This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 13, 2006 1:57 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Apple view.
The next post in this blog is Woke up with wood.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Speaking of the Blazers, it appears that the voters of Seattle have burned their bridges with their NBA team, the Sonics. Thus, the Sonics are likely to move to Oklahoma around the year 2010, which would leave a pro hoops void in the Emerald City that the Blazers' owner, Paul Allen, probably won't be able to resist. Will he try to move the Blazers north? Granted, he won't get a deal from the City of Seattle, but he's got a terrible deal in Portland right now -- it can't get much worse.
Comments (9)
The Oklahoma City purchase of the Sonics is why I don't see any mystery to the re-ignition of Paul Allen's interest in the team.
I've read lots of back and forth on whether his 25 year lease with the Rose Garden can be bought out. Or, even if ther is a buyout, if the league will allow the move of the Blazers to Seattle. B-Ball is Allen's favorite sport. No doubt he would want to move the team north if he could.
Could the City of Portland (which I understand is a party to the Rose Garden lease) hold fast and prevent this move?
We've been through that on here before. The lease holds him to Portland through 2025, I think. But he had a mortgage, too, and he was willing to walk away from that. If the Sonics are really gone from the Northwest, he could conceivably talk the league into letting him take the team into bankruptcy, void the lease, and re-emerge in a new hall that he builds in Seattle. A little far-fetched, but stranger stuff has happened with that guy.
While the corporate Blazers entity could indeed be run through a Chapter 11 and dump the executory remainder of the lease, Allen has a personal problem: IIRC, and maybe I don't, our civic fathers were surprisingly prescient with the Blazers vis a vis the Rose Garden -- Allen was required to personally, repeat, personally, guarantee the lease payments by the Blazers corporate entity to the city.
While Allen, through Vulcan Investments, is constantly prooving the old adage that all it takes to make a small fortune is to start with a large fortune (Charter Communications, for example), I still don't see Allen personally doing a chapter 11 or 13 any tme in this century.
Allen was required to personally, repeat, personally, guarantee the lease payments by the Blazers corporate entity to the city.
The city doesn't own the building, and as I understand it, never has. The lease is currently held (i.e., the building is owned) by the investor entities that were foolish enough to lend Allen's now-defunct arena corporation the money to build the place. Do they have his personal guarantee on the lease? I don't know.
I do know that if there's any way for DOS Boy to get out of Portland and move the team to Seattle, he'll do it. And if it costs him a mere $50 million or $100 million in damages, that won't deter him a bit. He pays that kind of money out all the time on his basketball hobby, to clowns like Sean Kemp and Darius Miles.
I see there is some sort of "site agreement" between the city and someone or something in the Allen camp. Even assuming that Allen's personally on the hook for that one, he can buy his way out of it if he wants to. And if the Blazers make the playoffs in '08 and start bringing in decent box office again, he may be more inclined to drop the dough and get the heck out of Dodge.
And some think that the site agreement may not be enforceable anyway. What? Portland City Hall sign a contract that it turns out it can't enforce? Impossible, you say?
I'm with you on this one Jack. I think that Paul Allen's motives are very suspect at this point. First we get all this jibberish about the "broken economic model", then several investor groups step up to buy the team and the arena, and then after all the drama he says the team is no longer on the market. The timing of taking the team off the market in close conjunction with the Oklahoma group buying out the Sonics makes me nervous...very nervous.
Still leaves the problem of no stadium in Seattle and no will there for public financing. Economically, it might cost him more than buying back the Rose Garden ($50 to $100 million per year in losses for four more years in Portland plus any damanges plus cost of building a new arena in Seattle).
It seems they may be trying to change public will here by appearing to be good guys and "engaged" in the community. Throw in some winning ways again, and there you go. But who knows? The way they operate hasn't made sense since they tried to bluff their way into buying the Rose Garden by going into bankrupcy.
He's going to have to own the arena to make his little hobby come even close to working. There's no public money for the building in either city. If it comes down to buying the Portland arena or building a shiny new one in Seattle, there's little doubt in my mind where he'll go.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (9)
The Oklahoma City purchase of the Sonics is why I don't see any mystery to the re-ignition of Paul Allen's interest in the team.
I've read lots of back and forth on whether his 25 year lease with the Rose Garden can be bought out. Or, even if ther is a buyout, if the league will allow the move of the Blazers to Seattle. B-Ball is Allen's favorite sport. No doubt he would want to move the team north if he could.
Could the City of Portland (which I understand is a party to the Rose Garden lease) hold fast and prevent this move?
Posted by Insideoutinner | November 13, 2006 6:04 PM
We've been through that on here before. The lease holds him to Portland through 2025, I think. But he had a mortgage, too, and he was willing to walk away from that. If the Sonics are really gone from the Northwest, he could conceivably talk the league into letting him take the team into bankruptcy, void the lease, and re-emerge in a new hall that he builds in Seattle. A little far-fetched, but stranger stuff has happened with that guy.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 13, 2006 7:08 PM
Jack -
While the corporate Blazers entity could indeed be run through a Chapter 11 and dump the executory remainder of the lease, Allen has a personal problem: IIRC, and maybe I don't, our civic fathers were surprisingly prescient with the Blazers vis a vis the Rose Garden -- Allen was required to personally, repeat, personally, guarantee the lease payments by the Blazers corporate entity to the city.
While Allen, through Vulcan Investments, is constantly prooving the old adage that all it takes to make a small fortune is to start with a large fortune (Charter Communications, for example), I still don't see Allen personally doing a chapter 11 or 13 any tme in this century.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | November 13, 2006 8:18 PM
Allen was required to personally, repeat, personally, guarantee the lease payments by the Blazers corporate entity to the city.
The city doesn't own the building, and as I understand it, never has. The lease is currently held (i.e., the building is owned) by the investor entities that were foolish enough to lend Allen's now-defunct arena corporation the money to build the place. Do they have his personal guarantee on the lease? I don't know.
I do know that if there's any way for DOS Boy to get out of Portland and move the team to Seattle, he'll do it. And if it costs him a mere $50 million or $100 million in damages, that won't deter him a bit. He pays that kind of money out all the time on his basketball hobby, to clowns like Sean Kemp and Darius Miles.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 13, 2006 10:35 PM
I see there is some sort of "site agreement" between the city and someone or something in the Allen camp. Even assuming that Allen's personally on the hook for that one, he can buy his way out of it if he wants to. And if the Blazers make the playoffs in '08 and start bringing in decent box office again, he may be more inclined to drop the dough and get the heck out of Dodge.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 13, 2006 10:41 PM
And some think that the site agreement may not be enforceable anyway. What? Portland City Hall sign a contract that it turns out it can't enforce? Impossible, you say?
Posted by Jack Bog | November 13, 2006 10:54 PM
I'm with you on this one Jack. I think that Paul Allen's motives are very suspect at this point. First we get all this jibberish about the "broken economic model", then several investor groups step up to buy the team and the arena, and then after all the drama he says the team is no longer on the market. The timing of taking the team off the market in close conjunction with the Oklahoma group buying out the Sonics makes me nervous...very nervous.
Posted by Kevin | November 14, 2006 4:23 AM
Still leaves the problem of no stadium in Seattle and no will there for public financing. Economically, it might cost him more than buying back the Rose Garden ($50 to $100 million per year in losses for four more years in Portland plus any damanges plus cost of building a new arena in Seattle).
It seems they may be trying to change public will here by appearing to be good guys and "engaged" in the community. Throw in some winning ways again, and there you go. But who knows? The way they operate hasn't made sense since they tried to bluff their way into buying the Rose Garden by going into bankrupcy.
Posted by Chris Bouneff | November 15, 2006 4:20 PM
He's going to have to own the arena to make his little hobby come even close to working. There's no public money for the building in either city. If it comes down to buying the Portland arena or building a shiny new one in Seattle, there's little doubt in my mind where he'll go.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 15, 2006 5:02 PM