Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 1, 2006 12:29 PM. The previous post in this blog was Ignore my "biting parlance," people. The next post in this blog is Comeback. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Sunday, October 1, 2006

"Dirty money" is still talking

Now that we have taxpayer financing of Portland City Council races, the corrupting influence of big money is supposedly a thing of the past. (No, wait -- no one on the council admits that there was actual corruption in the past, but... er... well, having voters "own" the election process is the "progressive" thing to do.)

Anyway, there's no "clean money" system for local ballot measures -- no siree bob. And just take a look at who's bankrolling the campaign to place a Band-Aid on the massive hemorrhage called the city's police and fire retirement fund:

Williams & Dame Development (South Waterfront developer Homer Williams): $10,000
Russell Development Co. (Former PDC Chair John Russell): $10,000
City Center Parking (Parking magnate Greg Goodman): $5,000
Richard Alexander: $5,000
Oregon Steel Mills: $3,500
Peter Stott (ex-timber executive): $2,500
Friends of Randy Leonard: $2,000*
Wayne Kingsley (Portland Spirit fame): $1,000
R.B. Pamplin Corp. (Ross Island): $1,000
Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt: $1,000

* ... The union passed on donating to the FPDR campaign and instead sent Leonard $2,000 for his 2008 re-election. Leonard re-directed it to FPDR since that's what he hit them up for.

Nobody there who wants to curry favor with the the city commissioners, eh? Nobody who would want to help the incumbents posture around like they're doing something serious about the looming pension fund crunch. Just a bunch of selfless, civic-minded individuals.

Oh, well. We'll pass the Pension Band-Aid, and then everyone can go back to sleep while the city racks up more billions in unfunded debt to make sure our bluecoats are set for life -- starting with "old age," defined as around age 50. And I'm sure we won't forget these generous sponsors when the time comes for the council to wink at some more urban renewal budget lies.

Just look at that contributor list. If you don't think the Usual Suspects still have undue leverage over Portland City Hall, maybe you should run for state attorney general. (Via Ryan Frank at The O.)

Comments (19)

If your point is that the public financing of city council races isn't working, then I don't think this makes your point very effectively, Jack, for the obvious reason that the public funding provisions of the voter owned elections program don't apply to this sort of measure. And if that isn't the point you are trying to make, then what is the point?

The point is that Homer Williams owns your friends Sam Adams and Erik Sten.

I think it makes his point eloquently. The whole impetus for VoE was the removal of money from influencing politicians. As I and many others have noted, it then becomes a game of how contributors can get around VoE, still contribute to politicians and gain face time.

I mean of we have to give out a $1M to politicians who would run for the office anyways and Homer can still give $10K to Randy's favorite cause, then why VoE?

As far as the measure "fixing" FPDR, if passed it will still increase everyone's taxes for the next 30+ years. However, it does have the salutory effect of giving Randy an excuse to say he did something about it.


The game is this reform, and I use the word loosely is for two purposes,

1. Take a billion dollar unfunded liabiltiy off the books, by turning it into a tax obligation conveniently exempted from the measure 5 limits by the same legislation that exempted Urban Renewal. ie State Legislature run by Goldschmidt and with Fireman Randy.

2. Guess what that does, by identifying a NEW revenue stream it allows more PDC bonds for UR.

Why now you ask.

There was this little law that took effect a couple of years ago saying goverment had to follow new accounting standards and show these unfunded liablities on the balance sheet, after several municipalities teetered on or went bankrupt. If you read the City Financial statements, they now also have to list the all the depreciated or worn out infrastructure, which in any "sustainable" organization would have been repaired prior to building a $57 million TRAM.

Tim Grewe took abandoned ship the first day he was able to collect PERS, get a clue.

VOE also does nothing to limit "voluntary" contributions to a politicos pet project, favorite charity, or PAC.

Money is like water: it always seeks the path of least resistance.

VOEs sole effect is to protect all incumbents from any challenge.

No challenger can match an incumbent's name recognition city wide.

Limit the challenger and the incumbent to the same $ 150K in spending and the incubent wins ever time unless the incumbent has recently been caught in pedophilia. No way a challenger can grab the public attention or match the incumbent's name recognition city wide for a measely $ 150 K.

And in all instances, the challenger won't even be able to gain a pluralty in, much less carry, her home precinct.

Right Amanda?

Wayne Kingsley (donor) and his law firm Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt (donor) just won a decision from the Code Hearings Officer (dated Sep 29) that calls the city rules requiring an easement for trails --when development happens on the designated areas of the river: "unconsitutional on its face." This would be a disaster for the Parks Bureau --and us citizens-- still seeking trail connectivity for the 40-mile-loop et al.

Our neighborhood, where the proposed SK Northwest project is planned, is where the Springwater Trail fails to connect with the Esplanade without going through heavy truck and street traffic. Kingsley has fought the trail extension on his properties tooth and nail. We've strongly supported the Bureau of Development Services and Parks on this issue.

The irony is that the appeal of Kingsley et al was still denied, on small technical grounds unrelated to the big constitional issue. So it will be heading to LUBA, the state land use board that hears futher appeals...and we're counting on Saltzman --and the City-- to fight Schwabe Williamson (and Ball Janik...they were double-teaming) and Wayne Kingsley to defend the constitutionality of the City's rules that have given us our trail system.

I have to wonder when Ball Janik is going to make its contribution. Not that any of this has any impact whatsoever on anything the City will decide on this completely unrelated matter. Of course.

If I had the money to spare I'd give 101 bucks just to get my name on the list of supporters.

I have my reasons . . . one common pension scheme going forward for all future work. I trust that a court will honor the body of law more than a tactical political maneuver to split the baby, culling out new hires for special distinction as the sacrificial lamb.

The remedy upon complete termination will be reduction of benefits (earned prior to the effective date of reform) to a stream of annuity payments, to be paid in the future, for which there is no need to issue bonds and that cap the current present value calculation of the stream of future payments, recently set at about 1.6 billion.

An employee directed account does not inherently need to be placed with the OIC.

Run with it; but insist that the job be finished.

Ron, can you please put this into simple terms and summarize your point at the end? No understand.

Dirty money is one of the loudest voices in Oregon politics, imo. What are most intriguing are the sub rosa deals in high places. Steve Duin noted, yesterday, I think, that our AG prefers the role of advisor to that of adversary. Yeah, but it goes beyond that: the go-to guy for real estate fraud in that office was involved in perpetrating a land scam in SW Portland. And call me insane, stupid, a wild-a*ssed (glad to amuse you, Bill) conspiracy theorist or anything else, but this can be demonstrated. So I think what we are really looking at is top-down organized crime.

Another thing: Regarding the "usual suspects' and their government cheerleaders: WHY do people CONTINUE to believe those who are caught in lies time and time again? I think of the jury instruction that allows you to discount the testimony of someone who lies once.

We just don't seem to get it. My latest debacle with Multnomah County Animal Services illustrates this point. I was at the Troutdale shelter yesterday to report a rescue cat that escaped from a foster home, one that hates other cats, so would fare quite poorly in a place like that. In the intake area, I saw a white cat that reached out through the bars of the cage to me; it had been labelled "hissing", a death sentence, we know from passed experience. Today communicating with shelter personnel we are told the cat was "playfully hissing" and is very adoptable. We are also told it was owner released. A lie to attempt to prevent someone we know who lost a white cat from going out there? Probably, if the non-pet use crowd needs white cats.

We could change this-and other government agencies-if we would just STOP believing the lies and put on our critical thinking caps, ESPECIALLY the press.

past experience-or passed, I guess.

Lee, Think water-billing. Accident? Anomaly?

One cannot always conclude that those who are corrupt are also smart.

All current safety workers risk being treated for all their future work in identical fashion to the new hires, notwithstanding the charter amendment giving only the new hires the cruel shaft (comparatively).

Ron what do you think of this?
A local county jail was, and may still be, needlessly paying face value of inmate health care bills while all insurance companies, (county is self insuring) pay a discounted amount.


Translation: MultCo treats kittys worse than taxpayers.


I'm no stranger to cynicism: every time I hear George Bush speak I assume he's lying. But your title of "Dirty Money" for this blog assumes that the folks who donated to the FPDR campaign had something to gain.

I can't speak for the other donors, but in my case, believe it or not, my donation came from a conviction that this reform, on which I've worked, deserves to pass. I've never had any business dealings with the City; I've basically retired from the development business; I use my contributions to advance causes and individuals that I believe in.

So I'd ask you to think about suspending your cynicism, at least in this circumstance.

Mr. Tee,

They're skinning us all.

Suppose the underfunded amount is anticipated to grow from 1.6 billion to 8 billion. That represents 6.4 billion (discounted present value calculation of future annuity payments).

Would you, or the rest of the contributors, pony up a like amount so that the "new hires" can organize and obtain recognition as a distinct bargaining unit and then lay equal claim to that increase in "liability" of 6.4 billion that will be claimed by the old guard -- for there is not yet a single "new hire" to even raise a hand let alone bat an eye.

Suppose I were to insist that the discount rate used should be pegged much closer to US T-Bills rather than an actuarial experts chartist view of 8 percent returns in stocks and such. The underfunded amount could/should more than double. Note the bankruptcy petitions by air lines so as to purge themselves of pension obligations to the PBGC, and the significance of little matter of the assumed rates of returns; returns on the funds that would be handed from the air lines to the PBGC. The question being what size of fund to transfer.

Given a proper legislative and judicial environment, the one and only justification for the announcement of any underfunded amount (in a pay-as-you-go scheme) is in the event of city bankruptcy and the prioritization of PRIVATE claims against the city to a limited set of funds and the limits on the taxing authority. If I represented the reform's tier-one and tier-two folks in a federal bankruptcy proceeding I would be insisting just like the PBGC that the discount rate for future annuities should be based on conservative investments -- and thus that the 1.6 billion dollar amount is far too low as a final payout even for a totally terminated plan today (paralleling the definition for termination of private pension plans as spelled out in the USC and published regulations, like at the very instant that the insurer covers a single dime for any plan beneficiary).

The present value of the immediate burden/obligation is significantly understated; under the assumption that the city WILL GO BANKRUPT and then issue bonds (or pro-actively issue bonds under the threat of credit rating, bond coupon, games) for investment in things like Oregon Steel Mills, via the OIC. (Seeing that one contributor made me jump out of my seat like a rocket, given the stock transactions immediately preceding the change of the guard at the OIC.) Oops!

The thing about unsound pension plans, just like unsound banking practices, is they never last all that long. The "new hires" would get the shaft any which way the ball bounced; and their interests are contemporaneously aligned (post reform amendment) with the citizens who demand the services of safety workers prospectively.

Jack is too kind, if anything.

To verify my point you need only ask what the amount is the city would have to borrow to transfer to a private insurer to cover already earned annuity payments if 1) the city terminated any and all current and prospective role as a pension plan sponsor AND insurer 2) and did not participate in PERS or subject themselves to PERB/OIC in any way but let the workers individually voluntarily select their own private plan sponsor AND insurer; to accommodate the individual worker's desire to avail themselves of federal tax incentives to those individuals to save for their own retirement.

1.6 billion is the wrong number, by a country mile. So too any 8 billion dollar number that is floated.

Mr. Russell, I encourage you to quadruple your donation. It would be of great public service. Your motivation is wholly irrelevant to me. I wouldn't even object if you did it ceremonially (so the tax man doesn't call it income by me) with my name as the nominal contributor. I could even create a PAC and get the donation for re-transfer to the Dan's PAC. (Pac/West does stuff like this all the time.) I would even sign a contract, rather than offer a personal promise and a wink and a nod, requiring such specific retransfer from my PAC.

Mr. Russell,

Both you and Mr. Bush are Ivy League, and I am sure you both believe and were culturally imprinted with what was taught at Harvard and Yale when the privledged went thought the hallowed halls.

Networking and Connections, Leveraging debt or someone elses money, all the Business terms that are fancy ways of profitting of the system and growing wealth.

When you were heading PDC it spent as much promoting development as the General Fund did on basic services. There is something wrong with the picture, and that debt just like the liability of FPF&D will saddle the common folks residents of Portland for years to come.

When the Pearl and SoWA developers make the City spend General Fund dollars developing the infrastructure and then in the Pearl Tax Abate many of the buildings so that the maintenance of them has to be taken away from the taxpayers who are supporting public. In today's paper people have to pay a higher % of thier income for housing, and yet in the metro area wages have gone flat or declined. Has all PDC's investment helped the average Joe.

Will you answer Steve's question.

How much money is diverted from schools, public health, and public services from TIF every year and do it in a cash flow statement. How much money would have gone to stemming the road deperciation and schools if it hadn't been diverted.

Do you think the people of Portland would vote to have a TRAM or a Park in thier neighborhood.

The thing that was striking about the article in the Tribune a few weeks ago was that the CONDO Developers in BC as opposed to here paid for the infrastructure and parks in thier new Condo developements. "Every blade of grass". Things have just been done too greedily in this town. I don't think anyone would fault folks making a profit or a good ROI. But that isn't the way things have worked out here, and with the 3rd and Oak and SoWa land givaways lately it has just gotten ludicous.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics