Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 26, 2006 4:35 PM. The previous post in this blog was No action. The next post in this blog is Jerry and me. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Two guys, four faces

Here's a laugher for a slow week in local politics. Fighting the pending move to have the City Council take control over the budget of the Portland Development Commission, Grampy and Big Pipe have started whining about how the matter should be put up for a public vote.

Gimme a break, boys. We don't get to vote on public campaign financing of municipal campaigns, or massive subsidies for greedy condo developers, or shutting down the police stations at night, or building the Floating Twinkies, or blowing neighborhood revitalization money on toney theaters for the rich, or the ongoing sellout of the city's parks, but suddenly the voters simply have to have a say in which set of face cards gets to dole out the PDC pork? Have you so soon forgotten the old "Let's try it for a while and see how the voters like it before they vote on it"?

Sure, let's have a vote on "urban renewal" in Portland. Let's vote on winding it down, since it's pretty much wrecking the place financially and aesthetically.

Comments (13)

I'm not sure I understand the point either. Isn't it pretty clear that the voters would overwhelmingly side with Sten, Leonard, and Adams anyway??

I don't understand it. One one hand you excoriate these guys for being in the pocket of the developers but you want to turn PDC over to them directly. At least now when a commissioner's assistant calls for a favor the employee can refer them to the Commission.

I agree that PDC needs refomred for better oversight but turning it directly over to City Council is a recipe for coruption.


As between City Council control and PDC board control, I favor City Council control. Always have. In fact, I have long advocated dissolving the PDC and turning it back into a regular city bureau. There are too many unsupervised pots of public money around here that are being stolen from. Getting the urban renewal grease back under the City Hall roof would mean one less pot.

The influence of the developer weasels wanes as accountability increases. Appointed, autonomous boards are far less accountable than directly elected officials.

But actually, this post is not about which side of that issue one comes down on. Instead, it is the hypocrisy of Potter and Saltzman preaching about public votes. Our politicians favor public votes only when it suits them; the lines they draw when deciding which issues should require such votes are utterly without principle.

That line seems to be drawn when the powers that be are likely to be defeated. If we turn it over to a vote of the people, then they can do their best to buy the vote and possibly have it turn out in their favor.

As for corruption, it's already there. PDC has violated its fiduciary responsibilities multiple times in the past year, alone. What makes you think that it would be any worse under the commissioners? At least they can be clearly identified and removed from office. Can the same be said of the PDC board of directors when it comes to familiarity to the public and ease of removal from office? The thing with PDC is that there is no accountability whatsoever; to the public, at least.

Did you see the editorial in today's "O" about saving the PDC. Disgusting! I'll vote to scrape it entirely. How could that possibly be worse than the bunch of sharks and weasels that have been feeding in the urban renewal trough for decades. A feast sponsered by the PDC but mostly funded by the taxpayers.

I agree with Bojack's "hypocrasy" post. Additionally, I think we have to consider the reality of the media "slant" if the PDC issue is put before the voters, and how the measure is written. The media is so important when an issue is vague to many voters.

The Oreonian has already come out strong for the continuance of PDC-maybe with a minor tuneup. The Tribune might also, considering their past/recent comments on PDC. Let's face it, how many of the voters really know the nuiances of the PDC issues or how it affects them in their pocketbooks? Not many. For example, consider Lily's post above, and "she" is knowledgable; "PDC...mostly funded by taxpayers". PDC is entirely funded by taxpayers.

If the three commissioners who are advocating sending the PDC issue to the state legislature, would spend as much time/energy to send it to the voters, it could pass. I for one would want city voters to know the true story behind the PDC history and financial failures without the media slant.

And who will carry on the "education" of voters if the measure becomes a reality? Are there any commissioners or other public officials that will help/sponsor the "re-education" efforts? And will the public education districts, Multnomah Co., police, firemen, etc. who are loosing taxdollars to their budgets because of the PDC step forward and question and support PDC reforms or elimination? It is a delicate "political ballgame" when one part of government questons another part. Multnomah Co. and a few fire districts have questioned Urban Renewal and its affect on their budgets recently. But the media has downplayed that difference, but it is there.

I, and several others have met with state reps, and lobbyists about Urban Renewal, PDC. They listen, but several eyes glaze over, and they have a hard time following the tax dollar ball; and they worry about the "media fallout" in taking a position. Even going to the legislature with the PDC issue is questionable because it would be watered down. But we should try either course.

