Maybe I'm naïve, but where does that sum go each year? More importantly, who decides?
Posted by WoodburnBob | December 3, 2006 1:18 PM
Boards are funny. Technically the CEO reports to the board, but the board members are typically really busy or really old and tired. A lot of what they hear from staff is often thoroughly pre-digested, and they can be led and misled. They also have their own constituencies and interests that they bring to the table, and good bureaucrats know how to play those cards hard and well.
At OHSU, I suspect the power base is about a dozen of the old guy doctors, a bunch of moneyed people from the West Hills, the governor, a few of the puppets in the Legislature, and a handful of top administrators, at least one of whom is grossly overpaid -- all of whom hate public scrutiny.
Seeing Charles Wilhoite, the second-newest member of the PDC board, on the OHSU board is not a confidence-inspiring moment.
Posted by Jack Bog | December 3, 2006 3:40 PM
Seeing Charles Wilhoite, the second-newest member of the PDC board, on the OHSU board is not a confidence-inspiring moment.
hahaha...he's a five-tool player!
Posted by Sebastian | December 3, 2006 10:27 PM
Jack, thanks for the analysis.
I was erroneously trying to fit what I see at OHSU into the model of a Machiavellian monarchy.
I can see that a closeted oligarchy dancing to the music of Byzantine group dynamics would be a more realistic model.
I guess my wish is to read a crushing exposé along the lines of Watergate, the S&L scandal or Enron, where in fact something much more mundane is at play.
Posted by WoodburnBob | December 4, 2006 7:55 AM
Wait until the animal rights anarchists take the tram hostage until all the political prisoners in the primate center are released.
Posted by Dave Lister | December 4, 2006 10:19 AM
Is there a place to donate funds for street people to ride the tram? A mix of lifestyles is good is it not.
Posted by ron | December 5, 2006 9:22 PM