Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 15, 2006 4:54 PM. The previous post in this blog was Pop quiz. The next post in this blog is Apple view, continued. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

They're not all bad

Finally, an aerial tram that I support.

Comments (26)

The possibilities are endless, not for the tram, but for Legos. Great video, I chuckled. Actually, the video says how creative a kid with Legos can be. Too bad I can't say the same for Dan Saltzman.

The only thing creative there is the accounting.

Have you ever been to Lego Land in San Diego?

I walked into that one.

No, but I played with the legos like most kids. Closet I've been to Lego Land is Gilbert House in Salem(The namesake house of the inventor of the Erectorset.).

Cool. I'd like to order one with a cup holder for my beer, sort of a high tech version of the old Reginald Van Gleason train set.

Speaking of train sets, that reminds me of the Addams Family when uncle Fester blows up the trains and other such model mayhem.

In regards to the Kohler coaster, there's some major f-ups in its engineering and construction.

The upper tower has a sky bridge connecting it to the building. Apparently, the bridge is off by about 6-inches. Engineers thought the cable tension would literally pull the bridge into place. It didn't work out that way. Major work needs to be done to correct the problem.

On the lower tower, the cars are colliding with the beams connecting the tower to the building. They have to literally tear out part of the building and facade to make the cars fit.

The completion date will be pushed back, count on it.

There is a page on OH&SU tram on Wikipedia.

It quotes $55M as the final cost with OHSU paying some 85% of it. If that's true the thing is a decent deal for the city, imho. People who disagree with these numbers and have other relevant data/observations, should go and edit that page for our mutual benefit. Wikipedia forces you to rethink your arguments clearly, and document them properly if you want your point of view included. That's usually helpful. Blog discussions on the other hand tend to be too ephemeral to be of significant benefit.

P.S. b!X could put some of his pics there, the current one is not good.

sorry the proper link is this.

Blog discussions on the other hand tend to be too ephemeral to be of significant benefit.


Hmmmm... WG does have a point, Jack. I don't think it was a potshot at you.

Blogs tend to lean toward partisans on both sides firing arguments at each other. There tends to be many unsourced claims and statements of questionable fact.

Meanwhile, Wikipedia has a strong core of people dedicated to NPOV - the 'neutral point of view' - wherein opinions are excised and facts and claims are sourced.

Don't get me wrong. Obviously, I love blogs - precisely because of their capacity to motivate, inspire, create buzz, and make a strong persuasive case.

But there's a place in this world for encyclopedic fact-gathering, too.

Using my bandwidth to tell my readers that their comments are of no significant benefit was a really stupid thing to do.

"Meanwhile, Wikipedia has a strong core of people dedicated to NPOV - the 'neutral point of view' - wherein opinions are excised and facts and claims are sourced."

Not always; I have found unsourced factual errors there and opinion posing as fact. And NPOV, what is that really? Sounds kind of like a contradiction in terms. Nonetheless, Wikipedia is valuable, I would say to about the same degree as blogs. When readers are motivated to think about and investigate issues raised, the populace is better informed overall, imho.

It is obvious that wg hasn't been reading this blog for the past two years or so. There has been numerous posts that disputes, with backup information, that the public costs far exceeds $8M or whatever Adams might tell you.

Please, wg, do some research. When city officials do not include land cost, financing cost, staff time/expenses, competition costs, hidden benefits given to OHSU (numerous) to compensate for their percentage, and the general public might use it only 10% of the time, then it might look good on paper from their perspective. The life cycle cost for twenty years is over $250M, and even Adam's recent PDOT shorten version life-cycle-cost substantuates this. Wg, look at his blog too.

Jack, you are right, of course. WG gets no style points.

Cynthia wrote: I have found unsourced factual errors there and opinion posing as fact.

Of course, the whole point of Wikipedia is that when you find something like that, you're supposed to fix it. Just click Edit, and fix it. Don't even have to log in.

Wikipedia is a great example of a commons. But a commons only works if everyone who benefits from it also contributes to the commons.

If you find it valuable, you have an ethical duty to help make it more valuable - when you have the ability to do so. Otherwise, you're benefiting without contributing for the benefit of others.

(Which isn't to say that other people aren't misusing it. That's become a regular beat on my professional blog: here and here.)

Blog discussions on the other hand tend to be too ephemeral to be of significant benefit.


Forgive us if that seems like an overreaction on your part, Jack. In no way does that seem like a poke at you, but rather one aimed at blog-pomposity in general [and goodness knows, there's no shortage of that].

Here's hoping you'll reconsider. It was a point well taken.

It's been an ugly day in Comment World, and this person wasn't even the half of it. I readmitted him or her to the fold a while ago, but I'll be glad if this person, and a few other of today's visitors, give it a rest for a while.

Me no style points!


Yours is a great place Jack, but it's not a library, you are more like a crowded winery on the shores of Mediterranean on a steamy summer night. Wine flows freely, excited, colorful, lively people all around you, laughing, talking, sometimes shouting through each other. You juggling little neat pieces from all over the internet to everybody's delight. Great place to be, great place to watch, but no place to look for concise, clinically detached, perfectly balanced presentation of technical issues. For that I and others go to Wikipedia, which in no way reflects on the quality or value of your place.

The intent of my original piece was to get those who hold strong negative views of the OH&SU tram to share them on Wikipedia. As things stand now the present Wikipedia entry appears terribly one-sided. No indication of any controversy. Nothing. The critics so plentiful and vocal here owe us something there too.

I clearly misspoke though when I said that your place is "of no significant benefit" . What I meant to say was that your place is "of little use" for those who look for dry, strictly technical, detached, dry as a bone, almost academic exposition of the issue.

Your place is much more than that.

I just noticed you want me to shut up for a while. No problem. Happy to oblige.

It's been a long day. No hard feelings.

Meanwhile, Wikipedia has a strong core of people dedicated to NPOV - the 'neutral point of view' - wherein opinions are excised and facts and claims are sourced.

I dont think thats entirely accurate. Maybe after some review thats the case. This entry on the tram is pretty typical of Wikipedia. Its more like the op-ed page of the WWW.

wg, I am sorry, but I am lucky to find the time to blog on BoJack, let alone on Wikipedia. I don't think it is my duty to make sure my postings or other pertinent postings on the Tram, or other issues, are posted on other blogs to make sure everyone is on the same page. Things can't be perfect.

"Wikipedia is a great example of a commons. But a commons only works if everyone who benefits from it also contributes to the commons."

Agreed. But problems can arise when one goes there to inform herself on an issue and finds mis/dis information and doesn't know enough to correct it. No worse than anywhere else, I guess. Rigor and skepticism are always well advised, imo.

I do think Jon has a point: the "NPOV" stikes me as an editorial slant,too. At least on blogs, we can argue with each other and defend/change our positions based on what we learn. You can't really go through that kind of learning process at Wikepedia. Imo, some blogs are too doctrinnaire to be of much value, but I think this is a good one, and that many people value the varied points of view and interchanges they find here.

Jerry it doesn't have to be you but I think we agree somebody should. Wikipedia is too important to ignore. Re learning process on Wikipedia they have a pretty good system over there including discussion groups specific to individual entries if necessary.

"Re learning process on Wikipedia they have a pretty good system over there including discussion groups specific to individual entries if necessary."

Thanks. I'll check it out.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2012
Decoy, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Marqués de Murrieta, Reserva Rioja 2010
Kendall-Jackson, Grand Reserve Cabernet 2009
Seven Hills, Merlot 2013
Los Vascos, Grande Reserve Cabernet 2011
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Forlorn Hope, St. Laurent, Ost-Intrigen 2013
Upper Five, Tempranillo 2010 and 2012
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Topsail, Syrah 2013
Jim Barry, The Lodge Hill Shiraz 2013
Robert Mondavi, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2012
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2014
Boomtown, Cabernet 2013
Boulay, Sauvignon Blanc 2014
Domaine de Durban Muscat 2011
Patricia Green, Estate Pinot Noir 2012
Crios, Cabernet, Mendoza 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Dehesa la Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #15
Selvapiana, Chianti Ruffina 2012
Joseph Carr, Cabernet 2012
Prendo, Pinot Grigio, Vigneti Delle Dolomiti 2014
Joel Gott, Oregon Pinot Gris 2014
Otazu, Red 2010
Chehalem, Pinot Gris, Three Vineyards 2013
Wente, Merlot, Sandstone 2011
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2012
Monmousseau, Vouvray 2014
Duriguttti, Malbec 2013
Ruby, Pinot Noir 2012
Castellare, Chianti 2013
Lugana, San Benedetto 2013
Canoe Ridge, Cabernet, Horse Heaven Hills 2011
Arcangelo, Negroamaro Rosato
Vale do Bomfim, Douro 2012
Portuga, Branco 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Late Bottled Vintage Porto 2009
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Kristina's Reserve 2010
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 28, 2012
Coppola, Sofia, Rose 2014
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Napa Meritage 2011
Kramer, Chardonnay Estate 2012
Forlorn Hope, Que Saudade 2013
Ramos, Premium Tinto, Alentejano 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Rutherford Cabernet 2012
Bottego Vinaia, Pinot Grigio Trentino 2013
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2011
Pete's Mountain, Elijah's Reserve Cabernet, 2007
Beaulieu, George Latour Cabernet 1998

The Occasional Book

Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 3
At this date last year: 0
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics