This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 12, 2006 8:51 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Know when to say when.
The next post in this blog is That's more like it.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Foxworth contends he did nothing wrong because there is no city rule that prohibits personal relationships with co-workers, and that others in similar senior positions, including the top chief's job, have had their own romantic relationships with other bureau employees and were never disciplined.
His claim does not identify which police chief or other police brass engaged in romantic relationships with co-workers, but suggests that Foxworth is willing to drudge up other dirty laundry in the bureau to defend himself.
Mark Kroeker? Nah.
Charles Moose? Penny Harrington? Ron Still?
Comments (14)
One person's perk is anothers scandal. Smacks of discrimmination, eh?
So, we have a veiled threat to "out" the Mayor's dirty laundry in an effort to settle out of court.
And we have the Mayor saying the city is going to fight this case with its full resources.
We don't know if either side will blink, but we do know this: Foxworth has tossed the last bit of dignity he had on the funeral pyre.
This isn't about breaking a taboo for a black man and a white woman. It is about a vicious and unstable woman hitting back at a man who has scorned her. And she chose to do it in the most public forum she could find.
The truth is, after all of this personal information was held out for public ridicule, Foxworth was made impotent in the Chief's role.
Derrick should be suing her and her attorney for destroying his credibility, not the city. That's what they sought to do, that's what they did. The city just has deep pockets.
If you read attorney Victor Calzaretta's April 11, 2006 letter to Potter, it specifically states the claim in NOT about sexual harassment. It was about Foxworth refusal to use his chief's power to have police bureau employees stop harassing Oswalt for details about their relationship.
Further, in the letter, Oswalt and her attorney sought to keep the complaint quiet, but Potter did not have the city answer the tort claim for more than 19 days. It's only because of Potter's calculated delay that Foxworth's e-mails to Oswalt (to prove their relationship) were made public.
Potter saw a way to remove the strong-willed Foxworth as chief with a scandal and he took it. Potter just wanted assurances that no one would investigate his past absues, and a city investigation rather than an independent one, would keep his sordid secrets.
Perhaps we'll finally learn who were the employees in the police bureau digging into a 6 year old Foxworth-Oswalt relationship? and Why?
I should have seen this coming, but please don't post accusations of sexual misconduct against particular individuals here unless you are willing to back them up by giving your real name. I'm sure Commander Foxworth's attorney would be happy to hear from you privately.
Yes, but being settled out of court means that WE, the taxpayers are ultimately paying the bill. As far as other people getting away with having affairs with other bureau employees, perhaps they showed better judgement and didn't leave a trail of "evidence". I'm disappointed in Foxworth for using the "race card". Tacky and inappropriate behaviour is tacky and inappropriate behaviour no matter what color you are.
And his attempt to justify it by saying "other people did it too" is so childish. My mother would say to him "Yeah and if everybody else jumps off a bridge are you going to as well ?" (she used that one on me quite a few times during my teenaged years.)
Besides, look who he chose to "misbehave" with- one look at her and you should see trouble coming your way. It is too bad they can't just duke it out legally between the two of them.
She's just a front for some other, much larger issue that somebody had a beef with Derrick over. The mayor started out defending him, but after one meeting with the union, that was the end of that.
From the start, the union was demanding an independent investigation, which would have included Foxworth's contentions that other chiefs, like Potter, and precinct commanders were also having sex with subordinates.
Once Potter was able to get the union leaders to back down on their demand for an outside review, he showed his true color and removed Foxworth from the job. He had avoided himself being incriminated with evidence of the same behavior.
Think about it! An investigation under Potter's control that set the scope and limits to the search for the truth, was the saving grace for Potter.
Again, why were people in the Police Bureau -- after Potter took office -- harassing Oswalt about a six-year old relationship with Foxworth?
She NEVER claimed any sexual harassment against Foxworth. This fact seem to be lost on people who assumed it was so, thus the public anger. His lover emails to his "girlfriend" were private from his home computer to hers.
When it comes to Black people, we all know the deep down truth: that conclusions are jumped to well before any facts are made clear. It's called racial profiling.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (14)
One person's perk is anothers scandal. Smacks of discrimmination, eh?
Posted by genop | October 12, 2006 9:28 AM
Ben Canada
Posted by Steve | October 12, 2006 9:45 AM
Sounds like a pretty risky strategy, one that could in turn bring some civil lawsuits by these people who he willing to drag through the mud, no?
Posted by Dave J. | October 12, 2006 9:53 AM
Tom Potter? ;)
Posted by Aaron B. Hockley | October 12, 2006 10:21 AM
Bill Clinton.
Posted by John | October 12, 2006 10:24 AM
So, we have a veiled threat to "out" the Mayor's dirty laundry in an effort to settle out of court.
And we have the Mayor saying the city is going to fight this case with its full resources.
We don't know if either side will blink, but we do know this: Foxworth has tossed the last bit of dignity he had on the funeral pyre.
This isn't about breaking a taboo for a black man and a white woman. It is about a vicious and unstable woman hitting back at a man who has scorned her. And she chose to do it in the most public forum she could find.
The truth is, after all of this personal information was held out for public ridicule, Foxworth was made impotent in the Chief's role.
Derrick should be suing her and her attorney for destroying his credibility, not the city. That's what they sought to do, that's what they did. The city just has deep pockets.
Posted by Tom | October 12, 2006 10:38 AM
If you read attorney Victor Calzaretta's April 11, 2006 letter to Potter, it specifically states the claim in NOT about sexual harassment. It was about Foxworth refusal to use his chief's power to have police bureau employees stop harassing Oswalt for details about their relationship.
Further, in the letter, Oswalt and her attorney sought to keep the complaint quiet, but Potter did not have the city answer the tort claim for more than 19 days. It's only because of Potter's calculated delay that Foxworth's e-mails to Oswalt (to prove their relationship) were made public.
Potter saw a way to remove the strong-willed Foxworth as chief with a scandal and he took it. Potter just wanted assurances that no one would investigate his past absues, and a city investigation rather than an independent one, would keep his sordid secrets.
Perhaps we'll finally learn who were the employees in the police bureau digging into a 6 year old Foxworth-Oswalt relationship? and Why?
Posted by Shadow | October 12, 2006 11:19 AM
I should have seen this coming, but please don't post accusations of sexual misconduct against particular individuals here unless you are willing to back them up by giving your real name. I'm sure Commander Foxworth's attorney would be happy to hear from you privately.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 12, 2006 12:38 PM
What, you want I should end up the victim of a police "accident" like that poor man who fell victim to Potter's "clean up downtown" directive.
Want to buy a bridge?
Foxworth's attorney received the information months ago. No doubt it supports what Foxworth and many others knows to be true about your Grampy.
Posted by Shadow | October 12, 2006 3:14 PM
If you're right, this will all get settled out of court.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 12, 2006 3:23 PM
Yes, but being settled out of court means that WE, the taxpayers are ultimately paying the bill. As far as other people getting away with having affairs with other bureau employees, perhaps they showed better judgement and didn't leave a trail of "evidence". I'm disappointed in Foxworth for using the "race card". Tacky and inappropriate behaviour is tacky and inappropriate behaviour no matter what color you are.
Posted by Lily | October 12, 2006 6:05 PM
And his attempt to justify it by saying "other people did it too" is so childish. My mother would say to him "Yeah and if everybody else jumps off a bridge are you going to as well ?" (she used that one on me quite a few times during my teenaged years.)
Besides, look who he chose to "misbehave" with- one look at her and you should see trouble coming your way. It is too bad they can't just duke it out legally between the two of them.
Posted by Lily | October 12, 2006 6:12 PM
She's just a front for some other, much larger issue that somebody had a beef with Derrick over. The mayor started out defending him, but after one meeting with the union, that was the end of that.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 12, 2006 6:30 PM
From the start, the union was demanding an independent investigation, which would have included Foxworth's contentions that other chiefs, like Potter, and precinct commanders were also having sex with subordinates.
Once Potter was able to get the union leaders to back down on their demand for an outside review, he showed his true color and removed Foxworth from the job. He had avoided himself being incriminated with evidence of the same behavior.
Think about it! An investigation under Potter's control that set the scope and limits to the search for the truth, was the saving grace for Potter.
Again, why were people in the Police Bureau -- after Potter took office -- harassing Oswalt about a six-year old relationship with Foxworth?
She NEVER claimed any sexual harassment against Foxworth. This fact seem to be lost on people who assumed it was so, thus the public anger. His lover emails to his "girlfriend" were private from his home computer to hers.
When it comes to Black people, we all know the deep down truth: that conclusions are jumped to well before any facts are made clear. It's called racial profiling.
Posted by Shadow | October 13, 2006 8:21 AM