I think the problem is we are so far down the "slipery slope" on this one as with many other things. In itself Urban Renewal is a great idea. I remember driving through some of the slums that spawned the race riots of the 60's. There are problems with what UR has devolved to, and things we have to remember.

UR decision making is too concentrated and there are no performance measures or adequate accounting practices in place to do a true and uncorrupted cost/benefit on how UR spending and its mirror immage reduced disposable income to government services and residents effects the City and Region as a whole, existing (non-subsidized) business expansion, and the pocketbook of the average Joe.

The thing to remember is capital when it belongs to an old family in the West Hills or Beacon Hill is guarded and a healthy ROI (Return on Investment)is expected before any matching funds are expended. They have "critical mass" and can keep it in T-bills and their lifestyle comfortable as wealth becomes more concentrated it takes more ROI to cut this money loose from not only the old guard but pension funds managed by the same investment trust officers.

If public tax money is invested in UR, and the "owner" of the project is protected from losing thier leveraged investment with the pledge of tax money, and this development stimulates the local economy, provides affordable housing, or family wage jobs, that is one thing. If public tax money is used as it has been in Portland to bleed money from taxpayers to provide a free source of capital for the developers and thier "investors" and cushie jobs for their offspring and relatives that is another.

As Jerry has pointed out elements of prudent financial analysis are forgotten, if you look at the life cycle of a PDC project. A good example the gravey, is the conversion of Harrison Towers, this was the great UR project of the 60's and 70's. The Randy Gragg of the day must have been salivating. This was the Jewish Slum torn down and "redevleoped" with public money. All those appartment units were put up, with UR money, and a positive cash flow from rents kept things rolling to assure the owner a good ROI, what happened when rents went up did the City get a share of the better ROI, and now the Condo conversion. The question would be what was the Public's ROI on thier investment and what was some nameless group of investors ROI on that UR deal.

In a society that is more and more programed toward instant gratification,and a goverment that only looks at a budget that will carry them through the next year, the best example of this was the surplus cookie jar the council went through this year, why not pay off a few of the bonds early, and cut down the future bond obligation.

No one, with the possible exception of maybe Fireman Randy, is looking out for the people in these deals, they have no place at the table they pay for.

To me this whole dust up has an interesting slant politically. I think it is the opening salvo for the mayoral campaign in '08 and is bringing forward the question of whether Potter will have a support base upon which to run for a second term.

Couple the PDC article with the "transparency" article (or is it "tramsparency"?) and then check the murmurs column which speculates that Potter is about to shuffle the deck and reassign bureaus. He could hand Sam some loser bureaus to get him out of the spotlight, give Sten a plum to placate him and maybe get out of this 3 to 2 voting situation. Then, and only then, can he move forward on charter reform or "visioning".

Bottom line folks, it's politics pure and simple, and who will be able to say what in 2008. It's going to be quite amusing.

Dave, I think you are right-Urban Renewal has the potential to be a major issue in '08 in the mayoral campaign.

Several of us tried to get the Mannix campaign four years ago to minimally discuss the UR issue on a state-wide basis and particularly Portland. What deficiencies we see today were there four years ago, and even the City Club UR committee was citing the problems even then. Then we tried again with Saxton. Didn't quite catch on. And it would of helped his campaign because Ted didn't know a thing about UR and its affect state-wide.

I appreciate that your campaign for City Council acknowledged the problems with PDC and UR. But like always, the media downplayed it.

PDC and UR should be a major issue in '08, and not just only for the "corruption" examples, but its affect on the tax base. If you run we will try to help you make it an issue; and I think Amanda Fritz agrees.

PS: UR should not be thought of as a democrat or republican issue. That doesn't mean it won't end up there. UR deficiencies are seen by both spectrums.

Maybe we should get to vote on term limits? That would prevent some of the power accumulation/consolidation by the entrenched incumbents. Plus, we may wind up with some of those much vaunted "women and people of color" on the City Council.

It worked for MultCo.

If not term limits, then how about an idea I read about over on
2% for Sinkholes!


Thanks for the encouragement. I did indeed try to focus on UR's impact on our basic services in the campaign. I believe it resonanted with everyone who got to hear it.... just didn't get to enough people. A lot of people believe the city is concerning itself with everything but what it should.

I am not ruling out a run in '08 but it will pretty much depend upon the political landscape as it begins to unfold this coming spring.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics