This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 20, 2006 4:08 PM.
The previous post in this blog was It's Tony's mom's birthday.
The next post in this blog is Uh oh.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
He committed no crime in that hotel room. He's sorry, and he's been "look[ing] at his life circumstance," according to his lawyer, Steve Houze. Oh, and somebody tried to extort money from him as part of this incident -- that's an important fact, apparently. As for the Blazers, they're "undertaking appropriate steps to work with Zach and his representatives to ensure that he understands the expectations for conduct by all our players as representatives of this team and our city."
That's it for Jail Blazer news.
For now.
Comments (13)
My bet is that when all the sleazy details leak into the press it's going to make the Foxworth "sexual harassment" scandal look trivial in comparison.
If you believe John "you always know more than you can print" Canzano, the press has the sleazy details. If we haven't heard them by now, chances are we're not going to hear them at all.
The Blazers are taking steps to work with Zach "and his representatives"?
Am I the only one who thinks that part of the problem may be that there's anybody other than Zach and Blazers management involved in that conversation?
I love it when a grown man (?) gets into trouble and then has "representatives" that need somehow to be involved. Diaper washers, sycophants, hangers-on and low life, a pox on their house.
Does anyone have a theory why Portland has the most ethically challenged team in the entirety and the utter and complete history of the NBA? We're stumped. Are we that bad? What gives?
Two accused rapists, whose images were splattered across front pages all over the country, and who were both later completely exonerated by law enforcement.
But, I hear Bubba actually HAS game, unlike our Zach, who couldn't jump over a Sunday newspaper.
According to Schrunk's memo, the investigation showed that Randolph and a friend asked the alleged victim and another woman, who is Randolph's occasional sex partner, to perform a live sex show for them for $500. The people involved differed on whether the show was supposed to include actual sex between the two women but those interviewed agreed it only was simulated sex. The alleged victim, who had never met Randolph before, said she agreed to do the performance because she "needed the money."
After the show, according to the memo, Randolph was unhappy with the performance and refused to pay the alleged victim.
O.K. now we have the sleazy details. Estcasy, orgies, arranging a $1,000 lesbian sex show at the Vintage Plaza, sharing women with his buddy, scattering 400 $1 bills on a stage at a strip club in N.E. Portland. Looks like Zach has done a nice job of scattering his dirty laundry all over the place. Portland is a regular litter box for this guy. I thought it was a nice touch that while the investigation was pending, the Blazer's public relations clowns sent several dozen doughnuts around to all the precincts in town plus a large basketball shaped doughnut to Chief Sizer. This all sort of has a surreal quality to it when you consider that this is an NBA franchise that is actually supposedly trying to IMPROVE it's image these days.
"Randolph was unhappy with the performance and refused to pay the alleged victim."
This gives me a great idea to improve the Blazer performance at Basketball games. You purchase your ticket AFTER the game if you like their performance, but you refuse to play if you are unhappy with their performance.
Let's go with the flow on the Blazers and turn them into an entertainment package most suited to their talents.
"Paula Allen" introduces the game dressed as a drag queen and the "Blazer Strippers" (formerly dancers) come out and give the bump and grind (which the Blazers aren't very good at on the court anyhow.)
The scent of marijuana rises in the air and the team comes out racing around the court in a miniature Hummer until one of the strippers stops them, wearing only a "police hat." Mayhem ensues as the players all come out of the car dressed as clowns, with Coach Nate emerging as that ultimate funkster, George Clinton.
The game doesn't really matter at this point, it's all a circus. The other team plays along and wins by 65 points. But hey, the Blazers would have lost anyway.
At least this way the audience gets something for their money.
Perhaps you are just too clever for your own good. Getting so caught up in your acrimonious wit, you imply "the audience gets something for their money" by witnessing the immaturely described scenario you present. Maybe "the audience" or God forbid, the fans, really do go to Blazer games to watch professional basketball. I am quite certain that no one in the Blazer audience would be happy to witness the silly scene you describe after paying good money for a ticket to a basketball game.
Your insulting references to the Blazer dancers as "Blazer Strippers" warrant a blackening of your eye. How many of the dancers do you know? Are you aware of their abilities to hold down full-time jobs, teach dancing professionally or in schools, and dance in a group with a demanding schedule that returns very meager monetary rewards? Do you know how strict the moral code is that they are expected to live up to on and off the court? Of course you don't.
And then you take a punch at Nate McMillan. Perhaps he most honorable man you could ever meet. He is doing everything in his power to try to bring honor to the Blazers. And it's working. The fact that you feel the need to turn him into "that ultimate funkster, George Clinton" only reveals your deep-seated prejudice. Why a funkster? Because he's black?
But after all, your prejudice permeates your cute little rant. Because you are judging the character of the entire team as it stands in 2006 on the despicable behavior of one current pathetic fool and some other past fools. Do I need to remind you that the host of this blog is a lawyer? Do you also condemn all lawyers on the bases of numerous unethical and even criminally negligent activities of some lawyers? (Oh, by the way, I'm married to one, so I know more stories than you will ever see printed in the papers or in this blog--stories that make Zach's stunts trivial)
In short, patrick b, grow up. It is of little concern to me whether you ever attend a Blazer game, buy a hat, or join the ranks of proud fans a few years down the road when the Blazers once again fill the Rose Garden and make it to the playoffs. But if you are going to comment on the team, at least take the time to learn who is on the roster this season and what degree of character they bring to Portland. Quit living in the past. It's just not funny anymore. Randolph is an embarrassment, but he is not the team.
And think before you write. You're only insulting the thousands in attendance on game day by stating; "At least this way the audience gets something for their money." Maybe this is something you would pay for. Not Blazer fans.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (13)
My bet is that when all the sleazy details leak into the press it's going to make the Foxworth "sexual harassment" scandal look trivial in comparison.
Posted by Kevin | September 20, 2006 4:36 PM
If you believe John "you always know more than you can print" Canzano, the press has the sleazy details. If we haven't heard them by now, chances are we're not going to hear them at all.
Posted by Chris Snethen | September 20, 2006 4:41 PM
The Blazers are taking steps to work with Zach "and his representatives"?
Am I the only one who thinks that part of the problem may be that there's anybody other than Zach and Blazers management involved in that conversation?
Posted by David Wright | September 20, 2006 8:28 PM
I love it when a grown man (?) gets into trouble and then has "representatives" that need somehow to be involved. Diaper washers, sycophants, hangers-on and low life, a pox on their house.
Posted by haha | September 20, 2006 8:40 PM
"undertaking appropriate steps to work with Zach and his representatives"
I think that means they have a call in to his agent.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 20, 2006 10:09 PM
Does anyone have a theory why Portland has the most ethically challenged team in the entirety and the utter and complete history of the NBA? We're stumped. Are we that bad? What gives?
Posted by Worldwide Pablo | September 20, 2006 11:28 PM
Zach meet Bubba.
Bubba meet Zach.
Two accused rapists, whose images were splattered across front pages all over the country, and who were both later completely exonerated by law enforcement.
But, I hear Bubba actually HAS game, unlike our Zach, who couldn't jump over a Sunday newspaper.
Posted by Daphne | September 21, 2006 8:53 AM
These aren't the "full details," but they are scuzzy enough to raise eyebrows:
According to Schrunk's memo, the investigation showed that Randolph and a friend asked the alleged victim and another woman, who is Randolph's occasional sex partner, to perform a live sex show for them for $500. The people involved differed on whether the show was supposed to include actual sex between the two women but those interviewed agreed it only was simulated sex. The alleged victim, who had never met Randolph before, said she agreed to do the performance because she "needed the money."
After the show, according to the memo, Randolph was unhappy with the performance and refused to pay the alleged victim.
Posted by Dave J. | September 21, 2006 9:52 AM
O.K. now we have the sleazy details. Estcasy, orgies, arranging a $1,000 lesbian sex show at the Vintage Plaza, sharing women with his buddy, scattering 400 $1 bills on a stage at a strip club in N.E. Portland. Looks like Zach has done a nice job of scattering his dirty laundry all over the place. Portland is a regular litter box for this guy. I thought it was a nice touch that while the investigation was pending, the Blazer's public relations clowns sent several dozen doughnuts around to all the precincts in town plus a large basketball shaped doughnut to Chief Sizer. This all sort of has a surreal quality to it when you consider that this is an NBA franchise that is actually supposedly trying to IMPROVE it's image these days.
Posted by Kevin | September 21, 2006 3:13 PM
"Randolph was unhappy with the performance and refused to pay the alleged victim."
This gives me a great idea to improve the Blazer performance at Basketball games. You purchase your ticket AFTER the game if you like their performance, but you refuse to play if you are unhappy with their performance.
Posted by tom | September 21, 2006 3:43 PM
Let's go with the flow on the Blazers and turn them into an entertainment package most suited to their talents.
"Paula Allen" introduces the game dressed as a drag queen and the "Blazer Strippers" (formerly dancers) come out and give the bump and grind (which the Blazers aren't very good at on the court anyhow.)
The scent of marijuana rises in the air and the team comes out racing around the court in a miniature Hummer until one of the strippers stops them, wearing only a "police hat." Mayhem ensues as the players all come out of the car dressed as clowns, with Coach Nate emerging as that ultimate funkster, George Clinton.
The game doesn't really matter at this point, it's all a circus. The other team plays along and wins by 65 points. But hey, the Blazers would have lost anyway.
At least this way the audience gets something for their money.
Posted by patrick b | September 21, 2006 5:16 PM
Patrick b,
Perhaps you are just too clever for your own good. Getting so caught up in your acrimonious wit, you imply "the audience gets something for their money" by witnessing the immaturely described scenario you present. Maybe "the audience" or God forbid, the fans, really do go to Blazer games to watch professional basketball. I am quite certain that no one in the Blazer audience would be happy to witness the silly scene you describe after paying good money for a ticket to a basketball game.
Your insulting references to the Blazer dancers as "Blazer Strippers" warrant a blackening of your eye. How many of the dancers do you know? Are you aware of their abilities to hold down full-time jobs, teach dancing professionally or in schools, and dance in a group with a demanding schedule that returns very meager monetary rewards? Do you know how strict the moral code is that they are expected to live up to on and off the court? Of course you don't.
And then you take a punch at Nate McMillan. Perhaps he most honorable man you could ever meet. He is doing everything in his power to try to bring honor to the Blazers. And it's working. The fact that you feel the need to turn him into "that ultimate funkster, George Clinton" only reveals your deep-seated prejudice. Why a funkster? Because he's black?
But after all, your prejudice permeates your cute little rant. Because you are judging the character of the entire team as it stands in 2006 on the despicable behavior of one current pathetic fool and some other past fools. Do I need to remind you that the host of this blog is a lawyer? Do you also condemn all lawyers on the bases of numerous unethical and even criminally negligent activities of some lawyers? (Oh, by the way, I'm married to one, so I know more stories than you will ever see printed in the papers or in this blog--stories that make Zach's stunts trivial)
In short, patrick b, grow up. It is of little concern to me whether you ever attend a Blazer game, buy a hat, or join the ranks of proud fans a few years down the road when the Blazers once again fill the Rose Garden and make it to the playoffs. But if you are going to comment on the team, at least take the time to learn who is on the roster this season and what degree of character they bring to Portland. Quit living in the past. It's just not funny anymore. Randolph is an embarrassment, but he is not the team.
And think before you write. You're only insulting the thousands in attendance on game day by stating; "At least this way the audience gets something for their money." Maybe this is something you would pay for. Not Blazer fans.
Posted by Alexander | September 21, 2006 9:53 PM
Alexander. It's in a green box and it's near the pharmacy counter. It says "Fleets" on the side. You need it...trust me.
Posted by Kevin | September 21, 2006 10:29 PM